0
Articles   |    
Arthrodesis with a Short Huckstep Nail as a Salvage Procedure for Failed Total Knee Arthroplasty*
KUO-AN LAI, M.D.†; WUN-JER SHEN, M.D.‡; CHYUN-YU YANG, M.D.†, TAINAN, TAIWAN
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Tainan
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1998; 80:380-8 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Arthrodesis of the knee with use of a short Huckstep nail was performed in thirty-three patients (thirty-three knees) after failure of a non-constrained total knee arthroplasty. The indication for the arthrodesis was an infection in thirty-one knees and a Charcot joint in two. Three knees had had a failed attempt at arthrodesis with use of external fixation.The Huckstep nail was inserted through the knee, retrograde into the femur, and then antegrade into the tibia. The duration of the operation averaged 104 minutes (range, sixty-five to 155 minutes). Local bone graft was used in all knees. At the time of follow-up, at an average of forty-seven months (range, eighteen to ninety-four months), thirty knees (91 per cent) had radiographic evidence of union. The average time to union was 5.2 months (range, two to ten months) after the arthrodesis. Eight knees that had a grossly purulent infection were treated with débridement, which was followed by the arthrodesis as a second-stage procedure; the other knees had a one-stage arthrodesis. Only one of the thirty-one knees that had had an infection before the arthrodesis had a recurrence after it.Arthrodesis with a short Huckstep nail provides immediate axial and rotational stability and allows weight-bearing without use of external support as well as placement of the knee in a slightly flexed and valgus position. In addition, the nail does not migrate and it may be used even when there is a standard-size prosthesis in the ipsilateral hip.

Figures in this Article
    Revision arthroplasty is the typical treatment for a failed total knee arthroplasty, but it is not always feasible in knees that have an infection or a Charcot arthropathy2. Thus, alternative techniques must be used. These include antibiotic suppression, débridement, resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and amputation12. Arthrodesis is indicated when revision arthroplasty is not advisable because of a poorly controlled infection with a virulent organism, problems with soft-tissue coverage, severe loss of bone stock, a deficient extensor mechanism, extreme ligamentous instability, or a high functional demand in a young patient.
    Techniques of arthrodesis include external fixation, intramedullary nailing, and fixation with a plate. Of these techniques, intramedullary nailing has been shown to result in the highest rate of fusion4,12. However, the popular method, in which a long curved Küntscher nail is inserted through the piriformis fossa to the distal part of the tibia, is technically demanding. In addition, a long operative time, a large amount of blood loss, and migration of the nail are common5,6.
    Since 1988, we have used a technique in which a Huckstep nail (Downs Surgical, Sheffield, England) is advanced in a retrograde fashion through an incision about the knee. The purpose of the present paper was to describe the technique, outcome, advantages, and complications of arthrodesis with the Huckstep nail after a failed total knee arthroplasty.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

    †Department of Orthopaedics, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Number 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, Taiwan.

    ‡Po-Cheng Orthopaedic Institute, 100 Po-Ai 2nd Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. E-mail address: w2212@ms14.hinet.net.

