0
Journal Contents   |    
RUPTURED INTERVERTEBRAL DISC AND SCIATIC PAIN
JOSEPH S. BARR
View Disclosures and Other Information
BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
1947 by The American Orthopaedic Association, Inc.
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1947; 29:429-437 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Within the past fifteen years the medical profession has recognized the existence of a syndrome characterized by low-back and sciatic pain, due to protrusion of a ruptured intervertebral disc with pressure on one or more roots of the lumbosacral plexus. The clinical diagnosis in the typical case presents no particular problem. The localization of the lesion by contrast myelography and the technique of its removal by partial larninectomy have become standard procedures. It appears probable that the trend is toward fusion of the spine, at the time of laminectomy, in an increasing number of these cases. The thesis that every patient should have a spine fusion done at the time of laminectomy is tenable. As operative technique improves, the difficulties of the combined operation tend to disappear, and it seems probable that the combined operation will, in the near future, be the operation of choice for the majority of patients.

There is every reason to maintain a conservative attitude toward the operative removal of ruptured intervertebral discs. An operation of this magnitude is not without some risk, and it is not invariably successful. The conscientious surgeon and the average patient will be much happier to have tried conservative treatment for a period of time before resorting to operative interference. The principles of rest and immobilization, adequate sedation during the acute phase of the process, followed by protection of the low back from undue strain, and postural rehabilitation appear to be the essential parts of a conservative regimen.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center