0
Journal Contents   |    
HEALING TIME IN FRACTURES OF THE SHAFTS OF THE TIBIA AND FEMUR
ROBERT V. FUNSTEN; ROBERT W. LEE
View Disclosures and Other Information
Fracture Clinic of the University of Virginia Hospital, Charlottesville
1945 by The American Orthopaedic Association, Inc.
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1945; 27:395-400 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

1. The long bones of the lower extremity are the biggest and strongest bones in the body. The force required to break them must necessarily be great, and the damage taking place at the time of injury is not only in the bone, but in the surrounding tissues. The speed of healing of fractures is usually proportionate to the amount of available circulation to and between the fragments.

2. In spite of the foregoing deduction, all the causes of delayed union and of non-union have not yet been determined.

3. The percentage of delayed union and non-union in fractures of the femur is not so great as in fractures of the tibia.

4. There are more cases of delayed union and non-union in the middle third of the tibia than in the upper and lower thirds.

5. The majority of our patients received some form of calcium therapy during their fracture treatment, with little recognizable effect on the end result.

6. In the instructions to patients and students, due consideration should be given to the slowness and uncertainty of the healing of fractures of the tibia and femur, so that patients may be prepared for the long period of time possibly necessary for the healing of these fractures.

7. The use of skeletal traction and the use of internal or external skeletal fixation in no way speeds the healing time of bone, and in some instances retards it, because of distraction, infection, or the osteolytic effect of the metals used.

8. In the series of cases here presented, circumstances in some instances necessitated the use of skeletal traction, plating, and external fixation (Haynes). In none did we feel that the results obtained by such methods were in any way superior to those of conservative treatment, when alignment could be maintained even at the expense of a loss of length of as much as three-quarters of an inch.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center