    *No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
    †Department of Orthopaedics, National Cheng Kung University Medical Center, Number 138 Sheng-Li Road, Tainan, Taiwan.
    ‡Po-Cheng Orthopaedic Institute, 100 Po-Ai 2nd Road, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. E-mail address: w2212@ms14.hinet.net.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    *NA = not applicable.
    CaseGender, Age (Yrs.)SideOriginal DiagnosisIndication for ArthrodesisStatus of Infection*BacteriaDuration of Operation (Mins.)ResultTime to Union (Mos.)Complications
    1F, 67LPost-traumatic osteoarthrosisPoor soft tissuePurulentS. aureus155Union8None
    2M, 71LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicEnterococcus120Union6None
    3M, 73ROsteoarthrosisCharcot jointNA95Union10None
    4M, 68LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronicS. epidermidis110Union4None
    5M, 61RPost-traumatic osteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. aureus105Union2None
    6F, 74LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus130Union6Broken screws
    7M, 71ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis140Union6None
    8F, 63LOsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisQuiescent70Union4Screws backed out
    9M, 69LOsteoarthrosisCharcot jointNA125Non-unionBroken nail
    10F, 72LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicPseudomonas aeruginosa110Union4None
    11F, 73ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus and Proteus mirabilis120Non-union
    12F, 67ROsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissuePurulentE. coli75Union6Screws backed out, pain
    13F, 74RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionPurulentS. aureus80Union4Screws backed out
    14F, 64LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus105Union2None
    15F, 65LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionPurulentS. epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa80Union4None
    16F, 66LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronic110Union6None
    17F, 66RRheumatoid arthritisInstabilityChronic130Union2None
    18M, 68RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionPurulentS. aureus90Union10Recurrent infection and screws backed out
    19M, 62LOsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisChronicPseudomonas aeruginosa65Union2None
    20F, 74ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus120Union8None
    21M, 67ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus110Non-union
    22M, 61LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. epidermidis115Union6Broken screws
    23F, 66LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronic100Union4None
    24F, 78RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionChronicGram-negative bacillus100Union6None
    25M, 62LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. epidermidis85Union4None
    26F, 71LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis105Union4None
    27F, 68ROsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisQuiescent65Union2None
    28M, 67ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus110Union6Screws backed out, pain
    29F, 73LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronic105Union6None
    30M, 70ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus110Union4None
    31M, 67ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. aureus and Bacillus subtilis80Union8Broken screws
    32F, 65LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicP. magnus115Union6None
    33F, 68LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis100Union6None
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II RESULTS OF ARTHRODESIS AT THE LATEST FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION*
    *NR = not recorded. †This patient had pain in the ipsilateral thigh brfore a repeat nailing and bone-grafting performed because of non-union.
    CaseDuration of Follow-up (Mos.)Flexion Angle(Degrees)Valgus Angle (Degrees)Limb-Length Discrepancy* (cm)Other Problems with Lower LimbsWalking Distance* (km)Walking AidsPain in the KneePain at Other Sites*
    194422Total arthroplasty of ipsilateral hip>1.5NoneNoNone
    2916030.5CrutchesNoModerate sciatica on right
    33624NRNRNoneNoNR
    487034>1.5CaneNoNone
    5802321.0CaneNoMild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    674512Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.5NoneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    764622Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee>1.5NoneNoNone
    81863NRNRNoneNoNR
    961432>1.5NoneMildNone†
    10588031.0NoneNoMild pain in contralateral knee
    1153723Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0NoneNoMild pain in ipsilateral thigh
    1251602Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.5CaneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    1348634Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0CaneNo Mild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    1447363Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0NoneNoNone
    1547653>1.5NoneNoNone
    16467330.5CaneNoModerate sciatica on left
    17441064Total arthroplasty of contralateral hip>1.5NoneNoNone
    1843843Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee and rheumatoid arthritis in both hipsIndoorsWalkerMildSevere pain in both hips and mild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    1942752Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    2042702>1.5NoneNoNone
    21416430.2CrutchesMildModerate pain in ipsilateral thigh
    2238522Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.5CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    2338733>1.5NoneNoNone
    2438352Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee and rheumatoid arthritis in both hipsIndoorsWalkerMildSevere pain in both hips and moderate sciatica on right
    25367221.0NoneNoNone
    26358121.0NoneNoNone
    27331043>1.5NoneNoNone
    2833952Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    29311023Total arthroplasty of contralateral hip1.0NoneNoNone
    3030642>1.5NoneNoNone
    3128532Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate sciatica on left
    32254521.0CaneNoNone
    3325733Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0CaneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Illustrations demonstrating the technique of arthrodesis with the Huckstep nail. (A) The nail is inserted into the femur in a retrograde manner until only one screw-hole is visible. (B) The nail is advanced into the tibia by pushing it with the drill-bit and using the exposed screw-holes for purchase. (C) A screw-targeting jig is used to place drill-bits in the tibia. (D) The femur and the tibia are compressed, and drill-bits are placed in the femur. (E) The drill-bits are replaced with screws.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2 Photograph showing the Huckstep nail and the screw-targeting device.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3 Case 17. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee, made two months after an arthrodesis with a Huckstep nail in a sixty-six-year-old woman who had chronic infection and instability after an arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Note that the knee is in a position of slight valgus and flexion.
