0
Articles   |    
Osteochondromas of the Distal Aspect of the Tibia or Fibula Natural History and Treatment*
Kingsley R. Chin, M.D.; F. Daniel Kharrazi, M.D.; Bruce S. Miller, M.D.; Henry J. Mankin, M.D.; Mark C. Gebhardt, M.D.
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Orthopaedic Oncology Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
*No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Gray Building, Room 606, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-2696. E-mail address for K. R. Chin: kchin@partners.org. E-mail address for B. S. Miller: bmiller@partners.org. E-mail address for H. J. Mankin: hmankin@partners.org. E-mail address for M. C. Gebhardt: gebhardt.mark@mgh.harvard.edu.
Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Kerlan-Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, 6801 Park Terrace, Los Angeles, California 90045.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2000; 82:1269-1269 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: There is little information on the natural history or treatment of osteochondromas arising from the distal aspect of either the tibia or the fibula. It is believed that there is a risk of deformation of the ankle if these exostoses are left untreated or if the physis or neurovascular structures are injured during operative intervention.

Methods: We reviewed the records of twenty-three patients who had been treated for osteochondroma of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula between 1980 and 1996. Four of the patients had hereditary multiple cartilaginous exostoses. There were seventeen male and six female patients, and the average age at the time of presentation was sixteen years (range, eight to forty-eight years).

Results: Preoperative radiographs showed evidence of plastic deformation of the fibula in eleven patients who had a large osteochondroma. Four patients elected not to have an operation. The tumor was excised in nineteen patients. Postoperatively, all nineteen patients had a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 100 percent for function of the lower extremity with pain-free symmetrical and unrestricted motion of the ankle at the latest follow-up examination. Partial remodeling of the tibia and fibula gradually diminished the asymmetry of the ankles in all nineteen operatively managed patients; however, the remodeling was most complete in the younger patients. Pronation deformities of the ankle did not change after excision of the tumor. Complications of operative treatment included four recurrences (only three of which were symptomatic), one sural neuroma, one superficial wound infection, and one instance of growth arrest of the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula.

Conclusions: Osteochondromas of the distal and lateral aspects of the tibia were more often symptomatic than those of the distal aspect of the fibula; they most commonly occurred in the second decade of life with ankle pain, a palpable mass, and unrestricted ankle motion. Untreated or partially excised lesions in skeletally immature patients may become larger and cause plastic deformation of the tibia and fibula and a pronation deformity of the ankle. Ideally, operative intervention should be delayed until skeletal maturity, but, in symptomatic patients, partial excision preserving the physis may be necessary for the relief of symptoms and the prevention of progressive ankle deformity. However, partial excision is associated with a high rate of recurrence, so a close follow-up is required. Skeletally mature patients who are symptomatic may require excision of the tumor.

