0
Correspondence   |    
Correspondence
John P. Lubicky, M.D.; Henry R. Cowell, M.D., Ph.D.
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1998; 80:1398-1398 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
text A A A
TO THE EDITOR:
I am writing this letter in response to "Editorial. Wrong-Site Surgery" (80-A: 463, April 1998), by Cowell. As Cowell mentioned, the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons has initiated a campaign against wrong-site surgery. Certainly, operating on the wrong side or wrong part is a potential problem that is bad for patient care and can lead to a lawsuit. A number of methods for preventing this problem have been developed, and identification of the proper site with some sort of a marker has been recommended. However, a number of objections have been made against such marking of the operative site, apparently because of the potential for infection. I suggest a much more simple, common-sense approach, which I have used for many years. My technique is to write "NO" on the side not to be operated on in large letters with a black marker. This lettering cannot possibly interfere with the operative site, and, because it is on the contralateral limb, it does not lead to any risk of infection. This technique serves the same purpose as writing on the side to be treated, without the need to actually put anything near the planned operative site.
I just offer this as another method of preventing wrong-site surgery.
John P. Lubicky, M.D.: Shriners Hospital for Children Chicago, 2211 North Oak Park Avenue, Chicago, Illinois 60707-3392
Dr. Cowell replies:
Dr. Lubicky correctly points out that there are a number of ways to avoid wrong-site surgery. As I noted in my Editorial, I, too, used a different method than that endorsed by the Academy.
The purpose of the Editorial was to alert the readers of The Journal to the problem and to provide the Academy's recommendations for avoiding wrong-site surgery. Each physician must choose what he or she believes, in his or her hands and in his or her judgment, to be the best means of avoiding wrong-site surgery. I thank Dr. Lubicky for bringing this simple alternative method to the attention of our readers.
Henry R. Cowell, M.D., Ph.D.: Editor, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Submit a comment

Topics

Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
Antibiotic prophylaxis for arthroscopic surgery.
Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2006 Apr
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
12/22/2011
VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
12/22/2011
ME - Central Maine Medical Center
12/22/2011
Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center