0
Articles   |    
Effect of Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2-Expressing Muscle-Derived Cells on Healing of Critical-Sized Bone Defects in Mice
Joon Yung Lee, MD; Douglas Musgrave, MD; Dalip Pelinkovic, MD; Kazumasa Fukushima, MD, PhD; James Cummins, BSc; Arvydas Usas, MD; Paul Robbins, PhD; Freddie H. Fu, MD; Johnny Huard, PhD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Joon Yung Lee, MD
Douglas Musgrave, MD
Dalip Pelinkovic, MD
Kazumasa Fukushima, MD, PhD
James Cummins, BSc
Arvydas Usas, MD
Paul Robbins, PhD
Freddie H. Fu, MD
Johnny Huard, PhD
Growth and Development Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (J.Y.L., D.M., D.P., K.F., J.C., A.U., and J.H.) and Department of Molecular Genetics and Biochemistry (P.R. and J.H.), and Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery (F.H.F.), Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh and University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1032-1039 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Cells that express bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) can now be prepared by transduction with adenovirus containing BMP-2 cDNA. Skeletal muscle tissue contains cells that differentiate into osteoblasts on stimulation with BMP-2. The objectives of this study were to prepare BMP-2-expressing muscle-derived cells by transduction of these cells with an adenovirus containing BMP-2 cDNA and to determine whether the BMP-2-expressing muscle-derived cells would elicit the healing of critical-sized bone defects in mice.

Methods: Primary cultures of muscle-derived cells from a normal male mouse were transduced with adenovirus encoding the recombinant human BMP-2 gene (adBMP-2). These cells (5 ¥ 105) were implanted into a 5-mm-diameter critical-sized skull defect in female SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency strain) mice with use of a collagen sponge as a scaffold. Healing in the treatment and control groups was examined grossly and histologically at two and four weeks. Implanted cells were identified in vivo with use of the Y-chromosome-specific fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique, and their differentiation into osteogenic cells was demonstrated by osteocalcin immunohistochemistry.

Results: Skull defects treated with muscle cells that had been genetically engineered to express BMP-2 had >85% closure within two weeks and 95% to 100% closure within four weeks. Control groups in which the defect was not treated (group 1), treated with collagen only (group 2), or treated with collagen and muscle cells without adBMP-2 (group 3) showed at most 30% to 40% closure of the defect by four weeks, and the majority of the skull defects in those groups showed no healing. Analysis of injected cells in group 4, with the Y-chromosome-specific FISH technique showed that the majority of the transplanted cells were located on the surfaces of the newly formed bone, but a small fraction (approximately 5%) was identified within the osteocyte lacunae of the new bone. Implanted cells found in the new bone stained immunohistochemically for osteocalcin, indicating that they had differentiated in vivo into osteogenic cells.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that cells derived from muscle tissue that have been genetically engineered to express BMP-2 elicit the healing of critical-sized skull defects in mice. The cells derived from muscle tissue appear to enhance bone-healing by differentiating into osteoblasts in vivo.

Clinical Relevance:Ex vivo gene therapy with muscle-derived cells that have been genetically engineered to express BMP-2 may be used to treat nonhealing bone defects. In addition, muscle-derived cells appear to include stem cells, which are easily obtained with muscle biopsy and could be used in gene therapy to deliver BMP-2.

