0
Articles   |    
Operative Treatment of Volar Intra-Articular Fractures of the Distal End of the Radius*
JESSE B. JUPITER, M.D.†, BOSTON; DIEGO L. FERNANDEZ, M.D.‡; CHOON-LAI TOH, M.D.§, AARAU, SWITZERLAND; THOMAS FELLMAN, M.D.‡; DAVID RING, M.D.†, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, and Kantonspital, Aarau
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1996; 78:1817-28 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

We retrospectively reviewed the results of operative treatment of forty-nine volar marginal intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. According to the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures, there were two B3.1 fractures (characterized by a small volar fragment, with the sigmoid notch intact), three B3.2 fractures (characterized by a large volar fragment that included the sigmoid notch), and forty-four B3.3 fractures (characterized by comminution of the volar fragment).Although all fractures healed and only nine patients had evidence of osteoarthrosis on follow-up radiographs, there were six early and fourteen late complications, some of which adversely influenced the over-all outcome. After an average of fifty-one months (range, twenty-four to 117 months), there were thirty-one excellent, ten good, and eight fair results according to the system described by Gartland and Werley, and thirty-two excellent, nine good, five fair, and three poor results according to the modified system of Green and O'Brien.Two factors were found to have a significant association with a fair or poor outcome: evidence of osteoarthrosis on the most recent follow-up radiographs and reversal of the normal volar tilt of the distal end of the radius. The age of the patient, the interval from the injury to the operation, a concomitant injury of the ipsilateral upper extremity, an associated fracture of the ulnar styloid process, the radio-ulnar index, ulnar angulation, the classification of the fracture, comminution of the volar fragment, and articular incongruity were not significantly associated with the outcome.

Figures in this Article
    Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius that are characterized by volar displacement of part of the articular surface are uncommon and tend to be associated with high-velocity trauma5,8,16,30.
    Although the findings of a number of studies have supported the effectiveness of operative treatment of such fractures6,7,9,11,17,22,25,31, few reports have described the morphology of the fracture in detail. Instead, many authors simply used the eponymic descriptions Barton or reversed Barton fracture1,2,5,6,19,20,23,28,29.
    The purpose of the present retrospective study was to evaluate the long-term functional and radiographic results of open reduction and internal fixation of such fractures. A number of variables, such as the age of the patient, the fracture pattern, and the interval between the injury and the operation were evaluated statistically with regard to their influence on the outcome.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

    †Orthopaedic Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, WAC-527, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.

    ‡Orthopaedische Chirurgie F. M. H., Mittelstrasse 54, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.

