JBJS | Combined Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligaments of the Knee. Effect of Treatment on Stability and Function of the Joint*

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Volume 78, Issue 2

Articles | February 01, 1996

Combined Injuries of the Anterior Cruciate and Medial Collateral Ligaments of the Knee. Effect of Treatment on Stability and Function of the Joint*

DIANE HILLARD-SEMBELL, M.D.†; DALE M. DANIEL, M.D.‡; MARY LOU STONE, R.P.T.§; BARBARA E. DOBSON, L.V.N.§; DONALD C. FITHIAN, M.D.§, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA

View Disclosures and Other Information

Investigation performed at the San Diego Kaiser Medical Center, San Diego

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1996; 78:169-76

5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

text A A A

Abstract

We performed a retrospective study of sixty-six patients (forty-one male and twenty-five female) who had a combined injury of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. Our purpose was to determine the prevalence of late valgus instability of the knee. The mean age of the patients was thirty-five years (range, sixteen to sixty-three years). The mean follow-up interval was forty-five months (range, twenty-one to 108 months). Twenty patients had been injured while snow-skiing; twenty-four, during other sports activities; seven, in a motor-vehicle accident; and the remaining fifteen, during activities of daily living. Eleven patients had reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and repair of the medial collateral ligament, thirty-three had reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament, and twenty-two were managed non-operatively.There was no evidence of valgus instability on clinical examination at the most recent follow-up visit. However, there was evidence of instability on stress roentgenograms of the knee in eight (13 per cent) of sixty patients. With the numbers available, we could detect no relationship between the presence of valgus instability and the method of treatment of the ligamentous tears (p > 0.4).We also compared the results for twenty-one of the thirty-three patients who had a combined ligamentous injury and reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament with those for thirty-seven patients who had reconstruction of an isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. After a mean follow-up interval of thirty-five months (range, twenty-one to sixty-six months), there was no difference in the anterior displacement, impairment of function, level of participation in sports activities, results of the one-leg-hop for distance test, or strength as determined by testing on a Cybex machine.On the basis of the findings in this study, we believe that, when there is mild or moderate valgus instability, an injury of the medial collateral ligament does not need to be repaired when the anterior cruciate ligament is repaired after a combined ligamentous injury.

Figures in this Article

Introduction

Introduction | Materials and Methods | Results | Discussion | References

There is general agreement that an isolated injury of the medial collateral ligament heals satisfactorily without operative intervention^14,21,25. Injury of the anterior cruciate ligament may result in anterior instability, which may prevent the patient from participating in sports activities involving jumping, abrupt lateral movements, and cutting (planting a foot, while running, in order to change direction); therefore, some authors have recommended reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament for those who participate in such sports activities²³. However, there has been little consensus as to the best treatment for combined injuries of the medial collateral and anterior cruciate ligaments^{1,14,24,26,28,33,39,44,45}.

We performed this retrospective review of patients who had a combined ligamentous injury to determine the prevalence of late valgus instability. Some authors have reported an increased prevalence of instability of the knee in patients who have an injury of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments, but valgus instability was not mentioned as a separate entity^14,26,44,45. Warren and Marshall^44,45 noted that the giving-way in these patients probably represented anterior instability; they stated that isolated valgus instability does not produce giving-way.

We also tried to determine whether operative treatment of a tear of the medial collateral ligament decreased the prevalence of valgus instability. Numerous authors^28,32,36 have recommended operative treatment of both ligaments. However, we know of no studies that have supported the thesis that repair of the medial collateral ligament decreases late valgus instability or symptoms associated with the knee. In contrast, stiffness of the knee has been reported after operative repair of the medial collateral ligament^1,36.

To answer the question of whether an injury of the medial collateral ligament alters the results of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, we compared the results of reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament in patients who had a combined ligamentous injury with the results in patients who had reconstruction of an isolated injury of the anterior cruciate ligament.

*One or more of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. Funds were received in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding source was the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Research Foundation.

†Springfield Clinic, 1025 South Seventh Street, Springfield, Illinois 62703.

‡Deceased.

§Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 4647 Zion Avenue, San Diego, California 92120.

†Springfield Clinic, 1025 South Seventh Street, Springfield, Illinois 62703.

‡Deceased.

§Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 4647 Zion Avenue, San Diego, California 92120.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

Figs. 1-A and 1-B: Varus/valgus device used to determine the amount of opening of the medial joint space (Stress-Ray; MedMetric, San Diego, California). The knees are positioned in 20 degrees of flexion (Fig. 1-A), a strap holds the thighs together, and a foot support cradles the foot to resist axial rotation of the limb (Fig. 1-B) while an abduction moment is applied to both limbs.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

Anteroposterior roentgenogram of the injured and contralateral knees, made while an abduction moment of 25.8 newton-meters was applied. Lines were drawn tangential to the femoral condyles and tibial plateaus. The distance between the tangential lines on the medial and lateral aspects of the knee was measured. In this patient, the medial joint space was eight millimeters in the uninjured knee and twelve millimeters in the injured knee.

