0
Articles   |    
A biomechanical analysis of prophylactic fixation for pathological fractures of the distal third of the humerus

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1994; 76:839-847 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A

Abstract

Twenty-four matched pairs of fresh-frozen humeri from human cadavera were divided randomly into four groups, in order to determine the most biomechanically desirable construct for the prophylactic fixation of impending fractures of the distal third of the humerus. Group I comprised intact humeri and matched humeri in which a 50 per cent lateral, semicylindrical cortical defect of the distal third had been created, resulting in a reproducible model of an impending fracture due to a lytic defect involving 50 per cent cortical disruption at the distal end of the humeral medullary canal. In Group II, such a lateral defect was created in both the right and the left, matched humeri. Group III was composed of humeri in which the defect had been fixed prophylactically with a single plate and the contralateral humeri, which had been treated with double-plating. Group IV comprised specimens in which the defect had been fixed with double-plating as well as those fixed with Rush rods. The fixation of each specimen in Groups III and IV was supplemented with bone cement. Each specimen was tested in torsion to failure, and the resulting peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed were analyzed for each group. The Group-I specimens that had a defect had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed than the intact specimens; all of the specimens with a defect failed at the defect, and all of the intact specimens failed proximally. In Group II, there was a high side-to-side association with respect to peak torque, torsional stiffness, and total energy absorbed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Figures in this Article
    This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

    Topics

    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center