0
Articles   |    
The Role of Epineurotomy in the Operative Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome*
CHARLES F. LEINBERRY, M.D.†; N. LEROY HAMMOND III, M.D.‡; JAY W. SIEGFRIED, M.D.‡, WYNNEWOOD, PENNSYLVANIA
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Lankenau Hospital, Wynnewood
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1997; 79:555-7 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized study to evaluate the effect of epineurotomy on the outcome of operative treatment of established median-nerve compression in the carpal canal. Fifty hands (forty-four patients) were randomized into two groups: one group had a release of the transverse carpal ligament alone, and the other had a release and adjuvant epineurotomy of the median nerve. The groups were similar with regard to age, gender, duration of symptoms, and preoperative physical findings. All patients had electrophysiological evidence of sensory delays and fibrillations on preoperative testing.All of the operative procedures were performed by the same surgeon. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at one year postoperatively. The follow-up examination revealed no detectable differences between the two groups with regard to symptoms, objective findings, or electrophysiological findings. This suggests that epineurotomy of the median nerve offers no benefit compared with sectioning of the transverse carpal ligament alone.

Figures in this Article
    Compression of the median nerve in the carpal canal is a well recognized condition7,9-11,13,15, and the results of operative treatment have been well documented5,8. A number of authors have suggested that, in addition to operative release of the transverse carpal ligament, operative treatment should include adjuvant manipulation of the median nerve1,3,4,12. Gelberman et al., in 1987, found no beneficial effect of internal neurolysis of the median nerve. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of epineurotomy of the median nerve on the outcome of operative treatment of chronic median nerve compression in the carpal canal.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

    †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Joseph Hospital, 12th and Walnut Streets, Reading, Pennsylvania 19603.

    ‡Divisions of Orthopaedic Surgery (N. L. H., III) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J. W. S.), Lankenau Hospital, 100 Lancaster Avenue, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
    †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Saint Joseph Hospital, 12th and Walnut Streets, Reading, Pennsylvania 19603.
    ‡Divisions of Orthopaedic Surgery (N. L. H., III) and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J. W. S.), Lankenau Hospital, 100 Lancaster Avenue, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096.
    The prospective, randomized clinical study, which was approved by the Investigational Review Board at our medical center, included fifty hands (forty-four patients) that were treated operatively by one of us (N. L. H., III) from November 1986 through July 1989. The criteria for inclusion were clinical signs and symptoms of dysfunction of the median nerve due to compression in the carpal canal that were not responsive to non-operative treatment as well as an electromyogram that demonstrated fibrillations suggesting an advanced degree of nerve compression. Patients who either had had a previous operation in the carpal canal or could not fulfill the follow-up requirements were excluded.
    The hands were randomly chosen to receive one of two types of treatment: operative decompression of the median nerve by longitudinal incision of the transverse carpal ligament alone (Group 1) or operative decompression of the median nerve and longitudinal opening of the epineurium in the region of the carpal canal (Group 2). The hands were randomized by the placement of numbers 1 through 50 (to represent the hands) in a bin. A second bin contained twenty-five epineurotomy tags and twenty-five non-epineurotomy tags. A number was drawn from the first bin and was matched to a tag drawn from the second bin. Thus, twenty-five hands were randomly selected for an epineurotomy and twenty-five, for treatment without an epineurotomy. Because each hand was considered separately, with no regard for which procedure (if any) was done on the contralateral side, some patients who had symptoms in both hands had the same procedure performed on both and some had an epineurotomy on one side but not on the other.
    The patients were evaluated twelve months postoperatively by a physician who was blinded with regard to the treatment. In addition, all of the patients had an electrophysiological study performed, both preoperatively and at twelve months postoperatively, by an independent physician (J. W. S.), who also was blinded to the treatment.
    Twenty-two patients (twenty-five hands) were randomly assigned to Group 1 (no epineurotomy). There were fourteen women and eight men, and the average age was 65.7 years (range, thirty-nine to 100 years). Associated medical conditions included hypertension (three patients), diabetes mellitus (two patients), and arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (one patient). Nineteen hands had pain, altered sensibility, paresthesia, and loss of manual dexterity, and the remaining six hands had three of the four symptoms. The average duration of symptoms was 2.3 years (range, three months to fourteen years). The average duration of follow-up was twenty months (range, twelve to seventy-six months).
    Twenty-two patients (twenty-five hands) were randomized to Group 2 (epineurotomy). There were twelve women and ten men with an average age of sixty-four years (range, thirty-eight to eighty-eight years). Four patients also had hypertension, one had diabetes mellitus, and one had arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Fifteen hands had pain, altered sensibility, paresthesia, and loss of manual dexterity, and ten hands had three of the four symptoms. The average duration of symptoms was three years (range, three months to ten years). The average duration of follow-up was 16.7 months (range, twelve to forty-eight months).
    On physical examination, the average two-point discrimination in the distribution of the median nerve in Group 1 was 7.0 millimeters (range, three to more than fifteen millimeters), as measured with static two-point-discrimination techniques. The average strength of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle, as determined by manual muscle-testing in opposition6, was 3.9 (range, 3 to 5) of 5. Tapping over the median nerve at the wrist elicited the Tinel sign11 in sixteen hands and the Phalen maneuver11 of flexing the wrist for a period of one minute elicited symptoms in fifteen hands.
    The average two-point discrimination in the distribution of the median nerve in Group 2 was 6.9 millimeters (range, three to more than twelve millimeters). The average strength of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle was 3.7 (range, 3 to 5) of 5. The Tinel sign was elicited in seventeen hands, and the Phalen maneuver elicited symptoms in seventeen hands.
    The preoperative electrophysiological testing in Group 1 revealed an average distal sensory latency of 5.1 milliseconds (range, 4.0 milliseconds to no response) (3.8 milliseconds is the upper limit of normal) in the fifteen hands in which it could be measured. Of note is that, in ten hands, the distal latencies were compromised to the point that they could not be measured. Preoperative electromyography revealed fibrillations in the abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis muscles.
    The preoperative electrophysiological testing in Group 2 revealed an average distal sensory latency of 5.2 milliseconds (range, 4.0 milliseconds to no response) in the sixteen hands in which it could be measured. The distal latencies in nine hands were so compromised that they could not be measured. Preoperative electromyography revealed fibrillations in the abductor pollicis brevis and opponens pollicis muscles.