View Larger

TABLE I RESULTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER INJURY

*The value is given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.†The value is given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses.

	Isolated Injury	Combined Injury
	(N = 37)	(N = 21)
Duration of follow-up (mos.)*	36 (23 to 66)	31 (21 to 53)
Age (yrs.)*	28 (15 to 46)	29 (16 to 43)
Time spent in sports (hrs. per yr.)*
Before injury	355 (0 to 1040)	329 (50 to 955)
After injury	258 (0 to 1250)	202 (0 to 660)
Participation in a level-I or II sport†
Before injury	32 (86)	15 (71)
After injury	19 (51)	9 (3)
Joint-space opening determined by arthrometer
89-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.5	1.0
>2.5-mm difference†	9 (24)	4 (9)
134-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.9	1.5
>2.5-mm difference†	14 (38)	7 (3)
>5.0-mm difference†	0	0
Manual maximum test
Mean difference (mm)	2.9	3.0
>5.0-mm difference†	3 (8)	3 (14)
Difference in joint flexion (degrees)*	3 (0-20)	2 (0 to 15)
Flexion contracture (degrees)*	2 (0 to +9)	2 (-4 to +6)
One-leg-hop test (per cent of uninjured)*	92 (71 to 114)	89 (80 to 107)
Strength of quadriceps (per cent of uninjured)*	86 (55 to 125)	88 (55 to 105)
Strength of hamstrings (per cent of uninjured)*	98 (87 to 136)	98 (82 to 120)
No difficulty climbing†	31 (84)	17 (81)
No difficulty kneeling†	15 (41)	10 (48)
No difficulty running†	25 (68)	13 (62)
No difficulty cutting†	29 (78)	16 (76)

Add to My JBJS

TABLE I RESULTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER INJURY

*The value is given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.†The value is given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses.

	Isolated Injury	Combined Injury
	(N = 37)	(N = 21)
Duration of follow-up (mos.)*	36 (23 to 66)	31 (21 to 53)
Age (yrs.)*	28 (15 to 46)	29 (16 to 43)
Time spent in sports (hrs. per yr.)*
Before injury	355 (0 to 1040)	329 (50 to 955)
After injury	258 (0 to 1250)	202 (0 to 660)
Participation in a level-I or II sport†
Before injury	32 (86)	15 (71)
After injury	19 (51)	9 (3)
Joint-space opening determined by arthrometer
89-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.5	1.0
>2.5-mm difference†	9 (24)	4 (9)
134-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.9	1.5
>2.5-mm difference†	14 (38)	7 (3)
>5.0-mm difference†	0	0
Manual maximum test
Mean difference (mm)	2.9	3.0
>5.0-mm difference†	3 (8)	3 (14)
Difference in joint flexion (degrees)*	3 (0-20)	2 (0 to 15)
Flexion contracture (degrees)*	2 (0 to +9)	2 (-4 to +6)
One-leg-hop test (per cent of uninjured)*	92 (71 to 114)	89 (80 to 107)
Strength of quadriceps (per cent of uninjured)*	86 (55 to 125)	88 (55 to 105)
Strength of hamstrings (per cent of uninjured)*	98 (87 to 136)	98 (82 to 120)
No difficulty climbing†	31 (84)	17 (81)
No difficulty kneeling†	15 (41)	10 (48)
No difficulty running†	25 (68)	13 (62)
No difficulty cutting†	29 (78)	16 (76)

Materials and Methods

Introduction | Materials and Methods | Results | Discussion | References

We reviewed the medical records of eighty-six patients who had an injury of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. Fifty-one patients had had an operation performed by one of three staff orthopaedic surgeons, including one of us (D. M. D.), between December 1981 and July 1990, and thirty-five patients had been managed non-operatively between March 1987 and July 1990. Sixty-six patients returned for the follow-up evaluation. Eleven patients could not be located, five patients lived too far away to return, and four patients in the San Diego area declined to come in for an evaluation. The mean follow-up interval was forty-five months (range, twenty-one to 108 months). Twenty patients had been injured while snow-skiing; seven, playing soccer; five, playing baseball; four, playing basketball; three, playing football; five, during other sports activities; seven, in a motor-vehicle accident; and the remaining fifteen, during activities of daily living. Eleven patients (ten male and one female), who were a mean of thirty-three years old (range, nineteen to forty-nine years old), had reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and repair of the medial collateral ligament within two weeks after the injury. Thirty-three patients (twenty-one male and twelve female), who were a mean of thirty-one years old (range, sixteen to fifty-nine years old), had reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament. The operation was performed within two weeks after the injury in twenty-one patients, three to eight weeks after the injury in eight, and more than eight weeks after the injury in four. Twenty-two patients (ten male and twelve female), who were a mean of forty-two years old (range, twenty-seven to sixty-three years old), were managed non-operatively.