    §Oberartz, Kantonspital, Aarau, Switzerland.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
    †Orthopaedic Hand Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, WAC-527, Boston, Massachusetts 02114.
    ‡Orthopaedische Chirurgie F. M. H., Mittelstrasse 54, 3012 Bern, Switzerland.
    §Oberartz, Kantonspital, Aarau, Switzerland.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I PREOPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    *Parentheses indicate that the injury involved the dominant limb.†Multifragmented‡ORIF=open reduction and internal fixation.
    Complications
    CaseGender, AgeInvolved Limb*OccupationType of AccidentFracture TypeFracture of Ulnar Styloid ProcessOther InjuriesPrimary Treatment‡Time to Op.Type of ImplantDurat. Splint Worn Postop.EarlyLateReop.
    (Yrs.)(Days)(Wks.)
      1M,19(R)WelderMotorcycleB3.3†YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF1T plate, screws2Pain over plateRemoval of plate
      2M,21LButcherMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaSplint19T plate2Paid over plateRemoval of plate
      3M,27LStudentSports-relatedB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, bone graft2
      4M,43(R)LaborerMopedB3.3†NonePlaster cast16T plate, bone graft2
      5M,22LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.2YesPolytraumaORIF1T plate3
      6M,17LConstruction workerMotorcycleB3.3NoneORIF1T plate2
      7M,16LMechanicMotorcycleB3.3NonePlaster cast5T plate2de Quervain tendinitisTenosynovectomy
      8M,28LLaborerMotorcycleB3.3YesPolytraumaSplint14T plate, Kirschner wire3Pain over plateRemoval of plate
      9M,22(R)MechanicMotorcycleB3.3NoneORIF1T plate4
    10F,24(R)NurseSports-relatedB3.3YesNoneORIF (failed)4T plate3
    11M,20(R)CarpenterMotorcycleB3.3YesNoneORIF4T plate4Pain over plateRemoval of plate
    12M,25LMechanicMotorcycleB3.3YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF0Screws2
    13M,22(R)TeacherMotorcycleB3.3YesPolytraumaSplint9T plate4
    14M,65LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaSplint11T plate, bone graft4Sympathetic maintained pain
    15M,52(R)Clerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaORIF1T plate2
    16M,24LConstruction workerMotorcycleB3.3†Ipsilat. upper limbORIF0T plate, bone graft2Carpal tunnel syndrome, rupture of extensor policis longus tendonNerve release, tendon transfer
    17F,54(R)LaborerFallB3.3NoneORIF0T plate2
    18F,57LLaborerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate4Carpal tunnel syndromeNerve release
    19M,28(R)ChauffeurMotorcycleB3.3†YesNoneSplint6T plate, Kirschner wire, screw4Carpal tunnel syndromeNerve release
    20M,23LLaborerMotorcycleB3.3†NoneORIF1T plate3
    21F,65LHomemakerBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast7T plate3Loss of reduct.Ulnar osteotomy, removal of plate
    22F,69LHomemakerMopedB3.3NonePlaster cast4T plate3
    23M,41(R)ExecutiveFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate2
    24F,70(R)HomemakerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate4
    25M,50(R)ArchitectBicycleB3.3†YesNonePlaster cast and Kirschner wires11T plate, Kirschner wire, screw3Subluxation of distal radio-ulnar jointHemiresection arthroplasty
    26M,30(R)SurgeonBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast12T plate, screw3
    27M,48LExecutiveBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, external fixation3Tendinitis, pain over plateTenosynovectomy, removal of plate
    28M,64(R)LaborerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaORIF1T plate2
    29F,28(R)TeacherAutomobileB3.3YesPolytraumaORIF0T plate2
    30F,23LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF (failed)9T plate, Kirschner wire3Scapholunate dissoc., sympathetic maintained painSevere radiocarpal osteoarthrosisRadiolunate arthrodesis
    31F,52LClerical workerBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, Kirschner wire2Sympathetic maintained painSubluxation of distal radio-ulnar jointSauvé-Kapandji procedure
    32M,72LRetiredFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate,2Deep venous thrombosis
    33M,25(R)MechanicBicycleB3.2NoneORIF0T plate2
    34F,36(R)LaborerMopedB3.3ORIF0T plate2
    35F,51LHomemakerBicycleB3.2ORIF0T plate2
    36F,56(R)LaborerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF1T plate2
    37F,76(R)RetiredFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate Kirschner wire, bone graft6
    38F,29(R)PhysicianSports-relatedB3.1Contralat, upper limbORIF3T plate0
    39F,54(R)HomemakerFallB3.3†NoneORIF2T plate2
    40F,26(R)HomemakerFallB3.1NoneORIF4T plate, Kirschner wire,2
    41M,44(R)ExecutiveFallB3.3†YesNoneORIF4T plate, external fixation2
    42F,50(R)Clerical workerBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast2T plate2
    43M,73(R)RetiredAutomobileB3.3YesIpsilat, upper limbPlaster cast4T plate2
    44F,60(R)LaborerFallB3.3NonePlaster cast2T plate2
    45F,24(R)Clerical workerFallB3.3†NoneORIF0T plate2
    46M,42(R)ExecutiveSports-relatedB3.3YesNoneORIF (failed)282 plates4
    47F,64(R)HomemakerAutomobileB3.3NonePlaster cast14T plate, Kirschner wire2
    48M,64RRetiredBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF2T plate, screws2
    49M,64(R)RetiredBicycleB3.3†NoneORIF2T plate,2
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP DATA
    *The value on the side of the fracture is underlined.†Compared with that on contralateral side.
    Mobility of Wrist* (Degrees)Mobility of Forearm* (Degrees)Outcome
    ExtensionFlexionRadial DeviationUlnar DeviationSupinationPronation
    CaseDurat. of Follow-upRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftGrip Strength†PainScarSensibilityGartland and Werley12Modified Green and O'Brien4
    (Mos.)
      1117657085903030555580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      2108653090901515555580807070EqualMildGoodGood
      3107707090303535503080808060Within 10%SevereHyperesthesiaFairPoor
      4101404540702525404080807080EqualNoneGoodGood
      51001565109053553580803080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      6100609090903030555080807070EqualMildWideExcellentExcellent
      79690909090303060551001008080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      886402565402525452580457045EqualNoneWideFairGood
      983606580803030404080807070EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    1078808090903030505080807070EqualMildWideExcellentExcellent
    117480809090202050501101105050EqualModerateGoodGood
    1270755590903035555080807575EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    1357908090903530605580808070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1461704565451530403080704570EqualModerateGoodGood
    1560704590903030604080707070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1648606090902535554580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1757909070703030606080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1852905090651530604080807060EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1952606090902530404080807070EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    2051808090903535555580807070EqualNoneWideExcellentExcellent
    2147504050302020554580607060EqualModerateWideFairFair
    2245606090903040555580806070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    234080707585510555080807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    2439604020301525454080807070EqualNoneGoodGood
    2535556045701530405580804570Within 10%ModerateHyperesthesiaFairFair
    263180809090303050601001005050EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    2727404090902525503080807070Within 10%MildHyperesthesiaGoodGood
    2826304570801010455580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    2924359030952040305080908080Within 10%SevereFairPoor
    3024702090452525653090307080Within 10%SevereWideHyperesthesiaFairPoor
    3135656590852525606080807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3224605090901515555580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3324808090903030505080807070EqualNoneWideExcellentExcellent
    3424656580802525454580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3524704090802525555080807070Within 25%ModerateFairFair
    3624604580803030605080807070Within 10%NoneGoodExcellent
    3724608040901030404080807070Within 25%ModerateFairFair
    382460605560715252580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3936505540551015353570809080Within 10%ModerateGoodFair
    4036607050601515303580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4148555545551520353580808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4224606060601010253080808080EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    4336457040601515303060808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4436606045601015303080808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4524606060601515303080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4648507045551010453070809080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4736606050501015303080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4824406050601515253080808080Within 10%MildGoodGood
    4948405050501515353575807580EqualMildGoodGood
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE III POSTOPERATIVE AND FOLLOW-UP RADIOGRAPHIC DATA
    *The data refer to the maximum displacement, as measured in either the frontal or the sagital plane.†0 = none, I = mild, and II = moderate.
    Radio-Ulnar Index (mm)Articular Displacement* (mm)Ulnar Angulation (Degrees)Volar Angulation (Degrees)Grade18 of Osteoarthrosis at Latest Follow-up†
    CasePostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-up
    10011222216160
    20011182310131
    3+1+13200-9-61
    4+2+206242414161
    5+1+100222216160
    60000202116150
    700002628440
    800002222-4-21
    90000262810100
    10-1-1002930660
    11-3-3211718-5-50
    120000252614140
    13-3-30015163-10
    14+2+2002628671
    150+100212212121
    16-2-2002121660
    1700001516440
    1800001820550
    190011222110100
    2000002224880
    21-10102630921
    220+211151813140
    2300001926000
    240000262316120
    2500003026840
    2600102222020
    2700002223100
    28001019128100
    290+321242201611
    30-10202021251
    31-3-1003032320
    320+10021231270
    330+10026251080
    34+1010232113150
    35-200027100-40
    360+300282214140
    37-2-2112020480
    38-1-111141414140
    39-1-1002121880
    40-1-122222214140
    41001.523232440
    4200112020660
    4300002424660
    440000242414140
    450000202011110
    4600002020440
    4700221414660
    4800002222990
    4900112626660
