0
Articles   |    
Isolation and Characterization of Polyethylene Wear Debris Associated with Osteolysis Following Total Shoulder Arthroplasty*
MICHAEL A. WIRTH, M.D.†; C. MAULI AGRAWAL, PH.D., P.E.†; JAY D. MABREY, M.D.†; DAVID D. DEAN, PH.D.†; CHERYL R. BLANCHARD, PH.D.‡; MICHAEL A. MILLER, M.S.‡; CHARLES A. ROCKWOOD, JR., M.D.†, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  1999; 81:29-37 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

We evaluated the interface membranes surrounding three total shoulder prostheses that had been removed because of progressive aseptic loosening associated with osteolysis. The mean time between the uncomplicated initial arthroplasty and the revision procedure was twelve years (10.5, 10.5, and 16.0 years). Membranes from around both the humeral and the glenoid component were obtained from all three shoulders and were studied histologically to determine the biological response involved in the development of aseptic loosening. For the purpose of comparison, periprosthetic tissue was also obtained from the sites of four failed total hip prostheses that were associated with osteolysis.Polyethylene particles were retrieved with an enzymatic digestion technique that involved the use of papain. Raman vibrational spectroscopy verified that the particles were ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. The particles were isolated from the tissue, and a computerized image-analysis system characterized 582 of them in terms of size and morphology. Each particle was defined with the use of six shape descriptors: equivalent circle diameter, roundness, form factor, aspect ratio, elongation, and outline fractal dimension. The particles from the hips had a mean equivalent circle diameter (and standard error of the mean) of 0.62 ± 0.03 micrometer, were predominantly globular in shape, and had low mean values for aspect ratio (1.46 ± 0.02) and elongation (1.85 ± 0.03) and relatively high values for roundness (0.74 ± 0.01) and form factor (0.87 ± 0.01). In contrast, the particles from the shoulders had a mean equivalent circle diameter of 1.04 ± 0.03 micrometers. In addition, they had relatively high values for aspect ratio (2.36 ± 0.07) and elongation (4.96 ± 0.23) and correspondingly low values for roundness (0.54 ± 0.01) and form factor (0.67 ± 0.01), indicating that they were more fibrillar in shape. The particles from the shoulders and those from the hips were significantly different (p < 0.0001) with respect to all of the descriptors except outline fractal dimension. The particles from the shoulders, in general, were larger and more fibrillar than the particles from the hips.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study demonstrated that particles generated by the wear of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene of total shoulder prostheses can be associated with clinically important osteolysis, with a pathogenesis that is similar to that of aseptic loosening after total hip replacement. The polyethylene wear debris obtained from the membranes around three failed total shoulder prostheses was strikingly different in terms of morphology than the wear debris obtained from the tissue around failed total hip prostheses; this finding suggests that the type of joint markedly influences the wear mechanism and the nature of the resulting debris.

Figures in this Article
    Symptomatic loosening of the glenoid and humeral components after a total shoulder arthroplasty is common and has been reported to account for nearly one-third of all complications that are associated with this procedure1-8,10,12-18,21,28,30,31,35-38,41-43,49-55. Numerous investigators have expressed concern that the appearance of progressive radiolucent lines may herald the onset of problems, such as symptomatic loosening1,4,7,11,12,21,50,52-55. The authors of one study from Sweden noted radiolucent lines around the glenoid component in twenty-five of twenty-six shoulders at a mean of forty-seven months postoperatively7. While no radiolucent lines were observed around the glenoid components on the radiographs made immediately postoperatively, lines developed within three years after the operation in all twenty-five shoulders. These radiographic findings were associated with a decrease in function and an increase in pain.
    In 1984, Cofield11 reported improved motion and reliable relief of pain in most shoulders two to six years after seventy-three Neer total shoulder arthroplasties. Although the clinical results were excellent and compared favorably with those of other studies, fifty-two shoulders had radiolucent lines at the bone-cement interface and eight had radiographic evidence of loosening of the glenoid component, as defined by a shift in the position of the component or a circumferential radiolucent line at the bone-cement interface that was at least 1.5 millimeters wide. More recently, Torchia and Cofield50 analyzed the results of eighty-nine total shoulder arthroplasties, some of which had been included in the earlier study by Cofield11. The clinical results were graded as excellent, satisfactory, or unsatisfactory, according to the systems of Neer et al.37 and Cofield11. An excellent result indicated that the patient had no or slight pain, active abduction to at least 140 degrees, and external rotation to at least 45 degrees and was satisfied with the result. A satisfactory result indicated that the patient had no or slight pain or moderate pain only with vigorous activities, active abduction to at least 90 degrees, and external rotation to at least 20 degrees and was satisfied with the result. An unsatisfactory result indicated that these criteria were not met. Associations and correlations between preoperative parameters and postoperative results were tested with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Spearman correlation test. P values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. At a mean of twelve years (range, five to seventeen years) postoperatively, radiolucent lines had developed at the bone-cement interface of seventy-five glenoid components (84 percent), and thirty-nine components (44 percent) had definite radiographic loosening. Comparison of the original report11 with the later one50 (which included additional patients who were not in the first study) revealed that the prevalence of radiographic loosening of the component had increased fourfold during the extended study period. Even more disturbing was the association between radiographic loosening of the glenoid component and pain (p = 0.0001). With an increased duration of follow-up, the percentage of patients who reported satisfactory relief of pain decreased from sixty-seven (92 percent) of seventy-three to seventy-two (81 percent) of eighty-nine.
    The capacity of polymeric wear debris to induce macrophage and giant-cell-mediated osteolysis of periprosthetic bone has been well documented in association with aseptic loosening of total hip and knee prostheses19,23,25,26,40,44. To our knowledge, this process has not been reported in association with total shoulder prostheses. The purpose of the present study was to characterize, in terms of size and morphology, polyethylene wear debris from the tissue around three failed total shoulder prostheses that were associated with osteolysis.

