JBJS | The Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Occult Fracture of the Radial Neck. A Case Report*

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Volume 80, Issue 9

Articles | September 01, 1998

The Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Occult Fracture of the Radial Neck. A Case Report*

RICHARD D. LAZAR, M.D.†; PETER M. WATERS, M.D.†; DIEGO JARAMILLO, M.D.†, BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS

View Disclosures and Other Information

Investigation performed at Children's Hospital, Boston

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1998; 80:1361-1364

5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Article

Figures

References

text A A A

Introduction

Introduction | Case Report | Discussion | References

Fractures of the radial neck have been reported to account for approximately 6 per cent of all fractures about the elbow in children; in the combined series reported by Wilkins et al., for example, 289 of 4490 fractures about the elbow in children involved the radial neck¹⁰. Fractures about the elbow in skeletally immature patients are often difficult to assess on plain radiographs because of the absence of, or variations in the appearance of, the secondary centers of ossification of the distal aspect of the humerus and the proximal aspects of the radius and olecranon. Clinical examination may be inconclusive because of diffuse swelling, the absence of localized tenderness, and the inability of a young patient to identify the site of pain appropriately.

Additional studies, such as stress radiography, arthrography^1,4, and magnetic resonance imaging³, often are needed in order to diagnose the injury accurately. However, these procedures are associated with a number of disadvantages; specifically, stress radiography can be painful for the patient, arthrography is invasive and often necessitates the use of sedation or anesthesia, and magnetic resonance imaging is relatively expensive. Ultrasonography has been advocated as an alternative method for the evaluation of injuries of the elbow in children because of its non-invasive nature and relatively low cost. Barr and Babcock as well as Markowitz et al. demonstrated the usefulness of ultrasonography in accurately identifying the unossified epiphysis of the distal aspect of the humerus and the proximal aspects of the ulna and radius. Davidson et al. subsequently demonstrated the ability of ultrasonography to provide diagnostic images of physeal separations and supracondylar fractures of the distal humeral epiphysis.

This case report illustrates the usefulness of ultrasonography in the evaluation of an injury of the elbow in a skeletally immature patient who had abnormal findings on physical examination. Plain radiographs were inconclusive because of the absence of the secondary centers of ossification of the radial head (Fig. 1-A). Ultrasonography defined the nature of the injury and helped to determine the appropriate treatment.

*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

†Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (R. D. L. and P. M. W.) and Radiology (D. J.), Harvard Medical School, Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02115. E-mail address for Dr. Waters: waters@a1.tch.harvard.edu.

*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1:: Figs. 1-A through 1-F: Imaging studies and line drawings demonstrating the appearance of the proximal aspect of the radius of the patient described in the present study. Fig. 1-A: Anteroposterior radiograph, made four weeks after the injury, showing a mild irregularity of the metaphyseal border (arrow) of the proximal aspect of the right radius. The radiographs that had been made at the time of the injury had been interpreted as normal.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-B:: Fig. 1-B Coronal ultrasonographic image of the radiocapitellar joint, showing the radial metaphysis (arrows) to be contiguous with the distal humeral epiphysis. The radial head is not visualized. C = ossification center of the capitellum.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-C:: Fig. 1-C Line drawing of the ultrasonographic image shown in Fig. 1-B, depicting separation of the proximal radial physis. The shaded area corresponds to cartilage, and the dotted lines indicate osseous contours obscured by shadowing. The unossified radial head is absent, and the capitellum abuts the radial metaphysis. 1 = unossified capitellum, 2 = ossification center of the capitellum, 3 = radial metaphysis, and 4 = fascial plane.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-D:: Fig. 1-D Coronal ultrasonographic image of the unaffected, left elbow, demonstrating the normal appearance of the cartilaginous radial epiphysis (arrow).