To be included in the study, the patients had to have been evaluated within fourteen days after the injury. The injury of the medial collateral ligament had to be grade II or III—that is, valgus instability as determined on the abduction stress test with the knee in 20 degrees of flexion⁶. A grade-II injury was defined as opening of the joint space that was three to five millimeters greater in the injured knee than in the contralateral (uninjured) knee, with a firm end point. A grade-III injury was characterized by opening of the joint space that was more than five millimeters greater in the injured knee, with no detectable end point. Disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament was diagnosed if an arthrometer (KT-1000; MedMetric, San Diego, California) showed a difference in displacement of more than 2.5 millimeters between the injured and uninjured knees on the manual maximum test⁸. Patients were excluded if they had had a previous injury or operative intervention in either knee, a fracture around the knee (with the exception of an avulsion fracture), or varus or posterior instability.

Operative treatment was recommended for patients who were less than thirty years old and involved in sports activities on a regular basis. Non-operative treatment consisted of immobilization in a cast or brace for two to four weeks followed by the use of a brace that permitted a range of motion for two to four weeks. The patients then followed a home exercise program. They were advised not to participate in sports involving running or cutting for a minimum of three months after the injury and to return to their previous level of activity only when they had a full range of motion of the knee and there was no effusion.

Before 1987, nine patients who had a combined ligamentous injury with a grade-III injury of the medial collateral ligament had repair of both ligaments and twelve patients who had a combined injury with a grade-II injury of the medial collateral ligament had reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament. Since 1987, one of us (D. M. D.) reconstructed the anterior cruciate ligament only in thirteen patients who had a combined injury, and two other surgeons reconstructed the anterior cruciate ligament and repaired the medial collateral ligament in two patients who had a combined injury and reconstructed the anterior cruciate ligament only in eight. Since 1987, the technique of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of a patellar-ligament autogenous graft was the same for patients with or without an injury of the medial collateral ligament⁷.

To determine if an injury of the medial collateral ligament alters the results of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, we compared two groups of patients who had reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament with a patellar-ligament graft within ninety days after the injury. One group consisted of twenty-one of the thirty-three patients who had a combined ligamentous injury, and the other group included thirty-seven patients who had an isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament. We had identified fifty-four patients who had an isolated tear, but seventeen chose not to return for evaluation. Both groups had reconstruction within the same time-period, and both followed the same rehabilitation program postoperatively.

The evaluations were performed by three of us (D. H.-S.M. L. S., and B. E. D.), who were not the operating surgeons. The evaluation included a questionnaire to assess symptoms such as pain, swelling, and giving-way of the extremity and to elicit information regarding the level of impairment during walking, climbing stairs, kneeling, squatting, running, jumping, cutting, and lateral motion. The total number of hours spent each year in sports activities was determined with the aid of a questionnaire^9,13. Sports were classified according to the description by the International Knee Documentation Committee^9,13. A level-I sport involves jumping and cutting (for example, basketball), a level-II sport involves lateral motion (for example, racquet sports), and a level-III sport does not involve jumping, cutting, or lateral motion (for example, jogging or swimming). Functional tests consisted of the one-leg-hop for distance test^9,11 and strength-testing with the Cybex machine⁹ (Lumex, Bayshore, New York). The hop index represents the distance that the patient could hop with the limb that had the injury compared with that for the contralateral limb; 90 per cent or more represented full function of the knee. Strength was tested at 60 degrees per second in both knees; 80 per cent or more represented full function of the knee.

The range of motion and stability of the joint were determined clinically. Anteroposterior instability was measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer (MedMetric). The amount of opening of the medial joint space was determined clinically by the application of a valgus stress to the knee in 20 degrees of flexion. Roentgenograms were made with both extremities held in a device (Stress-Ray; MedMetric) that positions the knee in 20 degrees of flexion and applies an abduction moment of 25.8 newton-meters (Figs. 1-A and 1-B). The opening of the joint space on the roentgenogram was measured in a manner similar to that described by Kennedy and Fowler²⁷ (Fig. 2). Lines were drawn tangential to the femoral condyles and tibial plateaus, and the distance between the tangential lines on the medial and lateral aspects of the knee was measured. The stress roentgenograms were made for sixty of the sixty-six patients.

The data were analyzed with use of statistical software (Minitab; State College, Pennsylvania). For continuous variables, one-way analysis of variance was used to compare the groups. For categorical variables, chi-square analysis was used to compare the groups.

Results

Introduction | Materials and Methods | Results | Discussion | References

Valgus Instability

At the initial examination, the injury of the medial collateral ligament was grade II in thirty-seven patients and grade III in twenty-nine. In four patients who had a grade-III injury, the opening of the joint space was estimated to be more than ten millimeters (range, eleven to fifteen millimeters) greater in the injured knee. In ten patients, the opening of the joint space was three to nine millimeters (mean, 4.5 millimeters) greater in the injured knee, according to roentgenograms that were made with the patient under anesthesia and the knee subjected to a valgus stress with use of an abduction moment of 12.9 newton-meters.