    *Although none of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, benefits have been or will be received but are directed solely to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which one or more of the authors is associated. Funds were received in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding source was The Center for the Enhancement of the Biology/Biomaterials Interface, San Antonio, Texas.

    †Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7774.

    ‡Materials and Structures Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78228.

    *Although none of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, benefits have been or will be received but are directed solely to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which one or more of the authors is associated. Funds were received in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding source was The Center for the Enhancement of the Biology/Biomaterials Interface, San Antonio, Texas.
    †Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78284-7774.
    ‡Materials and Structures Division, Southwest Research Institute, 6220 Culebra Road, San Antonio, Texas 78228.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-A:Fig. 1-A Anteroposterior radiograph made six years after the initial total shoulder arthroplasty. The prosthesis is well adapted to the bone and there are no signs of radiographic loosening. The patient was asymptomatic.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-B:Fig. 1-B Anteroposterior and axillary lateral radiographs made ten years after the initial arthroplasty, demonstrating periprosthetic osteolysis of the proximal aspect of the humerus and the glenoid (arrows). The patient had a two-year history of progressive discomfort with an insidious onset.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-C:Fig. 1-C Anteroposterior and axillary lateral radiographs made ten years after the initial arthroplasty, demonstrating periprosthetic osteolysis of the proximal aspect of the humerus and the glenoid (arrows). The patient had a two-year history of progressive discomfort with an insidious onset.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG2:Fig. 2 Photograph of the articular surface of a retrieved ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene glenoid component from a patient who had osteolysis of the glenoid.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG3:Fig. 3 Micrograph of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris retrieved from a periprosthetic osteolytic lesion in a shoulder (x 5000).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG4:Fig. 4 Micrograph of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris retrieved at the time of revision of a total hip prosthesis (x 5000).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG5-A:Fig. 5-A Frequency distribution for the size (equivalent circle diameter [ECD]) of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles from tissue around total shoulder and hip replacements. In general, the particles from the hip were smaller.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG5-B:Fig. 5-B Frequency distribution for the roundness of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles from tissue around total shoulder and hip replacements. The particles from the hips were rounder. (A perfect circle has a roundness of one.)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I SIZE AND MORPHOLOGY DESCRIPTORS FOR THE ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE PARTICLES*
    *The values are given as the mean and the standard error of the mean. †The value is significantly different from the value for the particles from the hip (p < 0.0001).
    Equivalent Circle Diameter (µm)Aspect RatioElongationRoundnessForm FactorOutline Fractal Dimension
    Hips0.62 ± 0.031.46 ± 0.021.85 ± 0.030.74 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.0111.76 ± 0.16
    Shoulders1.04 ± 0.03†2.36 ± 0.07†4.96 ± 0.23†0.54 ± 0.01†0.67 ± 0.01†10.94 ± 0.15
    Periprosthetic tissue was obtained from the sites of three total shoulder replacements from three men who were having a revision because of aseptic loosening between October 1996 and May 1997. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient for both the procurement and the analysis of the tissue. The humeral components (Neer II; Kirschner Medical, Fairlawn, New Jersey) were made of cobalt-chromium alloy. The glenoid components had been fixed with cement at the time of the initial operation, whereas the humeral components had been press-fit into the humerus, obviating the need for cement39.
    The patients were fifty, sixty-one, and sixty-nine years old. The mean time between the initial arthroplasty and the revision was twelve years (10.5, 10.5, and 16.0 years). The initial total shoulder arthroplasty had been performed because of posttraumatic degenerative joint disease in one shoulder and osteoarthritis in the other two. The tissue was examined histologically, and all of the intraoperative cultures of tissue obtained from the shoulder joints were sterile.
    The indications for the revision included pain in the shoulder and radiographic evidence of loosening or migration of a component. Preoperatively, all components were thought to be loose on the basis of pain and radiographic findings. The preoperative radiographs were analyzed for evidence of migration of the implant, the presence of radiolucent lines at the bone-implant or bone-cement interface, and endosteal erosion. Endosteal erosion was defined as localized resorption of bone around the implant or at the bone-cement interface. Radiographs were assessed with use of a modification of the grading system described by Cofield11. Radiographic evidence of loosening was defined as a shift in the position of the component or a circumferential radiolucent line at the bone-cement or bone-implant interface that was at least 2.0 millimeters wide.
    The periprosthetic tissue was obtained, by curettage, from the proximal aspect of the humerus between the humeral component and the bone and from the bone-cement interface of the glenoid cavity.
    For comparison, periprosthetic tissue was also obtained from the sites of four total hip prostheses that had failed because of aseptic loosening associated with osteolysis.

    Isolation of Particles of Wear Debris

    Granulomatous tissue was immediately placed in neutral buffered formalin at the time of the procurement and was stored at 20 degrees Celsius until it was analyzed. Wear debris was released from the tissue with papain digestion, as originally described by Maloney et al.33 and as modified by us for this study. First, approximately three grams of tissue was minced into small (two to three-square-millimeter) pieces and was washed four times with ten volumes of ultrapure water over a three-day period to remove the formalin fixative. After each wash, the tissue was collected by centrifugation at 2000 times gravity for fifteen minutes, the supernatant was removed, and fresh ultrapure water was added.
    After the final wash, the tissue was digested with papain (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri). The enzyme was dissolved in 0.05-molar sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.5) containing two-micromolar N-acetylcysteine at a ratio of three milligrams of papain to ten milliliters of buffer. Five milliliters of this enzyme solution was added for each gram of tissue. Tissue digestion was conducted at 65 degrees Celsius in a shaking water bath for three days. Each day, a fresh aliquot of papain, equivalent to the original amount of enzyme that had been used to digest the tissue, was added. At the end of digestion, the insoluble residue was removed by centrifugation at 100,000 times gravity for one hour, and the supernatant was then sonicated for ten minutes in a sonicator (model ME2.1; Mettler Electronics, Anaheim, California). The particles of wear debris were collected by filtration on a polyester filter (Poretics, Livermore, California) with a pore size of 0.2 micrometer. After filtration, the particles on the filter were washed two times with two milliliters of ultrapure water followed by two washings with two milliliters of 70 percent ethanol.

