0
Articles   |    
Limb salvage compared with amputation for osteosarcoma of the distal end of the femur. A long-term oncological, functional, and quality-of-life study

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1994; 76:649-656 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

The outcome of treatment of nonmetastatic high-grade osteosarcoma in the distal part of the femur was studied in 227 patients from twenty-six institutions. Eight of the seventy-three patients who had had a limb-salvage procedure and nine of the 115 patients who had had an above-the-knee amputation had a local recurrence, but there was no local recurrence in the thirty-nine patients who had had a disarticulation at the hip. There were no significant differences in the rate of survival or in the duration of the postoperative disease-free period between the three groups. One hundred and nine patients (48 per cent) were alive at an average of eleven years after the operation, and ninety patients (40 per cent) remained continuously disease-free. An additional operation on the limb was necessary more often for patients who had had a limb-salvage procedure than for those who had had an amputation. Function in seventy-eight living patients was assessed with the system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society for evaluation of function and by the functional assessment portion of the 1989 scoring system of the Knee Society; the scores were higher for the patients who had had a limb-salvage procedure than for the two groups of patients who had had an amputation. No difference was identified between the groups with regard to the patient's acceptance of the postoperative state, the ability to walk, or the amount of pain. The quality of life was evaluated for twenty-nine patients with a series of complex questionnaires.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Surgical Technique: Methods for Removing a Compress® Compliant Prestress Implant.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 2011 Oct 15
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center