    Operative Technique

    All of the operative procedures were performed on an outpatient basis with local infiltration of anesthesia supplemented with parenteral sedation. All of the procedures were performed by the same surgeon with use of a standardized operative technique14 under pneumatic tourniquet control. The incision was made in the hypothenar area just ulnar to the mid-palmar crease, with an attempt made to preserve the palmaris brevis muscle whenever possible. The distal edge of the transverse carpal ligament was identified and divided longitudinally.
    At this point, if the hand had been randomized to Group 1, the wound was copiously irrigated with sterile saline solution and only the skin was sutured. A standardized postoperative dressing, which included a volar plaster splint, was applied. If the hand had been randomized to Group 2, the epineurotomy was performed under 3.5-times operative-loupe magnification with the use of micro-forceps to open the epineurium on the ulnar side of the nerve, with care being taken not to disturb any fascicular areas of the nerve. The wound closure and the postoperative dressing were the same as those for Group 1. A flexor tenosynovectomy was not performed on any hand in this study.

    Follow-up

    The dressing was removed ten days postoperatively, at which time the patient was taught specific rehabilitation exercises. The patient was seen again at one week, six weeks, six months, and twelve months postoperatively. An analysis of the symptoms, as well as of objective findings compared with those seen preoperatively, was conducted by a physician who was blinded with regard to the type of operative treatment. Twelve months postoperatively, all patients had a repeat electrophysiological test performed by a physician who was also blinded with regard to the operative treatment. The data were analyzed statistically, by an independent examiner, with use of the chi-square and t tests.
    Because the data were incomplete for both groups at the six-week and six-month follow-up examinations, the results of the study were based on the data obtained at the twelve-month follow-up evaluation, which were complete for all of the patients.
    At the twelve-month follow-up evaluation, fifteen hands in Group 1 and fourteen hands in Group 2 no longer had any symptoms referable to the dysfunction of the median nerve. With the numbers available for study, we could not show this difference to be significant.
    On physical examination, the average two-point discrimination in the distribution of the median nerve was 5.1 millimeters (range, three to eleven millimeters) in Group 1 and 4.7 millimeters (range, three to ten millimeters) in Group 2. This difference could not be shown to be significant. The strength of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle in Group 1 had improved to an average of 4.3 (range, 3 to 5), compared with an average of 4.2 (range, 3 to 5) in Group 2. This difference also was not shown to be significant. Six hands in Group 1 and eleven hands in Group 2 had a positive Tinel sign11. The Phalen maneuver11 elicited symptoms in two hands in Group 1 and in four hands in Group 2. Again, these differences were not shown to be significant.
    The twelve-month results of the electrophysiological tests revealed an average sensory latency of 4.1 milliseconds (range, 3.4 to 5.0 milliseconds) for the twenty-four hands in Group 1 for which it could be measured, as compared with 4.1 milliseconds (range, 3.2 to 5.3 milliseconds) in Group 2. Only one hand in Group 1 still had unmeasurable latency, whereas none of the hands in Group 2 did. This difference was not shown to be significant.
    We detected no significant difference between the outcome for the hands treated with division of the transverse carpal ligament alone and that of the hands that had had adjuvant epineurotomy of the median nerve.