    Characterization of the Particles

    Microscopic Raman vibrational spectroscopy was used to determine the chemical composition of the wear debris. Raman spectroscopy is a light-scattering technique that permits study of the molecular composition of matter by probing the quantized vibrational energies of molecules with an intense monochromatic light source. Scattered light from a sample is spectrally resolved into group vibrational frequencies, which result in a spectral image, a discrete molecular composition. Particles were isolated as described, but they were collected on 0.2-micrometer polyester filters that had been sputter-coated with gold-palladium to increase the contrast of the particles in the field of view of the microscope and to mask the signal from the underlying polyester. A Renishaw Ramanscope System 2000 (Gloucestershire, United Kingdom) that employed a 780-nanometer excitation laser source was used in conjunction with an objective lens with a magnification of fifty times on the microscope to focus the beam of the laser source onto the filter media, thereby exciting an area with a diameter of one micrometer. The backscattered light emanating from this area was simultaneously collected through the objective lens and was resolved spectrally (one cm-1) as Raman vibrational modes after the Rayleigh component of the scattered light was removed. Multiple thirty-second acquisitions of resolved spectra centered at 1124 cm-1 enabled a detailed comparison of the debris spectra with that of an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene standard. Therefore, particles of wear debris or particle aggregates that were at least one micrometer in size could be evaluated unambiguously with this system when used in the described configuration. Multiple samples were analyzed under identical operating parameters.

    Analysis of the Particles

    A customized set of macros was developed with image-processing software (NIH Image; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) in order to quantitatively characterize the size, shape, and morphology of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris29. Each particle was defined with six measurements: equivalent circle diameter, roundness, form factor, aspect ratio, elongation, and outline fractal dimension. One was a measure of the size of the particle, and the other five were numerical shape parameters.
    The size of the particle was measured by determining the equivalent circle diameter, which is the diameter of a circle with an area equivalent to the area of the particle and is expressed in units of length. Roundness is a measure of how closely a particle resembles a circle. The value for roundness ranges from zero to one, with a perfect circle having a value of one. Form factor is similar to roundness, but it is based on the perimeter of the outline of the particle rather than on the major diameter. This distinction makes the form factor more sensitive to variations in the roughness of the outline. Although aspect ratio is a common measure of the shape of a particle, its definition varies. For the present study, aspect ratio was defined as the ratio of the major dimension (the longest straight line that can be drawn between any two points on the outline) to the minor dimension (the longest line perpendicular to the major dimension). Elongation is similar to the aspect ratio, but it is more suited for the measurement of long, thin particles. Elongation is a ratio of the actual length of a particle to its mean width. Finally, the outline fractal dimension is a measure of the complexity of the outline and is based on the fractal dimension of the outline. Although the outline fractal dimension is a two-dimensional measure of the so-called roughness of the outline of the particle, it may be a reasonable indicator of the texture of the particle in three dimensions.

    Statistical Analysis

    The data are given as the mean and standard error of the mean for each parameter. The distributions of the sizes and shapes of the particles were not assumed to be normal. The significance of differences between the particles from the hips and those from the shoulders was determined with the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test.

    Radiographic and Operative Findings

    Radiolucent lines were seen at the bone-implant interface of the humeral component or at the bone-cement interface of the glenoid component, or both, in all three shoulders. A progressive one to three-millimeter linear pattern of osteolysis was observed around the entire bone-cement interface of all three glenoid components (Figs. 1-A, 1-B, and 1-C). Two of these glenoids also had a focal or expansile pattern of osteolysis characterized by endosteal erosion. The mean size of the osteolytic lesions, as determined by multiplying the length by the width on the anteroposterior radiograph, was 0.7 square centimeter. One glenoid had osteolytic lesions at more than one site. Two humeri had at least two expansile osteolytic lesions. In one humerus, two lesions with a mean size of 0.6 square centimeter were observed near the tip of the component. A 1.0-square-centimeter lesion was observed in the proximal aspect of the other humerus, in the region of the lateral fin of the prosthesis. Specimens obtained from the vicinity of the osteolytic lesions demonstrated dense fibrous tissue with foci of intense histiocytic infiltration, foreign-body giant cells, and foamy macrophages. No acute inflammatory changes were seen.
    At the time of the revision operations, all of the glenoid and humeral components were determined to be loose and were easily removed. The cement was mainly attached to the keel of the glenoid component, although some cement was recovered from the glenoid trough. There was fibrous membrane in the humeral canal, at the proximal aspect of the humerus, and in the glenoid cavity of all shoulders. All of the glenoid components had wear. The margins of the components were worn down and were surrounded by areas of abrasion (Fig. 2). Several areas within the most extensively worn regions appeared to be delaminated and pitted. A full-thickness defect was noted in the articular surface of one glenoid component. No particular findings were noted regarding the humeral components.

