0
Articles   |    
Repair of the Defect in Spondylolysis. Durable Fixation with Pedicle Screws and Laminar Hooks*
MASAAKI KAKIUCHI, M.D.†, OSAKA, JAPAN
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1997; 79:818-825 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Direct repair of a defect in the pars interarticularis was performed with use of bone-grafting and internal fixation with a pedicle screw, rod, and laminar hook in order to achieve a higher prevalence of osseous union than that achieved with commonly used procedures. The configuration of the head of the screw, which is designed to allow it to connect with the rod at the necessary angle, simplified the placement of the rod. The procedure was performed in sixteen patients who had a bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis with or without grade-I or II spondylolisthesis, had had failure of non-operative treatment, and had had temporary relief of pain after the area of the defect in the pars interarticularis had been infiltrated with lidocaine. Concomitant degeneration of a disc was not a criterion for exclusion. The patients were followed for an average of twenty-five months (range, twenty-four to twenty-eight months). The average age at the time of the operation was thirty-two years (range, twelve to sixty years). Six patients had findings of nerve-root compression on myelography with computerized tomographic scanning, and the bone spurs overlying the affected nerve root around the defect in the pars interarticularis were removed with an ultrasonic osteotome through a small window. The implant was removed about one year after the operation. Oblique radiographs showed osseous union in the previous defect bilaterally in all sixteen patients. Thirteen patients were free of symptoms, and three had major improvement with occasional low-back pain. None had a complication, such as infection, breakage of the implant, or irritation of a nerve root.The method used for direct repair of the defect of the pars interarticularis in these patients proved to be simple and effective. Relief of symptoms appeared to depend on decompression of the affected nerve root, if one was involved, and on preoperative prediction of the locus of the symptoms by infiltration of the pars interarticularis with lidocaine.

Figures in this Article
    Most patients who have spondylolysis respond to non-operative management, but a small percentage of such patients need an operation. Posterolateral arthrodesis with or without excision of the posterior elements has been the usual procedure. However, the disadvantage of that operation is the resulting loss of a motion segment at the level that fuses, which increases the load on the adjoining segment. Repair of the spondylolytic defect does not have such a disadvantage.
    A variety of techniques for repair of the defect have been described, including bone-grafting with the placement of wire, screws, or hook-screws across the pars interarticularis3,6,7,9-12. Although the number of patients in those studies was small, the authors reported a high rate of complications3,6,7,9-12. Hefti et al. reported that only nineteen (58 per cent) of thirty-three patients who had fixation with a hook-screw had a clear union bilaterally and six (18 per cent) had pseudarthrosis bilaterally. The hook-screw was found to be loose in seven of fourteen patients who had a second operation. In a study of twenty-two patients who had had repair of the defect with wire fixation, Johnson and Thompson reported that five patients (23 per cent) had pseudarthrosis of the site of the defect bilaterally or unilaterally and two of those patients had a poor clinical result. Pedersen and Hagen, in a study of eighteen patients who had had repair of the defect with screw fixation, reported that three patients had pseudarthrosis of the site of the defect bilaterally or unilaterally with a poor clinical result and fifteen had union of the defect bilaterally with a good or excellent clinical result. In the three patients who had a poor result, all six sites of pseudarthrosis had a radiolucent area around the screw or were associated with improper placement of the screw, or both. Thus, these studies showed that pseudarthrosis may develop after repair of the defect and it often leads to a poor clinical result. In addition, pseudarthrosis was found to be associated with use of an insufficient construct for internal fixation. These results suggest that more rigid placement of the screw into the vertebra leads to a lower prevalence of pseudarthrosis and a better clinical result.
    I repaired spondylolytic defects with a combination of a pedicle screw, rod, and laminar hook in order to achieve more rigid internal fixation. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this method for repair of a defect of the pars interarticularis in spondylolysis.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

