0
Journal Contents   |    
A Clinical Comparative Study of Autogenous and Homogenous-Bone Grafts
Peter L. Carnesale; Jack D. Spankus
View Disclosures and Other Information
Orthopaedic Surgical Service, Wood Veterans Administration Hospital, Milwaukee Marquette University School of Medicine, Milwaukee
1959 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1959; 41:887-894 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

In the past ten years, 137 autogenous and 143 merthiolate-preserved, homogenous-bone-grafting procedures have been performed. Twenty-four additional procedures were done in which a combination of autogenous and homogenous-bone grafts was used. Thus there is a total of 304 surgical procedures. There were sixteen (12 per cent) failures in the autogenous group, thirty-three (23 per cent) in the homogenous group, and five (21 per cent) in the group in which a combination of autogenous and homogenous-bone grafts were used. All failures were included regardless of the reason, and no distinction was made as to the etiology of the non-union.

The incidence of failure with autogenous chips was 8 per cent. When a full-thickness autogenous-bone block was used, the incidence of failure was 17 per cent. The incidence of failure with homogenous chips was 19 per cent; when a full-thickness block graft was used the incidence was 31 per cent. A combination of autogenous and homogenous chips resulted in an 18 per cent incidence of failure. The occurrence of infection with merthiolate-preserved homogenous grafts was less than that with autogenous grafts. Bone grafts inserted in the presence of infection usually resulted in failure. No allergic reaction or sensitivity to merthiolate occurred unless one concludes that the greater number of failures from the use of merthiolate bone is on this basis.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center