At the follow-up clinical examination, the mean opening of the medial joint space was 0.6 millimeter (range, -1 to +2 millimeters) greater in the injured knee. On stress roentgenograms (made for sixty patients), the mean medial joint space was 7.0 millimeters (range, two to twelve millimeters) in the uninjured knee and 8.3 millimeters (range, four to fourteen millimeters) in the injured knee, a difference of 1.3 millimeters (range, -3 to +6 millimeters). Eight patients (one with a grade-II injury and seven with a grade-III injury of the medial collateral ligament) had an opening of the medial joint space that was more than 2.5 millimeters greater in the injured knee: four of these patients had not had an operation, two had had reconstruction of only the anterior cruciate ligament, and two had had reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and repair of the medial collateral ligament. With the numbers available, we could not detect a significant effect of the method of treatment of the combined ligamentous injury on late valgus instability (p > 0.4).

Complications

There were no infections. Four patients needed manipulation of the knee under anesthesia to regain motion of the joint: two had had repair of the medial collateral ligament, one had had reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament only, and one had been managed non-operatively. The mean flexion deficit at the time of follow-up was 6 degrees (range, 0 to 20 degrees) in the eleven patients who had had both ligaments repaired, 2 degrees (range, 0 to 15 degrees) in the thirty-three patients who had had reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament only, and 0 degrees in the twenty-two patients who had been managed non-operatively (p < 0.01). The mean flexion contracture for all patients was 1 degree, with no difference among the groups.

Function

At the time of follow-up, the number of hours of participation in sports activities each year (mean, 192) had decreased in all groups compared with the number before the injury (mean, 293). The number of patients who participated in a level-I or II sport for fifty hours or more each year decreased from forty-six to twenty-six. There was no significant difference among the treatment groups. The patients were asked about disability with walking, climbing, squatting, running, jumping, and cutting. The only difference between the operatively treated groups and the non-operatively treated group was with cutting; twelve (55 per cent) of the twenty-two patients who had been managed non-operatively had difficulty cutting, compared with twelve (27 per cent) of the forty-four patients who had been managed operatively.

Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament for a Combined Injury Compared with Such Reconstruction for an Isolated Tear

For the thirty-seven patients who had an isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament, the mean follow-up interval was thirty-six months (range, twenty-three to sixty-six months) and the mean age was twenty-eight years (range, fifteen to forty-six years). The patients participated in sports activities for a mean of 355 hours (range, zero to 1040 hours) each year before the injury and 258 hours (range, zero to 1250 hours) each year after the injury. Eighty-six per cent (thirty-two) of the patients participated in a level-I or II sport before the injury, and 51 per cent (nineteen) did so after the injury. For the twenty-one patients who had a combined ligamentous injury, the mean follow-up interval was thirty-one months (range, twenty-one to fifty-three months) and the mean age was twenty-nine years (range, sixteen to forty-three years). The patients participated in sports activities for a mean of 329 hours (range, fifty to 955 hours) each year before the injury and 202 hours (range, zero to 660 hours) each year after the injury. Seventy-one per cent (fifteen) of the patients participated in a level-I or II sport before the injury, and 43 per cent (nine) did so after the injury (Table I).

The mean difference in flexion of the joint between the injured and contralateral knees was 3 degrees (range, 0 to 20 degrees) in the patients who had an isolated tear and 2 degrees (range, 0 to 15 degrees) in those who had a combined injury. The mean flexion contracture was 2 degrees in both groups. The mean one-leg-hop index was 92 per cent (range, 71 to 114 per cent) of the value for the uninjured limb for the patients who had an isolated tear and 89 per cent (range, 80 to 107 per cent) for the patients who had a combined injury. The mean strength of the hamstrings was 98 per cent (range, 87 to 136 per cent) of the value for the uninjured limb for the patients who had an isolated tear and 98 per cent (range, 82 to 120 per cent) for the patients who had a combined injury. The mean strength of the quadriceps was 86 per cent (range, 55 to 125 per cent) of the value for the uninjured limb for the patients who had an isolated tear and 88 per cent (range, 55 to 105 per cent) for the patients who had a combined injury (Table I).

Eighty-four per cent (thirty-one) of the thirty-seven patients who had an isolated tear had no difficulty climbing, 41 per cent (fifteen) had no difficulty kneeling, 68 per cent (twenty-five) had no difficulty running, and 78 per cent (twenty-nine) had no difficulty cutting. Eighty-one per cent (seventeen) of the twenty-one patients who had a combined injury had no difficulty climbing, 48 per cent (ten) had no difficulty kneeling, 62 per cent (thirteen) had no difficulty running, and 76 per cent (sixteen) had no difficulty cutting (Table I).