    We retrospectively reviewed the records of thirty-six patients who had been managed at our institution, between 1988 and 1994, with arthrodesis of the knee with a Huckstep nail because of a failed total knee arthroplasty. One patient died from unrelated causes less than one year after the operation, and two patients were lost to follow-up. Thirty-three patients were followed clinically and radiographically for an average of forty-seven months (range, eighteen to ninety-four months) after the arthrodesis, and they form the basis of this report.
    Postoperatively, clinical and radiographic evaluation as well as measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the level of C-reactive protein were performed for all patients at two-month intervals until union. Union was defined clinically as stability or no motion of the knee on examination and radiographically as evidence of bridging osseous trabeculae or cortical union of more than 75 per cent of the total cortical apposition, according to the method of Fern et al.
    The average age of the patients at the time of the arthrodesis was 68.2 years (range, sixty-one to seventy-eight years). There were nineteen women and fourteen men. The right knee was involved in fifteen patients and the left, in eighteen. The underlying diagnosis before the primary arthroplasty was osteoarthrosis (twenty-seven patients), rheumatoid arthritis (four), and post-traumatic osteoarthrosis (two). The average time-interval between the most recent arthroplasty and the arthrodesis was 4.9 years (range, two to eight years). The indication for the arthrodesis was recurrent infection after a revision arthroplasty (fifteen patients), infection with gross ligamentous instability (eight), infection with poor soft-tissue coverage (five), a Charcot joint (two), and a failed previous attempt at arthrodesis of an infected knee with use of external fixation (three).
    Associated medical problems included diabetes (seven patients), a cardiovascular disorder (four), a previous stroke (three), cirrhosis of the liver (two), Parkinson disease (two), and chronic nephritis (one).
    All total knee prostheses that had been placed before the arthrodesis were of the non-constrained resurfacing type.
    Infections were classified as purulent, chronic, or quiescent (Table I). An infection was considered to be purulent when the patient had a fever as well as distention of the knee and there was gross pus on aspiration. An infection was defined as chronic when there was either a discharging sinus or local heat and erythema but no pus on aspiration. Four patients (Cases 16, 17, 23, and 29) who had negative cultures were considered to have a chronic infection because the histological finding of more than five polymorphonuclear neutrophils in five fields at a magnification of forty times, as well as the elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and level of C-reactive protein, were strongly suggestive of infection. An infection was termed quiescent when the patient had a history of infection but no infection was evident at the time of the arthrodesis, as demonstrated by a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
    Gram-positive organisms, mostly Staphylococcus, were found in eighteen knees, and gram-negative or mixed infections were found in seven. Cultures of specimens from the other knees revealed negative findings. A two-stage procedure was used for the eight knees that had a grossly purulent infection. Initially, the prosthesis and the cement were removed, the knee was thoroughly debrided, and cement impregnated with gentamicin or vancomycin (depending on the organism) was inserted. Arthrodesis was performed only after the infection appeared to be controlled clinically, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and the level of C-reactive protein were normal, and there was no growth on culture of fluid aspirated from the knee. The average time from the removal of the prosthesis to the arthrodesis was 5.1 weeks (range, two to fourteen weeks). The twenty-five knees that did not have a grossly purulent infection were treated with removal of the implant and the arthrodesis as a single-stage procedure.
    The Huckstep nail is a solid titanium reconstruction nail with a quadrilateral cross section. Transverse interlocking holes 4.5 millimeters in diameter are spaced fifteen millimeters apart along its entire length, and four-millimeter-diameter fine-threaded tapered screws are inserted through these holes. A 12.5-millimeter-diameter nail (the largest size available) was used in all knees.
    The femur was carefully measured on preoperative radiographs, and the nail was cut to a suitable length with use of a diamond-edged saw before the operation. A fourteen-hole, 22.5-centimeter-long nail was used in the twenty-four patients in whom the involved femur was less than forty centimeters long, as measured from the tip of the greater trochanter to the line of the knee joint. A sixteen-hole, 25.5-centimeter-long nail was used in the nine patients in whom the involved femur was more than forty centimeters long.
    The arthrodesis is performed with the patient in the supine position. A tourniquet is placed on the thigh and is inflated to a pressure of 350 millimeters of mercury (46.7 kilopascals). The arthrodesis is performed through a medial parapatellar approach, as the total knee arthroplasty was. The implant is removed, and a thorough débridement and synovectomy is done. The distal part of the femoral canal then is reamed to a diameter of thirteen millimeters and to a depth of twenty-two to twenty-five centimeters from the knee. This level is distal to the tip of the stem of most standard-size femoral components, so the nail can be used in patients who have an ipsilateral total hip prosthesis. The tibia is reamed from the plateau to a depth of twelve to thirteen centimeters and to a diameter of thirteen millimeters.
