0
Articles   |    
Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Precoated Offset Stem Four to Nine-Year Results*
Vincent P. Cannestra, M.D.; Richard A. Berger, M.D.; Laura R. Quigley, M.S.; Joshua J. Jacobs, M.D.; Aaron G. Rosenberg, M.D.; Jorge O. Galante, M.D.
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Arthritis and Orthopaedics Institute, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Illinois
*Although none of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article, benefits have been or will be received but are directed solely to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which one or more of the authors is associated. No funds were received in support of this study.
Arthritis and Orthopaedics Institute, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Rush Medical College, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, Illinois 60612.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2000; 82:1291-1291 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Use of modern cementing techniques for fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty has had excellent clinical and radiographic results in most patients. However, several authors have described early loosening of femoral components with roughened and precoated finishes. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the precoated Iowa stem, which has increased offset, and to compare the results with those of another cemented precoated femoral component with standard offset used at our institution.

Methods: We carried out a prospective analysis of 102 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) performed with use of the Iowa femoral component in ninety-five patients at our institution. The Iowa stem was used in hips that required greater offset than is available with standard stems as determined by preoperative templating. The average age of the patients at the time of the index procedure was sixty-nine years. Sixteen patients (seventeen hips) died before the forty-eight-month minimum follow-up period had elapsed. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and radiographic follow-up was incomplete for one. The mean duration of clinical and radiographic follow-up of the remaining eighty-two hips in the seventy-six surviving patients was sixty-five months (range, forty-eight to 104 months).

Results: The average preoperative Harris hip score of 47 points (range, 16 to 69 points) improved to an average of 87 points (range, 24 to 100 points) at the time of the review. Two hips underwent femoral component revision. Four femoral stems were radiographically loose at an average of thirty-four months. Femoral osteolysis was seen in five hips (6 percent) at an average of fifty-four months postoperatively. No acetabular component was revised because of aseptic loosening. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, the seven-year survival rate, with an end point of femoral revision, osteolysis, or stem debonding, was 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.94).

Conclusions: The prevalence of revision, osteolysis, and loosening after total hip arthroplasty with the Iowa femoral component at our institution was higher than that seen in our series of Harris Precoat stems, which had a survival rate of 98.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00) at ten years with the same end points. The design of the Iowa stem may make it difficult to achieve a good cement mantle, and, in combination with the geometry and increased offset of the stem, may compromise the long-term survival of this cemented femoral component.