Figures in this Article
    Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) have a powerful capacity to elicit new-bone formation1,2. There are several methods of treating segmental bone defects with BMPs3-9, one of which is gene therapy to deliver BMPs. Retrovirus, adenovirus, and adeno-associated virus have been utilized experimentally to deliver genes including BMPs in vitro and in vivo10-13. However, the direct use of these vectors has several disadvantages. For example, retroviral vectors require actively dividing cells for integration of the foreign gene, and they incorporate randomly into the host DNA, possibly transforming proto-oncogenes into oncogenes11. The adenovirus may induce a host immune response that decreases the efficiency of infection14,15. In addition, many of these vectors are cytotoxic, and their systemic effects on the host are largely unknown13,16.
    One way to circumvent these disadvantages is to use ex vivo gene therapy techniques7,9,17-19. This method involves the isolation and cultivation of host cells, transduction of the cells in vitro, and implantation of these cells into the skeletal defect7. Ex vivo gene therapy increases the efficiency of transduction (thus increasing the expression of the desired protein), and it allows the clinician to screen cells for tumorigenicity prior to implantation. Furthermore, the use of autologous cells decreases the possibility of immune rejection.
    Another advantage of ex vivo gene therapy is that the clinician can choose the type of cells to be transduced. Any one of several types of cells that are easily isolated from a patient can be used as a delivery vehicle for the BMP. The presence of stem cells in bone marrow20-22 and skeletal muscle20,23-27 suggests that these cells might be used as a vehicle for BMP delivery. These stem cells have the capacity to differentiate into osteogenic cells upon stimulation with BMP1,3,26. Thus, these cells can act as carriers of BMP as well as participate in new-bone formation by differentiating into osteogenic cells.
    Bone-marrow stromal cells have recently been used in ex vivo gene therapy to elicit healing of segmental bone defects in syngeneic rats7. Skeletal muscle is also an abundant source of stem cells3,9,20,23-28. A subpopulation of muscle-derived cells has been shown to differentiate into osteogenic cells in vitro and in vivo upon stimulation with BMP-23,29. Recent studies have identified a population of cells in skeletal muscle that have the same surface markers as bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells20,29. Muscle-derived cells are easy to obtain with muscle biopsy and are simple to culture or cryopreserve3,26,30-32.
    In this study, we sought to determine whether primary cultures of muscle-derived cells from mice can deliver recombinant human BMP-2. Using a critical-sized skull-defect model in mice, we showed that primary cultures of muscle-derived cells, genetically engineered to express BMP-2, enhanced bone-healing. In addition, we showed that a subpopulation of these cells differentiated into osteogenic cells.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:The amount of BMP-2, as determined with ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), that was produced by muscle-derived cells transduced with adenovirus containing BMP-2 cDNA. Nontransduced cells were used as the control. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with the control group (p < 0.05)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Percent closure of the skull defects in the four groups. d = defect only (group 1), d/s = defect treated with collagen sponge (group 2), d/s/c = defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells (group 3), and d/s/c/b = defect treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells (group 4). The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with the control group (p < 0.05).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:A, Gross specimen from group 3 (defect [arrows] treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells). B, Gross specimen from group 4 (defect [arrows] treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells). C and D, Coronal sections through the skull-defect area of group-3 (C) and group-4 (D) specimens. Histologic evaluation showed minimal bone formation (arrows) in the group-3 specimen and robust bone formation (arrows) in the group-4 specimen (magnification, 10).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:Von Kossa-stained specimens (magnification, 10). The arrowheads indicate the midsagittal line. A, Group 3 (defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells) at two weeks. B, Group 4 (defect treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells) at two weeks. S indicates nondegraded collagen sponge, and the arrows indicate newly formed bone. C, Group 3 at four weeks. D, Group 4 at four weeks. J indicates the junction between the native skull and new bone, and the arrows indicate newly formed bone.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of injected cells with use of the Y-chromosome-specific probe and co-localization with osteocalcin. A, Hematoxylin and eosin stain of the new bone showing the area of interest (box) (magnification, 20). B, A small fraction of the injected cells was identified within the lacunae of the new bone (arrow). The arrowheads indicate the outline of the newly formed bone (magnification, 100). C, Y-chromosome-positive cells also co-localized with osteocalcin, indicating in vivo osteogenic differentiation. The Y-chromosome is identified by bright-green fluorescence (arrow), the nuclei are identified by blue DAPI (4",6"-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining, and osteocalcin is stained red (magnification, 100).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Study Groups
    GroupTreatmentNo. of Animals Studied
    TotalAt 2 wkAt 4 wk
    1None?954
    2Collagen sponge only1055
    3Collagen sponge and nontransduced muscle cells?945
    4Collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing muscle cells1055
    All methods involving animals were approved by the animal use committee at the Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh.

    Isolation of Primary Cultures of Muscle-Derived Cells

    Muscle from hindlimbs of six to eight-week-old normal male mice (C57BL10J+/+; Jackson Laboratories, Bar Harbor, Maine) was dissected free of bone and minced. The minced muscle was digested by serial one-hour incubations at 37°C in 0.2% type-XI collagenase, dispase (grade II, 240 U), and 0.1% trypsin. The cell suspension was passed through 18, 20, and 22-gauge needles, centrifuged at 3000 rpm for five minutes, resuspended in growth medium (Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 10% horse serum, 0.5% chick embryo extract, and 2% penicillin/streptomycin), and plated in collagen-coated flasks. During the initial seven days, floating cells in the medium were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for five minutes and replated into the same culture flask with fresh medium. Cells that did not adhere to the flask after seven days were discarded. This method of cell isolation yielded a mixed population of 70% to 80% myofibroblasts and 20% to 30% myogenic cells as analyzed by desmin-staining31,32.

    Adenovirus Construct Encoding Recombinant Human BMP-2 Gene

    The BMP-2-125 plasmid that contains the recombinant human BMP-2 cDNA was provided by Genetics Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. A replication-defective, E1 and E3-gene-deleted adenoviral vector was engineered to encode BMP-2 under the human cytomegalovirus promoter. The BMP-2-125 plasmid was digested with Sal I, resulting in a 1237-base-pair fragment containing the BMP-2 cDNA. The BMP-2 cDNA was then inserted into the Sal I site of the pAd.lox plasmid, which placed the gene under a human cytomegalovirus promoter. Recombinant adenovirus was obtained by co-transfection of pAd.lox with psi-5 viral DNA into CRE-8 cells. The adenovirus-BMP-2 construct (adBMP-2) was stored at —80°C until it was used.