Figures in this Article
    Osteochondromas account for approximately 40 percent of benign bone tumors and 10 percent of all primary skeletal tumors3. The actual prevalence of these tumors in the general population is unknown, since many patients remain asymptomatic and are never seen by a physician. On the basis of the number of patients who seek treatment, 90 percent of these tumors occur as solitary osteochondromas and the remaining 10 percent are hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses2. Osteochondromas are believed to arise from aberrant cartilaginous epiphyseal growth-plate tissue that proliferates autonomously and increases in size by enchondral ossification3,18,20. They are usually located in the metaphysis of bones that develop by enchondral ossification and are most common in the distal aspect of the femur, proximal aspect of the humerus, and proximal aspect of the tibia, corresponding to the sites of most rapid bone growth2,3,18,20.
    Osteocartilaginous exostoses in the region of the ankle joint can be difficult to manage, despite their benign nature. Operative intervention is associated with the risk of injuring an open epiphyseal plate and the surrounding neurovascular structures. In order to avoid injuring these structures, a limited exposure is sometimes used. However, this makes it more difficult to resect the tumor adequately to prevent recurrence. It is believed that, prior to excision of the tumor, there is an established equilibrium between normal growth and structural deformation of the distal aspect of the tibia and fibula and there is the potential risk of altered ankle mechanics and growth disturbance if the lesion is resected. On the other hand, there is also the potential risk that untreated lesions may continue to deform the ankle and subsequently may affect ankle mechanics6,21 and growth.
    We describe the outcome of treatment of twenty-three patients who had an osteochondroma of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula, nineteen of whom had an excision of the tumor and four of whom were treated nonoperatively.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-F: Case 14.
    Figs. 1-A and 1-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle, made at the time of the initial examination, showing a solitary osteochondroma arising from the lateral side of the distal aspect of the tibia and eroding the posteromedial cortex of the adjacent fibula in a fifteen-year-old boy who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Figs. 1-A and 1-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle, made at the time of the initial examination, showing a solitary osteochondroma arising from the lateral side of the distal aspect of the tibia and eroding the posteromedial cortex of the adjacent fibula in a fifteen-year-old boy who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:Sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance image showing the osteochondroma arising from the distal aspect of the tibia and deforming the adjacent fibula and soft tissues. The bone-marrow space is continuous with that of the tumor.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:Anteroposterior radiograph of the ankle, made after complete resection of the lesion.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:Lateral and mortise radiographs of the ankle, made two and one-half years after the resection, showing closure of the physis, remodeling of the tibia and fibula, partial recurrence of the tumor, and mild valgus tilting of the talar articular surface. The patient was asymptomatic at the time of the latest follow-up examination.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:Lateral and mortise radiographs of the ankle, made two and one-half years after the resection, showing closure of the physis, remodeling of the tibia and fibula, partial recurrence of the tumor, and mild valgus tilting of the talar articular surface. The patient was asymptomatic at the time of the latest follow-up examination.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Representative mortise radiograph of the left ankle, showing substantial deformity of the distal aspect of the tibia and fibula with valgus tilting of the tibiotalar joint surface due to osteochondromas arising from the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula in a skeletally mature patient. The patient was lost to follow-up.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A through 3-D: Case 21.
    Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle of an asymptomatic thirteen-year-old skeletally immature boy, demonstrating a solitary osteochondroma arising from the medial aspect of the metaphysis of the distal aspect of the fibula and eroding the distal aspect of the tibia.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle of an asymptomatic thirteen-year-old skeletally immature boy, demonstrating a solitary osteochondroma arising from the medial aspect of the metaphysis of the distal aspect of the fibula and eroding the distal aspect of the tibia.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C:Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle, made seven years and eight months later, showing closure of the physis and minimal enlargement of the osteochondroma. The patient remained asymptomatic.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-D:Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle, made seven years and eight months later, showing closure of the physis and minimal enlargement of the osteochondroma. The patient remained asymptomatic.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTable I:  Data on the Operatively Managed Patients with Osteochondroma of the Distal Aspect of the Tibia or Fibula
    *MRI = magnetic resonance image, and CT = computerized axial tomography scan.ATFL = anterior tibiofibular ligament.
    CaseGenderAge (yrs.)Involved SideSite of TumorDiagnostic Studies*Adjacent Bone DeformedSymptoms at PresentationOp. IndicationsOp. ApproachExtent of ResectionDurat. of Follow-up (mos.)Symptoms at Latest Follow-upRemarks
    At PresentationAt Op.Since PresentationSince Op.
      1F  910 RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPainless mass, deformationIncreasing size and deformationAnteriorIncomplete  96  84NonePainful recurrence after first op. with 1-in. (2.5-cm) limb-length discrepancy; complete posterolat. resection at 14.5 yrs.
      2M1416LTibia (posteromed. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPainful ankle mass, posterior tibial tendinitis Persistent painAnteriorComplete  90  66NoneAvid hiker since op.
      3F1113LTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPainful ankle massPersistent painAnteriorIncomplete  56  32Intermittent mild swelling and pain with activitiesRecurrence; residual posterior fragment adherent to neurovascular structures
      4M  811LFibula (lat. metaph.)Radiog., MRITibiaPain with boots, deformationPain with boots, increasing deformationAnterolat.Incomplete  61  25NoneRecurrence; plan to complete excision when epiphysis closes
      5F1212LTibia (posterolat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain with activityPersistent pain, increasing sizePosterolat.Complete108108None
      6M1718RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., MRIFibulaPainful lumpPersistent painAnterolat.Complete  67  55None
      7F1717RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain, deformationPersistent pain, deformationPosterolat.Complete  45  45None
      8F1111RTibia (lat. metaph.)Radiog., CTFibulaPain with activity, deformationPersistent, painful mass; deformationAnterolat.Complete137137None
      9M1516RTibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog., MRIFibulaPain with activity, deformationPersistent, painful mass; deformationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete  40  36NoneHardware removed 12 mos. postop. because of irritation
    10M2424RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CT, angiogramNoneRecurrent sprains, painRecurrent sprains, pain Anterolat.Complete202202None
    11F4848LFibula (lat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog., biopsyTibiaPersistent painPersistent painDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete  90  90NoneHardware removed 7 mos. postop. because of irritation
    12M2332L Tibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog.FibulaPersistent painPersistent painAnterolat.Incomplete168   54NoneATFL repair, wound infection, chronic low-grade pain, recurrence, sural neuroma; second op. via fibular osteotomy at 32 yrs. fixed with Rush rod
    13M1010LTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog.FibulaPain with activity, deformationPain with activity, deformationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete144138NoneNationally ranked cyclist after surgery; died in motorcycle accident
    14M1515LTibia (posterolat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPersistent painPersistent pain, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete  32  32NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    15M1717LTibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain with activity, deformationPain with activity, deformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete  60  60NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    16M1414LTibia (lat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibula DeformationDeformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete122122NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    17M1012LTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRI, angiogramFibulaPainful ankle mass, deformationPain, deformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete142118NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    18M1719LFibula (lat. metaph.) Radiog., bone scan, CTTibiaRecurrent sprains, painful massRecurrent sprains, painful massAnterolat.Complete204180Occasional pain after prolonged activitiesWorks on feet all day on assembly line
    19M1518LTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.FibulaPain with activity, deformation, enlarging massPain with activity, increasing deformation, fear of malignant degenerationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete216180NoneFibular osteotomy fixed with Rush rod
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTable II:  Data on the Four Nonoperatively Managed Patients with Osteochondroma of the Distal Aspect of the Tibia or Fibula
    *MRI = magnetic resonance image, and CT = computerized axial tomography scan.
    CaseGenderAge at Presentation (yrs.)Involved SideSite of TumorDiagnostic Studies*Adjacent Bone DeformedSymptoms at PresentationRange of Motion at PresentationDurat. of Follow-up (mos.)Symptoms at Latest Follow-upRange of Motion at Latest Follow-upRemarks
    20M13LTibia (posteromed. metaph.)Radiog., MRI, CTNoneSprain (incidental finding)Full144NoneFull1-cm increase in size since initial presentation
    21M13RFibula (med. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.TibiaSprain (incidental finding)Full  92NoneFull
    22M13RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.FibulaSprain (incidental finding)Full216Small lat. lump, right shoe wore out fasterFullDeclined op. at initial presentation
    23M16RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scanFibulaLat. ankle massFull  89Irritation with boots and activitiesFullContemplating op. at latest follow-up
    We reviewed the records of twenty-three patients who had been treated for an osteochondroma of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula between 1980 and 1996. Nineteen patients had a tumor of the distal aspect of the tibia and four, a tumor of the distal aspect of the fibula. There were seventeen male and six female patients. Four of the male patients had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
    All but one of the skeletally immature patients (Case 4) were followed beyond skeletal maturity. Nineteen patients, ten of whom had been initially treated nonoperatively, were treated operatively. The two senior authors (H. J. M. and M. C. G.) operated on seventeen patients, and another surgeon operated on two patients (Cases 1 and 3). Two patients (Cases 1 and 12) who had had a resection performed elsewhere were referred to our service after recurrence of the tumor (Table I). Recurrence was defined as enlargement of an osteochondroma by more than approximately 25 percent of its original size, as seen on plain radiographs, with resulting symptoms or deformation of the ankle. Asymmetrical pronation or contour of the affected ankle was defined as a deformation of the ankle.
    The tumor was initially diagnosed on plain radiographs. Tomography, computerized axial tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, arteriography, and bone-scanning were performed for selected patients to assist with planning for operative intervention; to evaluate lesions when malignant degeneration was suspected, especially in the four patients who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses; and when the osteochondroma had grown larger after resection (Table I and Table II).
    All of the patients were followed with serial plain radiographs for a minimum of twelve months postoperatively. Radiographs were made after skeletal maturity was reached for all but one of the skeletally immature patients. This patient (Case 4) was still being followed at the time of this writing for possible recurrence or growth disturbance. For the purposes of our study, additional follow-up data were obtained from referring physicians, telephone interviews, plain radiographs, and clinical examination. Patients were asked about symptoms related to the ankle, the effect of these symptoms on their activities of daily living, the use of external supports, and walking ability. A physical examination was performed to determine the range of motion of the affected ankle compared with that of the contralateral ankle and to detect any signs of ankle deformation or a palpable mass. The functional scoring system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society8 was used to evaluate the lower extremity in terms of pain, function, emotional acceptance, use of external supports, walking ability, and gait.