    †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543, Japan.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
    †Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, 10-31 Kitayama-cho, Tennoji-ku, Osaka 543, Japan.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    CaseGender, Age at Operation (Yrs.)Occupation or Sports ActivityAffected VertebraPreoperative SymptomsDuration of Symptoms before Operation (Mos.)Postoperative Duration of Follow-up (Mos.)
    1M, 19BoxerL5Low-back pain on right926
    2M, 32Employee in wholesaleL3Low-back pain on right,2625
    marketnumbness in anterior
    part of left thigh
    3M, 37Police officerL3 and L4Pain in low back and826
    posterior part of thigh
    bilaterally
    4M, 27MillwrightL5Pain in low back and right1225
    buttock
    5M, 47Police officerL5Low-back pain3628
    6M, 27ElectricianL5Pain in low back and724
    posterior part of left
    lower limb
    7M, 24Employee in wholesaleL5Low-back pain626
    market
    8M, 58Police officerL5Pain in left buttock,2624
    numbness in lateral part
    of left leg and foot
    9F, 22SalespersonL5Low-back pain on left4825
    10M, 48Police officerL5Low-back pain24027
    11M, 16Student, handball playerL5Low-back pain1024
    12M, 25SalespersonL5Low-back pain1826
    13M, 19Student, baseball playerL5Low-back pain on left,3624
    numbness in lateral part
    of left thigh
    14F, 12StudentL2 and L3Low-back pain, weakness724
    of quadriceps
    15F, 46HomemakerL5Pain in low back and3624
    lateral part of left lower limb
    16M, 60Employee in food industryL5Pain in right buttock and725
    posterior part of right leg
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II PREOPERATIVE FINDINGS AND CLINICAL RESULTS
    *NA = not applicable.
        CaseFindings on Myelography with Computerized TomographyDegenerative Osteoarthrosis of Facet Joints on Computerized TomographyVertebral Slippage (Per cent )Disc Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging5  Decompression of Nerve Root  Subjective ResultReturn to Previous ActivityReturn to Previous Occupation*
    Grade Caudad to Affected VertebraGrade III, IV, or V at Other Levels (No. of Levels )
    1Normal--III-Not doneFree ofNoNA
      symptoms
    2Normal--II-Not doneFree ofYesYes
    symptoms
    3Normal-17 in L3, lII1Not doneMajor YesYes
    9 in L4improvement
    4Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5-14III1BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    5Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5--IV-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    6Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5 and compression of thecal sac at L4-L5L4-L5, bilateral-III-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    7Normal-10III1Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    8Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5, compression of thecal sac at L4-L5, and lateral stenosis at L3-L4L3-L4 and L4-L5, bilateral9V4Bilateral at L4-L5Free of symptomsYesYes
    9Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    10Normal-16V2Not doneMajor improvementYesYes
    11Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    12Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    13Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    14Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    15Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5--III-BilateralMajor improvementYesNA
    16Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5L4-L5, bilateral32V-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE III POSTOPERATIVE RELIEF OF SYMPTOMS ACCORDING TO PREOPERATIVE GRADE OF DISC DEGENERATION
    No. of Patients
    PreoperativeFree ofMajorMinor or No
    Grade5SymptomsImprovementImprovement
                I5--
                II1--
                III42-
                IV1--
                V21-
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Photograph showing the variable-angle pedicle screw (A), laminar hook (B), rod (C), eyebolt (D), and variable-angle eyebolt (E). A serrated spacer attached to the variable-angle eyebolt assembly and the serrated head of the variable-angle screw allow the screw to be placed at 6-degree increments. Hence, the variable-angle screw offers fixation in many degrees of angulation from the rod.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 2-A through 2-E: Drawings showing the operative procedure. Fig. 2-A: The recipient bed is prepared for the autogenous cancellous-bone graft.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B When nerve-root decompression is necessary, the posterior elements overlying the affected nerve root are excised.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C A variable-angle pedicle screw and a bone graft are inserted.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-D When the multifidus muscle is too tight for insertion of the pedicle screw through the midline approach, the paraspinal approach is used.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-E The rod is attached to the head of the screw with a variable-angle eyebolt, and the laminar hook is attached to the rod with an eyebolt.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 3-A through 3-G: Case 4. Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Preoperative lateral and left oblique radiographs showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrows).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B Preoperative lateral and left oblique radiographs showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrows).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C Right oblique radiograph showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrow).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-D Lateral and anteroposterior radiographs made immediately after repair of the bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-E Lateral and anteroposterior radiographs made immediately after repair of the bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-F Left oblique and right oblique radiographs, made nineteen months after the operation, showing the area of the defects (arrows) filled with new bone and remodeled to a normal appearance of the pars interarticularis. Minimum sclerosis is present.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-G Left oblique and right oblique radiographs, made nineteen months after the operation, showing the area of the defects (arrows) filled with new bone and remodeled to a normal appearance of the pars interarticularis. Minimum sclerosis is present.