    Infection of Muscle-Derived Cells with adBMP-2

    Freshly isolated muscle-derived cells were equally divided and plated in two T-75 flasks (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania). Cells in one flask were trypsinized, removed, and counted to calculate the amount of viral particles needed. The second flask of cells was washed with Hanks balanced salt solution. Adenovirus particles (fifty infectious particles per cell; multiplicity of infection = 50) were premixed into Hanks balanced salt solution and then layered onto the cultured cells. (Multiplicity of infection equals the number of particles used to infect one cell. For the adBMP-2, previous experiments have demonstrated that a multiplicity of infection of 50 was optimal for muscle-derived cells3,9,29.) After four hours of incubation at 37°C, an equal volume of growth medium was added, and cells were allowed to recover overnight. Cells were then harvested, washed with Hanks balanced salt solution, and counted. Approximately 0.5 to 1.0 ¥ 106 infected cells were used for the skull-defect assay.

    ELISA (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) for Determination of Production of BMP-2 by Muscle-Derived Cells

    Freshly isolated muscle-derived cells were transduced with adBMP-2 and plated in a T-25 culture flask with Optimem serum-free medium (Gibco BRL, Grand Island, New York). The serum-free medium was necessary to eliminate the BMP-2 present in the serum. After transduction, cells were grown for an additional three days, and the medium was collected for ELISA. Noninfected cells, treated in an identical manner, were used as negative controls.
    The monoclonal antibody (H3B2/17.8.1) and a biotinylated antibody (bH4B2/5.10.24) to BMP-2 were donated by Genetics Institute. H3B2/17.8.1 was coated onto a ninety-six-well microtiter plate by adding 50 L/well of 8 g/mL of antibody in the coating buffer (0.1M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer, pH 9.6) and incubating at 2° to 8°C overnight. Wells were then blocked by adding 200 L/well of the blocking solution (4% w/v nonfat dry milk, 50mM Trizma base, 1mM glycine, and 0.5M NaCl, pH 8.0) and incubating for one to two hours at 37°C. After 1:4 dilution with the diluent (25% v/v Optimem and 75% v/v THHST [1.5M NaCl, 50mM Trizma base, 1mM glycine, pH 8.0]), 50 L/well of the samples were added and were incubated at room temperature for two to three hours. Plates were washed six times with the wash buffer (50 mM Trizma base, 1mM glycine, 0.5M NaCl, pH 8.0, 0.05% v/v Tween-20). The biotinylated antibody was diluted 1:300 in the wash buffer and was added to each well (50 L) for incubation at room temperature for 1.5 to 2.0 hours. Horseradish peroxidase conjugated to avidin (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Missouri) was diluted 1:10,000 in buffer and was added to each well for a one-hour incubation at room temperature. Detection of bound BMP-2 was accomplished by adding 100 L/well of the TMB solution (3,3¢,5,5¢-tetramethylbenzidine; Kirkegaard and Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, Maryland) and incubating for four to eight minutes at room temperature. Color reaction was stopped with 100 L/well of 0.18M H2SO4 solution and read at 490 nm on a plate reader. All samples were assayed in triplicate, and known concentrations of BMP-2 were used as standards in each plate.

    Skull-Defect Assay

    For the skull-defect assay, we used female SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency strain) mice (Jackson Laboratories), which are immunodeficient mice unable to mount a sufficient immune response. Because we were employing human BMP-2, use of immunodeficient mice was necessary to avoid an immune response to the human protein as a variable in our model. The mice were anesthetized with methoxyflurane and were placed prone on the operating table. With use of a number-10 blade, the scalp was dissected to the skull and the periosteum was stripped. A 5-mm-diameter full-thickness circular skull defect, which is a nonhealing critical-sized defect6, was created at the apex of the skull with use of a dental burr, with minimal penetration of the dura.
    The mice were divided into four groups (Table I), and a collagen sponge (Helistat; Colla-Tec, Plainsboro, New Jersey)5 cut to form-fit the defect was used as a matrix. Group 1 did not receive any implant in the skull defect, Group 2 received collagen sponge only, Group 3 received collagen sponge seeded with muscle-derived cells, and Group 4 received collagen sponge seeded with muscle-derived cells transduced with adBMP-2. The scalp was closed with use of a 4-0 nylon suture, and the animals were allowed food and activity ad libitum. At two and four weeks, the mice were killed and the skull specimens were dissected free from the soft tissue for digital imaging. The percent closure of the defect was calculated with use of the NIH Image program. The area of the original defect was calculated with a 5-mm circular standard on the digital image, and the area of the closed defect was drawn and calculated with the NIH Image program. The area of the defect filled with new bone divided by the area of the original defect yielded the fraction of skull-defect closure.
    Skull specimens were then flash-frozen in 2-methylbutane (buffered in phosphate-buffered saline solution and precooled in liquid nitrogen). Frozen samples were cut into 5 to 10-m sections with use of a cryostat (Microm HM 505 E; Fisher Scientific) and stored at -20°C until they were used.
    For von Kossa staining, slides were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and soaked in 0.1M AgNO3 solution for fifteen minutes. After exposure to light for at least fifteen minutes, the slides were washed with phosphate-buffered saline solution and stained with hematoxylin and eosin for viewing.

    Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Osteocalcin Immunohistochemistry

    Cryosections were fixed for ten minutes in 3:1 methanol/glacial acetic acid (v:v), air-dried, and then denatured in 70% formamide 2 ¥ SSC (saline-sodium citrate; 0.3M NaCl, 0.03M sodium citrate, pH 7.0), at 70°C for two minutes. Slides were immediately dehydrated with a series of ethanol washes (70%, 80%, and 95%) for two minutes at each successive concentration. The Y-chromosome-specific probe33 was biotinylated with use of a BioNick kit (Gibco BRL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The biotinylated probe was then purified with use of a G-50 Quick Spin Column (Boerhinger-Mannheim, Indianapolis, Indiana), and the purified probe was lyophilized along with 5 ng/mL of sonicated herring sperm DNA. The probe was resuspended in 50% formamide, 1 ¥ SSC (0.15M NaC1 and 0.015M sodium citrate), 10% dextran sulfate solution prior to hybridization. After denaturation at 75°C for ten minutes, the probe was placed on denatured sections and allowed to hybridize overnight at 37°C. After hybridization, sections were rinsed with 2 ¥ SSC solution, pH 7.0, at 72°C for five minutes. Sections were then rinsed in BMS solution (0.1M NaHCO3, 0.5M NaCl, and 0.5% NP-40, pH 8.0). The hybridized probe was detected with fluorescein-labeled avidin (Oncor, Gaithersburg, Maryland). Nuclei were counterstained with 10 ng/mL of ethidium bromide or DAPI (4¢,6¢-diamidino-2-phenylindole) in Vectashield mounting medium (Vector, Burlingame, California). For osteocalcin staining, the primary antibody was goat anti-mouse osteocalcin (1:100 in phosphate-buffered saline solution; Chemicon, Temecula, California), and labeled cells were visualized with anti-goat antibody conjugated to Cy3.

    Statistical Methods

    Data are presented as the mean and standard deviation of the mean. Statistical differences between groups were calculated with use of a Student t test and a two-way analysis of variance with post hoc tests.
    As shown in Figure 1, ELISA demonstrated that muscle-derived cells transduced with adenovirus containing BMP-2 cDNA produced a mean of 0.47 ng of BMP-2/mL/million cells, whereas no detectable BMP-2 was produced by the nontransduced, control cells.
    As shown in Figure 2, the three control groups (untreated defect, defect treated with collagen sponge only, and defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells) had little or no healing of the defect at either two or four weeks. The maximal healing observed in any of the control groups was approximately 30% to 40% of the area of the original defect. On the other hand, the group treated with the sponge matrix and muscle-derived cells that had been genetically engineered to express BMP-2 had >85% healing of the defect by two weeks and 95% to 100% healing by four weeks.
    Gross and histological specimens from group 3 (defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells) and group 4 (defect treated with collagen sponge, cells, and adBMP-2) are shown in Figure 3. A typical specimen from group 3 at two weeks showed no evidence of healing of the defect either grossly (Fig. 3, A) or histologically (Fig. 3, C). On the other hand, a typical specimen from group 4 at two weeks showed closure of the defect both grossly (Fig. 3, B) and histologically (Fig. 3, D).
    Figure 4 shows representative specimens from groups 3 and 4 after von Kossa staining to identify mineralized bone. The control group showed no evidence of newly formed bone at two weeks (Fig. 4, A) or at four weeks (Fig. 4, C). The treatment group, however, showed robust new-bone formation at two weeks (Fig. 4, B) and complete bridging of the skull defect with mineralized bone at four weeks (Fig. 4, D). At two weeks, all group-4 specimens showed thin trabecular bone-bridging across the dura and the top of the sponge matrix, with some nondegraded sponge at the center of the newly formed bone (Fig. 4, B). However, at four weeks, the collagen sponge was completely degraded and thicker mineralized bone had replaced the entire defect area (Fig. 4, D).
    In our model, primary cultures of muscle-derived cells from male mice were implanted in the defects of female SCID mice. This allowed us to follow the fate of the transplanted cells in vivo with use of the Y-chromosome-specific FISH technique3,33. Again, immunodeficient mice were necessary to prevent an immune response to human BMP-2, allogenic cells, and adenovirus. The locations of the Y-chromosome-positive cells were analyzed in skull sections from group 4 at four weeks (Fig. 5). The majority of the cells were found localized to the periphery of the newly formed bone. However, a small fraction of the injected cells (Fig. 5, B [arrow]) occupied the lacunae of the newly formed bone, where osteocytes normally reside. A faint outline of the newly formed bone was visible because of autofluorescence of the mineralized bone (Fig. 5, B [arrowheads]). The number of transplanted muscle-derived cells occupying the lacunae of the new bone was approximately 5% of the total number of cells injected, as analyzed by cell-counting in twenty random high-powered fields (see Appendix). To confirm in vivo differentiation of injected cells into osteogenic cells, we attempted co-localization of Y-chromosome-positive cells with osteocalcin immunohistochemistry. As shown in Fig. 5, C, Y-chromosome-positive signals (green) co-localized with osteocalcin-positive cells (red [arrow]). Cells that co-localized with Y-chromosome and osteocalcin were in the lacunae of the new bone. This finding suggests that a small percentage of muscle-derived cells not only may participate as a vehicle of BMP-2 delivery but also may differentiate into osteocytes and help to repair the defect.
    We demonstrated that genetically engineered muscle-derived cells can produce BMP-2 and can substantially enhance the healing of a critical-sized bone defect. The Y-probe and osteocalcin analysis suggest that a fraction of muscle-derived cells is incorporated into the newly formed bone, differentiating in vivo into osteogenic cells. The observation that the muscle-derived cells alone were not capable of improving bone healing suggests that the osteogenic stimuli (BMP-2) are a major determinant to differentiate the muscle cells toward osteogenic lineage.
    The existence of stem cells in the bone marrow has been well documented20-22,28. Recent reports have indicated that these stem cells can be used in experimental models to treat clinical diseases. For example, Gussoni et al.20 used bone-marrow-transplantation techniques to restore dystrophin expression in mdx mice, an animal model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Also, Lieberman et al.7 recently reported repair of segmental femoral defects in rats with use of bone-marrow stromal cells genetically engineered to produce BMP-2.
    However, the use of skeletal-muscle stem cells that can differentiate into osteogenic cells remains relatively unexplored. Katagiri et al.26 first reported that a subpopulation of mouse muscle-derived cells can become osteogenic when exposed to BMP-2. In their study, an immortalized cell line from muscle showed increased expression of alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and parathyroid-dependent 3¢,5¢-cAMP in response to BMP-2 in vitro26. Recently, we identified a subset of muscle-derived cells that expresses higher levels of alkaline phosphatase in response to BMP-2 than do other fractions. This suggested that some muscle-derived cells differentiate into osteogenic cells when exposed to BMP-2 in vivo3. We also reported isolation of a clone from the BMP-2-responsive population that expresses several putative stem-cell markers29. This clone expressed markers Flk-1, a mouse homologue of KDR, and Sca-1, which were shown to be expressed by hematopoietic stem cells29,34. In addition, in vitro experiments showed that our clone was able to differentiate into osteogenic cells expressing alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin in response to BMP-2. In vivo, the clonal population was able to enhance skull-defect closure as well as to differentiate into osteocytes29. Results of other experiments demonstrate that, when BMP-2 is delivered with fibroblasts or chondrocytes, the cells do not seem to express alkaline phosphatase in response to BMP-29, are uniformly found outside of the bone matrix, and do not differentiate into osteogenic cells3,9. Therefore, muscle-derived cells, like the bone-marrow stromal cells, have the ability to act as a vehicle for BMP-2 delivery as well as to differentiate into osteocytes and participate in new-bone formation.
    Skeletal muscle represents an abundant source of easily accessible tissue. A simple surgical biopsy specimen can provide enough cells to use in ex vivo gene therapy. Thus, we envision a system in a clinical setting where a muscle biopsy specimen is obtained from the patient, muscle cells are cultured and transduced in a laboratory setting, and BMP-2-producing cells are reimplanted into the bone defect within a week’s time. Our results suggest that the number of stem cells with potential to differentiate into osteogenic cells in muscle is relatively small (about 5%). However, the remaining 95% of cells can act as a delivery vehicle for BMP-2, recruiting host osteogenic cells to promote bone-healing. The existence of muscle-derived stem cells and the abundance of tissue make skeletal muscle an attractive tool for tissue-engineering and gene therapy.
    Another table, showing the total number of Y-probe-positive cells per high-power field and the number and percentage in new bone, is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call 781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).
    Urist MR: Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science,1965.150: 893-9, 150893  1965  [PubMed]
     