    Particles of Wear Debris

    A total of 582 particles from the three shoulders were analyzed. The results of these analyses were then compared with those of 695 ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles retrieved from the tissue around the four hip prostheses. The procedures for isolation and characterization of the particles from the hips were identical to those for the particles from the shoulders. Raman vibrational spectroscopy showed the particles to be ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Although not every particle could be analyzed with this technique, none of the analyses of the particles or aggregates suggested the presence of any material other than ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene.
    The particles from the shoulders had a mean equivalent circle diameter of 1.04 ± 0.03 micrometers and relatively high mean values for aspect ratio (2.36 ± 0.07) and elongation (4.96 ± 0.23) and correspondingly low mean values for roundness (0.54 ± 0.01) and form factor (0.67 ± 0.01), indicating that they were fibrillar in shape. In contrast, the particles from the hips had a mean equivalent circle diameter of 0.62 ± 0.03 micrometer and were predominantly globular in shape, with low mean values for aspect ratio (1.46 ± 0.02) and elongation (1.85 ± 0.03). They also had relatively high mean values for roundness (0.74 ± 0.01) and form factor (0.87 ± 0.01). Except for outline fractal dimension, all of the descriptors for the particles from the shoulders were significantly different (p < 0.0001) from those for the particles from the hips (Table I). In general, the particles from the shoulders were larger and longer than those from the hips (Figs. 3 and 4).
    Several authors have measured the size of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles that have been retrieved from the tissue around total hip prostheses9,34,45,47. Margevicius et al.34 reported particle diameters ranging from 0.60 to 0.79 micrometer. However, it should be noted that the minimum size limit of detection in their study was 0.58 micrometer. Shanbhag et al.48 reported a mean size of 0.53 micrometer for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles that had been retrieved from the tissue around total hip prostheses, and they determined that approximately 92 percent of the particles were less than one micrometer in size. Similarly, Schmalzried et al.45 examined ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles that had been retrieved from the tissue around twenty-four total hip prostheses and concluded that most of the particles were less than one micrometer in size. The particles from the hips that were used for comparison in the present study had a mean size (equivalent circle diameter) of 0.62 micrometer, which was similar to the sizes reported in the previous studies. Additionally, the particles from the hips in the present study were predominantly globular with low mean values for aspect ratio and elongation. They also had relatively high mean values for roundness and form factor, which is additional evidence of their round or globular shape.
    The particles from the shoulders were significantly different. Their mean size (equivalent circle diameter) was 1.04 micrometers. In addition, they had relatively high mean values for aspect ratio and elongation and correspondingly low mean values for roundness and form factor, indicating that they were more fibrillar in nature. However, no significant differences were detected between the outline fractal dimension of the particles from the hips and that of the particles from the shoulders, indicating that the texture or roughness of the surfaces of the particles was similar.
    Earlier studies have involved comparisons between ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles retrieved from hips and knees22,47. Schmalzried et al.47 reported that the mean area of particles obtained from the tissue around total knee prostheses was twice that of particles from the tissue around total hip prostheses. However, they also determined that ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles from the tissue around total knee prostheses were more rounded than those from the tissue around total hip prostheses. In general, they observed a larger variation in the size, shape, and morphology of particles from knees compared with those from hips. This finding is supported by the work of Hirakawa et al.22, who also detected a larger variation in the size of particles from knees. These differences in the size and shape of particles are most likely related to differences in the wear process, as described by McKellop et al.32. This theory is supported by the observation that the relative motion between the metal-polyethylene articulating surfaces in both total shoulder and total knee replacements results in a sliding component while total hip replacements, in general, are more conforming and have a predominantly rolling motion20,24,27.
    In the present study, the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene particles from the shoulders varied more widely in terms of size and shape than the particles from the hips. This difference was especially obvious with regard to size and roundness (Figs. 5-A and 5-B). Approximately 60 percent of the particles from the shoulders were less than one micrometer in size compared with 90 percent of those from the hips. Also, approximately 56 percent of the particles from the shoulders had a roundness of more than 0.5 compared with almost 97 percent of the particles from the hips. However, it should be noted that the shape and size of particles may vary as a function of the exact site of tissue retrieval in the periprosthetic area.
    In summary, we believe that the debris generated by the wear of polyethylene in the shoulders in the present study was associated with progressive periprosthetic osteolysis and subsequent aseptic loosening. The analysis revealed distinct differences between wear particles associated with aseptic loosening of total hip prostheses and those associated with aseptic loosening of total shoulder prostheses. The ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles isolated from the tissue around the three failed total shoulder replacements were significantly different from those retrieved from the tissue around the failed total hip replacements in terms of both size and morphology. The particles from the shoulders tended to be larger but more fibrillar than those from the hips, suggesting different wear mechanisms. Future in vitro and in vivo studies may further elucidate the mechanisms of wear of the ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene of total shoulder prostheses.
    Averill, R. M.; Sledge, C. B.; and and Thomas, W. H.: Neer total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,4: 287, 1980.4287  1980 
     
    Bade, H. A.; Warren, R. F.; Ranawat, C. S.; and Inglis, A. E.: Long-term results of Neer total shoulder replacement. In Surgery of the Shoulder, p. 294. Edited by J. E. Bateman and R. P. Welsh, St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1984. 
     
    Barrett, W. P.; Franklin, J. L.; Jackins, S. E.; Wyss, C. R.; and and Matsen, F. A., III: Total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-A: 865-872, July 1987.69-A865  1987 
     
    Barrett, W. P.; Thornhill, T. S.; Thomas, W. H.; Gebhart, E. M.; and and Sledge, C. B.: Non-constrained total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis. Orthop. Trans.,11: 466, 1987.11466  1987 
     
    Boyd, A. D., Jr.; Thomas, W. H.; Scott, R. D.; Sledge, C. B.; and and Thornhill, T. S.: Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty,5: 329-336, 1990.5329  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Brenner, B. C.; Ferlic, D. C.; Clayton, M. L.; and and Dennis, D. A.: Survivorship of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,71-A: 1289-1296, Oct. 1989.71-A1289  1989 
     