    A Huckstep nail of appropriate length is inserted gently into the femoral canal in a retrograde manner until only the last screw-hole is visible (Fig. 1, A). The nail is rotated so that the screw-holes are oriented anteroposteriorly and the heads of the screws are medial to the tibial tuberosity and crest. The knee is extended, and then the nail is advanced into the tibia, with use of the exposed screw-holes for purchase, until half of the length of the nail is in the tibia (Fig. 1, B). The targeting jig for the interlocking screws is applied, and four, five, or six drill-bits are used to fix the nail to the tibia temporarily (Fig. 1, C). Because two holes usually are visible in the gap between the femur and the tibia, the jig can be aligned precisely. Also, as the nail is short and stiff, interlocking can be done without fluoroscopy and with use of the jig alone for guidance (Fig. 2). The intervening drill-bits are removed, and the femur is compressed against the tibia. The femoral fit usually is not tight, which allows the knee to be positioned in valgus angulation and slight flexion. Peripheral cortical contact is achieved, and the bone is trimmed as necessary to allow better bone-to-bone contact. The femur and the tibia are held in compression, and four, five, or six drill-bits are placed, again with use of the screw-targeting jig, into the screw-holes on the femoral side (Fig. 1, D). The stability of the site of the arthrodesis is checked, and the drill-bits are replaced with screws of appropriate length as determined with a depth gauge (Fig. 1, E). Four, five, or six screws are placed in both the femur and the tibia.
    In the thirty-one knees in which the patella was suitable for bone-grafting, it was fixed with one screw into the femur. Bone graft was taken from the tibial and femoral condyles. Polymethylmethacrylate beads containing gentamicin (Septopal) were placed subcutaneously around the site of the arthrodesis in twenty-three patients. The chain of beads was pulled out at approximately two weeks after the operation because later removal is technically more difficult.
    Postoperatively, the patients were allowed weight-bearing as tolerated. External supports were not used routinely. Antibiotics were selected according to the results of sensitivity testing and were given parenterally for an average of 3.8 weeks (range, two to six weeks). The antibiotics were then given orally for the balance of the six-week course.
    The angle of the knee fusion was measured on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs made at the time of the latest follow-up (Table II).
    The average duration of the operation was 104 minutes (range, sixty-five to 155 minutes) (Table I). None of the knees had an intraoperative fracture, a perforation of the femoral cortex, or a peroneal nerve palsy. Because a pneumatic tourniquet was applied, intraoperative blood loss was negligible. The estimated postoperative blood loss averaged 468 milliliters (range, 150 to 720 milliliters). Seven patients received blood replacement of 500 to 1000 milliliters postoperatively because of anemia, cirrhosis-related coagulopathy, or cardiovascular problems.
    Thirty (91 per cent) of the thirty-three knees had clinical and radiographic evidence of union at an average of 5.2 months (range, two to ten months) after the arthrodesis (Table I). Union was not seen radiographically in three patients. The nail broke two years postoperatively in one patient (Case 9) who had had a Charcot joint, and he was managed with repeat nailing and a bone graft. Three years after the second operation, the patient had union and was doing well. In the other two patients (Cases 11 and 21), who had had an infection at the time of the arthrodesis, a non-union was diagnosed on the basis of pain in the distal part of the thigh and a radiolucent zone around the nail. One (Case 21) had had an infection with Staphylococcus aureus, and the other (Case 11) had had a mixed infection with Staphylococcus aureus and Proteus mirabilis. At 3.5 and 4.5 years after the operation, neither patient had had a recurrence of the infection and both declined an additional procedure despite occasional pain in the thigh.
    Only one patient (Case 18), who had rheumatoid arthritis and was being managed with immunosuppressive therapy, had a recurrence of infection (with Staphylococcus aureus). The infection was treated successfully with operative débridement, with the nail left in place, and the knee eventually fused.
    Screws backed out in five knees (Table I). At least one screw broke in three knees, but the stability of the knee was not affected. Three patients needed removal of at least one screw that had backed out because the screw had become prominent and had resulted in irritation of the skin. The screws that did not back out were not associated with tenting of the skin and irritation. The only nail that was removed was the one that broke.
    The angle of the knee fusion averaged 6.0 degrees (range, 0 to 10 degrees) of flexion in the sagittal plane and 3.0 degrees (range, 0 to 6 degrees) of valgus in the frontal plane (Table II; Fig. 3). All patients could walk at least inside the house and could bear full weight on the limb, but four patients had mild pain in the involved knee. The three patients (Cases 9, 11, and 21) with a non-union had pain over the middle part of the thigh, probably secondary to motion of the nail in the distal aspect of the femur. None of the patients who had a successful fusion reported any pain in the thigh. All patients reported inconvenience caused by the stiff knee, particularly when they used the toilet.
    The average limb-length discrepancy, measured clinically, was 2.6 centimeters (range, two to four centimeters). All patients had a discrepancy that was either corrected with a shoe-lift or was so slight that the patient considered the shoe-lift to be unnecessary.
    The purpose of the present study was to describe the technique, outcome, advantages, and complications of arthrodesis with a Huckstep nail after a failed total knee arthroplasty. Because we retrospectively reviewed the records of the patients in the present study, the functional evaluations before and after the operation were not standardized. In addition, no other group was available for a direct comparison because arthrodesis of the knee is always performed with a Huckstep nail at our institution. Most of our patients who have a failed total knee arthroplasty secondary to infection are managed with a staged reimplantation, but those who have a recurrent infection, gross ligamentous instability, poor soft-tissue coverage, or poor bone stock are considered candidates for arthrodesis.
    The Huckstep nail was developed in Australia, in 1967, as a reconstruction nail for severely comminuted femoral fractures9. As far as we know, Huckstep was the first to use this nail in an arthrodesis of the knee. He reported on two patients who had an arthrodesis of the knee with a sixty-centimeter-long nail locked with seven to eleven screws for treatment of a failed total knee arthroplasty. The senior one of us (K.-A. L.) made the decision to use this nail in a retrograde manner after a discussion with Dr. Huckstep at a meeting in 1988.