Figures in this Article
    The clinical and radiographic results of modern cementing techniques for fixation of femoral components in total hip arthroplasty have usually been excellent16,28-30. However, several authors have described early loosening of femoral components of various designs. Surface finish has been implicated as a possible factor, and the results associated with use of the Iowa stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) have been reported to be particularly sensitive to surface finish6,7,27,35. This prosthesis, with the addition of a roughened, precoated finish, was designed to reduce the stress on the cement mantle as well as to provide greater offset than standard straight stems. Both surface finish and stem geometry have been implicated as factors contributing to early stem debonding leading to periprosthetic osteolysis and stem failure.
    Mohler et al.27 reported a unique pattern of loosening of the Iowa stem whereby the implant debonded from its cement mantle as manifested by an enlarging radiolucency along the shoulder of the stem in zone I of Gruen et al.17. This debonding was followed by progressive loosening of the prosthesis and the development of extensive osteolysis in the proximal part of the femur and at the distal stem tip. The authors noted that cement mantle deficiencies were common and may have led to loosening. Mohler et al.27, Callaghan et al.6, and Sporer et al.35 suggested that the geometry as well as the surface finish of the Iowa stem were primarily responsible for this early pattern of loosening. They hypothesized that after debonding occurs the cylindrical shape of the proximal part of the stem permits the stem to rotate within its cement mantle, allowing the roughened surface to abrade the polymethylmethacrylate and produce wear debris particles, leading to osteolysis and eventual aseptic failure. However, this early loosening has not been reported in other studies of roughened, precoated stems of other geometries2,16,26,29,30,34.
    In December 1989, the Iowa stem was introduced at our institution for hips requiring greater offset as determined by templating of preoperative radiographs. The purpose of this study was to report the performance of the Iowa stem after a minimum follow-up of four years.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Photograph of the Iowa stem. Note the cobra shape, the increased neck-stem offset, and the cylindrical stem.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made six weeks after insertion of an Iowa stem, showing thinning of the cement mantle (arrows) as a result of the stem's valgus position. The cement mantle was grade C-2.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B: The same hip at forty-eight months. Debonding has occurred (arrows), and there is a large osteolytic lesion. This stem was eventually revised because of progressive loosening.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made six months after insertion of an Iowa stem, showing the stem placed in varus with thinning of the cement mantle in Gruen zone III (arrows). The cement mantle was grade C-2.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B: The same hip at sixty-six months. Debonding (arrows) without osteolysis is evident.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made three months after insertion of an Iowa stem. The absence of proximal and distal centralizers allowed eccentric insertion of the stem into the cement. The resultant areas of thin cement (arrows) led to the mantle being classified as grade C-2.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B: The same hip at fifty-seven months. There is extensive osteolysis (arrowheads) but no radiographic evidence of debonding.
    In a nonrandomized study that began in December 1989, we evaluated the results of the use of Iowa stems at our institution. The data, including clinical scores and radiographs, were prospectively collected at predetermined intervals. From December 1989 through October 1994, 102 Iowa femoral components were implanted in ninety-five patients with an average age of sixty-nine years (range, forty to eighty-six years). There were fifty-three men (fifty-six hips) and forty-two women (forty-six hips). At the time of the review, sixteen patients (seventeen hips) had died of unrelated causes less than forty-eight months postoperatively and two patients (two hips) had been lost to follow-up. All nineteen hips were well functioning and radiographically stable at their last follow-up evaluation. One patient (one hip) had incomplete radiographic follow-up but had a clinically well functioning hip. Thus, the results of a complete clinical assessment and radiographic evaluation were available for eighty-two hips in seventy-six patients. The average duration of follow-up was sixty-five months (range, forty-eight to 104 months).
    The preoperative diagnosis was primary osteoarthrosis in eighty-nine hips (87 percent), rheumatoid arthritis in four (4 percent), avascular necrosis in seven (7 percent), and posttraumatic osteoarthrosis in two (2 percent). In patients with disabling disease of the hip, the indications for hybrid total hip arthroplasty (a cementless acetabular component and a cemented femoral component) included an age of more than sixty-five years or femoral bone stock that was considered inadequate for cementless fixation. The Iowa stem was used for hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients who required greater offset to restore the hip biomechanics, as determined by preoperative templating, than was provided by the Harris Precoat stem (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana), which was the stem that was normally used during this time-interval at our institution.
    The Iowa femoral components (Fig. 1) were made of forged cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy, had a grit-blasted roughened surface finish (Ra roughness, sixty to eighty microinches), and were precoated with a thin layer of polymethylmethacrylate over the proximal one-third of the stem during the manufacturing process. The stems came in two diameters (16.5 and 18.5 millimeters) and were 140 millimeters long. The neck angle used at our institution was 132 degrees with an offset of forty to fifty-five millimeters, depending on the head and neck prostheses that were selected. The components all had a collar and were cemented with modern technique. This included the use of a cement restrictor, a cement gun, vacuum-mixing, and cement pressurization. Simplex-P polymethylmethacrylate (Howmedica, Rutherford, New Jersey) was used in all hips and was placed into the femoral canal in a retrograde fashion. A distal centralizer was utilized in sixteen hips. A modular twenty-eight-millimeter-diameter cobalt-chromium femoral head with five available neck lengths was applied to the Morse taper.
    A hemispherical acetabular component made of titanium alloy with a sintered titanium fiber-mesh porous coating for fixation was used in all 102 hips. The Harris-Galante-II cup (Zimmer) was used in the first ninety-four hips, and the Trilogy component (Zimmer) was employed in the last eight. The acetabular components were inserted after underreaming by one to two millimeters. In nearly all patients, supplemental fixation was provided by one, two, or three 6.5-millimeter-diameter acetabular bone screws.
    Patients were followed in the office, according to a predetermined protocol, at six weeks, at three months, at six months, and yearly thereafter. At each visit, the patient was examined clinically and a complete set of radiographs was made; these included an anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis, anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the hip, and a lateral radiograph of the acetabulum. The radiographs were evaluated both qualitatively and quantitatively. The radiographs made at six weeks postoperatively were used as the baseline. Two independent observers scrutinized all radiographs of the femora for radiolucent lines at the bone-cement and prosthesis-cement interfaces, osteolysis, subsidence, migration, quality of the cement mantle, and stem alignment (varus, valgus, or neutral). At each yearly visit, an individual other than the operating surgeon determined a Harris hip score19.
    Qualitative evaluation of the acetabular component consisted of analysis of the implant-bone interface for the presence and extent of radiolucent lines on the anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The implant-bone interface was divided into five zones with a modification of the method of DeLee and Charnley10,25. The screws used to supplement the fixation of the acetabular cup were evaluated closely for evidence of adjacent radiolucent lines, breakage, or migration. Furthermore, the acetabular polyethylene was analyzed for linear wear and the periacetabular bone was examined for osteolysis. Comparisons were made among initial radiographs, those made at all follow-up intervals, and the final follow-up radiographs.
    Quantitative evaluation of the acetabular component was carried out with a digitizing tablet (Sigma Scan; Jandel Scientific, Corte Madera, California) as previously described25. Definite loosening of the acetabular component was defined as more than two millimeters of migration when compared with the position on baseline radiographs. When radiolucent lines were present in at least four zones and they were more than two millimeters wide in at least one of the zones, the acetabular component was defined as probably loose26.
    To evaluate the femoral component, the proximal aspect of the femur was divided into seven zones according to the method of Gruen et al.17. Radiolucent lines at the bone-cement and implant-cement interfaces were measured on both the anteroposterior and the lateral radiographs of the proximal part of the femur. Subsidence or a change in component position was determined by previously described methods26. The bone density of the calcar region of the proximal-medial cortex of the femur was evaluated qualitatively. The diaphysis of the femur was evaluated for any evidence of cortical hypertrophy.
    Debonding of the implant from the cement mantle was defined as a separation or a definite radiolucent line at the stem-cement interface that was not initially present on postoperative radiographs. Osteolysis was defined as a radiolucent area or line greater than three millimeters in thickness and progressive in nature as compared with that seen on the previous follow-up radiographs. Loosening of the femoral component was defined with use of the criteria established by Harris et al.20. The femoral component was considered definitely loose if there was subsidence of more than two millimeters, progressive radiolucency between the stem and the cement, or fracture of the cement or the stem.
    The cement mantles were graded as A, B, C, or D, according to the criteria of Barrack et al.1, on radiographs made within the first six months after implantation. The category of C-2 includes either a thin cement mantle (less than one millimeter) at any site or a defect in the mantle with metal in direct contact with cortical bone. The mantle is also rated as C-2 if there is less than ten millimeters of cement between the stem tip and the end of the cement plug.
    Heterotopic ossification was graded according to the classification of Brooker et al.4. A Kaplan-Meier21,32 survivorship analysis of all 102 hips was used to assess the life span of both the acetabular and the femoral components and the development of femoral debonding and osteolysis.