    Operative Technique

    The site of the incision was based on the location of the tumor as determined preoperatively with computerized axial tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Tumors located posterolaterally with deformation of the fibula were approached either directly by performing a fibular osteotomy or through a posterolateral incision. An anterolateral approach was used to excise most of the other tumors. The osteochondroma was exposed, with the surgeon carefully avoiding injury to the neurovascular structures, the normal anatomical location of which could have been altered by the enlarging osteochondroma. Care was also taken to avoid injury to the anterior and posterior tibiofibular ligaments. Drill-holes, one-eighth of an inch (0.32 centimeter) in diameter, were made to demarcate the intended line of the excisional osteotomy. Attempts were made to completely remove the entire cartilaginous cap and perichondrium in one piece with an osteotome; however, this tissue often had to be removed in small fragments. Intraoperative radiographs were made to ascertain the position of the open epiphyseal plate to avoid any injury and to confirm that the tumor had been completely resected.

    Postoperative Management

    Patients were allowed touch-down weight-bearing with the leg in a below-the-knee cast for four weeks. A physical therapy program was started after removal of the cast to regain a range of motion of the ankle and to strengthen and stretch the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle. Radiographs were made at the time of the first postoperative visit, four weeks after the cast was removed, at three months, and at six-month intervals thereafter until the bone had remodeled, the patient was asymptomatic, or skeletal maturity was reached. The range of motion of the ankle was documented as normal unless it was substantially different from that of the contralateral ankle.
    The osteochondromas were confined to either the metaphysis or the junction of the metaphysis and diaphysis of the tibia and fibula, and they did not invade the tibiotalar joint in any of our patients. The tibia was affected in all four patients who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses. Lesions on the lateral border of the tibia or medial border of the fibula abutted the adjacent bone, producing an indentation of the cortex. A tumor on the tibia produced a concave deformity of the medial cortex of the fibula (Fig. 1-A, Fig. 1-B, Fig. 1-C, and Fig. 1-D). Deformation of the fibula was usually associated with medial tilting of the talar surface on radiographs and a corresponding pronation deformity of the ankle on clinical examination (Cases 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, 13 through 17, and 19).
    The average age at the time of the initial presentation was sixteen years (range, eight to forty-eight years). The average age at the time of operative intervention was eighteen years (range, ten to forty-eight years). The average period of nonoperative treatment prior to operative intervention was eleven months (range, zero to three years).
    Most patients presented with a painful ankle mass. In twenty-two patients, the preoperative range of motion was documented as normal and symmetrical with that of the contralateral ankle. One patient (Case 18) had 5 degrees of dorsiflexion and 25 degrees of plantar flexion. In three of the four patients who were treated nonoperatively, the osteochondroma was detected incidentally at the time of evaluation for an ankle sprain (Table II).
    Fourteen patients were initially treated nonoperatively because the lesion appeared benign on plain radiographs, there was minimal structural deformation of the ankle, and the symptoms were mild. Ten of these patients eventually had operative treatment because of persistent pain, enlargement of the tumor, deformity of the ankle, and concern about possible malignant degeneration. Histological examination confirmed the diagnosis of osteochondroma in all of the operatively managed patients.
    In order to excise the tumor completely, an osteotomy of the distal aspect of the fibula was performed in five patients. Internal fixation of the fibula was obtained with a standard 3.5-millimeter dynamic compression plate and screws in two patients (Cases 9 and 11) and a Rush rod in two patients (Cases 12 and 19). In one patient (Case 13), a ten-year-old child, the osteotomy site was stabilized by suturing the periosteum around the osteotomized fibula. The fibular osteotomy healed in all five patients. The resection was incomplete in four patients (Cases 1, 3, 4, and 12) because an attempt to completely resect the tumor would have injured the adjacent physis and neurovascular structures.
    The average duration of follow-up from the time of initial presentation was nine years and six months (range, two years and eight months to eighteen years) for all twenty-three patients. For the nineteen patients who had an excision of the tumor, the average duration of follow-up from the time of the operation was seven years and nine months (range, two years and one month to sixteen years and ten months). For the four patients who were treated nonoperatively, the average duration of follow-up was eleven years and three months (range, seven years and five months to eighteen years). All of the operatively managed patients had a Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score of 100 percent in terms of function, unrestricted ankle motion symmetrical with that of the contralateral ankle, full ankle strength, and absence of ankle pain at the latest follow-up examination. Partial remodeling of the tibia and fibula had occurred in all of the operatively managed patients, particularly the skeletally immature ones (Fig. 1-E and Fig. 1-F).
    Complications included one sural neuroma, one superficial wound infection, and one instance of growth arrest of the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula. The tumor recurred in four patients who had had an incomplete resection; three (Cases 1, 3, and 4) were skeletally immature, and one (Case 12) was a young adult. Three of the four patients had a symptomatic recurrence of the osteochondroma. One patient (Case 1) was referred to our hospital four years after a painful recurrence and with a limb-length discrepancy of 2.5 centimeters secondary to premature closure of the physes of the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula. There was no physeal bar to suggest a traumatic growth arrest. Since the patient had already reached skeletal maturity when she was seen at our hospital, the limb-length discrepancy was treated with a one-inch (2.5-centimeter) shoe insert. The patient subsequently had complete resection of the osteochondroma with complete relief of symptoms. In one patient (Case 3), a posterior fragment was incompletely resected because it was adherent to the neurovascular structures about the ankle and was adjacent to the physis. This patient was followed until skeletal maturity, and serial plain radiographs showed that the remaining tumor did not become larger or symptomatic.