    Goldberg et al. reported the results of arthrodesis with the Huckstep nail to salvage total knee replacements that had failed because of infection. Four of their seventeen patients had a non-union after an average duration of follow-up of 22.6 months, but all of the patients were reported to be satisfied with the result. The rate of non-union in their study, which was much higher than that in our study, may be related to the fact that the patella was not used as a bone graft. It is of note that they inserted a long Huckstep nail in an antegrade manner, a technique that is similar to arthrodesis with use of a long straight Küntscher nail.
    It has been recommended that, when a long intramedullary nail (such as a Küntscher nail) is used for arthrodesis, it should be inserted to within two, three, or four centimeters of the ankle5,11. This placement necessitates reaming of the tibia, without tourniquet control, beginning at the greater trochanter and extending distally past the isthmus, and it has been associated with blood loss of more than 1500 milliliters5,6.
    Specific contraindications for intramedullary nailing, as described by Knutson and Lidgren, include the presence of a prosthesis in the proximal aspect of the ipsilateral femur, gross malunion of a fracture of the femoral shaft, and marked curvature of the femur. One patient in our series later needed a total arthroplasty of the ipsilateral hip after the arthrodesis of the knee. A femoral component with a sixteen-centimeter-long stem was successfully inserted without removal of the Huckstep nail.
    The design of the Huckstep nail and its screw-targeting jig allow the screws to be placed reliably without use of fluoroscopy (Fig. 2). We found the jig to be easy to use, but we acknowledge that many surgeons would prefer to have the position of the screws visually confirmed with fluoroscopy. Multiple interlocking screws provide immediate axial and rotational stability and allow full weight-bearing without the need for walking aids. No nail migrated either proximally5 or distally13 in the present series, and gluteal pain was not an issue as the nail does not traverse that region.
    An additional advantage of this technique is the ability to place the knee in the desirable position of slight valgus and flexion (Fig. 3); such a position is very difficult to achieve with use of a long intramedullary nail. Preservation of the normal valgus angulation at the knee theoretically lessens the strain on the ipsilateral hip.
    Cheng and Gross performed arthrodesis with a short locking stainless-steel intramedullary nail, with use of an outrigger targeting rod to guide the insertion of the screws, in two patients; both had a successful result. The use of the Neff femorotibial nail system (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) in arthrodesis of the knee recently was described in detail by Arroyo et al. Compared with our technique, their system appears to offer the advantage of modularity; the nails used in the femur and the tibia can have a different diameter. A potential disadvantage is the care that must be taken with regard to the reaming for the conical couples; if the couples are too deep, it may be difficult to join them. In addition, compression is difficult to achieve and the control of rotation is less firm because it relies on the fit in the isthmus rather than on interlocking screws. We have no personal experience with the use of the Neff femorotibial nail system.
    A meta-analysis of five reports on the results of different operative techniques of arthrodesis after a failed arthroplasty of the knee in fifty-six patients revealed an overall rate of fusion of 95 per cent for intramedullary nailing compared with only 64 per cent for external fixation4. In another meta-analysis, the overall rate of success of arthrodesis with intramedullary nailing was 91 per cent in ninety-eight knees12. The time to union has averaged 5.5 months (range, 2.5 to eleven months)6. It should be noted that these meta-analyses involved a small number of patients.
    Infection of any kind is known to decrease the rate of fusion. Damron and McBeath suggested that the rate of fusion in knees with a gram-positive infection is better than that in knees with a gram-negative or mixed infection. In the present study, the non-unions occurred in a patient who had a Charcot joint, one who had a mixed infection, and one who had a gram-positive infection, but the number of knees with a gram-negative infection was too small for statistical comparison. A one-stage arthrodesis was adequate for patients who had a low-virulence or non-purulent infection. Other authors have reported the same finding7,11. Knees with a grossly purulent infection are treated with a two-stage procedure. Initially, the prosthesis is removed, the knee is debrided, and antibiotic-impregnated cement is inserted. The arthrodesis is attempted only when the infection appears to be controlled, as indicated clinically and by a normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and level of C-reactive protein as well as no growth on culture of fluid aspirated from the knee. When this protocol is used, infection does not preclude a successful fusion.
    The rate of fusion associated with a resurfacing type of implant has been shown to be higher than that associated with a hinged implant because more bone stock is present12. All prostheses in our series were of the resurfacing type, which may account for the high rate of fusion despite the infections and for the relatively small limb-length discrepancies.
    The most troubling drawback of arthrodesis with a Huckstep nail is the difficulty of retrieving a nail in the event of a malunion or a recurrent infection. In our series, the only nail that was removed was one that had broken in a patient (Case 9) who had a non-union; the nail was removed by reversing the original procedure. In knees that have a non-union, the nail can be cut and removed in pieces or it can be backed up the femur. We have not removed any nail after a solid fusion has been achieved. Fenestration of the femur may be necessary for removal. A high-speed drill should be available so that the nail can be cut if necessary.
    In summary, insertion of the Huckstep nail in a retrograde manner allows use of a tourniquet, which minimizes intraoperative loss of blood. The rate of fusion is high (91 per cent in our study). In addition, the technique provides immediate axial and rotational stability, which permits early weight-bearing without use of external supports, and allows the surgeon to place the knee in a slightly flexed and valgus position. There is no gluteal pain, and the Huckstep nail can be used in the presence of a standard-size prosthesis in the ipsilateral hip. As a surgeon gains experience with the technique, the procedure may be done without fluoroscopy, thus minimizing the exposure of the patient and the surgeon to radiation.
    Arroyo, J. S.; Garvin, K. L.; and Neff, J. R.: Arthrodesis of the knee with a modular titanium intramedullary nail. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,79-A: 26-35, Jan. 1997.79-A26  1997 
     