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-E:: Fig. 1-E Line drawing of the ultrasonographic image shown in Fig. 1-D. The ossification center of the capitellum is not shown. The shaded areas correspond to cartilage, and the dotted line indicates the osseous contour obscured by shadowing. 1 = unossified capitellum (partially sectioned), 2 = unossified radial head, 3 = proximal aspect of the ulna, 4 = fascial plane, and 5 = radial metaphysis.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-F:: Fig. 1-F Sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of the right radiocapitellar joint, showing the capitellum (C) to be articulating with the radial metaphysis, which has an irregular border (arrow).

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-G:: Fig. 1-G Sagittal fat-suppressed T2-weighted magnetic resonance image of the radiocapitellar joint of a different patient, an eighteen-month-old boy who had a non-displaced fracture of the distal humeral metaphysis (not shown), demonstrating the normal appearance of the unossified structures of the elbow. The contour of the unossified capitellum (C) is outlined by the joint effusion. The radial head (arrow) has the same configuration as that of the radial head in an adult, even though it is completely unossified.

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-H:: Fig. 1-H Coronal gradient-recalled-echo magnetic resonance image of the patient described in the present study, showing an ovoid fragment of cartilage corresponding with the separated radial epiphysis (*), just distal to the capitellum (C).

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-I:: Fig. 1-I Anteroposterior radiograph, made at the time of the two-year follow-up examination of the patient described in the present study, showing the beginning of ossification of the secondary center of the radial head. The radial head and neck have nearly normal anatomical alignment. There is mild widening and irregularity of the proximal radial metaphysis.

Case Report

Introduction | Case Report | Discussion | References

A twenty-two-month-old boy was admitted to another hospital for evaluation and observation after a fall from a second-floor window. Radiographs of the right elbow were interpreted as revealing no osseous abnormality, and the patient was discharged after twenty-four hours of observation. Two day later, the parents noted that the child continued to protect the right arm and that he was unable to flex or extend the elbow. Additional radiographs showed only soft-tissue swelling and no fracture. Radiographs that were made four weeks later because of persistence of the symptoms were interpreted as normal by the treating physician; in retrospect, however, these radiographs demonstrated an irregularity of the metaphysis of the proximal aspect of the radius (Fig. 1-A).

Eight weeks after the injury, the patient was referred to us because of persistent pain and limitation of motion of the right elbow. Physical examination revealed a 20-degree arc of flexion-extension (from 90 to 110 degrees of flexion). The arc of supination-pronation also was limited to 20 degrees (from 10 degrees of supination to 10 degrees of pronation), and there was pain at the extremes of motion. Ultrasonography demonstrated displacement of the proximal radial epiphysis (Figs. 1-B, 1-C, 1-D through 1-E). The diagnosis was confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging (Figs. 1-F, 1-G, and 1-H).

The patient was taken to the operating room for open reduction and internal fixation of the physeal fracture of the radial neck. Intraoperatively, the physis and the articular surface of the radial head were found to be completely displaced and the radial metaphysis was seen to be articulating with the capitellum. The radial head was attached to the radial neck by a thin band of periosteal tissue. The fracture was reduced, with particular care being taken to maintain the periosteal attachment in order to preserve the blood supply to the radial head. The reduction was maintained when the forearm was rotated from a position of full supination to one of full pronation, and it was stabilized with a repair of the adjacent soft tissues and the application of an above-the-elbow cast.

The cast was worn for five weeks, and a sling was used for an additional two weeks. Eight weeks after the reduction, the patient had a 90-degree arc of flexion-extension (from 30 to 120 degrees of flexion) and a 75-degree arc of supination-pronation (from 10 degrees of supination to 65 degrees of pronation). At the two-year follow-up examination, the patient had a full range of flexion-extension and a 105-degree arc of supination-pronation (from 25 degrees of supination to 80 degrees of pronation). Radiographs showed the fracture to be healed, and there was nearly normal anatomical alignment of the radial head and neck (Fig. 1-I).