    A benign osteochondroma enlarges while the physis is open, and it stops growing with physeal closure2,3,18,20. The prevalence of this tumor in male and female patients is approximately 1.6 to one. Patients usually present with pain, limitation in the range of motion of the adjacent joint, or a palpable mass during the first or second decade of life3,20. However, because of indolent growth these tumors can either remain asymptomatic throughout the patient's life or cause a variety of symptoms because of their proximity to joints. The presenting symptoms may be due to pressure against nerves21,23,25, blood vessels9,22, tendons17, joints1,13, or bones4,20; bursa formation7; pathological fracture3,5; infarction20,24; osteomyelitis20; or malignant degeneration3,10.
    Radiographs are usually diagnostic and may be used to monitor the patient during follow-up evaluations. The tumors are either sessile or pedunculated with evidence of a definite continuity between the cortex and spongiosa of the lesion with those of the host bone3,12,18,20. Sessile osteochondroma can be difficult to differentiate from parosteal osteosarcoma, juxtacortical chondrosarcoma or chondroma, Ollier disease, and myositis ossificans19. Imaging studies and bone scintigraphy can aid in the diagnosis prior to definitive histological analysis11,15,16.
    Osteochondromas that occur about the ankle may affect the growth of the extremity, become painful, limit motion of the ankle joint, or result in weakness or deformity4,6,21. In the present study, the patients usually presented with ankle pain and a palpable ankle mass. Five patients were initially evaluated for an ankle sprain, and one of them had a history of recurrent sprains. The four patients who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses were seen at an average of two years earlier than the patients who had a solitary lesion. Three of the four patients did not respond to nonoperative treatment. The results for these four patients suggest that skeletally immature patients who have an aggressive osteochondroma of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula may have undiagnosed hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
    The decision to treat these lesions nonoperatively carries the risk of persistent symptoms and ankle deformity. The tumor may enlarge and deform the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula with mild-to-moderate pronation of the ankle, visualized as a valgus tilting of the talar articular surface on plain radiographs (Fig. 2). It remains to be seen whether such changes predispose these untreated patients to tibiotalar arthritis or recurrent ankle injuries.
    Excision of the tumor is the recommended treatment for osteochondromas that are symptomatic or have increased size after the patient has reached skeletal maturity. Tumors that occur in the axial skeleton, pelvic girdle, or shoulder girdle should be carefully evaluated and, at times, should be removed because of the potential for malignant degeneration3,10,12,19. This is especially true for patients who have multiple hereditary osteocartilaginous exostoses and for skeletally mature patients, since it may be difficult to distinguish osteochondroma from chondrosarcoma3,10,12,14,19. In contrast, pain and enlargement of an osteochondroma in a skeletally immature patient seldom indicates malignancy. Growth of these tumors parallels that of the physis and may continue even after the physis closes.
    All of our patients presented with normal function of the ankle, and they retained a normal range of motion postoperatively. Other authors have reported similar findings4. This may be due to the indolent growth of these lesions such that the soft tissues and bones are slowly distorted. In addition, these tumors usually grow away from joints at a right angle to the orientation of the epiphyseal plate of origin2,8,20.
    In the present study, there was remodeling of both bones in patients who had had a resection of an osteochondroma of the distal aspect of the tibia or fibula; this was more evident in skeletally immature patients. There was no change in the pronation deformity of the affected ankle. Patients who have a large tumor, substantial deformation of the fibula, and valgus alignment of the ankle are unlikely to have a marked decrease of the deformity after excision of the osteochondroma. These patients may need a varus osteotomy of the distal aspect of the tibia to correct the valgus deformity at the ankle.
    The importance of complete resection of the cartilaginous cap to prevent recurrence is well established19,20. Our initial concerns were that removing the lesion could disrupt an equilibrium that had been established between the lesion and the ankle, resulting in altered mechanics or a growth disturbance. Furthermore, since these lesions tend to grow away from the ankle joint and the epiphyseal plate of origin2,8, it appeared that the risk of iatrogenic injury to the growth plate and ankle joint might be greater than that posed by the tumor. In the present study, resection of the lesion while preserving the distal aspect of the fibula affected ankle motion and growth in only one patient (Case 1). An oblique osteotomy of the distal aspect of the fibula provided better exposure of the osteochondroma, permitting more complete resection of the tumor. Complete resection of the distal aspect of the fibula6 in order to remove an osteochondroma near the ankle may be an overly aggressive approach and may create undue risk of growth disturbance and altered ankle mechanics in order to obtain tumor-free margins. On the other hand, partial excision was associated with a high rate of recurrence (four of nineteen) and necessitates close long-term follow-up.
    In our series, the patients who had a symptomatic lesion and for whom nonoperative treatment had failed elected to have operative treatment to prevent chronic persistent symptoms and increasing deformity of the ankle. In contrast, the patients who had a smaller asymptomatic lesion, especially when found incidentally on plain radiographs, were followed with serial plain radiographs until skeletal maturity (Fig. 3-A, Fig. 3-B, Fig. 3-C, and Fig. 3-D) and, as a group, did well. The patients who had considerable growth remaining had deformation of the tibia and fibula. Therefore, we suggest treating this subset of patients with partial or complete resection while preserving the epiphysis. Plain radiographs should be made every three to six months, to monitor the size of the tumor, until the patient reaches skeletal maturity. The tumor can be resected if the symptoms recur. By following these guidelines, we have had few complications and minimal recurrence after limited resection of the tumor.
    Chioros, P. G.; Frankel, S. L.; and Sidlow, C. J.: Unusual osteochondroma of the foot and ankle. J. Foot Surg.,26: 407-411, 1987.26407  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Dahlin, D. C., and Unni, K. K.: Bone Tumors. General Aspects and Data on 8,542 Cases. Ed. 4, pp. 18-32. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C Thomas, 1986. 
     
