0
Journal Contents   |    
FRACTURES OF THE CARPAL NAVICULAR (SCAPHOID) A Report of 436 Cases
Marcus J. Stewart
View Disclosures and Other Information
Memphis, Tennessee
1954 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1954; 36:998-1006 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Every severe sprain or injury in the region of the carpal navicular should be considered a fracture until proved otherwise.

The results in these cases substantiate good orthopaedic teaching that, if a fracture of the carpal navicular is accurately reduced and adequately immobilized for a sufficient time, solid bony union may be expected.

Failure to diagnose, to reduce, and to immobilize these fractures properly is directly responsible for delayed union or non-union.

In delayed treatment, the presence of vacuolation or cystic change is not considered discouraging. When the fracture has been properly immobilized, the healing which takes place in the cystic area will include the fracture line.

If the proximal fragment is viable, sclerosis at the site of fracture is no contra-indication to prolonged immobilization. As a rule, after two or three months of uninterrupted immobilizations, decalcification of the sclerosis will be observed, signs of union will follow, and ultimately solid bony union will take place.

In adequately immobilized fresh fractures, the development of avascular sclerosis in the proximal fragment is no contra-indication to continued non-operative treatment. In the majority of cases, the fracture will unite and the proximal fragment will be revascularized. The wrist must be protected until revascularization is complete.

Rarely will normal function of the wrist be obtained following excision. Bone-grafting or drilling will not, except in an occasional case, offer any better prospect of union, nor will they, as a rule, reduce the average period of disability.

In the occasional fracture with excessive displacement of the proximal third, early excision of the proximal fragment is recommended, unless accurate reduction can be obtained by manipulation.

The type of plaster cast described ensures adequate immobilization of the navicular and allows the patient excellent use of the hand.

Immobilization may be prolonged for a year or more if daily exercise and activity of the fingers are systematically practised.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Displaced fracture of the waist of the scaphoid.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2011 Nov
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center