Discussion

Introduction | Case Report | Discussion | References

It is often difficult to evaluate the nature of an injury of the elbow in a skeletally immature patient with use of plain radiographs because of the wide variation in the chronological appearance of the six cartilaginous secondary centers of ossification about the elbow⁷. Usually, the capitellum appears between the ages of one and two years; the radial head, between two and three years; the medial epicondyle, between five and six years; the trochlea, between nine and ten years; the olecranon, between seven and nine years; and the lateral epicondyle, at ten years¹¹.

When radiographs of the injured elbow appear normal, radiographs of the contralateral elbow are often helpful for determining the presence of any asymmetry. Murphy and Siegel discussed the differential diagnoses that should be considered when abnormal elevation of the anterior or posterior fat pad is seen on a lateral radiograph of the elbow. Fraser described the risk of missing a displaced fracture of the radial head when the radiographic findings are interpreted as normal. Therefore, additional diagnostic studies are necessary when a fracture of the radial neck is suspected clinically. Radiographs made with the application of mediolateral stress can be considered, but the application of stress causes pain and is associated with the risk of physeal injury. An arthrogram is often useful for defining intra-articular involvement in a young patient who has an unossified condylar physeal center⁴. The disadvantage of arthrography of the elbow is its invasive nature, which often necessitates the use of sedation or anesthesia. Our protocol at Children's Hospital has been to perform arthrography of the elbow with the patient under general anesthesia in the operating room at the time of operative intervention.

Ultrasonography has been found to be useful for the detection of fractures involving the entire distal humeral epiphysis in neonates and infants, in whom ossification is incomplete⁶. An examination of the unossified radial head with ultrasonography necessitates high-resolution imaging with high-frequency linear transducers. Lateral coronal and posterior sagittal approaches best define the location of the radial epiphysis. The contralateral elbow should always be examined for comparison (Figs. 1-D and 1-E).

The case of our patient illustrates the diagnostic capability of ultrasonography in the evaluation of an injury of the elbow in a skeletally immature patient who has abnormal findings on physical examination and normal findings on radiographs. The ultrasonographic diagnosis of a completely displaced proximal radial epiphysis was confirmed with magnetic resonance imaging studies. On the basis of these findings, the patient was taken to the operating room for open reduction of the fracture. We believe that the delay in the appropriate management of our patient could have been avoided if ultrasonography had been performed earlier.

References

Introduction | Case Report | Discussion | References

Akbarnia, B. A.; Silberstein, M. J.; Remde, R. J.; Graviss, F. R.; and Luisiri, A.: Arthrography in the diagnosis of fractures of the distal end of the humerus in infants. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,68-A: 599-602, April 1986.68-A599 1986

Barr, L. L., and Babcock, D. S.: Sonography of normal elbow. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,157: 793-798, 1991.157793 1991 [PubMed]

Beltran, J.; Rosenberg, Z. S.; Kawelblum, M.; Montes, L.; Bergman, A. G.; and Strongwater, A.: Pediatric elbow fractures: MRI evaluation. Skel. Radiol.,23: 277-281, 1994.23277 1994

Blane, C. E.; Kline, T. F., Jr.; Andrews, J. C.; DiPietro, M. A.; and Hensinger, R. N.: Arthrography in the posttraumatic elbow in children. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,143: 17-21, 1984.14317 1984 [PubMed]

Davidson, R. S.; Markowitz, R. I.; Dormans, J.; and Drummond, D. S.: Ultrasonographic evaluation of the elbow in infants and young children after suspected trauma. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1804-1813, Dec. 1994.76-A1804 1994

Dias, J. J.; Lamont, A. C.; and Jones, J. M.: Ultrasonic diagnosis of neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-B(5): 825-828, 1988.70-B(5)825 1988

Fraser, K. E.: Displaced fracture of the proximal end of the radius in a child. A case report of the deceptive appearance of a fragment that had rotated one hundred and eighty degrees. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 782-783, May 1995.77-A782 1995

