0
Journal Contents   |    
OSTEOCHONDROMATA OF THE PELVIC BONES
RALPH K. GHORMLEY; HENRY W. MEYERDING; ROBERT D. MUSSEYJR.; CLARENCE A. LUCKEY
View Disclosures and Other Information
Section on Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic
1946 by The American Orthopaedic Association, Inc.
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1946; 28:40-48 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

This study is based on forty cases of osteochondroma observed at the Mayo Clinic from 1910 to 1943, inclusive. In each case, the diagnosis was verified by microseopic examination. A total of sixty-nine operations were performed on these patients. Nine of the patients are known to have died, and eight are known to have had one or more recurrences. In two cases, not all of the tumor was removed at the time of operation. In fifteen cases, there was no evidence of recurrence when the last follow-up data were obtained. No follow-up data were obtained in six cases.

In four of the forty patients, definite malignant changes were later found in the lesions. In sixteen patients (not included among the forty), microscopic examination revealed that the lesions were malignant at the time the patients were first operated upon at the Clinic.

From the foregoing review, the complexity of this problem is obvious. Chondromata of the pelvis must always be considered as serious surgical lesions. This is particularly true of those that are not well pedunculated, and of those in the more remote and inaccessible parts of the pelvis. When the tumor is purely cartilaginous in nature, the diagnosis may be extremely difficult. We have seen at least two cases in which the symptoms were referable to the hip, and, in spite of biopsies with negative findings, the symptoms continued and ultimately a chondroma was revealed. If the tumor is on the inner side of the innominate bone, particularly if it is within the true pelvis, its complete local removal is often difficult or impossible.

The idea is prevalent that these tumors may go from a benign to a malignant status, and in many cases this would seem to be true. However, in some of the cases described this change has not taken place, in spite of several recurrences and operations. In other instances, the presence of both benign and malignant regions in the same tumor may explain the apparent discrepancy.

The importance of complete surgical removal is evident to any one who has seen one or two of these patients in the late stage, when the tumor has reached a huge size, with a great deal of pain and discomfort, and there is little to offer in the way of relief. In those instances in which such removal cannot be accomplished by local excision, interinnomino-abdominal (hindquarter) amputations may be indicated.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center