With the numbers available, none of the differences in stability or function were shown to be significant (p < 0.5).

Discussion

Introduction | Materials and Methods | Results | Discussion | References

Studies of cadavera have shown that the primary restraint to anterior displacement is the anterior cruciate ligament^15,18,29,34. Sectioning of the medial ligamentous complex (the medial collateral ligament, medial capsular ligament, and posterior oblique ligament), with the anterior cruciate ligament left intact, does not result in an increase in anterior displacement; however, anterior displacement increases when the anterior cruciate ligament is also sectioned⁴². The primary restraint to valgus instability is the medial collateral ligament^16,19,38, with the cruciate ligaments acting as secondary stabilizers of the knee¹⁶. Therefore, sectioning of both structures increases anterior and valgus instability⁴². It is believed that instability secondary to disruption of the anterior cruciate ligament may reduce the quality of healing of the medial collateral ligament, further increasing valgus instability⁴⁶.

In studies of cadavera by Warren et al.⁴³, application of valgus stress to the knee in 30 degrees of flexion after sectioning of the superficial medial collateral ligament increased the distance between tibial and femoral reference points by three millimeters. When the entire medial ligamentous complex was cut, the distance increased by seven millimeters. Hughston et al.²⁰ recommended that the instability detected on the valgus stress test be considered mild when displacement was three to five millimeters, moderate when it was six to ten millimeters, and severe if it was more than ten millimeters. Those authors noted that the actual separation was not more than ten millimeters at the time of the operation in many knees, despite a preoperative rating of severe instability. Hughston¹⁹ reported the results of repair in forty-one patients who had a disruption of the medial collateral ligament and more than ten millimeters of valgus instability. He suggested non-operative treatment for mild or moderate valgus instability and repair for severe instability. In our study, we estimated the amount of opening of the medial joint space and compared this with the amount in the uninjured knee. Only four patients had a difference of more than ten millimeters of opening. The remaining patients had only mild or moderate instability. On the basis of the criterion that a difference of less than three millimeters represents stability, none of our patients had clinical evidence of valgus instability at the time of follow-up.

Jokl et al.²⁴ evaluated twenty-eight patients who had been managed non-operatively for a combined tear of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. Twenty patients had a good or excellent result (normal or nearly normal function of the knee with few if any symptoms) as determined with The Hospital for Special Surgery assessment form; roentgenograms or instrumented tests were not used to evaluate instability. Although it has been widely accepted that an isolated injury of the medial collateral ligament will heal satisfactorily without treatment^3,14,21,25, many believe that a combined injury is best treated with operative intervention and repair of all damaged structures^{5,14,22,32,36,44,45}. Ballmer et al.⁴ and Shelbourne and Porter⁴⁰ reported good results after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and non-operative treatment of a tear of the medial collateral ligament. Ballmer et al. documented joint instability with roentgenograms. Shelbourne and Porter documented anterior instability with the KT-1000 arthrometer but did not document valgus instability. In an earlier study, we showed that 188 of 190 patients in whom displacement was more than 2.5 millimeters greater in the injured knee were found to have a tear of the anterior cruciate ligament arthroscopically⁸.

Noyes et al.³¹ utilized measurements of anterior-posterior displacement with the KT-1000 arthrometer to classify function of the anterior cruciate ligament after revision procedures. Both knees were measured at an eighty-nine and 134-newton total anterior-posterior displacement force. The authors did not state whether the classification was made on the basis of the measurements obtained with the eighty-nine or 134-newton test. Greater displacement loads result in greater knee displacements, as has been seen in studies performed with eighty-nine and 200-newton loads¹⁰, eighty-nine and 134-newton loads^3,5, and eighty-nine-newton and maximum displacement loads^1,3-5. When function of the anterior cruciate ligament is classified, the testing load should be identified^{2,12,27,35,41}.

Because the medial collateral ligament heals without treatment^3,21,22, some authors have suggested that, when both ligaments are injured, reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament alone is sufficient, as the medial collateral ligament will heal spontaneously^4,39,40. If reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is to affect healing of the medial collateral ligament, presumably the repair needs to be performed within one to two weeks after the injury; however, the risk of postoperative stiffness when the anterior cruciate ligament is reconstructed within two to four weeks after the injury is well documented^17,30,37. Thus, the risk of postoperative stiffness must be weighed against the possible benefit from early correction of anterior instability. We know of no comparative clinical studies that have demonstrated that reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament improves healing of the medial collateral ligament.

