0
Articles   |    
Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two to five-year follow-up

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1985; 67:1074-1085 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

From January 1979 to February 1982, 143 patients (seventy-nine women and sixty-four men) with 146 uninfected cemented total hip arthroplasties had revision cemented hip arthroplasty at The Hospital for Special Surgery for what was considered to be mechanical failure. The average age of the patients at primary arthroplasty was 56.1 years and at revision, 62.1 years. Loosening of the femoral component before revision correlated with varus positioning in 50 per cent of the hips, inadequate cement in 34 per cent, and a relatively young age in 16 per cent. The average age of the patients (fifteen hips) with a loose femoral component that had been placed in a neutral or valgus position with good cementing technique was 48.2 years at the time of primary arthroplasty. Loosening of the acetabular component was attributed to high placement of the cup in 41 per cent, inadequate bone in 18 per cent, a vertical orientation of the opening of the cup in 7 per cent, and poor cementing technique in 3 per cent. Complications associated with revision included perforation of the femoral cortex in 13 per cent, postoperative deep infection in 3.4 per cent, postoperative dislocation in 8.2 per cent, trochanteric complications in 6.2 per cent, and sciatic palsy in 0.7 per cent. Of the 139 hips that were followed for an average of 3.6 years (range, two to five years) after revision, the results were excellent in 59 per cent, good in 7 per cent, fair in 16 per cent, and poor in 18 per cent. After revision of the 139 hips, 29 per cent showed progressive radiolucencies; 18 per cent, femoral subsidence; and 9 per cent, acetabular migration. Definite mechanical failure after revision was identified in 15.8 per cent of the hips. These failures were due to loosening in 12.2 per cent of the hips, femoral fracture in 2.2 per cent, and disabling dislocation in 1.4 per cent. At the time of follow-up, twelve hips (8.6 per cent) had been revised a second time: six (4.3 per cent) for loosening of one or both components, three (2.2 per cent) for femoral fracture, and three (2.2 per cent) for infection. Mechanical failure and progressive radiolucencies were associated with poor quality of bone (p less than 0.001) and inadequate anatomical reconstruction (p less than 0.03).

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center