0
Journal Contents   |    
Injury of the Median and Ulnar Nerves One Hundred and Fifty Cases with an Evaluation of Moberg's Ninhydrin Test
W. B. StrombergJr.; Robert M. Mcfarlane; John L. Bell; Sumner L. Koch; Michael L. Mason
View Disclosures and Other Information
Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, and Passavant Memorial Hospital, Chicago
1961 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1961; 43:717-730 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

In considering the results of suture of the median and ulnar nerves, we have excluded cases in which nerve regeneration might be hindered by excessive scar, by tension at the line of suture, by long delay at carrying out operation, or by multiple operative procedures. We have attempted to correlate return of useful sensation in the hand with return of pinprick, two-point discrimination, and sudomotor function. One hundred and fifty patients were examined, thirty of whom were re-examined five or more years after operation. The ninhydrin prints appeared normal in twenty-four and obviously abnormal in only six of the thirty patients. Three had normal two-point discrimination. In twelve patients, Moberg's picking-up test was performed, and function was good or almost normal in only four.

Special attention was paid to the ninhydrin fingerprint test and to the picking-up test in the hope that an objective evaluation of the quality of sensory return might be possible. Both in patients with fresh injuries and in patients first seen weeks or months after nerve division who had not had nerve suture, anhydrosis was demonstrated with but a few exceptions.

Sweating and response to pinprick invariably returned together, and we have not found that the ninhydrin test is more specific than the return of response to pinprick as an indication of satisfactory sensory return. There was poor correlation between sweating and normal tactile gnosis. There was little correlation also between the return of either two-point sensation or tactile gnosis and the patient's ability to return to his former status in industry or in recreation.

The twelve children in this study obtained the best functional results. Two were followed for over five years and obtained nearly perfect return of function. Three children re-examined two years after operation had regained normal sensation and normal sweating. Two other children had normal sensation as early as thirteen months after nerve repair. These five children had normal sensation to pinprick, tactile gnosis, normal muscle function, and complete return of sweating. The remaining five children had been followed for less than one year and none of them had complete return of sensation or sweating at the time of follow-up.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center