In an earlier study, we used roentgenograms to document valgus instability in twenty-four patients who had had repair of an isolated tear of the medial collateral ligament and in forty-one patients who had had repair of a combined ligamentous injury¹⁰. The opening of the joint space was more than three millimeters greater in the injured knee in seven patients who had had repair of an isolated injury of the medial collateral ligament and in five patients in whom both ligaments had been repaired. Ballmer and Jakob³ reported instability of three millimeters or more on roentgenograms of twelve of twenty patients who had been managed non-operatively for an isolated injury of the medial collateral ligament. The subjective rating for all patients was good or excellent. Ballmer et al.⁴ evaluated fourteen patients who had had a combined ligamentous injury and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. At the time of follow-up, twelve of the knees were stable and two had valgus instability of three to five millimeters. In the present study, only eight (13 per cent) of sixty patients had valgus instability according to roentgenograms. Operative treatment of both ligaments or of only the anterior cruciate ligament in a combined ligamentous injury did not alter the prevalence of late valgus instability. In addition, an injury of the medial collateral ligament did not alter the results of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament performed within ninety days after the injury.

NOTE: The authors thank Raymond Sachs, M.D., and John Murphy, M.D., for allowing us to evaluate their patients.

References

Introduction | Materials and Methods | Results | Discussion | References

Aglietti, P.; Buzzi, R.; Zaccherotti, G.; and |and |D'Andria, S.: Operative treatment of complete lesions of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments. Am. J. Knee Surg.,4: 186-194, 1991.4186 1991

Bach, B. R., Jr.; Warren, R. F.; Flynn, W. M.; Kroll, M.; and |and |Wickiewiecz, T. L.: Arthrometric evaluation of knees that have a torn anterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 1299-1306, Oct. 1990.72-A1299 1990

Ballmer, P. M., and |and |Jakob, R. P.: The non operative treatment of isolated complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. A prospective study. Arch. Orthop. and Trauma Surg.,107: 273-276, 1988.107273 1988 [CrossRef]

Ballmer, P. M.; Ballmer, F. T.; and |and |Jakob, R. P.: Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament alone in the treatment of a combined instability with complete rupture of the medial collateral ligament. A prospective study. Arch. Orthop. and Trauma Surg.,110: 139-141, 1991.110139 1991 [CrossRef]

Brantigan, O. C., and |and |Voshell, A. F.: The mechanics of the ligaments and menisci of the knee joint. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,23: 44-66, Jan. 1941.2344 1941

Daniel, D. M.: Diagnosis of a ligament injury. In Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair, pp. 3-10. Edited by D. M. Daniel, W. H. Akeson, and J. J. O'Connor. New York, Raven Press, 1990.

Daniel, D. M.: Principles of knee ligament surgery. In Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair, pp. 11-29. Edited by D. M. Daniel, W. H. Akeson, and J. J. O'Connor. New York, Raven Press, 1990.

Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; and Rangger, C.: The clinical measurement of knee instability. In Biology and Biomechanics of the Traumatized Synovial Joint: the Knee as a Model, pp. 475-496. Edited by G. A. M. Finerman and F. R. Noyes. Rosemont, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1992.

Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; and Riehl, B.: Ligament surgery: the evaluation of results. In Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair, pp. 521-534. Edited by D. M. Daniel, W. H. Akeson, and J. J. O'Connor. New York, Raven Press, 1990.

Daniel, D.; Malcom, L.; Stone, M. L.; and |and |Peth, H.: Quantification of knee function. Orthop. Trans.,5: 489-490, 1981.5489 1981

Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; Riehl, B.; and |and |Moore, M. R.: Measurement of lower limb function. The one leg hop for distance. Am. J. Knee Surg.,1: 212-214, 1988.1212 1988

Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; Sachs, R.; and |and |Malcom, L.: Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption. Am. J. Sports Med.,13: 401-407, 1985.13401 1985 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; Dobson, B. E.; Fithian, D. C.; Rossman, D. J.; and |and |Kaufman, K. R.: Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am. J. Sports Med.,22: 632-644, 1994.22632 1994 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Fetto, J. F., and |and |Marshall, J. L.: Medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee: a rationale for treatment. Clin. Orthop.,132: 206-218, 1978.132206 1978 [PubMed]

Fukubayashi, T.; Torzilli, P. A.; Sherman, M. F.; and |and |Warren, R. F.: An in vitro biomechanical evaluation of anterior-posterior motion of the knee. Tibial displacement, rotation, and torque. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,64-A: 258-264, Feb. 1982.64-A258 1982

Grood, E. S.; Noyes, F. R.; Butler, D. L.; and |and |Suntay, W. J.: Ligamentous and capsular restraints preventing straight medial and lateral laxity in intact human cadaver knees. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,63-A: 1257-1269, Oct. 1981.63-A1257 1981

Harner, C. D.; Irrgang, J. J.; Paul, J.; Dearwater, S.; and |and |Fu, F. H.: Loss of motion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am. J. Sports Med.,20: 499-506, 1992.20499 1992 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Hsieh, H.-H., and |and |Walker, P. S.: Stabilizing mechanisms of the loaded and unloaded knee joint. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 87-93, Jan. 1976.58-A87 1976