    Bose, W. J.; Gearen, P. F.; Randall, J. C.; and Petty, W.: Long-term outcome of 42 knees with chronic infection after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,319: 285-296, 1995.319285  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Cheng, S. L., and Gross, A. E.: Knee arthrodesis using a short locked intramedullary nail. A new technique. Am. J. Knee Surg.,8: 56-59, 1995.856  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Damron, T. A., and McBeath, A. A.: Arthrodesis following failed total knee arthroplasty: comprehensive review and meta-analysis of recent literature. Orthopedics,18: 361-368, 1995.18361  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Donley, B. G.; Matthews, L. S.; and Kaufer, H.: Arthrodesis of the knee with an intramedullary nail. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,73-A: 907-913, July 1991.73-A907  1991 
     
    Ellingsen, D. E., and Rand, J. A.: Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee after failed total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 870-877, June 1994.76-A870  1994 
     
    Fern, E. D.; Stewart, H. D.; and Newton, G.: Curved Kuntscher nail arthrodesis after failure of knee replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,71-B(4): 588-590, 1989.71-B(4)588  1989 
     
    Goldberg, J. A.; Drummond, R. P.; Bruce, W. J.; Viglione, W.; and Lennon, W. P.: Huckstep nail arthrodesis of the knee: a salvage for infected total knee replacement. Australian and New Zealand J. Surg.,59: 147-150, 1989.59147  1989 
     
