0
Articles   |    
A roentgenographic, biomechanical, and histological evaluation of vascularized and non-vascularized segmental fibular canine autografts

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1985; 67:105-112 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Advocates of vascularized bone grafts believe that these grafts should have a decreased time to graft-host union, and that they should be mechanically stronger than conventional (non-vascularized) grafts. The objectives of the present study were to determine the rate and pattern of repair in vascularized autogenous cortical bone grafts, to determine the mechanical strength of the grafts, and to correlate the mechanical strength with the biological repair. Forty-nine adult male mongrel dogs were divided into six groups to evaluate conventional (non-vascularized), cuff (periosteal-encased, non-vascularized), and vascularized segmental grafts. The fibula was the site of experimentation and all grafts were four-centimeter cortical segments. The vascularized and conventional grafts were analyzed at two, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks. The cuff grafts were analyzed at twenty-four weeks and were compared with conventional grafts to assess the effect of the periosteal soft tissue. Roentgenograms were made every two weeks to evaluate the time to union. The mechanical strength of each graft was assessed by determining rapid torsional load to failure. Biological repair was assessed by tetracycline labeling for new-bone formation and by microradiographic techniques for porosity and cross-sectional areas. The study showed that conventional and cuff grafts were similar in terms of mechanical and biological repair at six months. At all sampling intervals, the vascularized grafts exhibited histological findings that were consistent with viability. The conventional and vascularized grafts underwent different mechanisms of repair. The conventional, non-vascularized grafts healed by peripheral and internal resorption followed by callus encasement and osteonal remodeling.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    The humoral response to vascular and nonvascular allografts of bone.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 1996 May
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center