0
Articles   |    
Revision of the acetabular component with an uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated prosthesis

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1992; 74:987-994 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

One hundred and forty revisions for loosening of the acetabular component were performed in 124 patients, with the use of an uncemented Harris-Galante acetabular prosthesis. A component was considered loose if there was a change in its position or vertical or horizontal migration, or both, of four millimeters or more, as demonstrated on serial radiographs. All patients were followed prospectively for a mean of forty-one months (range, twenty-four to seventy-six months). Bone-grafting was performed at the time of the revision in 127 of the hips. Identifiable failure of fixation of the acetabular component occurred in only two hips (1 per cent), which had both severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity. In one of these hips, fixation of the component could not be achieved during the revision, and the component subsequently migrated. No other components migrated. Only one patient had a revision of the index acetabular operation. A continuous radiolucency developed at the bone-mesh interface of five acetabular components, and in one other hip a small portion of the mesh separated. This hip was reoperated on for a problem with the femur, and the socket was found to be rigidly fixed. No other evidence of loosening was identified. All of the bone grafts united, but partial resorption of the graft occurred in thirty-nine hips. Although there were substantial osseous defects that necessitated major bone-grafting, revision with the uncemented Harris-Galante porous-coated acetabular component provided superior fixation compared with that reported in other series in which cemented acetabular components were used for revision. Of the 140 hips, eighty-nine (64 per cent) had a postoperative score of good or excellent, according to the Harris hip-rating system. Twenty-eight (70 per cent) of the forty hips that had revision of the acetabular component alone were rated as good or excellent.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Images in clinical medicine. Disappearance of a breast prosthesis during Pilates.
    The New England journal of medicine: Issue date- 2011 Dec 15
    Examination of ten fractured Oxford unicompartmental knee bearings.
    The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume: Issue date- 2011 Dec
    Guidelines
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center