    Brostorm, L.-A.; Kronberg, M.; and and Wallensten, R.: Should the glenoid be replaced in shoulder arthroplasty with an unconstrained Dana or St. George prosthesis?. Ann. Chir. Gynaec.,81: 54-57, 1992.8154  1992 
     
    Brumfield, R. H., Jr.; Schilz, J.; and and Flinders, B. W.: Total shoulder replacement arthroplasty: a clinical review of 21 cases. Orthop. Trans.,5: 398-399, 1981.5398  1981 
     
    Campbell, P.; Ma, S.; Yeom, B.; McKellop, H.; Schmalzried, T. P.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,29: 127-131, 1995.29127  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Clayton, M. L.; Ferlic, D. C.; and and Jeffers, P. D.: Prosthetic arthroplasties of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop.,164: 184-191, 1982.164184  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield, R. H.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 899-906, July 1984.66-A899  1984 
     
    Cofield, R. H., and and Daly, P. J.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with a tissue-ingrowth glenoid component. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg.,1: 77-85, 1992.177  1992 
     
    Cruess, R. L.: Shoulder resurfacing according to the method of Neer. In Proceedings of the British Orthopaedic Association. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,62-B(1): 116, 1980.62-B(1)116  1980 
     
    Faludi, D. D., and and Weiland, A. J.: Cementless total shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary experience with thirteen cases. Orthopedics,6: 428-438, 1983.6428  1983 
     
    Fenlin, J. M., Jr.: Total glenohumeral joint replacement. Orthop. Clin. North America,67: 565-583, 1975.67565  1975 
     
    Figgie, M. P.; Inglis, A. E.; Figgie, H. E., III; Sobel, M.; Burnstein, A. H.; and and Kraay, M. J.: Custom total shoulder arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis. Preliminary results. J. Arthroplasty,7: 1-6, 1992.71  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Frich, L. H.; Moller, B. N.; and and Sneppen, O.: Shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer Mark-II prosthesis. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,107: 110-113, 1988.107110  1988 
     
    Gristina, A. G.; Romano, R. L.; Kammire, G. C.; and and Webb, L. X.: Total shoulder replacement. Orthop. Clin. North America,18: 445-453, 1987.18445  1987 
     
    Harris, W. H.; Schiller, A. L.; Scholler, J.-M.; Freiberg, R. A.; and and Scott, R.: Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 612-618, July 1976.58-A612  1976 
     
    Harryman, D. T., II; Sidles, J. A.; Clark, J. M.; McQuade, K. J.; Gibb, T. D.; and and Matsen, F. A., III: Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 1334-1343, Oct. 1990.72-A1334  1990 
     
    Hawkins, J. R.; Bell, R. H.; and and Jallay, B.: Total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,242: 188-194, 1989.242188  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Hirakawa, K.; Bauer, T. W.; Stulberg, B. N.; and and Wilde, A. H.: Comparison and quantitation of wear debris of failed total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,31: 257-263, 1996.31257  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Isaac, G. H.; Wroblewski, B. M.; Atkinson, J. R.; and and Dowson, D.: A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop.,276: 115-125, 1992.276115  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Itoi, E.; Motzkin, N. E.; Morrey, B. F.; and and An, K.-N.: The stabilizing function of the long head of the biceps: with the arm in hanging position. Orthop. Trans.,16: 775, 1992-1993.16775  1992-1993 
     
    Jasty, M. J.; Floyd, W. E., III; Schiller, A. L.; Goldring, S. R.; and and Harris, W. H.: Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,68-A: 912-919, July 1986.68-A912  1986 
     
    Jones, S. M. J.; Pinder, I. M.; Moran, C. G.; and and Malcolm, A. J.: Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(1): 18-22, 1992.74-B(1)18  1992 
     
    Karduna, A. R.; Williams, G. R.; Williams, J. L.; and and Iannotti, J. P.: Kinematics of the glenohumeral joint before and after total shoulder arthroplasty: effects of component conformity. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,21: 700, 1996.21700  1996 
     
    Kelly, I. G.; Foster, R. S.; and and Fisher, W. D.: Neer total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-B(5): 723-726, 1987.69-B(5)723  1987 
     
    Landry, M. E.; Blanchard, C. R.; Mabrey, J. D.; Wang, X.; and Agrawal, C. M.: The morphology of in vitro generated UHMWPE wear particles as a function of contact conditions and material parameters. Unpublished data. 
     
    McCoy, S. R.; Warren, R. F.; Bade, H. A., III; Ranawat, C. S.; and and Inglis, A. E.: Total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Arthroplasty,4: 105-113, 1989.4105  1989  [PubMed]
     
    McElwain, J. P., and and English, E.: The early results of porous-coated total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,218: 217-224, 1987.218217  1987  [PubMed]
     
    McKellop, H. A.; Campbell, P.; Park, S.-H.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Grigoris, P.; Amstutz, H. C.; and and Sarmiento, A.: The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,311: 3-20, 1995.3113  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Maloney, W. J.; Smith, R. L.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Chiba, J.; Huene, D.; and and Rubash, H.: Isolation and characterization of wear particles generated in patients who have had failure of a hip arthroplasty without cement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1301-1310, Sept. 1995.77-A1301  1995 
     
    Margevicius, K. J.; Bauer, T. W.; McMahon, J. T.; Brown, S. A.; and and Merritt, K.: Isolation and characterization of debris in membranes around total joint prostheses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1664-1675, Nov. 1994.76-A1664  1994 
     
    Martin, S. D.; Sledge, C. B.; Thomas, W. H.; and Thornhill, T. S.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented glenoid component. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, Feb. 19, 1995. 
     