Markowitz, R. I.; Davidson, R. S.; Harty, M. P.; Bellah, R. D.; Hubbard, A. M.; and Rosenberg, H. K.: Sonography of the elbow in infants and children. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,159: 829-833, 1992.159829 1992 [PubMed]

Murphy, W. A., and Siegel, M. J.: Elbow fat pads with new signs and extended differential diagnosis. Radiology,124: 659-665, 1977.124659 1977 [PubMed]

Wilkins, K. E., and Chambers, H. G.: Fractures of the proximal radius and ulna. In Fractures in Children, edited by C. A. Rockwood, Jr., K. E. Wilkins, and J. H. Beaty. Ed. 4, vol. 3, p. 587. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996.

Wilkins, K. E.; Beaty, J. H.; Chambers, H. G.; and Toniolo, R. M.; Fractures and dislocations of the elbow region. In Fractures in Children, edited by C. A. Rockwood, Jr., K. E. Wilkins, and J. H. Beaty. Ed. 4, vol. 3, p. 661. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1996.

Topics

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

FIG1-D:: Fig. 1-D Coronal ultrasonographic image of the unaffected, left elbow, demonstrating the normal appearance of the cartilaginous radial epiphysis (arrow).

View Large | Download Slide(.ppt)
Add to My JBJS

Barr, L. L., and Babcock, D. S.: Sonography of normal elbow. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,157: 793-798, 1991.157793 1991 [PubMed]

Beltran, J.; Rosenberg, Z. S.; Kawelblum, M.; Montes, L.; Bergman, A. G.; and Strongwater, A.: Pediatric elbow fractures: MRI evaluation. Skel. Radiol.,23: 277-281, 1994.23277 1994

Dias, J. J.; Lamont, A. C.; and Jones, J. M.: Ultrasonic diagnosis of neonatal separation of the distal humeral epiphysis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-B(5): 825-828, 1988.70-B(5)825 1988

Murphy, W. A., and Siegel, M. J.: Elbow fat pads with new signs and extended differential diagnosis. Radiology,124: 659-665, 1977.124659 1977 [PubMed]

Accreditation Statement

These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

CME Activities Associated with This Article

Submit a Comment

Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field

Comment Author(s) * (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)

Example: John Doe

Affiliation & Institution*

Comment Title*

Comment*

Cancel

Print
PDF
Email

Recipient(s) will receive an email with a link (good for 5 Days) to 'The Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Occult Fracture of the Radial Neck. A Case Report*' and do not need to have The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery account to access the content.
Your Name:*
Example: John Doe

Email Address:* CC Me:
Enter your valid email address. Example: jdoe@example.com

Recipient's Email Address:*

Separate multiple email address with semi-colons (up to 5).

Subject:* 's The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery: 'The Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Occult Fracture of the Radial Neck. A Case Report*'
Subject for your email.

Message:

(Optional, message will truncate at 1000 characters)

Processing your request... Please Wait...

Copyright © in the material you requested is held by The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Inc. (unless otherwise noted). This email ability is provided as a courtesy, and by using it you agree that that you are requesting the material solely for personal, non-commercial use, and that it is subject to Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, Inc.'s Terms of Use. The information provided in order to email this topic will not be used to send unsolicited email, nor will it be furnished to third parties. Please refer to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Inc.'s Privacy Policy for further information.

Copyright © The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Inc. All rights reserved.
Share
Get Citation

RICHARD D. LAZAR, PETER M. WATERS, DIEGO JARAMILLO; The Use of Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Occult Fracture of the Radial Neck. A Case Report*. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. 1998 Sep;80(9):1361-1364.

Download citation file:

RIS (Zotero)

EndNote

BibTex

Medlars

ProCite

RefWorks

Reference Manager

Copyright © The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
Rights & Permissions
Sign Up for Alerts on this
Article

Processing your request... Please Wait.
Submit a Comment