    Urist MR; Huo YK; Brownell AG; Hohl WM; Buyske J; Lietze A; Tempst P; Hunkapiller M; and DeLange RJ: Purification of bovine bone morphogenetic protein by hydroxyapatite chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1984.81: 371-5, 81371  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Bosch P; Musgrave DS; Lee JY; Cummins J; Shuler F; Ghivizzani SC; Evans C; Robbins PD; and Huard J: Osteoprogenitor cells within skeletal muscle. J Orthop Res,2000.18: 933-44, 18933  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Boyne PJ; Marx RE; Nevins M; Triplett G; Lazaro E; Lilly LC; Alder M; and Nummikoski P: A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,1997.17: 11-25, 1711  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Hollinger JO; Schmitt JM; Buck DC; Shannon R; Joh SP; Zegzula HD; and Wozney J: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and collagen for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res,1998.43: 356-64, 43356  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Krebsbach PH; Mankani MH; Satomura K; Kuznetsov SA; and Robey PG: Repair of craniotomy defects using bone marrow stromal cells. Transplantation,1998.66: 1272-8, 661272  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Lieberman JR; Daluiski A; Stevenson S; Wu L; McAllister P; Lee YP; Kabo JM; Finerman GA; Berk AJ; and Witte ON: The effect of regional gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2-producing bone-marrow cells on the repair of segmental femoral defects in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999.81: 905-17, 81905  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Musgrave DS; Bosch P; Ghivizzani S; Robbins PD; Evans CH; and Huard J: Adenovirus-mediated direct gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2 produces bone. Bone,1999.24: 541-7, 24541  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Musgrave DS; Bosch P; Lee JY; Pelinkovic D; Ghivizzani SC; Whalen J; Niyibizi C; and Huard J: Ex vivo gene therapy to produce bone using different cell types. Clin Orthop,2000.378: 290-305, 378290  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Ghivizzani SC; Lechman ER; Tio C; Mule KM; Chada S; McCormack JE; Evans CH; and Robbins PD: Direct retrovirus-mediated gene transfer to the synovium of the rabbit knee: implications for arthritis gene therapy. Gene Ther,1997.4: 977-82, 4977  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Robbins PD; Tahara H; and Ghivizzani SC: Viral vectors for gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol,1998.16: 35-40, 1635  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Romano G; Claudio PP; Kaiser HE; and Giordano A: Recent advances, prospects and problems in designing new strategies for oligonucleotide and gene delivery in therapy.. In Vivo,1998.12: 59-67, 1259  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Verma IM, and Somia N: Gene therapy—promises, problems and prospects. Nature,1997.389: 239-42, 389239  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Vilquin JT; Guerette B; Kinoshita I; Roy B; Goulet M; Gravel C; Roy R; and Tremblay JP: FK506 immunosuppression to control the immune reactions triggered by first-generation adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther,1995.6: 1391-401, 61391  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Yang Y; Nunes FA; Berencsi K; Furth EE; Gonczol E; and Wilson JM: Cellular immunity to viral antigens limits E1-deleted adenoviruses for gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1994.91: 4407-11, 914407  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Knoell DL, and Yiu IM: Human gene therapy for hereditary diseases: a review of trials. Am J Health Syst Pharm,1998.55: 899-904, 55899  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Dai Y; Roman M; Naviaux RK; and Verma IM: Gene therapy via primary myoblasts: long-term expression of factor IX protein following transplantation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1992.89: 10892-5, 8910892  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Evans CH, and Robbins PD: Gene therapy of arthritis. Intern Med,1999.38: 233-9, 38233  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Otani K; Nita I; Macaulay W; Georgescu HI; Robbins PD; and Evans CH: Suppression of antigen-induced arthritis in rabbits by ex vivo gene therapy. J Immunol,1996.156: 3558-62, 1563558  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gussoni E; Soneoka Y; Strickland CD; Buzney EA; Khan MK; Flint AF; Kunkel LM; and Mulligan RC: Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature,1999.401: 390-4, 401390  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Pittenger MF; Mackay AM; Beck SC; Jaiswal RK; Douglas R; Mosca JD; Moorman MA; Simonetti DW; Craig S; and Marshak DR: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science,1999.284: 143-7, 284143  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res,1991.9: 641-50, 9641  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Baroffio A; Hamann M; Bernheim L; Bochaton-Piallat ML; Gabbiani G; and Bader CR: Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. Differentiation,1996.60: 47-57, 6047  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Beauchamp JR; Morgan JE; Pagel CN; and Partridge TA: Dynamics of myoblast transplantation reveal a discrete minority of precursors with stem cell-like properties as the myogenic source. J Cell Biol,1999.144: 1113-22, 1441113  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Cornelison DD, and Wold BJ: Single-cell analysis of regulatory gene expression in quiescent and activated mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol,1997.191: 270-83, 191270  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Katagiri T; Yamaguchi A; Komaki M; Abe E; Takahashi N; Ikeda T; Rosen V; Wozney JM; Fujisawa-Sehara A; and Suda T: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol,1994.127(6 Pt 1): 1755-66, erratum, 1995;128:following 713127(6 Pt 1)1755  1994 
     