    Patients

    Indications for the procedure included bilateral spondylolysis with or without grade-I or II spondylolisthesis8; persistent low-back pain that prevented the patient from performing activities of daily living, work, or sports; failure of non-operative treatment for a minimum of six months; and temporary relief of low-back pain after infiltration of 0.2 to 0.3 milliliter of 2 per cent lidocaine into each defect of the pars interarticularis13. (The lidocaine was injected bilaterally.) Patients were included in the study if they had evidence of degenerative osteoarthrosis of a facet joint or narrowing of a disc space and had pain in the lower limb, physical signs of nerve-root compression, or findings of nerve-root compression on myelography with computerized tomographic scanning.
    Between July 1993 and January 1994, sixteen patients (eighteen vertebrae) were managed with this method (Tables I and II). None of the patients were lost to follow-up during the period of the study. The average duration of follow-up was twenty-five months (range, twenty-four to twenty-eight months). The average age at the operation was thirty-two years (range, twelve to sixty years). Five patients were forty years old or more. Two patients had repair of the spondylolysis at two levels. Seven vertebrae had an average slip of 15 per cent (range, 9 to 32 per cent), and eleven vertebrae had no slip. Eight patients had physical symptoms or signs in the lower limb, including unilateral pain (three patients), bilateral pain (one patient), unilateral numbness (three patients), and motor weakness in the left quadriceps without pain or numbness (one patient). None of the patients had a sensory deficit.
    Degeneration of the disc was graded according to the findings on magnetic resonance imaging5. Grade I indicates a normal disc; grade II, horizontal dark bands in the nucleus pulposus extending across the annulus fibrosus centrally and areas of increased signal intensity in the annulus fibrosus; grade III, an annulus fibrosus that is indistinguishable from the nucleus pulposus, diminished signal intensity of the nucleus pulposus, and small, dark projections from margins of the vertebral body; grade IV, focal defects in the line of the end plate and projections of less than two millimeters from the margins of the vertebral bodies with the same intensity as marrow from the margins of the vertebral body; and grade V, gross loss of the height of the disc and projections of more than two millimeters from the margins of the vertebral bodies.
    All patients had preoperative myelography with computerized tomographic scanning and magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. Grade-V degeneration of the disc at the level just caudad to the affected vertebra was seen in three patients on magnetic resonance imaging. Computerized tomographic scanning demonstrated degenerative osteoarthrosis of the facet joint bilaterally just cephalad to the defect of the pars interarticularis in three patients. Six patients (Cases 4, 5, 6, 8, 15, and 16) were found to have nerve-root compression around the defect bilaterally on myelography with computerized tomographic scanning. The nerve root was decompressed in those patients whether or not the patient had physical symptoms or signs in the lower limb. When a patient had normal findings on myelography with computerized tomographic scanning, decompression of the nerve root was not performed even if the patient had physical symptoms or signs in the lower limb (Cases 2, 3, 13, and 14) (Tables I and II).
    The implant was removed approximately one year after the operation, which is the standard procedure at my institution when pedicle screws are used for arthrodesis of the lumbar spine. Osseous union of the bilateral defect was determined on oblique radiographs made at least three months after removal of the implant.