    Mazas, F., and and de la Caffinière, J. Y.: Total arthroplasty of the shoulder. Experience with 38 cases. Orthop. Trans.,5: 57, 1981.557  1981 
     
    Neer, C. S., II; Watson, K. C.; and and Stanton, F. J.: Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,64-A: 319-337, March 1982.64-A319  1982 
     
    Neer, C. S., II, and and Morrison, D. S.: Glenoid bone-grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-A: 1154-1162, Sept. 1988.70-A1154  1988 
     
    Neer, C. S., II: Glenohumeral arthroplasty. In Shoulder Reconstruction, pp. 152-153. Edited by C. S. Neer, II. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1990. 
     
    Nolan, J. F., and and Bucknill, T. M.: Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(1): 23-24, 1992.74-B(1)23  1992 
     
    Pahle, J. A., and and Kvarnes, L.: Shoulder replacement arthroplasty. Ann. Chir. Gynaec.,74 (Supplementum 198): 85-89, 1985.74 (Supplementum 198)85  1985 
     
    Pollock, R. G.; Deliz, E. D.; McIlveen, S. J.; Flatow, E. L.; and and Bigliani, L. U.: Prosthetic replacement in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg.,1: 173-186, 1992.1173  1992 
     
    Roper, B. A.; Paterson, J. M. H.; and and Day, W. H.: The Roper-Day total shoulder replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-B(4): 694-697, 1990.72-B(4)694  1990 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Jasty, M.; and and Harris, W. H.: Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-A: 849-863, July 1992.74-A849  1992 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Jasty, M.; Rosenberg, A.; and and Harris, W. H.: Polyethylene wear debris and tissue reactions in knee as compared to hip replacement prostheses. J. Appl. Biomater.,5: 185-190, 1994.5185  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Campbell, P.; Brown, I. C.; Schmitt, A. K.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Polyethylene wear particles generated in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,41: 163, 1995.41163  1995 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Campbell, P.; Schmitt, A. K.; Brown, I. C.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Shapes and dimensional characteristics of polyethylene wear particles generated in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,38: 203-210, 1997.38203  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Shanbhag, A. S.; Jacobs, J. J.; Glant, T. T.; Gilbert, J. L.; Black, J.; and and Galante, J. O.: Composition and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-B(1): 60-67, 1994.76-B(1)60  1994 
     
    Thomas, B. J.; Amstutz, H. C.; and and Cracchiolo, A.: Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Orthop.,265: 125-128, 1991.265125  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Torchia, M. E., and and Cofield, R. H.: Long-term results of Neer total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,18: 977, 1994-1995.18977  1994-1995 
     
    Wilde, A. H.; Borden, L. S.; and Brems, J. J.: Experience with the Neer total shoulder replacement. In Surgery of the Shoulder, pp. 224-228. Edited by J. E. Bateman and R. P. Welsh, St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1984. 
     
    Williams, G. R., Jr., and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Massive rotator cuff defects and glenohumeral arthritis. In Arthroplasty of the Shoulder, pp. 204-214. Edited by R. J. Friedman. New York, Thieme Medical, 1994. 
     
    Wirth, M. A., and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,307: 47-69, 1994.30747  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Wirth, M. A.; Seltzer, D. G.; Senes, H. R.; Pannone, A.; Lee, J.; and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: An analysis of failed humeral head and total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,18: 977-978, 1994-1995.18977  1994-1995 
     
    Wirth, M. A., and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Current concepts review. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,78-A: 603-616, April 1996.78-A603  1996 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-A:Fig. 1-A Anteroposterior radiograph made six years after the initial total shoulder arthroplasty. The prosthesis is well adapted to the bone and there are no signs of radiographic loosening. The patient was asymptomatic.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-B:Fig. 1-B Anteroposterior and axillary lateral radiographs made ten years after the initial arthroplasty, demonstrating periprosthetic osteolysis of the proximal aspect of the humerus and the glenoid (arrows). The patient had a two-year history of progressive discomfort with an insidious onset.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG1-C:Fig. 1-C Anteroposterior and axillary lateral radiographs made ten years after the initial arthroplasty, demonstrating periprosthetic osteolysis of the proximal aspect of the humerus and the glenoid (arrows). The patient had a two-year history of progressive discomfort with an insidious onset.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG2:Fig. 2 Photograph of the articular surface of a retrieved ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene glenoid component from a patient who had osteolysis of the glenoid.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG3:Fig. 3 Micrograph of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris retrieved from a periprosthetic osteolytic lesion in a shoulder (x 5000).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG4:Fig. 4 Micrograph of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris retrieved at the time of revision of a total hip prosthesis (x 5000).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG5-A:Fig. 5-A Frequency distribution for the size (equivalent circle diameter [ECD]) of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles from tissue around total shoulder and hip replacements. In general, the particles from the hip were smaller.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +FIG5-B:Fig. 5-B Frequency distribution for the roundness of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles from tissue around total shoulder and hip replacements. The particles from the hips were rounder. (A perfect circle has a roundness of one.)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump  TABLE I SIZE AND MORPHOLOGY DESCRIPTORS FOR THE ULTRA-HIGH MOLECULAR WEIGHT POLYETHYLENE PARTICLES*
    *The values are given as the mean and the standard error of the mean. †The value is significantly different from the value for the particles from the hip (p < 0.0001).
    Equivalent Circle Diameter (µm)Aspect RatioElongationRoundnessForm FactorOutline Fractal Dimension
    Hips0.62 ± 0.031.46 ± 0.021.85 ± 0.030.74 ± 0.010.87 ± 0.0111.76 ± 0.16
    Shoulders1.04 ± 0.03†2.36 ± 0.07†4.96 ± 0.23†0.54 ± 0.01†0.67 ± 0.01†10.94 ± 0.15
    Averill, R. M.; Sledge, C. B.; and and Thomas, W. H.: Neer total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,4: 287, 1980.4287  1980 
     
    Bade, H. A.; Warren, R. F.; Ranawat, C. S.; and Inglis, A. E.: Long-term results of Neer total shoulder replacement. In Surgery of the Shoulder, p. 294. Edited by J. E. Bateman and R. P. Welsh, St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1984. 
     