    Miller JB; Schaefer L; and Dominov JA: Seeking muscle stem cells. Curr Top Dev Biol,1999.43: 191-219, 43191  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Young HE; Mancini ML; Wright RP; Smith JC; Black AC; Reagan CR; and Lucas PA: Mesenchymal stem cells reside within the connective tissues of many organs. Dev Dyn,1995.202: 137-44, 202137  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Lee JY; Qu-Petersen Z; Cao B; Kimura S; Jankowski R; Cummins J; Usas A; Gates C; Robbins P; Wernig A; and Huard J: Clonal isolation of muscle-derived cells capable of enhancing muscle regeneration and bone healing. J Cell Biol,2000.150: 1085-100, 1501085  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Rando TA, and Blau HM: Primary mouse myoblast purification, characterization, and transplantation for cell-mediated gene therapy. J Cell Biol,1994.125: 1275-87, 1251275  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Qu Z; Balkir L; van Deutekom JC; Robbins PD; Pruchnic R; and Huard J: Development of approaches to improve cell survival in myoblast transfer therapy. J Cell Biol,1998.142: 1257-67, 1421257  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Qu Z, and Huard J: Matching host muscle and donor myoblasts for myosin heavy chain improves myoblast transfer therapy. Gene Ther,2000.7: 428-37, 7428  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Fan Y; Maley M; Beilharz M; and Grounds M: Rapid death of injected myoblasts in myoblast transfer therapy. Muscle Nerve,1996.19: 853-60, 19853  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Ziegler BL; Valtieri M; Porada GA; De Maria R; Muller R; Masella B; Gabbianelli M; Casella I; Pelosi E; Bock T; Zanjani ED; and Peschle C: KDR receptor: a key marker defining hematopoietic stem cells. Science,1999.285: 1553-8, 2851553  1999  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:The amount of BMP-2, as determined with ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay), that was produced by muscle-derived cells transduced with adenovirus containing BMP-2 cDNA. Nontransduced cells were used as the control. The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with the control group (p < 0.05)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Percent closure of the skull defects in the four groups. d = defect only (group 1), d/s = defect treated with collagen sponge (group 2), d/s/c = defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells (group 3), and d/s/c/b = defect treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells (group 4). The asterisk indicates a significant difference compared with the control group (p < 0.05).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:A, Gross specimen from group 3 (defect [arrows] treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells). B, Gross specimen from group 4 (defect [arrows] treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells). C and D, Coronal sections through the skull-defect area of group-3 (C) and group-4 (D) specimens. Histologic evaluation showed minimal bone formation (arrows) in the group-3 specimen and robust bone formation (arrows) in the group-4 specimen (magnification, 10).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:Von Kossa-stained specimens (magnification, 10). The arrowheads indicate the midsagittal line. A, Group 3 (defect treated with collagen sponge and nontransduced cells) at two weeks. B, Group 4 (defect treated with collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing cells) at two weeks. S indicates nondegraded collagen sponge, and the arrows indicate newly formed bone. C, Group 3 at four weeks. D, Group 4 at four weeks. J indicates the junction between the native skull and new bone, and the arrows indicate newly formed bone.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis of injected cells with use of the Y-chromosome-specific probe and co-localization with osteocalcin. A, Hematoxylin and eosin stain of the new bone showing the area of interest (box) (magnification, 20). B, A small fraction of the injected cells was identified within the lacunae of the new bone (arrow). The arrowheads indicate the outline of the newly formed bone (magnification, 100). C, Y-chromosome-positive cells also co-localized with osteocalcin, indicating in vivo osteogenic differentiation. The Y-chromosome is identified by bright-green fluorescence (arrow), the nuclei are identified by blue DAPI (4",6"-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining, and osteocalcin is stained red (magnification, 100).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Study Groups
    GroupTreatmentNo. of Animals Studied
    TotalAt 2 wkAt 4 wk
    1None?954
    2Collagen sponge only1055
    3Collagen sponge and nontransduced muscle cells?945
    4Collagen sponge and BMP-2-producing muscle cells1055
    Urist MR: Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science,1965.150: 893-9, 150893  1965  [PubMed]
     
