0
Articles   |    
The effect of calcar contact on femoral component micromovement. A mechanical study

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1980; 62:1315-1323 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Extra-long-neck, large-stem Trapezoidal-28 femoral components with standard and modified large flanges were cemented into fresh cadaver femora and measurements were made of the movement of the prostheses relative to the bone as load was applied to the head of the prosthesis. In the presence of collar-calcar femoral contact, the prosthesis subsided very little under load; displacements for a load of 2000 newtons were less than 0.1 millimeter. Removal of bone and acrylic support beneath the undersurface of the flange by sawing a thin gap caused no increase in the displacement of the stem tip in most specimens, but the displacements of the collar relative to bone for the standard flange design increased by an average of 0.014 millimeter (8 to 28 per cent) under a 2000-newton force when contact was removed, while the displacements for the prostheses with a modified large flange that extended to the cortical rim of the resected neck increased 0.047 to 0.060 millimeter (56 to 432 per cent), indicating greater support from the collar due to the increased area of contact. An increase of the stem-flange angle of 22 degrees (from 30 to 52 degrees), making the flange more horizontal, had no significant effect on the results for large-flanged units. Prostheses with a standard flange and a one to two-millimeter Silastic liner between cement and bone subsided as much as twenty times more than rigidly cemented units. In the presence of the liner, removal of collar-calcar contact increased the collar displacement by 29 to 75 per cent, indicating a possibly important function of the flange for components cemented in soft bone or components that may become loose or be surrounded by a fibrous membrane. Repacking of the gap between the collar and bone with acrylic after removal of part of the calcar femoral reduced subsidence in one specimen, while the acrylic in a second specimen cracked out during reloading. Based on our laboratory experience with sixteen specimens, we believe that it would be extremely difficult to achieve an effective degree of uniform calcar femorale-collar contact at operation and that one or two localized contact areas would be the more common situation after total hip replacement.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Efficacy and late complications of percutaneous epiphysiodesis with transphyseal screws.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2012 Feb
    Early results of a non-invasive extendible prosthesis for limb-salvage surgery in children with bone tumours.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2012 Feb
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center