    D'Ambrosia, R., and Ferguson, A. B., Jr.: The formation of osteochondroma by epiphyseal cartilage transplantation. Clin. Orthop.,61: 103-115, 1968.61103  1968  [PubMed]
     
    Danielsson, L. G.; el-Haddad, I.; and Quadros, O.: Distal tibial osteochondroma deforming the fibula. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,61: 469-470, 1990.61469  1990 
     
    Davids, J. R.; Glancy, G. L.; and Eilert, R. E.: Fracture through the stalk of pedunculated osteochondromas. A report of three cases. Clin. Orthop.,271: 258-264, 1991.271258  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Durak, K.; Bilgen, O.; Kaleli, T.; and Aydinli, U.: Distal fibula resection in osteochondroma. J. Internat. Med. Res.,24: 381-386, 1996.24381  1996 
     
    El-Khoury, G. Y., and Bassett, G. S.: Symptomatic bursa formation with osteochondromas. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,133: 895-898, 1979.133895  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking, W. F.; Dunham, W.; Gebhardt, M. C.; Malawar, M.; and Pritchard, D. J.: A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin. Orthop.,286: 241-246, 1993.286241  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Ferriter, P.; Hirschy, J.; Kesseler, H.; and Scott, W. N.: Popliteal pseudoaneurysm. A case report.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,65-A: 695-697, June 1983.65-A695  1983 
     
    Garrison, R. C.; Unni, K. K.; McLeod, R. A.; Pritchard, D. J.; and Dahlin, D. C.: Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer,,49: 1890-1897, 1982.491890  1982 
     
    Hudson, T. M.; Springfield, D. S.; Spanier, S. S.; Enneking, W. F.; and Hamlin, D. J.: Benign exostoses and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage thickness by CT. Radiology,152: 595-599, 1984.152595  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Jaffe, H. L.: Tumors and Tumorous Conditions of the Bones and Joints, pp. 143-168. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1958. 
     