    Urist MR; Huo YK; Brownell AG; Hohl WM; Buyske J; Lietze A; Tempst P; Hunkapiller M; and DeLange RJ: Purification of bovine bone morphogenetic protein by hydroxyapatite chromatography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1984.81: 371-5, 81371  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Bosch P; Musgrave DS; Lee JY; Cummins J; Shuler F; Ghivizzani SC; Evans C; Robbins PD; and Huard J: Osteoprogenitor cells within skeletal muscle. J Orthop Res,2000.18: 933-44, 18933  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Boyne PJ; Marx RE; Nevins M; Triplett G; Lazaro E; Lilly LC; Alder M; and Nummikoski P: A feasibility study evaluating rhBMP-2/absorbable collagen sponge for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent,1997.17: 11-25, 1711  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Hollinger JO; Schmitt JM; Buck DC; Shannon R; Joh SP; Zegzula HD; and Wozney J: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 and collagen for bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res,1998.43: 356-64, 43356  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Krebsbach PH; Mankani MH; Satomura K; Kuznetsov SA; and Robey PG: Repair of craniotomy defects using bone marrow stromal cells. Transplantation,1998.66: 1272-8, 661272  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Lieberman JR; Daluiski A; Stevenson S; Wu L; McAllister P; Lee YP; Kabo JM; Finerman GA; Berk AJ; and Witte ON: The effect of regional gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2-producing bone-marrow cells on the repair of segmental femoral defects in rats. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999.81: 905-17, 81905  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Musgrave DS; Bosch P; Ghivizzani S; Robbins PD; Evans CH; and Huard J: Adenovirus-mediated direct gene therapy with bone morphogenetic protein-2 produces bone. Bone,1999.24: 541-7, 24541  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Musgrave DS; Bosch P; Lee JY; Pelinkovic D; Ghivizzani SC; Whalen J; Niyibizi C; and Huard J: Ex vivo gene therapy to produce bone using different cell types. Clin Orthop,2000.378: 290-305, 378290  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Ghivizzani SC; Lechman ER; Tio C; Mule KM; Chada S; McCormack JE; Evans CH; and Robbins PD: Direct retrovirus-mediated gene transfer to the synovium of the rabbit knee: implications for arthritis gene therapy. Gene Ther,1997.4: 977-82, 4977  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Robbins PD; Tahara H; and Ghivizzani SC: Viral vectors for gene therapy. Trends Biotechnol,1998.16: 35-40, 1635  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Romano G; Claudio PP; Kaiser HE; and Giordano A: Recent advances, prospects and problems in designing new strategies for oligonucleotide and gene delivery in therapy.. In Vivo,1998.12: 59-67, 1259  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Verma IM, and Somia N: Gene therapy—promises, problems and prospects. Nature,1997.389: 239-42, 389239  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Vilquin JT; Guerette B; Kinoshita I; Roy B; Goulet M; Gravel C; Roy R; and Tremblay JP: FK506 immunosuppression to control the immune reactions triggered by first-generation adenovirus-mediated gene transfer. Hum Gene Ther,1995.6: 1391-401, 61391  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Yang Y; Nunes FA; Berencsi K; Furth EE; Gonczol E; and Wilson JM: Cellular immunity to viral antigens limits E1-deleted adenoviruses for gene therapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1994.91: 4407-11, 914407  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Knoell DL, and Yiu IM: Human gene therapy for hereditary diseases: a review of trials. Am J Health Syst Pharm,1998.55: 899-904, 55899  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Dai Y; Roman M; Naviaux RK; and Verma IM: Gene therapy via primary myoblasts: long-term expression of factor IX protein following transplantation in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,1992.89: 10892-5, 8910892  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Evans CH, and Robbins PD: Gene therapy of arthritis. Intern Med,1999.38: 233-9, 38233  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Otani K; Nita I; Macaulay W; Georgescu HI; Robbins PD; and Evans CH: Suppression of antigen-induced arthritis in rabbits by ex vivo gene therapy. J Immunol,1996.156: 3558-62, 1563558  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gussoni E; Soneoka Y; Strickland CD; Buzney EA; Khan MK; Flint AF; Kunkel LM; and Mulligan RC: Dystrophin expression in the mdx mouse restored by stem cell transplantation. Nature,1999.401: 390-4, 401390  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Pittenger MF; Mackay AM; Beck SC; Jaiswal RK; Douglas R; Mosca JD; Moorman MA; Simonetti DW; Craig S; and Marshak DR: Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science,1999.284: 143-7, 284143  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Caplan AI: Mesenchymal stem cells. J Orthop Res,1991.9: 641-50, 9641  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Baroffio A; Hamann M; Bernheim L; Bochaton-Piallat ML; Gabbiani G; and Bader CR: Identification of self-renewing myoblasts in the progeny of single human muscle satellite cells. Differentiation,1996.60: 47-57, 6047  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Beauchamp JR; Morgan JE; Pagel CN; and Partridge TA: Dynamics of myoblast transplantation reveal a discrete minority of precursors with stem cell-like properties as the myogenic source. J Cell Biol,1999.144: 1113-22, 1441113  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Cornelison DD, and Wold BJ: Single-cell analysis of regulatory gene expression in quiescent and activated mouse skeletal muscle satellite cells. Dev Biol,1997.191: 270-83, 191270  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Katagiri T; Yamaguchi A; Komaki M; Abe E; Takahashi N; Ikeda T; Rosen V; Wozney JM; Fujisawa-Sehara A; and Suda T: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 converts the differentiation pathway of C2C12 myoblasts into the osteoblast lineage. J Cell Biol,1994.127(6 Pt 1): 1755-66, erratum, 1995;128:following 713127(6 Pt 1)1755  1994 
     