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Illustration demonstrating the various types of B3 (volar marginal intra-articular) fractures described in the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures21. B3.1 fractures are characterized by a small volar fragment, with the sigmoid notch intact; B3.2 fractures, by a large volar fragment that includes the sigmoid notch; and B3.3 fractures, by comminution of the volar fragment.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figure 2-A through 2-F: Case 1. A nineteen-year-old man who worked as a welder sustained a complex B3.3 fracture in a motorcycle accident. Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fracture.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fracture.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C Lateral tomogram demonstrating the volarly displaced articular fragment and an impacted articular fragment.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-D Lateral radiograph made after the operative fixation.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-E Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, made one year postoperatively, showing that anatomical reduction was maintained. The plate and screws subsequently were removed.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-F Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, made one year postoperatively, showing that anatomical reduction was maintained. The plate and screws subsequently were removed.
    Fifty-two volar marginal intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius were treated operatively by the senior two of us (J. B. J. and D. L. F.) at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and Kantonspital in Aarau, Switzerland, from 1982 to 1993. Forty-nine patients (forty-nine fractures) were available for follow-up, and they form the basis of the present retrospective study. Operative treatment was indicated for volar intra-articular fractures that were associated with at least two millimeters of articular displacement; those for which previous non-operative or operative treatment had failed; and those associated with carpal subluxation, trauma involving the ipsilateral upper extremity, or soft-tissue injury. Similar fractures that had been treated operatively at our institutions but not by the senior two of us, as well as those that were associated with a devascularizing injury or a complete amputation, were excluded from the study.
    Twenty-nine patients were male and twenty were female; the average age was forty-three years (range, sixteen to seventy-six years). Thirty fractures involved the right wrist and nineteen, the left; thirty fractures involved the dominant extremity. At the time of the injury, eighteen patients were white-collar workers, eighteen were employed at manual labor, seven were homemakers, five were retired, and one was a student (Table I).
    Twenty patients had sustained the fracture in a motorcycle or moped accident; twelve, in a fall from a standing height; ten, in a bicycle accident; four, in a sports-related incident; and three, in an automobile accident. The average age of the patients who had been injured in a motorcycle or moped accident was thirty-two years, compared with fifty years for those who had been injured in a bicycle accident and fifty-five years for those who had been injured in a fall (Table I).
    Eight patients had polytrauma, and five others had additional trauma involving the ipsilateral upper extremity. Eight patients had an open fracture, and all of these injuries were classified as grade I according to the criteria described by Gustilo and Anderson14.
    The fractures were classified according to the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures21 by the senior two of us solely on the basis of the operative findings. All of the fractures were type-B3 injuries; that is, the volar aspect of the distal articular surface of the radius was involved while the dorsal aspect remained intact. The injuries were further subdivided into two B3.1 fractures (characterized by a small volar fragment, with the sigmoid notch intact), three B3.2 fractures (characterized by a large volar fragment that included the sigmoid notch), and forty-four B3.3 fractures (characterized by comminution of the volar fragment) (Fig. 1). In twenty-five of the B3.3 fractures, the volar fragment was split into two components; in the other nineteen, the volar fragment and the metaphysis were split into multiple components.
    Twenty-four patients had an associated fracture of the ulnar styloid process, and three had radiographic evidence of alteration of the normal relationship between the scaphoid and lunate bones.
    Thirty-five patients were managed with primary open reduction and internal fixation (Figs. 2-A, 2-B, 2-C, 2-D, 2-E through 2-F). Three of these patients (Cases 10, 30, and 46) initially had been managed at another institution and had been referred to us because of postoperative displacement of the fracture. Nine other patients initially had been managed with closed reduction and immobilization in a plaster cast and had been referred to us because of displacement of the fracture while the limb was in the cast. The remaining five patients had been managed with provisional stabilization of the fracture in a plaster splint without definitive reduction because of associated life-threatening injuries that required emergency treatment.
    Sixteen patients were managed operatively on the day of the injury; fourteen, within two days after the injury; nine, within one week after the injury; seven, within two weeks after the injury; and three, more than two weeks after the injury. General anesthesia was used for twenty-five patients and a brachial plexus block, for the remaining twenty-four. Each procedure was performed, under pneumatic tourniquet control, through the distal limb of the Henry approach15. Internal fixation was achieved with a 3.5-millimeter T-plate for forty-seven patients, with additional screws or Kirschner wire being used to secure osseous fragments in eleven. Two of the forty-seven patients were managed with adjunctive fixation with an external device that extended from the second metacarpal to the distal part of the radial diaphysis. In both of these patients, the external fixation device was used intraoperatively to provide longitudinal traction to facilitate the reduction of a comminuted fracture and was left in place because of associated soft-tissue swelling. The fracture in one other patient (Case 12) was secured with screws alone. The remaining patient (Case 46), who had been referred to us after previous operative fixation had failed, had two separate fragments that were secured with two 2.7-millimeter straight plates. Autogenous iliac-crest bone graft was added to the site of the fracture in five patients (Cases 3, 4, 14, 16, and 37) to help to support the reduction of impacted articular fragments.
    The average duration of the operation was eighty-three minutes (range, thirty-five to 175 minutes). Postoperatively, the wrist was supported in a volar splint for an average of three weeks (range, zero to six weeks). Active motion of the wrist and forearm was permitted after removal of the splint, and the patient was allowed to use the hand and wrist for activities of daily living by six weeks after the operation.
    The reduction of the fracture was assessed on the immediate postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs by the surgeon who had performed the operation. The radio-ulnar index (representing the distance between the distalmost aspect of the sigmoid notch of the radius and the distalmost aspect of the ulnar head) and the accuracy of the realignment of the articular surface in the frontal and sagittal planes were measured in millimeters. The angulation of the articular surface of the distal part of the radius in the frontal plane, termed ulnar angulation, as well as that in the sagittal plane, termed volar angulation, were measured in degrees.
    The patients were followed at regular intervals by the senior two of us. At the time of the most recent follow-up examination, they were asked to rate the pain as absent, mild (occasional pain that did not interfere with activities), moderate (pain that was noted only during exertional activities), or severe (pain at rest or that interfered with activities of daily living). The occupational status of each patient was recorded, and the influence of pain and function of the wrist on the ability of the patient to perform occupational and leisure activities was noted.
    Active pronation and supination of the forearm as well as active extension, flexion, and radial and ulnar deviation of the wrist were measured with use of a hand-held goniometer, and the measurements were compared with those for the contralateral forearm and wrist. Grip strength was measured with use of a Jamar dynamometer (Asimow Engineering, Los Angeles, California) and was recorded as a percentage of that of the contralateral, uninjured hand. Sensibility in the hand was determined by light touch as well as two-point discrimination. Finally, the presence of a hypertrophic operative scar or visible deformity about the wrist was documented.
    Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of both the injured and the contralateral wrist were made at the time of the most recent follow-up examination and were compared with those made immediately postoperatively. The radio-ulnar index, articular congruity, and ulnar angulation of the distal part of the radius in the frontal plane, and the volar angulation of the articular surface in the sagittal plane, were measured by two of us (C.-L. T. and T. F.). Radiographic changes consistent with post-traumatic osteoarthrosis were evaluated according to the system described by Knirk and Jupiter18, in which grade 0 indicates no evidence of osteoarthrosis; grade I, slight narrowing of the joint space; grade II, marked narrowing of the joint space and formation of osteophytes; and grade III, complete loss of the joint space with bone-to-bone contact as well as formation of marginal osteophytes and subchondral cysts.
    The subjective and objective criteria were incorporated into an over-all assessment of the outcome with use of the wrist-scoring system of Gartland and Werley12 as well as the system of Green and O'Brien as modified by Cooney et al.4.
    The association of dichotomous variables (such as the presence or absence of an associated fracture of the ulnar styloid process) with a fair or poor outcome as opposed to an excellent or good outcome was evaluated with use of the Fisher exact test (Number Cruncher Statistical System, J. L. Hintze, Kaysville, Utah). The association of continuous variables (such as age and ulnar angulation) with a fair or poor outcome as opposed to an excellent or good outcome was evaluated with use of the Mann-Whitney test (Number Cruncher Statistical System). A p value of 0.05 or less (that is, a probability of 5 per cent or less that the observed association was due to chance) was considered significant. All of the tests were two-tailed.