    Operative Technique and Postoperative Care

    The Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation system (TSRH Spinal System; Sofamor Danek, Memphis, Tennessee) was used for repairing the defect of the pars interarticularis on each side. The system consists of a variable-angle screw that is 5.5 or 6.5 millimeters in diameter, a laminar hook, and a 4.7-millimeter-diameter rod (Fig. 1). The 5.5-millimeter-diameter screw was used in only one patient (Case 14). An eyebolt connects the hook to the rod, and a variable-angle eyebolt connects the rod to the variable-angle screw (Fig. 1).
    The patients were placed in the prone position on a Hall frame. The involved vertebra, including the defect of the pars interarticularis, was exposed through a midline posterior incision. The fibrous tissue in and behind the defect was removed with a Cobb elevator, a rongeur, or a curet. In order to maintain the length of the pars interarticularis, the sclerotic bone on both sides of the defect was not removed. The lateral aspect of the inferior half of the superior articular process and the medial third of the posterior aspect of the transverse process were cleaned of soft tissue without interfering with the capsule of the facet. The posterior aspect of the pars interarticularis and the adjoining portion of the lamina were decorticated with use of a small chisel (Fig. 2-A). To maintain the strength of the osseous structure, which sustains the pedicle screw, the lateral and inferior aspects of the superior articular process were not decorticated. When nerve-root decompression was indicated, the bone spurs overlying the affected nerve root were removed with an ultrasonic osteotome (Sumisonic ME-2400; Sumitomo Bakelite, Tokyo, Japan) (Fig. 2-B). In order to achieve a wider area for bone-grafting, the starting point for the insertion of the pedicle screw was slightly more cephalad than usual—that is, it was near the intersection of a vertical line through the center axis of the pedicle and a horizontal line at the superior border of the pedicle (Fig. 2-C). The screw was directed slightly caudad so that it entered the vertebral body at the center axis of the pedicle. After insertion of the pedicle screw, strips of cancellous bone were taken from the posterior aspect of the ilium, usually through the same incision in the skin. The cancellous bone was packed as an onlay graft from the medial third of the transverse process to the decorticated portion of the lamina to form a sheet of bone about one centimeter thick (Fig. 2-C). When the posterior elements just overlying the affected nerve root were removed, as has been described, free fat tissue was buried in the defect above the nerve root to prevent the bone graft from falling onto the nerve root.
    When the multifidus muscle was too tight for insertion of the pedicle screw through this midline approach, which is more common at the fifth lumbar level than at more cephalad levels, the starting point for insertion of the pedicle screw on the superior articular process was exposed again through the paraspinal approach (Fig. 2-D). This approach was made over the pedicle through the same midline incision in the skin, and additional small fascial incisions were made two or three centimeters lateral to the midline. The finger of the surgeon was inserted through the natural cleavage plane between the multifidus and longissimus muscles to the insertion point over the pedicle15.
    The rod was cut to the appropriate length and attached to the head of the variable-angle screw. Then the laminar hook was inserted to the inferior edge of the lamina and attached to the rod (Fig. 2-E). To reduce the size of the defect of the pars interarticularis, mild compression force was applied between the hook and the head of the screw with the hook compressor before the lock nut was tightened in the eyebolt. These procedures were repeated on the contralateral side.
    Postoperatively, the first two patients were kept in bed for seven days, but the rest of the patients were allowed to stand and walk on the second or third day. All of the patients wore a lumbosacral hard corset for two months. Six months after the operation, the patients were allowed unrestricted activity. The duration that a patient had to restrict activities or wear a corset was determined empirically.
    Radiographic assessment showed osseous union in the defect in the pars interarticularis bilaterally in all sixteen patients (Figs. 3-A, 3-B, 3-C, 3-D, 3-E, 3-F, 3-G). There were no complications, such as wound infection, breakage of the implant, or irritation of the nerve root. At the most recent follow-up examination, thirteen patients were free of symptoms and three patients had major improvement (Table II). Of those three patients, one (Case 3) had residual symptoms of low-back pain and occasional stiffness after sports activities, another (Case 10) had low-back pain only on rising in the morning, and the third (Case 15) had low-back pain occasionally on physical activity. These residual symptoms did not prevent the patients from returning to a previous activity. None had symptoms in the lower limb. The three patients, who were thirty-seven, forty-eight, and forty-six years old, had had grade-III or V degeneration of the disc just caudad to the affected vertebra on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (Table III).