    Huckstep, R. L.: The Huckstep intramedullary compression nail. Indications, technique, and results. Clin. Orthop.,212: 48-61, 1986.21248  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Knutson, K., and Lidgren, L.: Arthrodesis after infected knee arthroplasty using an intramedullary nail. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,100: 49-53, 1982.10049  1982 
     
    Puranen, J.; Kortelainen, P.; and Jalovaara, P.: Arthrodesis of the knee with intramedullary nail fixation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 433-442, March 1990.72-A433  1990 
     
    Rand, J. A.: Instructional Course Lecture, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Alternatives to reimplantaion for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-A: 282-289, Feb. 1993.75-A282  1993 
     
    Wilde, A. H., and Stearns, K. L.: Intramedullary fixation for arthrodesis of the knee after infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,248: 87-92, 1989.24887  1989  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1 Illustrations demonstrating the technique of arthrodesis with the Huckstep nail. (A) The nail is inserted into the femur in a retrograde manner until only one screw-hole is visible. (B) The nail is advanced into the tibia by pushing it with the drill-bit and using the exposed screw-holes for purchase. (C) A screw-targeting jig is used to place drill-bits in the tibia. (D) The femur and the tibia are compressed, and drill-bits are placed in the femur. (E) The drill-bits are replaced with screws.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2 Photograph showing the Huckstep nail and the screw-targeting device.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3 Case 17. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the knee, made two months after an arthrodesis with a Huckstep nail in a sixty-six-year-old woman who had chronic infection and instability after an arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Note that the knee is in a position of slight valgus and flexion.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I DATA ON THE PATIENTS
    *NA = not applicable.
    CaseGender, Age (Yrs.)SideOriginal DiagnosisIndication for ArthrodesisStatus of Infection*BacteriaDuration of Operation (Mins.)ResultTime to Union (Mos.)Complications
    1F, 67LPost-traumatic osteoarthrosisPoor soft tissuePurulentS. aureus155Union8None
    2M, 71LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicEnterococcus120Union6None
    3M, 73ROsteoarthrosisCharcot jointNA95Union10None
    4M, 68LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronicS. epidermidis110Union4None
    5M, 61RPost-traumatic osteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. aureus105Union2None
    6F, 74LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus130Union6Broken screws
    7M, 71ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis140Union6None
    8F, 63LOsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisQuiescent70Union4Screws backed out
    9M, 69LOsteoarthrosisCharcot jointNA125Non-unionBroken nail
    10F, 72LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicPseudomonas aeruginosa110Union4None
    11F, 73ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus and Proteus mirabilis120Non-union
    12F, 67ROsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissuePurulentE. coli75Union6Screws backed out, pain
    13F, 74RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionPurulentS. aureus80Union4Screws backed out
    14F, 64LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus105Union2None
    15F, 65LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionPurulentS. epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa80Union4None
    16F, 66LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronic110Union6None
    17F, 66RRheumatoid arthritisInstabilityChronic130Union2None
    18M, 68RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionPurulentS. aureus90Union10Recurrent infection and screws backed out
    19M, 62LOsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisChronicPseudomonas aeruginosa65Union2None
    20F, 74ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus120Union8None
    21M, 67ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus110Non-union
    22M, 61LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. epidermidis115Union6Broken screws
    23F, 66LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronic100Union4None
    24F, 78RRheumatoid arthritisFailed revisionChronicGram-negative bacillus100Union6None
    25M, 62LOsteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. epidermidis85Union4None
    26F, 71LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis105Union4None
    27F, 68ROsteoarthrosisFailed arthrodesisQuiescent65Union2None
    28M, 67ROsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. aureus110Union6Screws backed out, pain
    29F, 73LOsteoarthrosisPoor soft tissueChronic105Union6None
    30M, 70ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityChronicS. aureus110Union4None
    31M, 67ROsteoarthrosisInstabilityPurulentS. aureus and Bacillus subtilis80Union8Broken screws
    32F, 65LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicP. magnus115Union6None
    33F, 68LOsteoarthrosisFailed revisionChronicS. epidermidis100Union6None
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE II RESULTS OF ARTHRODESIS AT THE LATEST FOLLOW-UP EXAMINATION*
    *NR = not recorded. †This patient had pain in the ipsilateral thigh brfore a repeat nailing and bone-grafting performed because of non-union.
    CaseDuration of Follow-up (Mos.)Flexion Angle(Degrees)Valgus Angle (Degrees)Limb-Length Discrepancy* (cm)Other Problems with Lower LimbsWalking Distance* (km)Walking AidsPain in the KneePain at Other Sites*
    194422Total arthroplasty of ipsilateral hip>1.5NoneNoNone
    2916030.5CrutchesNoModerate sciatica on right
    33624NRNRNoneNoNR
    487034>1.5CaneNoNone
    5802321.0CaneNoMild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    674512Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.5NoneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    764622Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee>1.5NoneNoNone
    81863NRNRNoneNoNR
    961432>1.5NoneMildNone†
    10588031.0NoneNoMild pain in contralateral knee
    1153723Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0NoneNoMild pain in ipsilateral thigh
    1251602Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.5CaneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    1348634Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0CaneNo Mild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    1447363Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0NoneNoNone
    1547653>1.5NoneNoNone
    16467330.5CaneNoModerate sciatica on left
    17441064Total arthroplasty of contralateral hip>1.5NoneNoNone
    1843843Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee and rheumatoid arthritis in both hipsIndoorsWalkerMildSevere pain in both hips and mild pain in ipsilateral ankle
    1942752Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    2042702>1.5NoneNoNone
    21416430.2CrutchesMildModerate pain in ipsilateral thigh
    2238522Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.5CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    2338733>1.5NoneNoNone
    2438352Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee and rheumatoid arthritis in both hipsIndoorsWalkerMildSevere pain in both hips and moderate sciatica on right
    25367221.0NoneNoNone
    26358121.0NoneNoNone
    27331043>1.5NoneNoNone
    2833952Osteoarthrosis in contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    29311023Total arthroplasty of contralateral hip1.0NoneNoNone
    3030642>1.5NoneNoNone
    3128532Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee0.3CrutchesNoModerate sciatica on left
    32254521.0CaneNoNone
    3325733Total arthroplasty of contralateral knee1.0CaneNoModerate pain in contralateral knee
    Arroyo, J. S.; Garvin, K. L.; and Neff, J. R.: Arthrodesis of the knee with a modular titanium intramedullary nail. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,79-A: 26-35, Jan. 1997.79-A26  1997 
     