    The immediate postoperative radiographs were evaluated by the surgeon who had performed the operation. The radio-ulnar index, as measured in millimeters, was 0 for thirty-two patients, +1 for three, +2 for two, -1 for six, -2 for three, and -3 for three. (A positive value indicated that the ulna was longer than the radius, and a negative value, that the radius was longer than the ulna). Articular incongruity was measured as the maximum incongruity in either the sagittal or the frontal plane. In thirty patients, the articular reconstruction was considered to be anatomical (that is, there was no incongruity in either plane) as seen on the immediate postoperative radiographs. Of the remaining nineteen patients, twelve had a one-millimeter gap, six had a 1.5 or two-millimeter gap, and one had a three-millimeter gap.
    The average ulnar angulation was 22 degrees (range, 0 to 32 degrees), and the average volar angulation was 7 degrees (range, -9 to 16 degrees). The normal volar angulation of the articular surface was lost in three patients, in whom the volar angle ranged from -4 to -9 degrees.
    Six complications occurred in the early postoperative period, before the fracture had healed. One patient (Case 32) had deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremity and was managed with anticoagulation therapy, three patients (Cases 14, 30, and 31) had signs and symptoms of sympathetic maintained pain and were managed with sympathetic blockade and physical therapy for the hand, one patient (Case 21) had a loss of reduction and was managed with a shortening osteotomy of the ulna, and one patient (Case 30) had scapholunate dissociation and was managed with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning. Fourteen late complications, all of which necessitated an additional operative procedure, developed in twelve patients. Five patients (Cases 1,2,8,11, and 27) had pain over the operative incision or the implant and were managed with removal of the plate, three patients (Cases 16, 18, and 19) had median-nerve compression in the carpal canal and were managed with release of that nerve, two patients had tenosynovitis involving the flexor carpi radialis tendon (Case 27) or tendons in the first dorsal extensor compartment (Case 7) and were managed with tenosynovectomy, two patients had subluxation of the distal radio-ulnar joint and were managed with the procedure described by Sauvé and Kapandji24 (Case 31) or a hemiresection arthroplasty (Case 25), one patient (Case 30) had severe post-traumatic osteoarthrosis involving the radiolunate articulation and was managed with an arthrodesis of that joint, and one patient (Case 16) had spontaneous rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon and was managed with transfer of the extensor indicis proprius tendon.
    After an average duration of follow-up of fifty-one months (range, twenty-four to 117 months), twenty-eight patients stated that they had no pain in the involved wrist, eleven had mild pain, seven had moderate pain, and three (Cases 3, 29, and 30) had severe pain (Table II). Thirty-one patients had returned to their previous occupation without restrictions; ten had retired either before the injury or for reasons that were unrelated to the injury; four had changed jobs for reasons that were unrelated to the injury; three had changed jobs because of problems related to other injuries that had occurred simultaneously with the radial fracture; and only one (Case 28), who had sustained a multi-fragmented fracture, had changed from full-time to part-time employment because of sequelae of the radial fracture. Thirty-nine patients were able to perform leisure activities without any restrictions, six had occasional discomfort with such activities, and four (Cases 14, 28, 32, and 33) had substantial discomfort with such activities.
    Active pronation of the involved forearm averaged 72 degrees (range, 45 to 90 degrees) and active supination averaged 78 degrees (range, 30 to 110 degrees), compared with 71 and 82 degrees, respectively, for the contralateral forearm.
    Active extension of the involved wrist averaged 58 degrees (range, 20 to 90 degrees) and active flexion averaged 66 degrees (range, 20 to 90 degrees), compared with 64 and 75 degrees, respectively, for the contralateral wrist.
    Active radial deviation of the involved wrist averaged 22 degrees (range, 5 to 40 degrees) and active ulnar deviation averaged 42 degrees (range, 25 to 60 degrees), compared with 23 and 46 degrees, respectively, for the contralateral wrist.
    Thirty-five patients had grip strength that was equal to that on the contralateral side; twelve, within 10 per cent of that on the contralateral side; and two, within 25 per cent of that on the contralateral side.
    Forty-two patients had an operative scar that was unremarkable in appearance, and seven had a hypertrophic scar. Four patients had residual sensitivity to touch over the scar.
    Follow-up radiographs revealed that five patients had reversal of the normal volar angulation of the radial articular surface; the volar angle in these five patients ranged from -1 to -6 degrees. The other forty-four patients had an average volar angulation of 9 degrees (range, 0 to 16 degrees) (Table III).
    The radio-ulnar index, as measured in millimeters, averaged 0.04 (range, +3 to -3). In ten patients the ulna was longer than the radius, and in nine the distal end of the ulna was proximal to the sigmoid notch of the radius. Ulnar angulation averaged 22 degrees (range, 0 to 32 degrees).
    The distal articular surface of the radius was congruent in thirty-five patients, whereas anteroposterior radiographs revealed a one-millimeter articular step-off in ten patients and a two-millimeter gap in four. Forty patients had no radiographic evidence of radiocarpal osteoarthrosis, eight had grade-I osteoarthrosis, and one had grade-II osteoarthrosis.
    There were thirty-one excellent, ten good, and eight fair results according to the system described by Gartland and Werley12, and there were thirty-two excellent, nine good, five fair, and three poor results according to the modified system4 of Green and O'Brien (Table II).
    When the ratings of both scoring systems were combined, nine patients (Cases 3, 8, 21, 25, 29, 30, 35, 37, and 39) had either a fair or a poor over-all result. All but one of these patients had had a B3.3 fracture, and four (Cases 3, 25, 30, and 39) had had a multifragmented fracture. In addition, five of these patients (Cases 3, 8, 21, 29, and 30) had radiographic evidence of osteoarthrosis, three (Cases 3, 8, and 35) had loss of normal volar angulation of the articular surface of the radius, and three (Cases 3, 29, and 37) had residual articular incongruity.
    There was no significant difference, between the patients who had an excellent or good result and those who had a fair or poor result, with regard to age (p = 0.588), the interval from the injury to the operation (p = 0.846), a concommitant injury of the ipsilateral upper extremity (p = 1.00), the presence of an associated fracture of the ulnar styloid process (p = 0.289), articular incongruity at the time of the most recent follow-up examination (p = 0.701), the radio-ulnar index (p = 0.969), or ulnar angulation (p = 0.327). Neither the B3.3 fractures in which the volar fragment was split into two pieces (p = 1.00) nor those with multiple fragments (p = 0.701) were significantly more likely to be associated with a fair or poor outcome.
    Two factors were associated with a fair or poor outcome: evidence of osteoarohrosis on the most recent follow-up radiographs (p = 0.006) and reversal of the normal volar tilt of the distal end of the radius. Three of the five patients who had a reversal of the normal volar tilt had a fair or poor outcome (p = 0.037, Fisher exact test). The average volar angle among patients who had an excellent or good result was 8.4 degrees, compared with 3.4 degrees among those who had a fair or poor result (p = 0.041, Mann-Whitney test).
    The persistent use of eponyms (such as reversed Barton, Barton2, Smith25, or Goyrand13 fracture) and imprecise systems of classification (such as that described by Thomas28) has inhibited a more accurate understanding of the morphology of volar marginal intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius. This, in turn, has made accurate interpretation of the results of treatment of such fractures exceedingly difficult1,3,5,6,10,11,19,20,22,26-32.
    Appreciation of the likelihood that a displaced marginal intra-articular fracture comprises at least two fragments will help the surgeon to plan both the operative exposure and the placement of internal fixation devices. Although we used the distal limb of the Henry approach15 routinely in the present series, it became evident that, in some patients, the operative exposure of the fracture would have been easier with use of a more ulna-based approach8. It is likely that, in some patients, excessive retraction of the median nerve led to the development of a sympathetic maintained pain syndrome or to residual hyperesthesia in the distribution of the median nerve.
    The multifragmented nature of the articular surface necessitated the use of additional implants to supplement the volar T plate in eleven patients. The surgeon should be prepared to use an additional Kirschner wire or screw to secure a volarly displaced fragment consisting of the styloid process or the lunate facet.
    Although a number of authors have reported excellent results after the operative treatment of these fractures1,5-7,11,30, our experience as well as that of Keating et al.17 suggest that operative intervention may not be suitable for all patients. We identified six early complications (two of which necessitated operative intervention) as well as fourteen late complications (all of which necessitated operative intervention), and we noted residual articular incongruity on the follow-up radiographs of fourteen patients (29 per cent). It is noteworthy that a substantial prevalence of malpositioning of the fracture (as seen on follow-up radiographs) also was described by Keating et al. The fact that five of the fractures in the present study healed with reversal of the normal volar angulation of the articular surface of the radius suggests that these fractures may have been classified incorrectly and should have been classified as type-C injuries with involvement of the metaphyseal and dorsal osseous column. Although this is possible, there was no evidence of such involvement either on preoperative radiographs or intraoperatively.
    The present study was not designed to validate the accuracy of the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures21 with regard to the identification of the morphology of fractures on the basis of preoperative radiographs. Rather, the fracture patterns that were identified by direct intraoperative observations suggest that this classification system may be useful for the accurate documentation of the variable fracture patterns that may necessitate an operation.
    Ametewee, K.: Fractures of the distal radius with anterior displacement. Smith's and Barton's fractures. J. Roy. Coll. Surg.,31: 351-354, 1986.31351  1986 
     