    Clinical Results

    For the eighty-two hips (seventy-six patients) with at least forty-eight months of follow-up, the average preoperative Harris hip score19 was 47 points (range, 16 to 69 points). At the latest follow-up examination, at an average of sixty-five months (range, forty-eight to 104 months), the average Harris hip score was 87 points (range, 24 to 100 points). Overall, fifty-three (65 percent) had an excellent result (90 to 100 points), sixteen (20 percent) had a good result (80 to 89 points), three (4 percent) had a fair result (70 to 79 points), and ten (12 percent) had a poor result (less than 70 points).
    Examination of the ten poor results (nine patients) demonstrated that pain and limp were primarily responsible for the poor Harris hip scores. The scores regarding walking supports revealed that two of the nine patients in this group were unable to walk. This group of nine patients included the one patient in the series who had a periprosthetic infection, one of the patients with femoral osteolysis, and the one patient who had a femoral revision without infection.
    There were three reoperations that involved revision of one or both prosthetic components. One was performed because of a late deep hematogenous infection, which developed after the prosthesis had been in situ fifteen months and which necessitated removal of both the femoral and the acetabular component in a two-stage revision. The second reoperation was performed in a patient who had femoral loosening and subsequent development of a large osteolytic lesion in zone II of Gruen et al.17 without evidence of infection (Fig. 2-A and Fig. 2-B). The femoral component was revised because of progressive symptoms and radiographic loosening with osteolysis at fifty-three months after the index procedure; the acetabular component was retained. The third reoperation was an acetabular revision in a patient with recurrent dislocations secondary to loss of abductor function from a trochanteric fracture. There were no hips with aseptic loosening of the acetabular component, and no revision operations were pending at the time of this review.

    Complications

    Postoperative complications included urinary tract infection in three patients and urinary retention, a superficial wound infection requiring intravenous antibiotics, and an ileus in one each. Atrial fibrillation developed after the procedure in one patient, and one patient had thrombosis of a femoral-popliteal bypass graft, requiring thrombectomy and heparinization, on the second postoperative day. No patient died, and there were no instances of excessive bleeding, pulmonary emboli, or transient neurapraxias.
    Late complications were seen in three patients, all described in the section on revisions above.

    Radiographic Results

    Femoral Component

    A one-millimeter-thick nonprogressive radiolucent line at the prosthesis-cement interface, which was not present on the initial postoperative radiographs, was seen in four hips at an average of thirty-four months (Fig. 3-A and Fig. 3-B). One of these stems was revised, as previously noted. All of these radiolucencies were present in Gruen zone I. However, one radiolucent line was also seen in Gruen zone VII. No hip had subsidence of the femoral stem (except for the hip that had the stem revision, as previously mentioned), stem fracture, or cement fracture.
    Osteolysis was seen at the bone-cement interface in five hips at an average of fifty-four months. One of the five hips had the osteolysis in Gruen zone II and was revised as previously described. Of the other four osteolytic lesions, one occurred in zone III; two, in zone VI; and one, in zones V, VI, and VII. None of these four hips were revised, and all four remained asymptomatic. Three of the five hips had debonding in Gruen zone I, as described above. The two hips that had isolated osteolysis in Gruen zone VI did not have radiographic evidence of implant-cement radiolucencies elsewhere to suggest debonding (Fig. 4-A and Fig. 4-B).
    The femoral cement mantle was grade A in thirty-two hips (31 percent), grade B in nineteen (19 percent), grade C-1 in thirteen (13 percent), grade C-2 in thirty-seven (36 percent), and grade D in one (1 percent). The femoral stem was in neutral alignment in fifty-two hips (51 percent), valgus in twenty-two (22 percent), and varus in twenty-eight (27 percent). Varus or valgus alignment usually produced a grade C-2 cement mantle as a result of the tip of the stem nearing the femoral cortex (usually in zone III for varus stems and in zone V for valgus stems).
    The cement mantle was grade C-2 in all hips with debonding or osteolysis. No hip with a grade-A, B, or C-1 cement mantle demonstrated radiolucencies at the prosthesis-cement interface or evidence of osteolysis. None of the sixteen stems that were inserted with a distal centralizer had debonding or were associated with osteolysis (p > 0.05). The single grade-D mantle was a result of a deficient cement plug distal to the stem tip and was not associated with radiolucencies or osteolysis.
    Examination of the bone-cement interface demonstrated no linear radiolucencies greater than one millimeter in width.
    Review of the femoral radiographs revealed that there initially had been complete contact between the collar and the calcar in fifty-four hips (53 percent) and partial contact in forty-eight hips (47 percent). At the time of the final follow-up, there was complete contact in fifty hips (49 percent), partial contact in fifty hips (49 percent), and no contact in two hips (2 percent). There was calcar resorption or rounding at the time of the final follow-up in seventy-seven hips; it was complete in five (5 percent) and partial in seventy-two (71 percent). The density of the calcar was estimated to be decreased in seventy-eight hips (76 percent), increased in one hip (1 percent), and unchanged in twenty-three hips (23 percent). Hypertrophy of the femoral cortex was seen in five hips (5 percent); it was primarily found in Gruen zones III and V.
    Radiographic review of the seventeen hips with less than forty-eight months of follow-up showed no evidence of radiolucencies, debonding, migration, osteolysis, or subsidence.