    Jones, W. T., and Jones, R. O.: Solitary osteochondroma of the ankle in a four-year-old. J. Foot Surg.,21: 191-193, 1982.21191  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Krieg, J. C.; Buckwalter, J. A.; Peterson, K. K.; El-Khoury, G. Y.; and Robinson, R. A.: Extensive growth of an osteochondroma in a skeletally mature patient. A case report. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 269-273, Feb 1995.77-A269  1995 
     
    Lange, R. H.; Lange, T. A.; and Rao, B. K.: Correlative radiographic, scintigraphic, and histological evaluation of exostoses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 1454-1459, Dec 1984.66-A1454  1984 
     
    Lee, J. K.; Yao, L.; and Wirth, C. R.: MR imaging of solitary osteochondromas: report of eight cases. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,149: 557-560, 1987.149557  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Martin, M. A.; Garcia, L.; Hijazi, H.; and Sanchez, M. M.: Osteochondroma of the peroneal tubercle. A report of two cases. Internat. Orthop.,19: 405-407, 1995.19405  1995 
     
    Milgram, J. W.: The origins of osteochondromas and enchondromas. A histopathologic study.. Clin. Orthop.,174: 264-284, 1983.174264  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Mirra, J. M.: Bone Tumors, Diagnosis and Treatment, pp. 520-577. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1980. 
     
    Mirra, J. M.: Bone Tumors. Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Correlation. Vol. 2, pp. 1626-1660. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1989. 
     
    Montella, B. J.; O'Farrell, D. A.; Furr, W. S.; and Harrelson, J. M.: Fibular osteochondroma presenting as chronic ankle sprain. Foot and Ankle Internat.,16: 207-209, 1995.16207  1995 
     
    Prosser, A. J.; Brenkel, I. J.; Pearse, M.; and Gregg, P. J.: Unusual causes of calf swelling - 3. Popliteal vein obstruction by an osteochondroma of the proximal tibia. Postgrad. Med. J.,63: 657-659, 1987.63657  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Trotter, D.; Zindrick, M.; and Ibrahim, K.: An unusual presentation of an osteochondroma. Report of a case. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 299-301, Feb 1984.66-A299  1984 
     
    Unger, E. C.; Gilula, L. A.; and Kyriakos, M.: Case report 430: ischemic necrosis of osteochondroma of tibia. Skel. Radiol.,16: 416-421, 1987.16416  1987 
     