    The t test showed no significant differences between the two groups at twelve months (p > 0.05), and chi-square analysis showed that the proportions in Groups 1 and 2 were not independent of each other at twelve months.
    Several authors have addressed the issue of nerve manipulation, especially epineurotomy, in relation to the outcome of decompression of the median nerve in the carpal canal3,8. Duncan et al. polled members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and found that 369 (79 per cent) of the 467 who completed the survey performed a linear epineurotomy through the constricted area of the median nerve during carpal tunnel release.
    Foulkes et al. performed a prospective clinical study of thirty-six wrists (thirty-three patients) that had been randomized to operative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with or without an epineurotomy. The patients were evaluated preoperatively and at six or twelve months postoperatively, with fifteen evaluated at both postoperative time-points. Sensory testing showed over-all improvement postoperatively in both groups. The conclusion of that study and ours was that the addition of an adjuvant epineurotomy, although safe, is of no clinical benefit. The study by Foulkes et al. differed from ours in that not all of the patients had electromyographic changes indicative of denervation of the thenar muscles. However, in both studies, epineurotomy did not cause any significant difference in the outcome of treatment of primary carpal tunnel syndrome.
    The use of adjuvant manipulation of the median nerve has been questioned. Curtis and Eversmann found that internal neurolysis resulted in a return of sensation and improvement in thenar function in patients who had had constant sensory loss and atrophy or palsy of thenar muscles. However, Gelberman et al. found no significant difference in outcome between patients who had had an internal neurolysis and those who had not.
    On the basis of the results of the present study, we concluded that a gain of muscle strength after operative decompression of the carpal canal is possible, although such a gain may not be evident for at least twelve months after the treatment of an advanced lesion. Second, and most importantly, there is no difference in outcome when an adjuvant epineurotomy is performed compared with when a ligament release is performed alone for the most advanced forms of carpal tunnel syndrome.
    NOTE: The authors thank Jean Piccicuto, M.S., chairperson and statistical consultant at Alvernia College, for performing the statistical analysis.
    Curtis, R. M., and Eversmann, W. W., Jr.: Internal neurolysis as an adjunct to the treatment of the carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 733-740, June 1973.55-A733  1973 
     
    Duncan, K. H.; Lewis, R. C., Jr.; Foreman, K. A.; and Nordyke, M. D.: Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: results of a questionnaire. J. Hand Surg.,12A: 384-391, 1987.12A384  1987 
     
    Foulkes, G. D.; Atkinson, R. E.; Beuchle, C.; Doyle, J. R.; and Singer, D. I.: Outcome following epineurotomy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J. Hand Surg.,19A: 539-547, 1994.19A539  1994 
     
    Gelberman, R. H.; Pfeffer, G. B.; Galbraith, R. T.; Szabo, R. M.; Rydevik, B.; and Dimick, M.: Results of treatment of severe carpal-tunnel syndrome without internal neurolysis of the median nerve. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-A: 896-903, July 1987.69-A896  1987 
     
    Harris, C. M.; Tanner, E.; Goldstein, M. N.; and Pettee, D. S.: The surgical treatment of the carpal-tunnel syndrome correlated with preoperative nerve-conduction studies. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,61-A: 93-98, Jan. 1979.61-A93  1979 
     
    Hoppenfeld, S.: Orthopaedic Neurology: a Diagnostic Guide to Neurologic Levels, p. 2. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1977. 
     