    Acetabular Component

    Linear polyethylene wear averaged 0.11 millimeter per year (maximum, 0.44 millimeter per year) over an average time-interval of sixty-five months. The average inclination angle of the components was 41 degrees (range, 21 to 68 degrees) of abduction. No screws broke, and only two screws were associated with any radiolucency.
    Peripheral, noncontinuous, nonprogressive radiolucent lines were seen around fifty-two acetabular components (51 percent). All radiolucent lines were less than one millimeter thick. No acetabular component had a continuous or progressive radiolucent line. Periacetabular osteolysis occurred in two hips, in zone A1 in one and in zone A2 in the other. Both lesions were small (less than one square centimeter on radiographs). No cup migrated or was considered definitely loose. Only two acetabular components were revised, one because of recurrent dislocations and one because of infection, as mentioned above. There were no acetabular revisions because of aseptic loosening.
    Heterotopic bone formation was noted in forty-nine hips (48 percent). It was categorized as class I in twenty-two (22 percent), class II in fourteen (14 percent), and class III in thirteen (13 percent). No hips demonstrated class-IV heterotopic bone formation, and no operations were performed as a result of heterotopic ossification.

    Survivorship Analysis

    A Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve21,32 for failure of either the femoral or the acetabular component necessitating revision for any reason revealed that the chance of both implants surviving at seven years was 96.5 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.94 to 0.98). The probability of the femoral component surviving at seven years was 97.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.96 to 0.99) with revision for any reason as the end point, 92.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.89 to 0.96) with femoral osteolysis as the end point, and 90.6 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.87 to 0.94) with femoral debonding, osteolysis, or revision for any reason as the end point.
    The purpose of this prospective study was to examine the performance of 102 consecutive primary Iowa stems at our institution. We found that the Iowa stem, with its cobra shape and increased offset, did not perform as well as other cemented straight stems used at our institution2,26. At an average of 5.4 years, radiographic debonding developed at the stem-cement interface in four (5 percent) of the eighty-two hips; one of them was revised because of osteolysis and pain. Furthermore, although the follow-up was short, femoral osteolysis had developed in five hips, two of which did not have radiographic debonding.
    Of 701 primary hybrid total hip arthroplasties that were performed at our institution during the review period, 484 involved use of a Harris Precoat component, which is another roughened, precoated stem but with less offset. The Harris Precoat stem had a grit-blasted surface finish with an Ra roughness of sixty to ninety microinches and an offset of thirty-three to forty-three millimeters, depending on the prosthetic head and neck selected. The Iowa stem used in this study had a surface finish with an Ra roughness of sixty to eighty microinches and available offsets of forty to fifty-five millimeters. A review of the results of 153 total hip arthroplasties performed with the Harris Precoat stem at our institution, and followed for a similar duration of five to eight years, showed only a 1 percent failure rate and no osteolysis adjacent to any nonrevised stem26. This comparison is very appropriate, as the two groups were identical with regard to patient selection, surgical skill, surface finish, precoating, and duration of follow-up. The main differences were stem geometry and offset. Furthermore, the ten-year survival rate of the Harris Precoat stem, with revision, aseptic loosening, or osteolysis as the end point, was 98.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00)2.
    The overall rate of failure and development of osteolysis associated with the Iowa stem in this series was higher than that associated with other contemporary designs of cemented stems. Goldberg et al.16 reported on 125 consecutive hybrid total hip arthroplasties and noted that only one femoral stem was revised because of mechanical loosening and only one other stem was radiographically loose after an average of 8.6 years of follow-up. Similarly, Oishi et al.30 found a 1 percent rate of failure (loosening or revision) of the femoral component six to eight years after 100 hybrid total hip arthroplasties. Berger et al.2, reviewing the results of 150 consecutive hybrid total hip arthroplasties, reported a ten-year survival rate of the stem of 98.4 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.00). Lastly, Mulroy et al.29, in a review of the results of 162 hybrid total hip arthroplasties, reported a 2 percent rate of femoral revision at an average of fifteen years.
    The 90.6 percent rate of survival of the Iowa stem at seven years in our study, with revision, debonding, or osteolysis used as the end point, was similar to the performance of this stem reported by other authors. In a study of 131 hybrid total hip arthroplasties with the Iowa femoral component, Callaghan et al.6 reported that the rate of radiographic aseptic loosening of the femoral component was 7 percent (nine hips) at eight to nine years. Of these nine hips, eight had been revised because of aseptic loosening, as evidenced by stem debonding, at an average of 6.25 years postoperatively. Six of these revised hips demonstrated femoral osteolysis. The rate of aseptic loosening of the stem in the present series was very similar (5 percent).