    The Buck screw, Morscher hook-screw, and Scott wiring techniques are the most commonly used methods for repair of a spondylolytic defect3,9,12. Although the Buck-screw and Morscher-hook-screw techniques have been associated with a low prevalence of pseudarthrosis in patients sixteen years old or less, older patients have been shown to need more extensive fixation16. In a study of the results of the Morscher technique in nine patients who ranged in age from twenty to forty-seven years (average, 35.8 years), five patients had non-union, three had loosening of the screw, and one had breakage of the screw4. Four of them had a reoperation. In a study of fixation with the wiring technique, the authors recommended that repair of a spondylolytic defect be limited to patients who are less than thirty years old2. In addition, although the Buck method appears to be simple and durable in theory, it is technically difficult, with a slight error resulting in failure1.
    Five of the sixteen patients in the present study were more than forty years old and the oldest was sixty years old. A solid osseous union of the defect was achieved in all of the patients without any failure or loosening of the implant. The good results achieved in older patients is the main difference between the current study and previous studies, which have shown good results in young patients but poor results in patients who were more than twenty years old. The success in the present study may be due to rigid internal fixation with use of the pedicle-screw system and a sufficient amount of autogenous cancellous-bone graft as an onlay across the pars interarticularis. A possible problem with this method may be that insertion of the pedicle screw necessitates extensive retraction of the paravertebral muscle. Also, the bulky head of the screw may irritate the surrounding soft tissue. However, the additional small incision through the paraspinal approach provides good exposure of the osseous structures for insertion of the screw without excessive retraction of the muscles. Much less irritation or compression of the muscle occurs when the head of the screw is buried in the space between the multifidus and longissimus muscles than when it is inserted through the midline approach alone. In fact, the use of the pedicle screw in the patients in the present study did not cause any problems or complications.
    The rationale for direct repair of the defect of the pars interarticularis is that the defect is the main locus of pain. In the present series, as in a previous report13, infiltration of lidocaine into the defect seemed to enable accurate prediction of the patients who would have relief of pain despite concomitant degeneration of the disc. The nerve root just caudad to the defect of the pars interarticularis may be another locus of symptoms. The bone spurs that proliferate around the defect sometimes compress or irritate the underlying nerve root. Removal of the spurs with an ultrasonic osteotome decompressed the affected nerve root through the minimum area of osteotomy and interfered little with the integrity of the pars interarticularis and the facet. Relief of symptoms in the patients in the present study depended on the preoperative prediction of the main locus of pain and on the adequate decompression of the affected nerve root, if it was necessary. My method may be useful in older patients who have spondylolytic spondylolisthesis with degenerative disc disease or degenerative osteoarthrosis, or both. However, if the patient does not have a positive response to the injection of lidocaine, decompression and posterior interbody arthrodesis or posterolateral arthrodesis may be indicated.
    Another system for repair of the spondylolytic defect with use of a pedicle screw and a hook has been described in a preliminary report14. When that system is used, it is necessary to bend the rod during the repair. It has been my experience that inappropriate bending of the rod places the lamina in an incorrect position, which results in misalignment of the facet joints. The head of the variable-angle screw used in the present study is designed to connect to the rod at any angle. Thus, the rod does not have to be bent and the operative procedure is easier.
    In conclusion, the use of the variable-angle pedicle screw, rod, and laminar hook with a sufficient amount of onlay graft across the spondylolytic defect was a simple and effective method for repairing spondylolytic defects. The preoperative evaluation of the locus of the symptoms by infiltration of the pars interarticularis with a local anesthetic may allow accurate prediction of a successful result. Decompression of the affected nerve root, if it is necessary, through the small window further aids in the relief of symptoms.
    NOTE: The author thanks Dr. Keiro Ono, M.D., Director of the Osaka Koseinenkin Hospital and Professor Emeritus of the Osaka University Medical School, for the critical review of this paper.
    Beckers, L.: Buck's operation for treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop. Belgica,52: 819-823, 1986.52819  1986 
     