    Barton, J. R.: Views and treatment of an important injury of the wrist. Med. Exam.,1: 365-368, 1838.1365  1838 
     
    Cooney, W. P., III; Dobyns, J. H.; and |and |Linscheid, R. L.: Complications of Colles' fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,62-A: 613-619, June 1980.62-A613  1980 
     
    Cooney, W. P.; Bussey, R.; Dobyns, J. H.; and |and |Linscheid, R. L.: Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin. Orthop.,214: 136-147, 1987.214136  1987  [PubMed]
     
    De Oliveira, J. C.: Barton's fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 586-594, April 1973.55-A586  1973 
     
    Ellis, J.: Smith's and Barton's fracture. A method of treatment. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,47-B(4): 724-727, 1965.47-B(4)724  1965 
     
    Fernandez, D. L.: Smith-Frakturen. Hefte Unfallheilk.,148: 91-95, 1979.14891  1979 
     
    Fernandez, D. L., and Jupiter, J. B.: Articular marginal shearing fractures. In Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Practical Approach to Management, pp. 159-188. Edited by D. L. Fernandez and J. B. Jupiter. New York, Springer, 1996. 
     
    Fernandez, D. L., and |and |Mader, G.: Die Behandlung der Smith-Frakturen. Arch. Orthop. Unfall-Chir.,88: 153-161, 1977.88153  1977  [CrossRef]
     
    Flandreau, R. H.; Sweeney, R. M.; and |and |O'Sullivan, W. D.: Clinical experiences with a series of Smith's fractures. Arch. Surg.,84: 288-291, 1962.84288  1962  [PubMed]
     
    Fuller, D. J.: The Ellis plate operation for Smith's fracture. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-B(1): 173-178, 1973.55-B(1)173  1973 
     
    Gartland, J. J., Jr., and |and |Werley, C.W.: Evaluation of healed Colles' fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,33-A: 895-907, Oct. 1951.33-A895  1951 
     
    Goyrand, G.: Memoirs sur les fractures de l'extremite inferieure du radius, qui simulent les luxations du poignet. Gaz. Med.,3: 664-667, 1832.3664  1832 
     
    Gustilo, R. B., and |and |Anderson, J. T.: Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analyses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 453-458, June 1976.58-A453  1976 
     
    Henry, A. K.: Extensile Exposure. Ed. 2, p. 67. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1957. 
     
