0
Articles   |    
Grading of bone tumors by analysis of nuclear DNA content using flow cytometry

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1985; 67:404-413 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

We studied 217 consecutive tumors of bone by flow cytometric analysis of nuclear DNA concentration after staining with propidium iodide. A diagnosis and histological grade (benign, low-grade, or high-grade sarcoma) were assigned to each tumor on the basis of staging data (with the exception of the forty-six giant-cell tumors, which, although indistinguishable histologically, were divided according to the flow cytometric pattern into two distinct groups), and we quantitatively studied the flow cytometry data to assess the percentages of cells in diploidy, tetraploidy, or aneuploidy. When compared, the mean values for the flow cytometric data for the three grades showed significant differences. Criteria were established for the three classes of tumors: for benign tumors, less than 11 per cent tetraploidy and no aneuploidy; for low-grade sarcomas, more than 11 per cent and less than 17 per cent tetraploidy, and no aneuploidy; and for high-grade tumors, either more than 17 per cent tetraploidy or aneuploidy. Tests for compliance for all groups of tumors (excluding the forty-six giant-cell tumors)--benign, low grade, or high grade--were significant for most of the benign lesions (with the exception of chondroblastoma and fibrous dysplasia) and for the high-grade sarcomas (with the exception of round-cell tumors). The low-grade sarcomas did far less well, based principally on the failure of the low-grade chondrosarcomas, chordomas, and adamantinomas to comply with the criteria. An attempt to assess the value of the system as a predictor of metastases showed that a low percentage of diploid cells (less than 75 per cent) and the presence of an aneuploid peak correlated statistically with the development of metastatic disease, but the usefulness of this observation could not be fully assessed because of multiple variables, associated principally with treatment.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center