Hughston, J. C.: The importance of the posterior oblique ligament in repairs of acute tears of the medial ligaments with and without an associated rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Results of long-term follow-up. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1328-1344, Sept. 1994.76-A1328 1994

Hughston, J. C.; Andrews, J. R.; Cross, M. J.; and |and |Moschi, A.: Classification of knee ligament instabilities. Part I. The medial compartment and cruciate ligaments. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 159-172, March 1976.58-A159 1976

Indelicato, P. A.: Nonoperative treatment of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,65-A: 323-329, March 1983.65-A323 1983

Indelicato, P. A.; Hermansdorfer, J.; and |and |Huegel, M.: Nonoperative management of complete tears of the medial collateral ligament of the knee in intercollegiate football players. Clin. Orthop.,256: 174-177, 1990.256174 1990 [PubMed]

Johnson, R. J.; Beynnon, B. D.; Nichols, C. E.; and |and |Renstrom, P. A. F. H.: Current concepts review. The treatment of injuries of the anterior cruciate ligament. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-A: 140-151, Jan. 1992.74-A140 1992

Jokl, P.; Kaplan, N.; Stovell, P.; and |and |Keggi, K.: Non-operative treatment of severe injuries to the medial and anterior cruciate ligaments of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 741-744, June 1984.66-A741 1984

Jones, R. E.; Henley, M. B.; and |and |Francis, P.: Nonperative management of isolated grade III collateral ligament injury in high school football players. Clin. Orthop.,213: 137-140, 1986.213137 1986 [PubMed]

Kannus, P.: Long-term results of conservatively treated medial collateral ligament injuries of the knee joint. Clin. Orthop.,226: 103-112, 1988.226103 1988 [PubMed]

Kennedy, J. C., and |and |Fowler, P. J.: Medial and anterior instability of the knee. An anatomical and clinical study using stress machines. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,53-A: 1257-1270, Oct. 1971.53-A1257 1971

Larson, R. L.: Combined instabilities of the knee. Clin. Orthop.,147: 68-75, 1980.14768 1980 [PubMed]

Markolf, K. L.; Mensch, J. S.; and |and |Amstutz, H. C.: Stiffness and laxity of the knee—the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 583-594, July 1976.58-A583 1976

Mohtadi, N. G.; Webster-Bogaert, S.; and |and |Fowler, P. J.: Limitation of motion following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A case-control study. Am. J. Sports Med.,19: 620-625, 1991.19620 1991 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Noyes, F. R.; Grood, E. S.; and |and |Torzilli, P. A.: Current concepts review. The definitions of terms for motion and position of the knee and injuries of the ligaments. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,71-A: 465-472, March 1989.71-A465 1989

O'Donoghue, D. H.: Surgical treatment of fresh injuries to the major ligaments of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,32-A: 721-738, Oct. 1950.32-A721 1950

O'Donoghue, D. H.: An analysis of end results of surgical treatment of major injuries to the ligaments of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,37-A: 1-13, Jan. 1955.37-A1 1955

Piziali, R. L.; Seering, W. P.; Nagel, D. A.; and |and |Schurman, D. J.: The function of the primary ligaments of the knee in anterior-posterior and medial-lateral motions. J. Biomech.,13: 777-784, 1980.13777 1980 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Rangger, C.; Daniel, D. M.; Stone, M. L.; and |and |Kaufman, K.: Diagnosis of an ACL disruption with KT-1000 arthrometer measurements. Knee Surg. Sports Traumat., Arthrosc.,1: 60-66, 1993.160 1993 [CrossRef]

Robins, A. J.; Newman, A. P.; and |and |Burks, R. T.: Postoperative return of motion in anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries. The effect of medial collateral ligament rupture location. Am. J. Sports Med.,21: 20-25, 1993.2120 1993 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Sachs, R. A.; Reznik, A.; Daniel, D. M.; and Stone, M. L.: Complications of knee ligament surgery. In Knee Ligaments. Structure, Function, Injury, and Repair, pp. 505-520. Edited by D. M. Daniel, W. H. Akeson, and J. J. O'Connor. New York, Raven Press, 1990.

Seering, W. P.; Piziali, R. L.; Nagel, D. A.; and |and |Schurman, D. J.: The function of the primary ligaments of the knee in varus-valgus and axial rotation. J. Biomech.,13: 785-794, 1980.13785 1980 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Shelbourne, K. D., and |and |Baele, J. R.: Treatment of combined anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries.. Am. J. Knee Surg.,1: 56-58, 1988.156 1988

Shelbourne, K. D., and |and |Porter, D. A.: Anterior cruciate ligament-medial collateral ligament injury; nonoperative management of medial collateral ligament tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A preliminary report. Am. J. Sports Med.,20: 283-286, 1992.20283 1992 [PubMed][CrossRef]

Sherman, O. H.; Markolf, K. L.; and |and |Ferkel, R. D.: Measurements of anterior laxity in normal and anterior cruciate absent knees with two instrumented test devices. Clin. Orthop.,215: 156-161, 1987.215156 1987 [PubMed]

