0
Journal Contents   |    
Motion of the Lumbosacral Spine after Laminectomy and Spine Fusion CORRELATION OF MOTION WITH THE RESULT
EDWARD C. FRONING; BARBARA FROHMAN
View Disclosures and Other Information
215 North San Mateo Drive, San Mateo, California 94401 876 Chiltern Road, Hillsborough, California 94010
1968 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1968; 50:897-918 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Five hundred and sixty-five examinations were made by flexion and extension roentgenograms of 400 consecutive patients seen in a private orthopaedic practice because of low-back pain. Ninety-two of these patients were operated on—by us in seventy-two and by others in the remainder. Of the seventy-two operated on by us, fifty-two had laminectomy and twenty spine fusion. A preoperative roentgenographic analysis of motion was made in seventeen of the patients and eighteen had a similar evaluation at intervals after operation to demonstrate progressive changes.

Measurements of motion at all five lumbar levels were made by use of the technique of Begg and Falconer. Flexion and extension roentgenograms were made with the patient standing for the flexion and kneeling for the extension roentgenograms or lying on his side on the top of the x-ray table when this position was necessary to obtain maximum flexion in the presence of pain. The examination (known as a lumbar dynamogram) provides a quantitative measurement of motion in degrees rather than an indication of qualitative changes in motion and thus makes possible more precise comparisons between joints of the same spine, as well as comparison between patients.

The findings demonstrated restriction of flexion and extension in the majority of patients who had a successful laminectomy. Persistence of mobility comparable with that expected in a normal individual was usually found in patients judged to have poor results.

Lumbar dynamograms often demonstrated increased flexion and extension of the joints adjacent to those showing restriction of motion, especially joints successfully fused.

A hypothesis is proposed: As disc degeneration progresses, an internal stiffness of the degenerated disc junction may result from fibrous replacement and marginal ossification. This stiffness may cause more motion in adjacent better preserved lumbar joints which have essentially normal internal resistance. These two effects serve together to preserve both flexibility and support of the spine despite the advance of morphological changes in some segments.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center