    Jupiter, J. B.: Current concepts review. Fractures of the distal end of the radius. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,73-A: 461-469, March 1991.73-A461  1991 
     
    Keating, J. F.; Court-Brown, C. M.; and |and |McQueen, M. M.: Internal fixation of volar-displaced distal radial fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-B(3): 401-405, 1994.76-B(3)401  1994 
     
    Knirk, J. L., and |and |Jupiter, J. B.: Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,68-A: 647-659, June 1986.68-A647  1986 
     
    Mehara, A. K.; Rastogi, S.; Bhan, S.; and |and |Dave, P. K.: Classification and treatment of volar Barton fractures. Injury,24: 55-59, 1993.2455  1993  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Mills, T. J.: Smith's fracture and anterior marginal fracture of radius. British Med. J.,2: 603-605, 1957.2603  1957  [CrossRef]
     
    Müller, M. E.; Nazarian, S.; Koch, P.; and Schatzker, J.: The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. New York, Springer, 1990. 
     
    Paterson, D. C.: Smith's fracture. A review. Australian and New Zealand J. Surg.,36: 145-152, 1966.36145  1966  [CrossRef]
     
    Pattee, G. A., and |and |Thompson, G. H.: Anterior and posterior marginal fracture-dislocations of the distal radius. An analysis of the results of treatment. Clin. Orthop.,231: 183-195, 1988.231183  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Sauve, L., and |and |Kapandji, M.: Nouvelle technique de traitement chirurgical des luxations recidivantes isolees de l'extremite inferieure du cubitus. J. Chir.,47: 589-594, 1936.47589  1936 
     
    Smith, R. S.; Crick, J. C.; Alonso, J.; and |and |Horowitz, M.: Open reduction and internal fixation of volar lip fractures of the distal radius. J. Orthop. Trauma,2: 181-187, 1988.2181  1988  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Smith, R. W.: A Treatise on Fractures in the Vicinity of Joints and on Certain Forms of Accidental and Congenital Dislocations. Dublin, Hodges and Smith, 1847. 
     
    Solgaard, S.: Classification of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,56: 249-252, 1985.56249  1985  [CrossRef]
     
    Thomas, F. B.: Reduction of Smith's fracture.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,39-B(3): 463-470, 1957.39-B(3)463  1957 
     
    Thompson, G. H., and |and |Grant, T. T.: Barton's fractures-reverse Barton's fractures. Confusing eponyms. Clin. Orthop.,122: 210-211, 1977.122210  1977 
     
    van Leeuwen, P. A.; Reynders, P. A.; Rommens, P. M.; and |and |Broos, P. L.: Operative treatment of Smith-Goyrand fractures. Injury,21: 358-360, 1990.21358  1990  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Van Raay, J. J., and |and |van der Werken, C.: External fixation of Smith's fracture. 16 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,62: 284-287, 1991.62284  1991  [CrossRef]
     