    Watson, L. W., and Torch, M. A.: Peroneal nerve palsy secondary to compression from an osteochondroma. Orthopedics,16: 706-710, 1993.16706  1993 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-F: Case 14.
    Figs. 1-A and 1-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle, made at the time of the initial examination, showing a solitary osteochondroma arising from the lateral side of the distal aspect of the tibia and eroding the posteromedial cortex of the adjacent fibula in a fifteen-year-old boy who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Figs. 1-A and 1-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the ankle, made at the time of the initial examination, showing a solitary osteochondroma arising from the lateral side of the distal aspect of the tibia and eroding the posteromedial cortex of the adjacent fibula in a fifteen-year-old boy who had hereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:Sagittal T1-weighted magnetic resonance image showing the osteochondroma arising from the distal aspect of the tibia and deforming the adjacent fibula and soft tissues. The bone-marrow space is continuous with that of the tumor.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:Anteroposterior radiograph of the ankle, made after complete resection of the lesion.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:Lateral and mortise radiographs of the ankle, made two and one-half years after the resection, showing closure of the physis, remodeling of the tibia and fibula, partial recurrence of the tumor, and mild valgus tilting of the talar articular surface. The patient was asymptomatic at the time of the latest follow-up examination.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:Lateral and mortise radiographs of the ankle, made two and one-half years after the resection, showing closure of the physis, remodeling of the tibia and fibula, partial recurrence of the tumor, and mild valgus tilting of the talar articular surface. The patient was asymptomatic at the time of the latest follow-up examination.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Representative mortise radiograph of the left ankle, showing substantial deformity of the distal aspect of the tibia and fibula with valgus tilting of the tibiotalar joint surface due to osteochondromas arising from the distal aspects of the tibia and fibula in a skeletally mature patient. The patient was lost to follow-up.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A through 3-D: Case 21.
    Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle of an asymptomatic thirteen-year-old skeletally immature boy, demonstrating a solitary osteochondroma arising from the medial aspect of the metaphysis of the distal aspect of the fibula and eroding the distal aspect of the tibia.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Figs. 3-A and 3-B: Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle of an asymptomatic thirteen-year-old skeletally immature boy, demonstrating a solitary osteochondroma arising from the medial aspect of the metaphysis of the distal aspect of the fibula and eroding the distal aspect of the tibia.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C:Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle, made seven years and eight months later, showing closure of the physis and minimal enlargement of the osteochondroma. The patient remained asymptomatic.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-D:Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the right ankle, made seven years and eight months later, showing closure of the physis and minimal enlargement of the osteochondroma. The patient remained asymptomatic.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTable I:  Data on the Operatively Managed Patients with Osteochondroma of the Distal Aspect of the Tibia or Fibula
    *MRI = magnetic resonance image, and CT = computerized axial tomography scan.ATFL = anterior tibiofibular ligament.
    CaseGenderAge (yrs.)Involved SideSite of TumorDiagnostic Studies*Adjacent Bone DeformedSymptoms at PresentationOp. IndicationsOp. ApproachExtent of ResectionDurat. of Follow-up (mos.)Symptoms at Latest Follow-upRemarks
    At PresentationAt Op.Since PresentationSince Op.
      1F  910 RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPainless mass, deformationIncreasing size and deformationAnteriorIncomplete  96  84NonePainful recurrence after first op. with 1-in. (2.5-cm) limb-length discrepancy; complete posterolat. resection at 14.5 yrs.
      2M1416LTibia (posteromed. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPainful ankle mass, posterior tibial tendinitis Persistent painAnteriorComplete  90  66NoneAvid hiker since op.
      3F1113LTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPainful ankle massPersistent painAnteriorIncomplete  56  32Intermittent mild swelling and pain with activitiesRecurrence; residual posterior fragment adherent to neurovascular structures
      4M  811LFibula (lat. metaph.)Radiog., MRITibiaPain with boots, deformationPain with boots, increasing deformationAnterolat.Incomplete  61  25NoneRecurrence; plan to complete excision when epiphysis closes
      5F1212LTibia (posterolat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain with activityPersistent pain, increasing sizePosterolat.Complete108108None
      6M1718RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., MRIFibulaPainful lumpPersistent painAnterolat.Complete  67  55None
      7F1717RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain, deformationPersistent pain, deformationPosterolat.Complete  45  45None
      8F1111RTibia (lat. metaph.)Radiog., CTFibulaPain with activity, deformationPersistent, painful mass; deformationAnterolat.Complete137137None
      9M1516RTibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog., MRIFibulaPain with activity, deformationPersistent, painful mass; deformationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete  40  36NoneHardware removed 12 mos. postop. because of irritation
    10M2424RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CT, angiogramNoneRecurrent sprains, painRecurrent sprains, pain Anterolat.Complete202202None
    11F4848LFibula (lat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog., biopsyTibiaPersistent painPersistent painDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete  90  90NoneHardware removed 7 mos. postop. because of irritation
    12M2332L Tibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog.FibulaPersistent painPersistent painAnterolat.Incomplete168   54NoneATFL repair, wound infection, chronic low-grade pain, recurrence, sural neuroma; second op. via fibular osteotomy at 32 yrs. fixed with Rush rod
    13M1010LTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.) Radiog.FibulaPain with activity, deformationPain with activity, deformationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete144138NoneNationally ranked cyclist after surgery; died in motorcycle accident
    14M1515LTibia (posterolat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRIFibulaPersistent painPersistent pain, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete  32  32NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    15M1717LTibia (lat. metaph.) Radiog., bone scan, CTFibulaPain with activity, deformationPain with activity, deformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete  60  60NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    16M1414LTibia (lat. metaph.)Radiog., bone scan, CTFibula DeformationDeformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete122122NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    17M1012LTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scan, MRI, angiogramFibulaPainful ankle mass, deformationPain, deformation, fear of malignant degenerationAnterolat.Complete142118NoneHereditary multiple osteocartilaginous exostoses
    18M1719LFibula (lat. metaph.) Radiog., bone scan, CTTibiaRecurrent sprains, painful massRecurrent sprains, painful massAnterolat.Complete204180Occasional pain after prolonged activitiesWorks on feet all day on assembly line
    19M1518LTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.FibulaPain with activity, deformation, enlarging massPain with activity, increasing deformation, fear of malignant degenerationDirect lat. (fibular osteotomy)Complete216180NoneFibular osteotomy fixed with Rush rod
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTable II:  Data on the Four Nonoperatively Managed Patients with Osteochondroma of the Distal Aspect of the Tibia or Fibula
    *MRI = magnetic resonance image, and CT = computerized axial tomography scan.
    CaseGenderAge at Presentation (yrs.)Involved SideSite of TumorDiagnostic Studies*Adjacent Bone DeformedSymptoms at PresentationRange of Motion at PresentationDurat. of Follow-up (mos.)Symptoms at Latest Follow-upRange of Motion at Latest Follow-upRemarks
    20M13LTibia (posteromed. metaph.)Radiog., MRI, CTNoneSprain (incidental finding)Full144NoneFull1-cm increase in size since initial presentation
    21M13RFibula (med. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.TibiaSprain (incidental finding)Full  92NoneFull
    22M13RTibia (lat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog.FibulaSprain (incidental finding)Full216Small lat. lump, right shoe wore out fasterFullDeclined op. at initial presentation
    23M16RTibia (posterolat. metaph.-diaph.)Radiog., bone scanFibulaLat. ankle massFull  89Irritation with boots and activitiesFullContemplating op. at latest follow-up
    Chioros, P. G.; Frankel, S. L.; and Sidlow, C. J.: Unusual osteochondroma of the foot and ankle. J. Foot Surg.,26: 407-411, 1987.26407  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Dahlin, D. C., and Unni, K. K.: Bone Tumors. General Aspects and Data on 8,542 Cases. Ed. 4, pp. 18-32. Springfield, Illinois, Charles C Thomas, 1986. 
     