    Several authors have attributed the stem's poor survival rate to its surface finish6,27,35. Sporer et al.35 hypothesized that the rougher surface finish of the grit-blasted precoated stem may produce more wear debris from the cement mantle as a result of its abrasive nature compared with the bead-blasted nonprecoated stem. Such debris may lead to third-body wear, and possibly an increase in polyethylene debris, and therefore may lead to greater and earlier debris-induced osteolysis and loosening. However, this surface finish has performed well at our institution2,26, as demonstrated by the 98.4 percent rate of survival of a different cemented grit-blasted precoated stem at ten years. Other centers have reported similar results. Brown and Lachiewicz5 reported that, five to nine years after arthroplasty with a precoated femoral component in 119 consecutive hips, only two stems had definite loosening and none demonstrated debonding. Therefore, we believe that it was not the surface finish but rather the stem's geometry, shape, and increased offset and the effect that these had on cementing technique and strain that were responsible for the Iowa component's poor performance.
    A number of studies have recently suggested that a thin cement mantle (less than two millimeters in thickness) may contribute to loosening and failure of cemented femoral components12,22,36. Mulroy et al.29 showed that a thin cement mantle (less than one millimeter thick) at one point or more was a significant predictor (p < 0.05) of radiographic loosening of the femoral component. Reductions in axial and shear strain of the cement have been noted with thicker cement mantles13,14.
    In the present study, every stem that debonded or was associated with osteolysis had a grade-C-2 cement mantle. The design and geometry of the Iowa stem involves a cylindrical shape distal to a proximal cobra shape with increased femoral neck offset in comparison with that of standard straight stems. Thus, insertion of a stem with increased lateralization and offset into the proximal part of the femur during cementing can lead to a suboptimal cement mantle. First, because of the stem's cobra shape and offset, there is a tendency to insert the stem initially by way of a varus position. This creates an inadequate cement mantle in the area just distal to the greater trochanter. As a result, there can be very thin cement or almost a complete lack of cement in Gruen zone I or II, or both. We found seven hips with a grade-C-2 cement mantle as a result of such deficiencies.
    In addition, because of the stem's geometry and shape, there was a greater tendency to position the stem in valgus or varus malalignment rather than in a neutral position. Malpositioning was noted in 49 percent of the hips in our series, with twenty-eight hips in varus and twenty-two hips in valgus. This malpositioning can also result in a thin (grade-C-2) cement mantle with a resultant increase in cement strain13. The deficiency was localized to Gruen zone III in varus hips and to Gruen zone V in valgus hips. Ebramzadeh et al.12 showed that progressive loosening, cement fracture, and radiolucent lines at the stem-cement or bone-cement interface are more likely to develop when a stem is placed in more than 5 degrees of varus. A distal centralizer was used in only sixteen hips in our study, and neither debonding nor osteolysis developed in any of those hips. The use of this device reduced the tendency to place the stem in varus or valgus alignment and improved the cement mantle (none were grade C-2). The quality of the cement mantle improved, particularly on the lateral radiographs. Distal centralization has been shown to prevent malpositioning and to significantly reduce suboptimal cement mantles (p < 0.0001)3,15,18.
    The Iowa stem's shape may have also influenced the transmission of load to the surrounding cement mantle as well as the development of osteolysis. The Harris Precoat stem has a rectangular shape with rounded edges, whereas the Iowa stem has a cylindrical shape. Mohler et al.27 postulated that the cylindrical shape allows the Iowa stem to rotate within its cement mantle after debonding has occurred, leading to increased wear debris, osteolysis, and eventual failure. Several authors have noted that a flat-sided femoral stem provides more torsional resistance and lower peak tensile stresses in the proximal part of the cement mantle than a round femoral stem8,24. Thus, the design of the Iowa stem may predispose to early debonding as a result of this increase in cement stress.
    Finally, the increased offset of the Iowa stem may have contributed to the higher debonding and failure rates in comparison with those of standard straight stems. An increase in offset has several advantages, including increasing the abductor moment arm of the hip. Consequently, there is a decrease in the necessary abductor force about the hip and therefore a reduction in the resultant force across the hip. A concern, however, is the potential increase in the bending moment on the prosthesis23,37. An increase in the cement mantle strain may lead to debonding or failure of the implant. Medial and lateral cement strains have been shown to increase in the proximal, middle, and distal parts of the cement mantle as a result of increased offset9. Chang et al.8 demonstrated that increasing neck length, and hence offset, increases shear stresses at the cement interface by 24 percent.
    In conclusion, our experience with the Iowa femoral stem demonstrated relatively early debonding, loosening, and osteolysis. All of the stems that were radiographically loose, debonded, or associated with osteolysis had a deficient cement mantle. When the femoral component is cemented, emphasis must be placed on technique to produce an optimal mantle. This may involve the use of proximal and distal centralizers as well as a rasp-to-stem ratio that allows for an adequate mantle of at least one millimeter in thickness2,11,29. We stopped using the Iowa stem but have not abandoned roughened and precoated stems in general. We believe that the design of the stem - that is, its geometry and increased offset - and the effect that it had on the quality and strain of the cement mantle, not the stem's surface finish or precoat, was the critical element in the failure mechanism.
    Barrack, R. L.; Mulroy, R. D., Jr.; and Harris, W. H.: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(3): 385-389, 1992.74-B(3)385  1992 
     