    Woodyard, J. E.: A review of Smith's fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,51-B(2): 324-329, 1969.51-B(2)324  1969 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Illustration demonstrating the various types of B3 (volar marginal intra-articular) fractures described in the Comprehensive Classification of Fractures21. B3.1 fractures are characterized by a small volar fragment, with the sigmoid notch intact; B3.2 fractures, by a large volar fragment that includes the sigmoid notch; and B3.3 fractures, by comminution of the volar fragment.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figure 2-A through 2-F: Case 1. A nineteen-year-old man who worked as a welder sustained a complex B3.3 fracture in a motorcycle accident. Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fracture.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 2-A and 2-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs demonstrating the fracture.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C Lateral tomogram demonstrating the volarly displaced articular fragment and an impacted articular fragment.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-D Lateral radiograph made after the operative fixation.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-E Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, made one year postoperatively, showing that anatomical reduction was maintained. The plate and screws subsequently were removed.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-F Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs, made one year postoperatively, showing that anatomical reduction was maintained. The plate and screws subsequently were removed.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I PREOPERATIVE AND OPERATIVE DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    *Parentheses indicate that the injury involved the dominant limb.†Multifragmented‡ORIF=open reduction and internal fixation.
    Complications
    CaseGender, AgeInvolved Limb*OccupationType of AccidentFracture TypeFracture of Ulnar Styloid ProcessOther InjuriesPrimary Treatment‡Time to Op.Type of ImplantDurat. Splint Worn Postop.EarlyLateReop.
    (Yrs.)(Days)(Wks.)
      1M,19(R)WelderMotorcycleB3.3†YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF1T plate, screws2Pain over plateRemoval of plate
      2M,21LButcherMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaSplint19T plate2Paid over plateRemoval of plate
      3M,27LStudentSports-relatedB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, bone graft2
      4M,43(R)LaborerMopedB3.3†NonePlaster cast16T plate, bone graft2
      5M,22LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.2YesPolytraumaORIF1T plate3
      6M,17LConstruction workerMotorcycleB3.3NoneORIF1T plate2
      7M,16LMechanicMotorcycleB3.3NonePlaster cast5T plate2de Quervain tendinitisTenosynovectomy
      8M,28LLaborerMotorcycleB3.3YesPolytraumaSplint14T plate, Kirschner wire3Pain over plateRemoval of plate
      9M,22(R)MechanicMotorcycleB3.3NoneORIF1T plate4
    10F,24(R)NurseSports-relatedB3.3YesNoneORIF (failed)4T plate3
    11M,20(R)CarpenterMotorcycleB3.3YesNoneORIF4T plate4Pain over plateRemoval of plate
    12M,25LMechanicMotorcycleB3.3YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF0Screws2
    13M,22(R)TeacherMotorcycleB3.3YesPolytraumaSplint9T plate4
    14M,65LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaSplint11T plate, bone graft4Sympathetic maintained pain
    15M,52(R)Clerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaORIF1T plate2
    16M,24LConstruction workerMotorcycleB3.3†Ipsilat. upper limbORIF0T plate, bone graft2Carpal tunnel syndrome, rupture of extensor policis longus tendonNerve release, tendon transfer
    17F,54(R)LaborerFallB3.3NoneORIF0T plate2
    18F,57LLaborerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate4Carpal tunnel syndromeNerve release
    19M,28(R)ChauffeurMotorcycleB3.3†YesNoneSplint6T plate, Kirschner wire, screw4Carpal tunnel syndromeNerve release
    20M,23LLaborerMotorcycleB3.3†NoneORIF1T plate3
    21F,65LHomemakerBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast7T plate3Loss of reduct.Ulnar osteotomy, removal of plate
    22F,69LHomemakerMopedB3.3NonePlaster cast4T plate3
    23M,41(R)ExecutiveFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate2
    24F,70(R)HomemakerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate4
    25M,50(R)ArchitectBicycleB3.3†YesNonePlaster cast and Kirschner wires11T plate, Kirschner wire, screw3Subluxation of distal radio-ulnar jointHemiresection arthroplasty
    26M,30(R)SurgeonBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast12T plate, screw3
    27M,48LExecutiveBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, external fixation3Tendinitis, pain over plateTenosynovectomy, removal of plate
    28M,64(R)LaborerMotorcycleB3.3†PolytraumaORIF1T plate2
    29F,28(R)TeacherAutomobileB3.3YesPolytraumaORIF0T plate2
    30F,23LClerical workerMotorcycleB3.3†YesIpsilat. upper limbORIF (failed)9T plate, Kirschner wire3Scapholunate dissoc., sympathetic maintained painSevere radiocarpal osteoarthrosisRadiolunate arthrodesis
    31F,52LClerical workerBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF0T plate, Kirschner wire2Sympathetic maintained painSubluxation of distal radio-ulnar jointSauvé-Kapandji procedure
    32M,72LRetiredFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate,2Deep venous thrombosis
    33M,25(R)MechanicBicycleB3.2NoneORIF0T plate2
    34F,36(R)LaborerMopedB3.3ORIF0T plate2
    35F,51LHomemakerBicycleB3.2ORIF0T plate2
    36F,56(R)LaborerFallB3.3YesNoneORIF1T plate2
    37F,76(R)RetiredFallB3.3YesNoneORIF0T plate Kirschner wire, bone graft6
    38F,29(R)PhysicianSports-relatedB3.1Contralat, upper limbORIF3T plate0
    39F,54(R)HomemakerFallB3.3†NoneORIF2T plate2
    40F,26(R)HomemakerFallB3.1NoneORIF4T plate, Kirschner wire,2
    41M,44(R)ExecutiveFallB3.3†YesNoneORIF4T plate, external fixation2
    42F,50(R)Clerical workerBicycleB3.3NonePlaster cast2T plate2
    43M,73(R)RetiredAutomobileB3.3YesIpsilat, upper limbPlaster cast4T plate2
    44F,60(R)LaborerFallB3.3NonePlaster cast2T plate2
    45F,24(R)Clerical workerFallB3.3†NoneORIF0T plate2
    46M,42(R)ExecutiveSports-relatedB3.3YesNoneORIF (failed)282 plates4
    47F,64(R)HomemakerAutomobileB3.3NonePlaster cast14T plate, Kirschner wire2
    48M,64RRetiredBicycleB3.3†YesNoneORIF2T plate, screws2
    49M,64(R)RetiredBicycleB3.3†NoneORIF2T plate,2
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP DATA
    *The value on the side of the fracture is underlined.†Compared with that on contralateral side.
    Mobility of Wrist* (Degrees)Mobility of Forearm* (Degrees)Outcome
    ExtensionFlexionRadial DeviationUlnar DeviationSupinationPronation
    CaseDurat. of Follow-upRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftRightLeftGrip Strength†PainScarSensibilityGartland and Werley12Modified Green and O'Brien4
    (Mos.)
      1117657085903030555580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      2108653090901515555580807070EqualMildGoodGood
      3107707090303535503080808060Within 10%SevereHyperesthesiaFairPoor
      4101404540702525404080807080EqualNoneGoodGood
      51001565109053553580803080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      6100609090903030555080807070EqualMildWideExcellentExcellent
      79690909090303060551001008080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
      886402565402525452580457045EqualNoneWideFairGood
      983606580803030404080807070EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    1078808090903030505080807070EqualMildWideExcellentExcellent
    117480809090202050501101105050EqualModerateGoodGood
    1270755590903035555080807575EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    1357908090903530605580808070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1461704565451530403080704570EqualModerateGoodGood
    1560704590903030604080707070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1648606090902535554580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1757909070703030606080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1852905090651530604080807060EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    1952606090902530404080807070EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    2051808090903535555580807070EqualNoneWideExcellentExcellent
    2147504050302020554580607060EqualModerateWideFairFair
    2245606090903040555580806070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    234080707585510555080807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    2439604020301525454080807070EqualNoneGoodGood
    2535556045701530405580804570Within 10%ModerateHyperesthesiaFairFair
    263180809090303050601001005050EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    2727404090902525503080807070Within 10%MildHyperesthesiaGoodGood
    2826304570801010455580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    2924359030952040305080908080Within 10%SevereFairPoor
    3024702090452525653090307080Within 10%SevereWideHyperesthesiaFairPoor
    3135656590852525606080807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3224605090901515555580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3324808090903030505080807070EqualNoneWideExcellentExcellent
    3424656580802525454580807070EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3524704090802525555080807070Within 25%ModerateFairFair
    3624604580803030605080807070Within 10%NoneGoodExcellent
    3724608040901030404080807070Within 25%ModerateFairFair
    382460605560715252580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    3936505540551015353570809080Within 10%ModerateGoodFair
    4036607050601515303580808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4148555545551520353580808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4224606060601010253080808080EqualMildExcellentExcellent
    4336457040601515303060808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4436606045601015303080808080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4524606060601515303080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4648507045551010453070809080Within 10%NoneExcellentExcellent
    4736606050501015303080808080EqualNoneExcellentExcellent
    4824406050601515253080808080Within 10%MildGoodGood
    4948405050501515353575807580EqualMildGoodGood
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE III POSTOPERATIVE AND FOLLOW-UP RADIOGRAPHIC DATA
    *The data refer to the maximum displacement, as measured in either the frontal or the sagital plane.†0 = none, I = mild, and II = moderate.
    Radio-Ulnar Index (mm)Articular Displacement* (mm)Ulnar Angulation (Degrees)Volar Angulation (Degrees)Grade18 of Osteoarthrosis at Latest Follow-up†
    CasePostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-upPostop.Latest Follow-up
    10011222216160
    20011182310131
    3+1+13200-9-61
    4+2+206242414161
    5+1+100222216160
    60000202116150
    700002628440
    800002222-4-21
    90000262810100
    10-1-1002930660
    11-3-3211718-5-50
    120000252614140
    13-3-30015163-10
    14+2+2002628671
    150+100212212121
    16-2-2002121660
    1700001516440
    1800001820550
    190011222110100
    2000002224880
    21-10102630921
    220+211151813140
    2300001926000
    240000262316120
    2500003026840
    2600102222020
    2700002223100
    28001019128100
    290+321242201611
    30-10202021251
    31-3-1003032320
    320+10021231270
    330+10026251080
    34+1010232113150
    35-200027100-40
    360+300282214140
    37-2-2112020480
    38-1-111141414140
    39-1-1002121880
    40-1-122222214140
    41001.523232440
    4200112020660
    4300002424660
    440000242414140
    450000202011110
    4600002020440
    4700221414660
    4800002222990
    4900112626660
    Ametewee, K.: Fractures of the distal radius with anterior displacement. Smith's and Barton's fractures. J. Roy. Coll. Surg.,31: 351-354, 1986.31351  1986 
     