    D'Ambrosia, R., and Ferguson, A. B., Jr.: The formation of osteochondroma by epiphyseal cartilage transplantation. Clin. Orthop.,61: 103-115, 1968.61103  1968  [PubMed]
     
    Danielsson, L. G.; el-Haddad, I.; and Quadros, O.: Distal tibial osteochondroma deforming the fibula. Acta Orthop. Scandinavica,61: 469-470, 1990.61469  1990 
     
    Davids, J. R.; Glancy, G. L.; and Eilert, R. E.: Fracture through the stalk of pedunculated osteochondromas. A report of three cases. Clin. Orthop.,271: 258-264, 1991.271258  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Durak, K.; Bilgen, O.; Kaleli, T.; and Aydinli, U.: Distal fibula resection in osteochondroma. J. Internat. Med. Res.,24: 381-386, 1996.24381  1996 
     
    El-Khoury, G. Y., and Bassett, G. S.: Symptomatic bursa formation with osteochondromas. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,133: 895-898, 1979.133895  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking, W. F.; Dunham, W.; Gebhardt, M. C.; Malawar, M.; and Pritchard, D. J.: A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin. Orthop.,286: 241-246, 1993.286241  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Ferriter, P.; Hirschy, J.; Kesseler, H.; and Scott, W. N.: Popliteal pseudoaneurysm. A case report.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,65-A: 695-697, June 1983.65-A695  1983 
     
    Garrison, R. C.; Unni, K. K.; McLeod, R. A.; Pritchard, D. J.; and Dahlin, D. C.: Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer,,49: 1890-1897, 1982.491890  1982 
     
    Hudson, T. M.; Springfield, D. S.; Spanier, S. S.; Enneking, W. F.; and Hamlin, D. J.: Benign exostoses and exostotic chondrosarcomas: evaluation of cartilage thickness by CT. Radiology,152: 595-599, 1984.152595  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Jaffe, H. L.: Tumors and Tumorous Conditions of the Bones and Joints, pp. 143-168. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1958. 
     
    Jones, W. T., and Jones, R. O.: Solitary osteochondroma of the ankle in a four-year-old. J. Foot Surg.,21: 191-193, 1982.21191  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Krieg, J. C.; Buckwalter, J. A.; Peterson, K. K.; El-Khoury, G. Y.; and Robinson, R. A.: Extensive growth of an osteochondroma in a skeletally mature patient. A case report. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 269-273, Feb 1995.77-A269  1995 
     
    Lange, R. H.; Lange, T. A.; and Rao, B. K.: Correlative radiographic, scintigraphic, and histological evaluation of exostoses. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 1454-1459, Dec 1984.66-A1454  1984 
     
    Lee, J. K.; Yao, L.; and Wirth, C. R.: MR imaging of solitary osteochondromas: report of eight cases. AJR: Am. J. Roentgenol.,149: 557-560, 1987.149557  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Martin, M. A.; Garcia, L.; Hijazi, H.; and Sanchez, M. M.: Osteochondroma of the peroneal tubercle. A report of two cases. Internat. Orthop.,19: 405-407, 1995.19405  1995 
     
    Milgram, J. W.: The origins of osteochondromas and enchondromas. A histopathologic study.. Clin. Orthop.,174: 264-284, 1983.174264  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Mirra, J. M.: Bone Tumors, Diagnosis and Treatment, pp. 520-577. Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott, 1980. 
     
    Mirra, J. M.: Bone Tumors. Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic Correlation. Vol. 2, pp. 1626-1660. Philadelphia, Lea and Febiger, 1989. 
     
    Montella, B. J.; O'Farrell, D. A.; Furr, W. S.; and Harrelson, J. M.: Fibular osteochondroma presenting as chronic ankle sprain. Foot and Ankle Internat.,16: 207-209, 1995.16207  1995 
     
    Prosser, A. J.; Brenkel, I. J.; Pearse, M.; and Gregg, P. J.: Unusual causes of calf swelling - 3. Popliteal vein obstruction by an osteochondroma of the proximal tibia. Postgrad. Med. J.,63: 657-659, 1987.63657  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Trotter, D.; Zindrick, M.; and Ibrahim, K.: An unusual presentation of an osteochondroma. Report of a case. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,66-A: 299-301, Feb 1984.66-A299  1984 
     
    Unger, E. C.; Gilula, L. A.; and Kyriakos, M.: Case report 430: ischemic necrosis of osteochondroma of tibia. Skel. Radiol.,16: 416-421, 1987.16416  1987 
     
    Watson, L. W., and Torch, M. A.: Peroneal nerve palsy secondary to compression from an osteochondroma. Orthopedics,16: 706-710, 1993.16706  1993 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Surgical management of 121 benign proximal fibula tumors.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 2010 Nov
    Salvage reconstruction for lateral ankle instability using a tendon allograft.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 2003 Oct
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center