    Berger, R. A.; Kull, L. R.; Rosenberg, A. G.; and Galante, J. O.: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7- to 10-year results. Clin. Orthop.,333: 134-146, 1996.333134  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Berger, R. A.; Seel, M. J.; Wood, K.; Evans, R.; D'Antonio, J.; and Rubash, H. E.: Effect of a centralizing device on cement mantle deficiencies and initial prosthetic alignment in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty,12: 434-443, 1997.12434  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Brooker, A. F.; Bowerman, J. W.; Robinson, R. A.; and Riley, L. H., Jr.: Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 1629-1632, Dec 1973.55-A1629  1973 
     
    Brown, E. C., III, and Lachiewicz, P. F.: Precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Results of 5- to 9-year followup. Clin. Orthop.,364: 153-159, 1999.364153  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan, J. J.; Tooma, G. S.; Olejniczak, J. P.; Goetz, D. D.; and Johnston, R. C.: Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,333: 118-125, 1996.333118  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan, J. J., and Johnston, R. C.: Cemented arthroplasty: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Orthopedics,20: 769-770, 1997.20769  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Chang, P. B.; Mann, K. A.; and Bartel, D. L.: Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length. Clin. Orthop.,355: 57-69, 1998.35557  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Davey, J. R.; O'Connor, D. O.; Burke, D. W.; and Harris, W. H.: Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J. Arthroplasty,8: 23-26, 1993.823  1993  [PubMed]
     
    DeLee, J. G., and Charnley, J.: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 121: 20-32, 1976. 12120  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Dowd, J. E.; Cha, C. W.; Trakru, S.; Kim, S. Y.; Yang, I. H.; and Rubash, H. E.: Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results. Clin. Orthop.,355: 123-136, 1998.355123  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Ebramzadeh, E.; Sarmiento, A.; McKellop, H. A.; Llinas, A.; and Gogan, W.: The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 77-87, Jan 1994.76-A77  1994 
     
    Estok, D. M., II; Orr, T. E.; and Harris, W. H.: Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component. J. Arthroplasty,,12: 40-48, 1997.1240  1997 
     
    Fisher, D. A.; Tsang, A. C.; Paydar, N.; Milionis, S.; and Turner, C. H.: Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement. J. Biomech.,30: 1173-1177, 1997.301173  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg, B. A.; Al-Habbal, G.; Noble, P. C.; Paravic, M.; Liebs, T. R.; and Tullos, H. S.: Proximal and distal femoral centralizers in modern cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,349: 163-173, 1998.349163  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg, V. M.; Ninomiya, J.; Kelly, G.; and Kraay, M.: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 11-year followup. Clin. Orthop.,333: 147-154, 1996.333147  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen, T. A.; McNeice, G. M.; and Amstutz, H. C.: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin. Orthop.,141: 17-27, 1979.14117  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Hanson, P. B., and Walker, R. H.: Total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral component distal stem centralizer. Effect on stem centralization and cement mantle. J. Arthroplasty,10: 683-688, 1995.10683  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Harris, W. H.: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,51-A: 737-755, June 1969.51-A737  1969 
     
    Harris, W. H.; McCarthy, J. C., Jr.; and O'Neill, D. A.: Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,64-A: 1063-1067, Sept 1982.64-A1063  1982 
     
    Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Statist. Assn.,53: 457-481, 1958.53457  1958 
     
    Kawate, K.; Maloney, W. J.; Bragdon, C. R.; Biggs, S. A.; Jasty, M.; and Harris, W. H.: Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin. Orthop.,355: 70-76, 1998.35570  1998  [PubMed]
     
    McGrory, B. J.; Morrey, B. F.; Cahalan, T. D.; An, K.-N.; and Cabanela, M. E.: Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-B(6): 865-869, 1995.77-B(6)865  1995 
     
    Mann, K. A.; Bartel, D. L.; and Ayers, D. C.: Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J. Orthop. Res.,15: 700-706, 1997.15700  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Martell, J. M.; Pierson, R. H., III; Jacobs, J. J.; Rosenberg, A. G.; Maley, M.; and Galante, J. O.:: Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-A: 554-571, April 1993.75-A554  1993 
     
    Mohler, C. G.; Kull, L. R.; Martell, J. M.; Rosenberg, A. G.; and Galante, J. O.: Total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Four to seven-year results. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 86-96, Jan 1995.77-A86  1995 
     
    Mohler, C. G.; Callaghan, J. J.; Collis, D. K.; and Johnston, R. C.: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1315-1322, Sept 1995.77-A1315  1995 
     
    Mulroy, R. D., Jr., and Harris, W. H.: The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-B(5): 757-760, 1990.72-B(5)757  1990 
     
    Mulroy, W. F.; Estok, D. M.; and Harris, W. H.: Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1845-1852, Dec 1995.77-A1845  1995 
     
    Oishi, C. S.; Walker, R. H.; and Colwell, C. W., Jr.: The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1130-1136, Aug 1994.76-A1130  1994 
     
    Robinson, R. P.; Lovell, T. P.; Green, T. M.; and Bailey, G. A.: Early femoral component loosening in DF-80 total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty,4: 55-64, 1989.455  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Rosner, B.: Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Ed. 3. Boston, PWS-Kent, 1990. 
     
