0
Articles   |    
Arthrodesis of the cervical spine for fractures and dislocations in children and adolescents. A long-term follow-up study

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1994; 76:1606-1616 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Forty-two patients who had had an arthrodesis for instability of the cervical spine resulting from trauma were followed clinically for a minimum of seven years (median, seventeen years and six months). The ages of the patients at the time of the injury ranged from one year and eleven months to fifteen years and eleven months. On the basis of a new post-traumatic neck score, which includes an assessment of pain, mobility, neurological status, and function, thirty-two patients (76 per cent) had an excellent result, six (14 per cent) had a good result, and four (10 per cent) had a fair result. No patient had a poor result. There was no notable deterioration of the clinical result with an increased duration of follow-up. Current radiographs of the cervical spine in flexion and extension were available for thirty-one (74 per cent) of the forty-two patients. There was no change in stability, deformity, or the fusion mass after healing or with an increased duration of follow-up, but there was a significant increase in osteoarthrotic changes in the unfused segments of the cervical spine after an increased duration of follow-up (p = 0.0001). Complications included spontaneous extension of the fusion mass in sixteen patients (38 per cent), mild pain or dysesthesias at the iliac-crest donor site in six patients (14 per cent), superficial infection at a bone-graft donor site in one patient (2 per cent), an incorrect level of arthrodesis in one patient (2 per cent). One patient had instability secondary to juvenile rheumatoid arthritis, which developed after treatment of the original injury, and she needed a reoperation. We concluded that spinal arthrodesis for fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine in children and adolescents can be accomplished safely, with an acceptable clinical outcome, a low rate of complications, and minimum morbidity after long-term follow-up. Pain, neurological status, and function do not change markedly, but mobility may decrease with an increased duration of follow-up. Our patients had a decrease in mobility, associated with an increase in osteoarthrotic changes, as seen on radiographs (p = 0.05).

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Guidelines
    ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute hand and wrist trauma. -American College of Radiology | 7/17/2009
    ACR Appropriateness Criteria® acute trauma to the knee. -American College of Radiology | 7/17/2009
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center