Sullivan, D.; Levy, I. M.; Sheskier, S.; Torzilli, P. A.; and |and |Warren, R. F.: Medial restraints to anterior-posterior motion of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 930-936, July 1984.66-A930 1984

Warren, L. F.; Marshall, J. L.; and |and |Girgis, F.: The prime static stabilizer of the medial side of the knee. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,56-A: 665-674, June 1974.56-A665 1974

Warren, R. F., and |and |Marshall, J. L.: Injuries of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the knee. A retrospective analysis of clinical records—Part I. Clin. Orthop.,136: 191-197, 1978.136191 1978 [PubMed]

Warren, R. F., and |and |Marshall, J. L.: Injuries of the anterior cruciate and medial collateral ligaments of the knee. A long-term follow-up of 86 cases—Part II. Clin. Orthop.,136: 198-211, 1978.136198 1978 [PubMed]

Woo, S. L-Y.; Young, E. P.; Ohland, K. J.; Marcin, J. P.; Horibe, S.; and |and |Lin, H.-C.: The effects of transection of the anterior cruciate ligament on healing of the medial collateral ligament. A biomechanical study of the knee in dogs. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 382-392, March 1990.72-A382 1990

Topics

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

View Larger

TABLE I RESULTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER INJURY

*The value is given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.†The value is given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses.

	Isolated Injury	Combined Injury
	(N = 37)	(N = 21)
Duration of follow-up (mos.)*	36 (23 to 66)	31 (21 to 53)
Age (yrs.)*	28 (15 to 46)	29 (16 to 43)
Time spent in sports (hrs. per yr.)*
Before injury	355 (0 to 1040)	329 (50 to 955)
After injury	258 (0 to 1250)	202 (0 to 660)
Participation in a level-I or II sport†
Before injury	32 (86)	15 (71)
After injury	19 (51)	9 (3)
Joint-space opening determined by arthrometer
89-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.5	1.0
>2.5-mm difference†	9 (24)	4 (9)
134-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.9	1.5
>2.5-mm difference†	14 (38)	7 (3)
>5.0-mm difference†	0	0
Manual maximum test
Mean difference (mm)	2.9	3.0
>5.0-mm difference†	3 (8)	3 (14)
Difference in joint flexion (degrees)*	3 (0-20)	2 (0 to 15)
Flexion contracture (degrees)*	2 (0 to +9)	2 (-4 to +6)
One-leg-hop test (per cent of uninjured)*	92 (71 to 114)	89 (80 to 107)
Strength of quadriceps (per cent of uninjured)*	86 (55 to 125)	88 (55 to 105)
Strength of hamstrings (per cent of uninjured)*	98 (87 to 136)	98 (82 to 120)
No difficulty climbing†	31 (84)	17 (81)
No difficulty kneeling†	15 (41)	10 (48)
No difficulty running†	25 (68)	13 (62)
No difficulty cutting†	29 (78)	16 (76)

Add to My JBJS

TABLE I RESULTS OF RECONSTRUCTION OF THE ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT WITHIN NINETY DAYS AFTER INJURY

*The value is given as the mean, with the range in parentheses.†The value is given as the number of patients, with the percentage in parentheses.

	Isolated Injury	Combined Injury
	(N = 37)	(N = 21)
Duration of follow-up (mos.)*	36 (23 to 66)	31 (21 to 53)
Age (yrs.)*	28 (15 to 46)	29 (16 to 43)
Time spent in sports (hrs. per yr.)*
Before injury	355 (0 to 1040)	329 (50 to 955)
After injury	258 (0 to 1250)	202 (0 to 660)
Participation in a level-I or II sport†
Before injury	32 (86)	15 (71)
After injury	19 (51)	9 (3)
Joint-space opening determined by arthrometer
89-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.5	1.0
>2.5-mm difference†	9 (24)	4 (9)
134-N test
Mean difference (mm)	1.9	1.5
>2.5-mm difference†	14 (38)	7 (3)
>5.0-mm difference†	0	0
Manual maximum test
Mean difference (mm)	2.9	3.0
>5.0-mm difference†	3 (8)	3 (14)
Difference in joint flexion (degrees)*	3 (0-20)	2 (0 to 15)
Flexion contracture (degrees)*	2 (0 to +9)	2 (-4 to +6)
One-leg-hop test (per cent of uninjured)*	92 (71 to 114)	89 (80 to 107)
Strength of quadriceps (per cent of uninjured)*	86 (55 to 125)	88 (55 to 105)
Strength of hamstrings (per cent of uninjured)*	98 (87 to 136)	98 (82 to 120)
No difficulty climbing†	31 (84)	17 (81)
No difficulty kneeling†	15 (41)	10 (48)
No difficulty running†	25 (68)	13 (62)
No difficulty cutting†	29 (78)	16 (76)