    Rothman, R. H.; Hearn, S. L.; Eng, K. O.; and Hozack, W. J.: The effect of varying femoral offset on component fixation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,17: 1115, 1993-1994.171115  1993-1994 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P., and Harris, W. H.: Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-B(4): 608-615, 1993.75-B(4)608  1993 
     
    Sporer, S. M.; Callaghan, J. J.; Olejniczak, J. P.; Goetz, D. D.; and Johnston, R. C.: The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 81-A: 481-492, April 1999. 81-A481  1999 
     
    Star, M. J.; Colwell, C. W., Jr.; Kelman, G. J.; Ballock, R. T.; and Walker, R. H.: Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J. Arthroplasty,9: 143-149, 1994.9143  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Wong, P. K. C.; Otsuka, N. Y.; Davey, J. R.; Fornasier, V. L.; and Binnington, A. G.: The effect of femoral component offset in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Read at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 31, 1993. 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Photograph of the Iowa stem. Note the cobra shape, the increased neck-stem offset, and the cylindrical stem.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made six weeks after insertion of an Iowa stem, showing thinning of the cement mantle (arrows) as a result of the stem's valgus position. The cement mantle was grade C-2.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B: The same hip at forty-eight months. Debonding has occurred (arrows), and there is a large osteolytic lesion. This stem was eventually revised because of progressive loosening.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made six months after insertion of an Iowa stem, showing the stem placed in varus with thinning of the cement mantle in Gruen zone III (arrows). The cement mantle was grade C-2.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B: The same hip at sixty-six months. Debonding (arrows) without osteolysis is evident.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A: Anteroposterior radiograph made three months after insertion of an Iowa stem. The absence of proximal and distal centralizers allowed eccentric insertion of the stem into the cement. The resultant areas of thin cement (arrows) led to the mantle being classified as grade C-2.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B: The same hip at fifty-seven months. There is extensive osteolysis (arrowheads) but no radiographic evidence of debonding.
    Barrack, R. L.; Mulroy, R. D., Jr.; and Harris, W. H.: Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,74-B(3): 385-389, 1992.74-B(3)385  1992 
     
    Berger, R. A.; Kull, L. R.; Rosenberg, A. G.; and Galante, J. O.: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7- to 10-year results. Clin. Orthop.,333: 134-146, 1996.333134  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Berger, R. A.; Seel, M. J.; Wood, K.; Evans, R.; D'Antonio, J.; and Rubash, H. E.: Effect of a centralizing device on cement mantle deficiencies and initial prosthetic alignment in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty,12: 434-443, 1997.12434  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Brooker, A. F.; Bowerman, J. W.; Robinson, R. A.; and Riley, L. H., Jr.: Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,55-A: 1629-1632, Dec 1973.55-A1629  1973 
     
    Brown, E. C., III, and Lachiewicz, P. F.: Precoated femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Results of 5- to 9-year followup. Clin. Orthop.,364: 153-159, 1999.364153  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan, J. J.; Tooma, G. S.; Olejniczak, J. P.; Goetz, D. D.; and Johnston, R. C.: Primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,333: 118-125, 1996.333118  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan, J. J., and Johnston, R. C.: Cemented arthroplasty: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Orthopedics,20: 769-770, 1997.20769  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Chang, P. B.; Mann, K. A.; and Bartel, D. L.: Cemented femoral stem performance. Effects of proximal bonding, geometry, and neck length. Clin. Orthop.,355: 57-69, 1998.35557  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Davey, J. R.; O'Connor, D. O.; Burke, D. W.; and Harris, W. H.: Femoral component offset. Its effect on strain in bone-cement. J. Arthroplasty,8: 23-26, 1993.823  1993  [PubMed]
     
    DeLee, J. G., and Charnley, J.: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin. Orthop., 121: 20-32, 1976. 12120  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Dowd, J. E.; Cha, C. W.; Trakru, S.; Kim, S. Y.; Yang, I. H.; and Rubash, H. E.: Failure of total hip arthroplasty with a precoated prosthesis. 4- to 11-year results. Clin. Orthop.,355: 123-136, 1998.355123  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Ebramzadeh, E.; Sarmiento, A.; McKellop, H. A.; Llinas, A.; and Gogan, W.: The cement mantle in total hip arthroplasty. Analysis of long-term radiographic results. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 77-87, Jan 1994.76-A77  1994 
     
    Estok, D. M., II; Orr, T. E.; and Harris, W. H.: Factors affecting cement strains near the tip of a cemented femoral component. J. Arthroplasty,,12: 40-48, 1997.1240  1997 
     