    Barrett, W. P.; Franklin, J. L.; Jackins, S. E.; Wyss, C. R.; and and Matsen, F. A., III: Total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-A: 865-872, July 1987.69-A865  1987 
     
    Barrett, W. P.; Thornhill, T. S.; Thomas, W. H.; Gebhart, E. M.; and and Sledge, C. B.: Non-constrained total shoulder arthroplasty in patients with polyarticular rheumatoid arthritis. Orthop. Trans.,11: 466, 1987.11466  1987 
     
    Boyd, A. D., Jr.; Thomas, W. H.; Scott, R. D.; Sledge, C. B.; and and Thornhill, T. S.: Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing. J. Arthroplasty,5: 329-336, 1990.5329  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Brenner, B. C.; Ferlic, D. C.; Clayton, M. L.; and and Dennis, D. A.: Survivorship of unconstrained total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,71-A: 1289-1296, Oct. 1989.71-A1289  1989 
     
    Brostorm, L.-A.; Kronberg, M.; and and Wallensten, R.: Should the glenoid be replaced in shoulder arthroplasty with an unconstrained Dana or St. George prosthesis?. Ann. Chir. Gynaec.,81: 54-57, 1992.8154  1992 
     
    Brumfield, R. H., Jr.; Schilz, J.; and and Flinders, B. W.: Total shoulder replacement arthroplasty: a clinical review of 21 cases. Orthop. Trans.,5: 398-399, 1981.5398  1981 
     
    Campbell, P.; Ma, S.; Yeom, B.; McKellop, H.; Schmalzried, T. P.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Isolation of predominantly submicron-sized UHMWPE wear particles from periprosthetic tissues. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,29: 127-131, 1995.29127  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Clayton, M. L.; Ferlic, D. C.; and and Jeffers, P. D.: Prosthetic arthroplasties of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop.,164: 184-191, 1982.164184  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Cofield, R. H.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 899-906, July 1984.66-A899  1984 
     
    Cofield, R. H., and and Daly, P. J.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with a tissue-ingrowth glenoid component. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg.,1: 77-85, 1992.177  1992 
     
    Cruess, R. L.: Shoulder resurfacing according to the method of Neer. In Proceedings of the British Orthopaedic Association. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,62-B(1): 116, 1980.62-B(1)116  1980 
     
    Faludi, D. D., and and Weiland, A. J.: Cementless total shoulder arthroplasty: preliminary experience with thirteen cases. Orthopedics,6: 428-438, 1983.6428  1983 
     
    Fenlin, J. M., Jr.: Total glenohumeral joint replacement. Orthop. Clin. North America,67: 565-583, 1975.67565  1975 
     
    Figgie, M. P.; Inglis, A. E.; Figgie, H. E., III; Sobel, M.; Burnstein, A. H.; and and Kraay, M. J.: Custom total shoulder arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis. Preliminary results. J. Arthroplasty,7: 1-6, 1992.71  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Frich, L. H.; Moller, B. N.; and and Sneppen, O.: Shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer Mark-II prosthesis. Arch. Orthop. and Traumatic Surg.,107: 110-113, 1988.107110  1988 
     
    Gristina, A. G.; Romano, R. L.; Kammire, G. C.; and and Webb, L. X.: Total shoulder replacement. Orthop. Clin. North America,18: 445-453, 1987.18445  1987 
     
    Harris, W. H.; Schiller, A. L.; Scholler, J.-M.; Freiberg, R. A.; and and Scott, R.: Extensive localized bone resorption in the femur following total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,58-A: 612-618, July 1976.58-A612  1976 
     
    Harryman, D. T., II; Sidles, J. A.; Clark, J. M.; McQuade, K. J.; Gibb, T. D.; and and Matsen, F. A., III: Translation of the humeral head on the glenoid with passive glenohumeral motion. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-A: 1334-1343, Oct. 1990.72-A1334  1990 
     
    Hawkins, J. R.; Bell, R. H.; and and Jallay, B.: Total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,242: 188-194, 1989.242188  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Hirakawa, K.; Bauer, T. W.; Stulberg, B. N.; and and Wilde, A. H.: Comparison and quantitation of wear debris of failed total hip and total knee arthroplasty. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,31: 257-263, 1996.31257  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Isaac, G. H.; Wroblewski, B. M.; Atkinson, J. R.; and and Dowson, D.: A tribological study of retrieved hip prostheses. Clin. Orthop.,276: 115-125, 1992.276115  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Itoi, E.; Motzkin, N. E.; Morrey, B. F.; and and An, K.-N.: The stabilizing function of the long head of the biceps: with the arm in hanging position. Orthop. Trans.,16: 775, 1992-1993.16775  1992-1993 
     
    Jasty, M. J.; Floyd, W. E., III; Schiller, A. L.; Goldring, S. R.; and and Harris, W. H.: Localized osteolysis in stable, non-septic total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,68-A: 912-919, July 1986.68-A912  1986 
     
    Jones, S. M. J.; Pinder, I. M.; Moran, C. G.; and and Malcolm, A. J.: Polyethylene wear in uncemented knee replacements. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(1): 18-22, 1992.74-B(1)18  1992 
     
    Karduna, A. R.; Williams, G. R.; Williams, J. L.; and and Iannotti, J. P.: Kinematics of the glenohumeral joint before and after total shoulder arthroplasty: effects of component conformity. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,21: 700, 1996.21700  1996 
     
    Kelly, I. G.; Foster, R. S.; and and Fisher, W. D.: Neer total shoulder replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,69-B(5): 723-726, 1987.69-B(5)723  1987 
     
    Landry, M. E.; Blanchard, C. R.; Mabrey, J. D.; Wang, X.; and Agrawal, C. M.: The morphology of in vitro generated UHMWPE wear particles as a function of contact conditions and material parameters. Unpublished data. 
     