    Bradford, D. S., and Iza, J.: Repair of the defect in spondylolysis or minimal degrees of spondylolisthesis by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Spine,10: 673-679, 1985.10673  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Buck, J. E.: Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,52-B(3): 432-437, 1970.52-B(3)432  1970 
     
    Dreyzin, V., and Esses, S. I.: A comparative analysis of spondylolysis repair. Spine,19: 1909-1915, 1994.191909  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Eyre, D.; Benya, P.; Buckwalter, J.; Caterson, B.; Heinegard, D.; Oegema, T.; Pearce, R.; Pope, M.; and Urban, J.: Intervertebral disk. Part B: Basic science perspectives. In New Perspectives on Low Back Pain, pp. 147-207. Edited by J. W. Frymoyer and S. L. Gordon. Park Ridge, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1989. 
     
    Hefti, F.; Seelig, W.; and Morscher, E.: Repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook-screw. Internat. Orthop.,16: 81-85, 1992.1681  1992 
     
    Johnson, G. V., and Thompson, A. G.: The Scott wiring technique for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(3): 426-430, 1992.74-B(3)426  1992 
     
    Meyerding, H. W.: Spondylolisthesis. Surg., Gynec. and Obstet.,54: 371-377, 1932.54371  1932 
     
    Morscher, E.; Gerber, B.; and Fasel, J.: Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,103: 175-178, 1984.103175  1984 
     
    Nicol, R. O., and Scott, J. H.: Lytic spondylolysis. Repair by wiring. Spine,11: 1027-1030, 1986.111027  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Pedersen, A. K., and Hagen, R.: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Treatment by internal fixation and bone-grafting of the defect. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-A: 15-24, Jan. 1988.70-A15  1988 
     
    Scott, J. H. S.: The Edinburgh repair of isthmic (group II) spondylolysis. In Proceedings of the British Orthopaedic Association. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-B(3): 491, 1987.69-B(3)491  1987 
     
    Suh, P. B.; Esses, S. I.; and Kostuik, J. P.: Repair of pars interarticularis defect. The prognostic value of pars infiltration. Spine,16(8S): 445-S448, 1991.16(8S)445  1991 
     
    Tokuhashi, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Wakabayashi, K.; and Sano, S.: [Repair of the defect in the pars interarticularis by segmental pedicular screw hook fixation.]. J. Japan Spine Res. Soc.,5: 342, 1994.5342  1994 
     