    Miller JB; Schaefer L; and Dominov JA: Seeking muscle stem cells. Curr Top Dev Biol,1999.43: 191-219, 43191  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Young HE; Mancini ML; Wright RP; Smith JC; Black AC; Reagan CR; and Lucas PA: Mesenchymal stem cells reside within the connective tissues of many organs. Dev Dyn,1995.202: 137-44, 202137  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Lee JY; Qu-Petersen Z; Cao B; Kimura S; Jankowski R; Cummins J; Usas A; Gates C; Robbins P; Wernig A; and Huard J: Clonal isolation of muscle-derived cells capable of enhancing muscle regeneration and bone healing. J Cell Biol,2000.150: 1085-100, 1501085  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Rando TA, and Blau HM: Primary mouse myoblast purification, characterization, and transplantation for cell-mediated gene therapy. J Cell Biol,1994.125: 1275-87, 1251275  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Qu Z; Balkir L; van Deutekom JC; Robbins PD; Pruchnic R; and Huard J: Development of approaches to improve cell survival in myoblast transfer therapy. J Cell Biol,1998.142: 1257-67, 1421257  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Qu Z, and Huard J: Matching host muscle and donor myoblasts for myosin heavy chain improves myoblast transfer therapy. Gene Ther,2000.7: 428-37, 7428  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Fan Y; Maley M; Beilharz M; and Grounds M: Rapid death of injected myoblasts in myoblast transfer therapy. Muscle Nerve,1996.19: 853-60, 19853  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Ziegler BL; Valtieri M; Porada GA; De Maria R; Muller R; Masella B; Gabbianelli M; Casella I; Pelosi E; Bock T; Zanjani ED; and Peschle C: KDR receptor: a key marker defining hematopoietic stem cells. Science,1999.285: 1553-8, 2851553  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Notch signaling components are upregulated during both endochondral and intramembranous bone regeneration.
    Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society: Issue date- 2012 Feb
    Guidelines
    Guideline for the management of patients on oral anticoagulants requiring dental surgery. -British Committee for Standards in Haematology | 4/18/2008
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center