    Bose, W. J.; Gearen, P. F.; Randall, J. C.; and Petty, W.: Long-term outcome of 42 knees with chronic infection after total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,319: 285-296, 1995.319285  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Cheng, S. L., and Gross, A. E.: Knee arthrodesis using a short locked intramedullary nail. A new technique. Am. J. Knee Surg.,8: 56-59, 1995.856  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Damron, T. A., and McBeath, A. A.: Arthrodesis following failed total knee arthroplasty: comprehensive review and meta-analysis of recent literature. Orthopedics,18: 361-368, 1995.18361  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Donley, B. G.; Matthews, L. S.; and Kaufer, H.: Arthrodesis of the knee with an intramedullary nail. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,73-A: 907-913, July 1991.73-A907  1991 
     
    Ellingsen, D. E., and Rand, J. A.: Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee after failed total knee arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 870-877, June 1994.76-A870  1994 
     
    Fern, E. D.; Stewart, H. D.; and Newton, G.: Curved Kuntscher nail arthrodesis after failure of knee replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,71-B(4): 588-590, 1989.71-B(4)588  1989 
     
    Goldberg, J. A.; Drummond, R. P.; Bruce, W. J.; Viglione, W.; and Lennon, W. P.: Huckstep nail arthrodesis of the knee: a salvage for infected total knee replacement. Australian and New Zealand J. Surg.,59: 147-150, 1989.59147  1989 
     
    Huckstep, R. L.: The Huckstep intramedullary compression nail. Indications, technique, and results. Clin. Orthop.,212: 48-61, 1986.21248  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Knutson, K., and Lidgren, L.: Arthrodesis after infected knee arthroplasty using an intramedullary nail. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,100: 49-53, 1982.10049  1982 
     
    Puranen, J.; Kortelainen, P.; and Jalovaara, P.: Arthrodesis of the knee with intramedullary nail fixation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 433-442, March 1990.72-A433  1990 
     
    Rand, J. A.: Instructional Course Lecture, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Alternatives to reimplantaion for salvage of the total knee arthroplasty complicated by infection. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-A: 282-289, Feb. 1993.75-A282  1993 
     
    Wilde, A. H., and Stearns, K. L.: Intramedullary fixation for arthrodesis of the knee after infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,248: 87-92, 1989.24887  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preservation only versus remnant tensioning technique.
    Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2011 Sep
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center