0
Articles   |    
The influence of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1994; 76:159-171 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

A study was done in rabbits to determine the effect of a hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating on bone growth into titanium fiber-metal implants. Titanium fiber rods with a solid titanium core were implanted bilaterally into the distal aspect of the femora of fifty-five New Zealand White rabbits. One rod was uncoated and the other rod was surface-coated with hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate by the plasma-spray technique. Thirty-five rabbits were labeled sequentially with fluorochromes; killed at one, two, three, four, six, twelve, or twenty-four weeks after the operation; and studied histologically and histomorphometrically. The implants in the remaining twenty rabbits were subjected to pull-out testing to determine the shear strength at the implant-bone interface at three, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks after the operation. Histomorphometry revealed significant effects of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating. When whole-group means (which included all time-points) were compared, it was found that 44 per cent of the perimeter of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was covered with bone compared with 12 per cent of the perimeter of the uncoated implants. The percentage of the internal surface of the implant that was covered with bone was also significantly higher in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants: 27 per cent of the internal surface of the coated implants was covered compared with 8 per cent in the uncoated implants. The amount of bone in the pores of the implants was also higher in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants: 12 per cent of the available pore space in the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was filled with bone compared with 4 per cent in the uncoated implants. Scanning electron microscopy of the implants, done in backscatter mode, demonstrated apposition of new bone directly on the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate coating, with variable degrees (amounts) of hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate resorption and new-bone replacement over time. Bone was never directly apposed to uncoated titanium fiber-metal. The pull-out strength of the hydroxyapatite and tricalcium-phosphate-coated implants was consistently greater than that of the uncoated implants, at all time-periods.

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center