    McCoy, S. R.; Warren, R. F.; Bade, H. A., III; Ranawat, C. S.; and and Inglis, A. E.: Total shoulder arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Arthroplasty,4: 105-113, 1989.4105  1989  [PubMed]
     
    McElwain, J. P., and and English, E.: The early results of porous-coated total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,218: 217-224, 1987.218217  1987  [PubMed]
     
    McKellop, H. A.; Campbell, P.; Park, S.-H.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Grigoris, P.; Amstutz, H. C.; and and Sarmiento, A.: The origin of submicron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,311: 3-20, 1995.3113  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Maloney, W. J.; Smith, R. L.; Schmalzried, T. P.; Chiba, J.; Huene, D.; and and Rubash, H.: Isolation and characterization of wear particles generated in patients who have had failure of a hip arthroplasty without cement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1301-1310, Sept. 1995.77-A1301  1995 
     
    Margevicius, K. J.; Bauer, T. W.; McMahon, J. T.; Brown, S. A.; and and Merritt, K.: Isolation and characterization of debris in membranes around total joint prostheses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1664-1675, Nov. 1994.76-A1664  1994 
     
    Martin, S. D.; Sledge, C. B.; Thomas, W. H.; and Thornhill, T. S.: Total shoulder arthroplasty with an uncemented glenoid component. Read at the Annual Meeting of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Orlando, Florida, Feb. 19, 1995. 
     
    Mazas, F., and and de la Caffinière, J. Y.: Total arthroplasty of the shoulder. Experience with 38 cases. Orthop. Trans.,5: 57, 1981.557  1981 
     
    Neer, C. S., II; Watson, K. C.; and and Stanton, F. J.: Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,64-A: 319-337, March 1982.64-A319  1982 
     
    Neer, C. S., II, and and Morrison, D. S.: Glenoid bone-grafting in total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,70-A: 1154-1162, Sept. 1988.70-A1154  1988 
     
    Neer, C. S., II: Glenohumeral arthroplasty. In Shoulder Reconstruction, pp. 152-153. Edited by C. S. Neer, II. Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders, 1990. 
     
    Nolan, J. F., and and Bucknill, T. M.: Aggressive granulomatosis from polyethylene failure in an uncemented knee replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(1): 23-24, 1992.74-B(1)23  1992 
     
    Pahle, J. A., and and Kvarnes, L.: Shoulder replacement arthroplasty. Ann. Chir. Gynaec.,74 (Supplementum 198): 85-89, 1985.74 (Supplementum 198)85  1985 
     
    Pollock, R. G.; Deliz, E. D.; McIlveen, S. J.; Flatow, E. L.; and and Bigliani, L. U.: Prosthetic replacement in rotator cuff-deficient shoulders. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg.,1: 173-186, 1992.1173  1992 
     
    Roper, B. A.; Paterson, J. M. H.; and and Day, W. H.: The Roper-Day total shoulder replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-B(4): 694-697, 1990.72-B(4)694  1990 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Jasty, M.; and and Harris, W. H.: Periprosthetic bone loss in total hip arthroplasty. Polyethylene wear debris and the concept of the effective joint space. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-A: 849-863, July 1992.74-A849  1992 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Jasty, M.; Rosenberg, A.; and and Harris, W. H.: Polyethylene wear debris and tissue reactions in knee as compared to hip replacement prostheses. J. Appl. Biomater.,5: 185-190, 1994.5185  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Campbell, P.; Brown, I. C.; Schmitt, A. K.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Polyethylene wear particles generated in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements. Trans. Orthop. Res. Soc.,41: 163, 1995.41163  1995 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P.; Campbell, P.; Schmitt, A. K.; Brown, I. C.; and and Amstutz, H. C.: Shapes and dimensional characteristics of polyethylene wear particles generated in vivo by total knee replacements compared to total hip replacements. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.,38: 203-210, 1997.38203  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Shanbhag, A. S.; Jacobs, J. J.; Glant, T. T.; Gilbert, J. L.; Black, J.; and and Galante, J. O.: Composition and morphology of wear debris in failed uncemented total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-B(1): 60-67, 1994.76-B(1)60  1994 
     
    Thomas, B. J.; Amstutz, H. C.; and and Cracchiolo, A.: Shoulder arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Orthop.,265: 125-128, 1991.265125  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Torchia, M. E., and and Cofield, R. H.: Long-term results of Neer total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,18: 977, 1994-1995.18977  1994-1995 
     
    Wilde, A. H.; Borden, L. S.; and Brems, J. J.: Experience with the Neer total shoulder replacement. In Surgery of the Shoulder, pp. 224-228. Edited by J. E. Bateman and R. P. Welsh, St. Louis, C. V. Mosby, 1984. 
     
    Williams, G. R., Jr., and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Massive rotator cuff defects and glenohumeral arthritis. In Arthroplasty of the Shoulder, pp. 204-214. Edited by R. J. Friedman. New York, Thieme Medical, 1994. 
     
    Wirth, M. A., and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Complications of shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,307: 47-69, 1994.30747  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Wirth, M. A.; Seltzer, D. G.; Senes, H. R.; Pannone, A.; Lee, J.; and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: An analysis of failed humeral head and total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,18: 977-978, 1994-1995.18977  1994-1995 
     
    Wirth, M. A., and and Rockwood, C. A., Jr.: Current concepts review. Complications of total shoulder-replacement arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,78-A: 603-616, April 1996.78-A603  1996 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center