    Hunt, W. E., and Luckey, W. T.: The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. J. Neurosurg.,21: 178-181, 1964.21178  1964  [PubMed]
     
    Kulick, M. I.; Gordillo, G.; Javidi, T.; Kilgore, E. S., Jr.; and Newmeyer, W. L., III: Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg.,11A: 59-66, 1986.11A59  1986 
     
    Pfeffer, G. B.; Gelberman, R. H.; Boyes, J. H.; and Rydevik, B.: The history of carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg.,13-B: 28-34, 1988.13-B28  1988 
     
    Phalen, G. S.: The carpal tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years' experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,48-A: 211-228, March 1966.48-A211  1966 
     
    Phalen, G. S.; Gardner, W. J.; and La Londe, A. A.: Neuropathy of the median nerve due to compression beneath the transverse carpal ligament. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,32-A: 109-112, Jan. 1950.32-A109  1950 
     
    Rhoades, C. E.; Mowery, C. A.; and Gelberman, R. H.:: Results of internal neurolysis of the median nerve for severe carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,67-A: 253-256, Feb. 1985.67-A253  1985 
     
    Robbins, H.: Anatomical study of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel and etiologies of the carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,45-A: 953--966, July 1963.45-A953  1963 
     
    Taleisnik, J.: The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve and the approach to the carpal tunnel. An anatomical study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 1212-1217, Sept. 1973.55-A1212  1973 
     
    Tanzer, R. C.: The carpal-tunnel syndrome. A clinical and anatomical study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,41-A: 626-634, June 1959.41-A626  1959 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Curtis, R. M., and Eversmann, W. W., Jr.: Internal neurolysis as an adjunct to the treatment of the carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 733-740, June 1973.55-A733  1973 
     
    Duncan, K. H.; Lewis, R. C., Jr.; Foreman, K. A.; and Nordyke, M. D.: Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand: results of a questionnaire. J. Hand Surg.,12A: 384-391, 1987.12A384  1987 
     
    Foulkes, G. D.; Atkinson, R. E.; Beuchle, C.; Doyle, J. R.; and Singer, D. I.: Outcome following epineurotomy in carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J. Hand Surg.,19A: 539-547, 1994.19A539  1994 
     
    Gelberman, R. H.; Pfeffer, G. B.; Galbraith, R. T.; Szabo, R. M.; Rydevik, B.; and Dimick, M.: Results of treatment of severe carpal-tunnel syndrome without internal neurolysis of the median nerve. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-A: 896-903, July 1987.69-A896  1987 
     
    Harris, C. M.; Tanner, E.; Goldstein, M. N.; and Pettee, D. S.: The surgical treatment of the carpal-tunnel syndrome correlated with preoperative nerve-conduction studies. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,61-A: 93-98, Jan. 1979.61-A93  1979 
     
    Hoppenfeld, S.: Orthopaedic Neurology: a Diagnostic Guide to Neurologic Levels, p. 2. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1977. 
     
    Hunt, W. E., and Luckey, W. T.: The carpal-tunnel syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment. J. Neurosurg.,21: 178-181, 1964.21178  1964  [PubMed]
     
    Kulick, M. I.; Gordillo, G.; Javidi, T.; Kilgore, E. S., Jr.; and Newmeyer, W. L., III: Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg.,11A: 59-66, 1986.11A59  1986 
     
    Pfeffer, G. B.; Gelberman, R. H.; Boyes, J. H.; and Rydevik, B.: The history of carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Hand Surg.,13-B: 28-34, 1988.13-B28  1988 
     
    Phalen, G. S.: The carpal tunnel syndrome. Seventeen years' experience in diagnosis and treatment of six hundred fifty-four hands. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,48-A: 211-228, March 1966.48-A211  1966 
     
    Phalen, G. S.; Gardner, W. J.; and La Londe, A. A.: Neuropathy of the median nerve due to compression beneath the transverse carpal ligament. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,32-A: 109-112, Jan. 1950.32-A109  1950 
     
    Rhoades, C. E.; Mowery, C. A.; and Gelberman, R. H.:: Results of internal neurolysis of the median nerve for severe carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,67-A: 253-256, Feb. 1985.67-A253  1985 
     
    Robbins, H.: Anatomical study of the median nerve in the carpal tunnel and etiologies of the carpal-tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,45-A: 953--966, July 1963.45-A953  1963 
     
    Taleisnik, J.: The palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve and the approach to the carpal tunnel. An anatomical study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 1212-1217, Sept. 1973.55-A1212  1973 
     
    Tanzer, R. C.: The carpal-tunnel syndrome. A clinical and anatomical study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,41-A: 626-634, June 1959.41-A626  1959 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center