    Barton, J. R.: Views and treatment of an important injury of the wrist. Med. Exam.,1: 365-368, 1838.1365  1838 
     
    Cooney, W. P., III; Dobyns, J. H.; and |and |Linscheid, R. L.: Complications of Colles' fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,62-A: 613-619, June 1980.62-A613  1980 
     
    Cooney, W. P.; Bussey, R.; Dobyns, J. H.; and |and |Linscheid, R. L.: Difficult wrist fractures. Perilunate fracture-dislocations of the wrist. Clin. Orthop.,214: 136-147, 1987.214136  1987  [PubMed]
     
    De Oliveira, J. C.: Barton's fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 586-594, April 1973.55-A586  1973 
     
    Ellis, J.: Smith's and Barton's fracture. A method of treatment. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,47-B(4): 724-727, 1965.47-B(4)724  1965 
     
    Fernandez, D. L.: Smith-Frakturen. Hefte Unfallheilk.,148: 91-95, 1979.14891  1979 
     
    Fernandez, D. L., and Jupiter, J. B.: Articular marginal shearing fractures. In Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Practical Approach to Management, pp. 159-188. Edited by D. L. Fernandez and J. B. Jupiter. New York, Springer, 1996. 
     
    Fernandez, D. L., and |and |Mader, G.: Die Behandlung der Smith-Frakturen. Arch. Orthop. Unfall-Chir.,88: 153-161, 1977.88153  1977  [CrossRef]
     
    Flandreau, R. H.; Sweeney, R. M.; and |and |O'Sullivan, W. D.: Clinical experiences with a series of Smith's fractures. Arch. Surg.,84: 288-291, 1962.84288  1962  [PubMed]
     
    Fuller, D. J.: The Ellis plate operation for Smith's fracture. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-B(1): 173-178, 1973.55-B(1)173  1973 
     
    Gartland, J. J., Jr., and |and |Werley, C.W.: Evaluation of healed Colles' fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,33-A: 895-907, Oct. 1951.33-A895  1951 
     
    Goyrand, G.: Memoirs sur les fractures de l'extremite inferieure du radius, qui simulent les luxations du poignet. Gaz. Med.,3: 664-667, 1832.3664  1832 
     
    Gustilo, R. B., and |and |Anderson, J. T.: Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones. Retrospective and prospective analyses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 453-458, June 1976.58-A453  1976 
     
    Henry, A. K.: Extensile Exposure. Ed. 2, p. 67. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins, 1957. 
     
    Jupiter, J. B.: Current concepts review. Fractures of the distal end of the radius. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,73-A: 461-469, March 1991.73-A461  1991 
     
    Keating, J. F.; Court-Brown, C. M.; and |and |McQueen, M. M.: Internal fixation of volar-displaced distal radial fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-B(3): 401-405, 1994.76-B(3)401  1994 
     
    Knirk, J. L., and |and |Jupiter, J. B.: Intra-articular fractures of the distal end of the radius in young adults. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,68-A: 647-659, June 1986.68-A647  1986 
     
    Mehara, A. K.; Rastogi, S.; Bhan, S.; and |and |Dave, P. K.: Classification and treatment of volar Barton fractures. Injury,24: 55-59, 1993.2455  1993  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Mills, T. J.: Smith's fracture and anterior marginal fracture of radius. British Med. J.,2: 603-605, 1957.2603  1957  [CrossRef]
     
    Müller, M. E.; Nazarian, S.; Koch, P.; and Schatzker, J.: The Comprehensive Classification of Fractures of Long Bones. New York, Springer, 1990. 
     
    Paterson, D. C.: Smith's fracture. A review. Australian and New Zealand J. Surg.,36: 145-152, 1966.36145  1966  [CrossRef]
     
    Pattee, G. A., and |and |Thompson, G. H.: Anterior and posterior marginal fracture-dislocations of the distal radius. An analysis of the results of treatment. Clin. Orthop.,231: 183-195, 1988.231183  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Sauve, L., and |and |Kapandji, M.: Nouvelle technique de traitement chirurgical des luxations recidivantes isolees de l'extremite inferieure du cubitus. J. Chir.,47: 589-594, 1936.47589  1936 
     
    Smith, R. S.; Crick, J. C.; Alonso, J.; and |and |Horowitz, M.: Open reduction and internal fixation of volar lip fractures of the distal radius. J. Orthop. Trauma,2: 181-187, 1988.2181  1988  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Smith, R. W.: A Treatise on Fractures in the Vicinity of Joints and on Certain Forms of Accidental and Congenital Dislocations. Dublin, Hodges and Smith, 1847. 
     
    Solgaard, S.: Classification of distal radius fractures. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,56: 249-252, 1985.56249  1985  [CrossRef]
     
    Thomas, F. B.: Reduction of Smith's fracture.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,39-B(3): 463-470, 1957.39-B(3)463  1957 
     
    Thompson, G. H., and |and |Grant, T. T.: Barton's fractures-reverse Barton's fractures. Confusing eponyms. Clin. Orthop.,122: 210-211, 1977.122210  1977 
     
    van Leeuwen, P. A.; Reynders, P. A.; Rommens, P. M.; and |and |Broos, P. L.: Operative treatment of Smith-Goyrand fractures. Injury,21: 358-360, 1990.21358  1990  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Van Raay, J. J., and |and |van der Werken, C.: External fixation of Smith's fracture. 16 patients followed for 2 years. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,62: 284-287, 1991.62284  1991  [CrossRef]
     
    Woodyard, J. E.: A review of Smith's fractures. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,51-B(2): 324-329, 1969.51-B(2)324  1969 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center