0
Journal Contents   |    
Cineplasty HISTORICAL REVIEW, PRESENT STATUS, AND CRITICAL EVALUATION OF SIXTY-FOUR PATIENTS
ROBERT MAZETJR.
View Disclosures and Other Information
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA
1958 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1958; 40:1389-1400 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Cineplastic muscle tunnels and prostheses, made according to present technological methods in selected patients are generally adequate. Causes of failure in cineplastic prosthesis wearers are many, and in given instances there may be several. Those encountered in this series were, in order of their importance:

1. Injudicious selection of candidates.

2. Lack of patient cooperation in learning to use the prosthesis (as a corollary to 1).

3. In the forearm the technical impossibility of constructing muscle tunnels with sufficient strength and excursion.

4. Recurrent excoriation of tunnel skin, with resulting narrowing and sometimes, closure of the skin tube orifice.

5. Rotation of prosthesis on shoulder when tunnelled muscle is contracted.

6. Insufficient transmission of force through cable system.

7. Limitation of excursion because of re-attachment of severed distal end of canalized muscle to deep tissue.

8. Patients' lack of real need for a prosthetic device.

Prerequisites for successful use of cineplasty tunnels are:

1. A mature, intelligent, well adjusted patient. In general he should not beengaged in heavy labor. He should have observed others who have had cineplasty, and ask for the operation. He should have exhibited good use of a conventional device for six months. Only in exceptional circumstances should cineplasty be done before the patient is fifteen years old.

2. A competent prosthetist who will make a well functioning and properly fitted device is essential.

3. Preoperatively, an adequate progra of joint mobilization and muscle strengthening, and postoperatively, training in post-fitting prosthetic use is mandatory.

4. When a biceps tunnel is contemplated, an amputation stump should be well muscled, covered by good skin exhibiting normal nerve innervation, and there should be relatively normal shoulder motion.

5. Daily tunnel hygiene.

We believe that, mad each of the patients reviewed in this series been screened by a prosthetic team, a number of operations which were profitless to the patient would have been avoided.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Common problems of lower extremity amputees.
    The Orthopedic clinics of North America: Issue date- 1982 Jul
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center