    Fisher, D. A.; Tsang, A. C.; Paydar, N.; Milionis, S.; and Turner, C. H.: Cement-mantle thickness affects cement strains in total hip replacement. J. Biomech.,30: 1173-1177, 1997.301173  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg, B. A.; Al-Habbal, G.; Noble, P. C.; Paravic, M.; Liebs, T. R.; and Tullos, H. S.: Proximal and distal femoral centralizers in modern cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop.,349: 163-173, 1998.349163  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg, V. M.; Ninomiya, J.; Kelly, G.; and Kraay, M.: Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 11-year followup. Clin. Orthop.,333: 147-154, 1996.333147  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen, T. A.; McNeice, G. M.; and Amstutz, H. C.: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin. Orthop.,141: 17-27, 1979.14117  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Hanson, P. B., and Walker, R. H.: Total hip arthroplasty cemented femoral component distal stem centralizer. Effect on stem centralization and cement mantle. J. Arthroplasty,10: 683-688, 1995.10683  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Harris, W. H.: Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,51-A: 737-755, June 1969.51-A737  1969 
     
    Harris, W. H.; McCarthy, J. C., Jr.; and O'Neill, D. A.: Femoral component loosening using contemporary techniques of femoral cement fixation. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,64-A: 1063-1067, Sept 1982.64-A1063  1982 
     
    Kaplan, E. L., and Meier, P.: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Statist. Assn.,53: 457-481, 1958.53457  1958 
     
    Kawate, K.; Maloney, W. J.; Bragdon, C. R.; Biggs, S. A.; Jasty, M.; and Harris, W. H.: Importance of a thin cement mantle. Autopsy studies of eight hips. Clin. Orthop.,355: 70-76, 1998.35570  1998  [PubMed]
     
    McGrory, B. J.; Morrey, B. F.; Cahalan, T. D.; An, K.-N.; and Cabanela, M. E.: Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-B(6): 865-869, 1995.77-B(6)865  1995 
     
    Mann, K. A.; Bartel, D. L.; and Ayers, D. C.: Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond. J. Orthop. Res.,15: 700-706, 1997.15700  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Martell, J. M.; Pierson, R. H., III; Jacobs, J. J.; Rosenberg, A. G.; Maley, M.; and Galante, J. O.:: Primary total hip reconstruction with a titanium fiber-coated prosthesis inserted without cement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-A: 554-571, April 1993.75-A554  1993 
     
    Mohler, C. G.; Kull, L. R.; Martell, J. M.; Rosenberg, A. G.; and Galante, J. O.: Total hip replacement with insertion of an acetabular component without cement and a femoral component with cement. Four to seven-year results. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 86-96, Jan 1995.77-A86  1995 
     
    Mohler, C. G.; Callaghan, J. J.; Collis, D. K.; and Johnston, R. C.: Early loosening of the femoral component at the cement-prosthesis interface after total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1315-1322, Sept 1995.77-A1315  1995 
     
    Mulroy, R. D., Jr., and Harris, W. H.: The effect of improved cementing techniques on component loosening in total hip replacement. An 11-year radiographic review. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,72-B(5): 757-760, 1990.72-B(5)757  1990 
     
    Mulroy, W. F.; Estok, D. M.; and Harris, W. H.: Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,77-A: 1845-1852, Dec 1995.77-A1845  1995 
     
    Oishi, C. S.; Walker, R. H.; and Colwell, C. W., Jr.: The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. Six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,76-A: 1130-1136, Aug 1994.76-A1130  1994 
     
    Robinson, R. P.; Lovell, T. P.; Green, T. M.; and Bailey, G. A.: Early femoral component loosening in DF-80 total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty,4: 55-64, 1989.455  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Rosner, B.: Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Ed. 3. Boston, PWS-Kent, 1990. 
     
    Rothman, R. H.; Hearn, S. L.; Eng, K. O.; and Hozack, W. J.: The effect of varying femoral offset on component fixation in cemented total hip arthroplasty. Orthop. Trans.,17: 1115, 1993-1994.171115  1993-1994 
     
    Schmalzried, T. P., and Harris, W. H.: Hybrid total hip replacement. A 6.5-year follow-up study.. J. Bone and Joint Surg.,75-B(4): 608-615, 1993.75-B(4)608  1993 
     
    Sporer, S. M.; Callaghan, J. J.; Olejniczak, J. P.; Goetz, D. D.; and Johnston, R. C.: The effects of surface roughness and polymethylmethacrylate precoating on the radiographic and clinical results of the Iowa hip prosthesis. A study of patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 81-A: 481-492, April 1999. 81-A481  1999 
     
    Star, M. J.; Colwell, C. W., Jr.; Kelman, G. J.; Ballock, R. T.; and Walker, R. H.: Suboptimal (thin) distal cement mantle thickness as a contributory factor in total hip arthroplasty femoral component failure. A retrospective radiographic analysis favoring distal stem centralization. J. Arthroplasty,9: 143-149, 1994.9143  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Wong, P. K. C.; Otsuka, N. Y.; Davey, J. R.; Fornasier, V. L.; and Binnington, A. G.: The effect of femoral component offset in uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Read at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Orthopaedic Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, May 31, 1993. 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center