    Wiltse, L. L., and Spencer, C. W.: New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine,13: 696-706, 1988.13696  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Winter, M., and Jani, L.: Results of screw osteosynthesis in spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Arch. Orthop. and Trauma Surg.,108: 96-99, 1989.10896  1989 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Photograph showing the variable-angle pedicle screw (A), laminar hook (B), rod (C), eyebolt (D), and variable-angle eyebolt (E). A serrated spacer attached to the variable-angle eyebolt assembly and the serrated head of the variable-angle screw allow the screw to be placed at 6-degree increments. Hence, the variable-angle screw offers fixation in many degrees of angulation from the rod.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 2-A through 2-E: Drawings showing the operative procedure. Fig. 2-A: The recipient bed is prepared for the autogenous cancellous-bone graft.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B When nerve-root decompression is necessary, the posterior elements overlying the affected nerve root are excised.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C A variable-angle pedicle screw and a bone graft are inserted.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-D When the multifidus muscle is too tight for insertion of the pedicle screw through the midline approach, the paraspinal approach is used.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-E The rod is attached to the head of the screw with a variable-angle eyebolt, and the laminar hook is attached to the rod with an eyebolt.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Figs. 3-A through 3-G: Case 4. Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Preoperative lateral and left oblique radiographs showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrows).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B Preoperative lateral and left oblique radiographs showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrows).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C Right oblique radiograph showing the defect of the pars interarticularis (arrow).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-D Lateral and anteroposterior radiographs made immediately after repair of the bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-E Lateral and anteroposterior radiographs made immediately after repair of the bilateral defect of the pars interarticularis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-F Left oblique and right oblique radiographs, made nineteen months after the operation, showing the area of the defects (arrows) filled with new bone and remodeled to a normal appearance of the pars interarticularis. Minimum sclerosis is present.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-G Left oblique and right oblique radiographs, made nineteen months after the operation, showing the area of the defects (arrows) filled with new bone and remodeled to a normal appearance of the pars interarticularis. Minimum sclerosis is present.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    CaseGender, Age at Operation (Yrs.)Occupation or Sports ActivityAffected VertebraPreoperative SymptomsDuration of Symptoms before Operation (Mos.)Postoperative Duration of Follow-up (Mos.)
    1M, 19BoxerL5Low-back pain on right926
    2M, 32Employee in wholesaleL3Low-back pain on right,2625
    marketnumbness in anterior
    part of left thigh
    3M, 37Police officerL3 and L4Pain in low back and826
    posterior part of thigh
    bilaterally
    4M, 27MillwrightL5Pain in low back and right1225
    buttock
    5M, 47Police officerL5Low-back pain3628
    6M, 27ElectricianL5Pain in low back and724
    posterior part of left
    lower limb
    7M, 24Employee in wholesaleL5Low-back pain626
    market
    8M, 58Police officerL5Pain in left buttock,2624
    numbness in lateral part
    of left leg and foot
    9F, 22SalespersonL5Low-back pain on left4825
    10M, 48Police officerL5Low-back pain24027
    11M, 16Student, handball playerL5Low-back pain1024
    12M, 25SalespersonL5Low-back pain1826
    13M, 19Student, baseball playerL5Low-back pain on left,3624
    numbness in lateral part
    of left thigh
    14F, 12StudentL2 and L3Low-back pain, weakness724
    of quadriceps
    15F, 46HomemakerL5Pain in low back and3624
    lateral part of left lower limb
    16M, 60Employee in food industryL5Pain in right buttock and725
    posterior part of right leg
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II PREOPERATIVE FINDINGS AND CLINICAL RESULTS
    *NA = not applicable.
        CaseFindings on Myelography with Computerized TomographyDegenerative Osteoarthrosis of Facet Joints on Computerized TomographyVertebral Slippage (Per cent )Disc Degeneration on Magnetic Resonance Imaging5  Decompression of Nerve Root  Subjective ResultReturn to Previous ActivityReturn to Previous Occupation*
    Grade Caudad to Affected VertebraGrade III, IV, or V at Other Levels (No. of Levels )
    1Normal--III-Not doneFree ofNoNA
      symptoms
    2Normal--II-Not doneFree ofYesYes
    symptoms
    3Normal-17 in L3, lII1Not doneMajor YesYes
    9 in L4improvement
    4Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5-14III1BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    5Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5--IV-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    6Thinning of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5 and compression of thecal sac at L4-L5L4-L5, bilateral-III-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    7Normal-10III1Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    8Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5, compression of thecal sac at L4-L5, and lateral stenosis at L3-L4L3-L4 and L4-L5, bilateral9V4Bilateral at L4-L5Free of symptomsYesYes
    9Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    10Normal-16V2Not doneMajor improvementYesYes
    11Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    12Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesYes
    13Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    14Normal--I-Not doneFree of symptomsYesNA
    15Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5--III-BilateralMajor improvementYesNA
    16Absence of nerve-root sleeve bilaterally at L5L4-L5, bilateral32V-BilateralFree of symptomsYesYes
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE III POSTOPERATIVE RELIEF OF SYMPTOMS ACCORDING TO PREOPERATIVE GRADE OF DISC DEGENERATION
    No. of Patients
    PreoperativeFree ofMajorMinor or No
    Grade5SymptomsImprovementImprovement
                I5--
                II1--
                III42-
                IV1--
                V21-
    Beckers, L.: Buck's operation for treatment of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Acta Orthop. Belgica,52: 819-823, 1986.52819  1986 
     
    Bradford, D. S., and Iza, J.: Repair of the defect in spondylolysis or minimal degrees of spondylolisthesis by segmental wire fixation and bone grafting. Spine,10: 673-679, 1985.10673  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Buck, J. E.: Direct repair of the defect in spondylolisthesis. Preliminary report. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,52-B(3): 432-437, 1970.52-B(3)432  1970 
     
    Dreyzin, V., and Esses, S. I.: A comparative analysis of spondylolysis repair. Spine,19: 1909-1915, 1994.191909  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Eyre, D.; Benya, P.; Buckwalter, J.; Caterson, B.; Heinegard, D.; Oegema, T.; Pearce, R.; Pope, M.; and Urban, J.: Intervertebral disk. Part B: Basic science perspectives. In New Perspectives on Low Back Pain, pp. 147-207. Edited by J. W. Frymoyer and S. L. Gordon. Park Ridge, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1989. 
     
    Hefti, F.; Seelig, W.; and Morscher, E.: Repair of lumbar spondylolysis with a hook-screw. Internat. Orthop.,16: 81-85, 1992.1681  1992 
     
    Johnson, G. V., and Thompson, A. G.: The Scott wiring technique for direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(3): 426-430, 1992.74-B(3)426  1992 
     
    Meyerding, H. W.: Spondylolisthesis. Surg., Gynec. and Obstet.,54: 371-377, 1932.54371  1932 
     
    Morscher, E.; Gerber, B.; and Fasel, J.: Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis by bone grafting and direct stabilization of spondylolysis by means of a hook screw. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,103: 175-178, 1984.103175  1984 
     
    Nicol, R. O., and Scott, J. H.: Lytic spondylolysis. Repair by wiring. Spine,11: 1027-1030, 1986.111027  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Pedersen, A. K., and Hagen, R.: Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis. Treatment by internal fixation and bone-grafting of the defect. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-A: 15-24, Jan. 1988.70-A15  1988 
     
    Scott, J. H. S.: The Edinburgh repair of isthmic (group II) spondylolysis. In Proceedings of the British Orthopaedic Association. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-B(3): 491, 1987.69-B(3)491  1987 
     
    Suh, P. B.; Esses, S. I.; and Kostuik, J. P.: Repair of pars interarticularis defect. The prognostic value of pars infiltration. Spine,16(8S): 445-S448, 1991.16(8S)445  1991 
     
    Tokuhashi, Y.; Matsuzaki, H.; Wakabayashi, K.; and Sano, S.: [Repair of the defect in the pars interarticularis by segmental pedicular screw hook fixation.]. J. Japan Spine Res. Soc.,5: 342, 1994.5342  1994 
     
    Wiltse, L. L., and Spencer, C. W.: New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine,13: 696-706, 1988.13696  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Winter, M., and Jani, L.: Results of screw osteosynthesis in spondylolysis and low-grade spondylolisthesis. Arch. Orthop. and Trauma Surg.,108: 96-99, 1989.10896  1989 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    The imaging and management of nonconsecutive pars interarticularis defects: a case report and review of literature.
    The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society: Issue date- 2011 Dec
    Direct repair of spondylolysis presenting after correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society: Issue date- 2011 Feb
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center