0
Articles   |    
Arthroplasty with a Metal Radial Head for Unreconstructible Fractures of the Radial Head
Jaydeep K. Moro, MD, FRCSC; Joel Werier, MD, FRCSC; Joy C. MacDermid, BScPT, PhD; Stuart D. Patterson, MBChB, FRCSC; Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Health Care, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
Jaydeep K. Moro, MD, FRCSC
St. Joseph’s Health Care, McMaster University, 1 Young Street, Suite 505, Hamilton, ON L8N 1T8, Canada

Joel Werier, MD, FRCSC
Joy C. MacDermid, BScPT, PhD
Graham J.W. King, MD, MSc, FRCSC
The Hand and Upper Limb Centre, St. Joseph’s Health Care, University of Western Ontario, 268 Grosvenor Street, London, ON N6A 4L6, Canada. E-mail address for G.J.W. King: gking@uwo.ca

Stuart D. Patterson, MBChB, FRCSC
Bond Clinic, 500 East Central Avenue, Winter Haven, FL 33880-3094

No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1201-1211 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Treatment of unreconstructible comminuted fractures of the radial head remains controversial. There is limited information on the outcome of management of these injuries with arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant.

Methods: The functional outcomes of arthroplasties with a metal radial head implant for the treatment of twenty-five displaced, unreconstructible fractures of the radial head in twenty-four consecutive patients (mean age, fifty-four years) were evaluated at a mean of thirty-nine months (minimum, two years). There were ten Mason type-III and fifteen Mason-Johnston type-IV injuries. Two of these injuries were isolated, and twenty-three were associated with other elbow fractures and/or ligamentous injuries.

Results: At the time of follow-up, Short Form-36 (SF-36) summary scores suggested that overall health-related quality of life was within the normal range (physical component = 47 ± 10, and mental component = 49 ± 13). Other outcome scales indicated mild disability of the upper extremity (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score = 17 ± 19), wrist (Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score = 17 ± 21 and Wrist Outcome Score = 60 ± 10), and elbow (Mayo Elbow Performance Index = 80 ± 16). According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, three results were graded as poor; five, as fair; and seventeen, as good or excellent. The poor and fair outcomes were associated with concomitant injury in two patients, a history of a psychiatric disorder in three, comorbidity in two, a Workers’ Compensation claim in two, and litigation in one. Subjective patient satisfaction averaged 9.2 on a scale of 1 to 10. Elbow flexion of the injured extremity averaged 140° ± 9°; extension, -8° ± 7°; pronation, 78° ± 9°; and supination, 68° ± 10°. A significant loss of elbow flexion and extension and of forearm supination occurred in the affected extremity, which also had significantly less strength of isometric forearm pronation (17%) and supination (18%) as well as significantly less grip strength (p < 0.05). Asymptomatic bone lucencies surrounded the stem of the implant in seventeen of the twenty-five elbows. Valgus stability was restored, and proximal radial migration did not occur. Complications, all of which resolved, included one complex regional pain syndrome, one ulnar neuropathy, one posterior interosseous nerve palsy, one episode of elbow stiffness, and one wound infection.

Conclusions: Patients treated with a metal radial head implant for a severely comminuted radial head fracture will have mild-to-moderate impairment of the physical capability of the elbow and wrist. At the time of short-term follow-up, arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant was found to have been a safe and effective treatment option for patients with an unreconstructible radial head fracture; however, long-term follow-up is still needed.

Figures in this Article
    Radial head fractures account for 33% of all adult elbow fractures1. They are frequently associated with soft-tissue injuries (including ulnohumeral dislocation) and/or other fractures. Following disruption of the medial collateral ligament and/or interosseous membrane, the radial head becomes the main stabilizer against valgus and longitudinal compressive forces about the elbow2-5. Mason1 first classified injuries to the radial head, and Johnston6 later modified the classification. Treatment of unreconstructible Mason type-III and Mason-Johnston type-IV comminuted fractures of the radial head remains controversial7. Radial head excision was advocated for the management of these severe fractures in the past8-11. Complications such as valgus elbow instability, elbow stiffness, and proximal radial migration can result in degenerative arthritis of the elbow and wrist as well as chronic pain in the elbow, forearm, and wrist12-15. Radial head arthroplasty is employed in an attempt to minimize the prevalence of complications of radial head excision. The use of different prosthetic materials, including acrylic16, silicone rubber17, Vitallium3, cobalt-chromium18, and titanium19, has been described in the literature. Radial head arthroplasty with a silicone implant does not provide stability against valgus and compressive forces at the elbow either clinically20-23 or biomechanically2,5,24,25. However, as a result of their compressive rigidity, metal implants resist valgus and axial forces, conferring stability to the elbow that approaches that of the native radial head3,5,24.
    There is little evidence in the literature documenting the clinical outcome of arthroplasty with a metal radial head3,18,19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of such procedures in a group of consecutive patients with an unreconstructible fracture of the radial head.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-F Case 6. Figs. 1-A and 1-B Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-eight-year-old man, demonstrating a fracture-dislocation of the left elbow that was sustained in a fall while the man was roller-blading.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Figs. 1-A through 1-F Case 6. Figs. 1-A and 1-B Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-eight-year-old man, demonstrating a fracture-dislocation of the left elbow that was sustained in a fall while the man was roller-blading.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:Figs. 1-C and 1-D Postreduction radiographs demonstrating a comminuted fracture of the radial head with a type-I coronoid fracture.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:Figs. 1-C and 1-D Postreduction radiographs demonstrating a comminuted fracture of the radial head with a type-I coronoid fracture.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:Figs. 1-E and 1-F Radiographs demonstrating congruent articulation of the metal radial head implant two and one-half years postoperatively. The patient was asymptomatic.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:Figs. 1-E and 1-F Radiographs demonstrating congruent articulation of the metal radial head implant two and one-half years postoperatively. The patient was asymptomatic.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Case 21. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-five-year-old woman, demonstrating lucencies (arrows) around the stem of a metal radial head implant three years following surgical management of a comminuted fracture of the radial head. The patient had no pain with normal activities of daily living, but she had mild residual discomfort with strenuous use of the arm.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Case 21. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-five-year-old woman, demonstrating lucencies (arrows) around the stem of a metal radial head implant three years following surgical management of a comminuted fracture of the radial head. The patient had no pain with normal activities of daily living, but she had mild residual discomfort with strenuous use of the arm.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Patients
    *The injuries were classified as either a Mason1 type-III or a Mason-Johnston6 type-IV injury. The Mason-Johnston type-IV injuries were associated with posterior ulnohumeral dislocation. †MCL = medial collateral ligament, and LCL = lateral collateral ligament. ‡All patients had an arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant. ORIF = open reduction and internal fixation, ICBG = iliac crest bone graft, MCL = medial collateral ligament, and LCL = lateral collateral ligament. §MEPI = Mayo Elbow Performance Index. #PRWE = Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. **WCC = Workers’ Compensation claim, and MCL = medial collateral ligament. †† = dominant arm.
    CaseGender, Age (yr)Fracture Type*Ipsilateral Injuries† [Contralateral Injuries]Op. Treatment‡Durat. of Follow-up (mo)MEPI§ Grade (Score)PRWE#Subjective Patient SatisfactionElbow Ext./Flex. (deg)Forearm Pron./Sup. (deg)Radiog. Stem LucencyComplications and Comments**
    ?1F, 68 IV††Type-2 coronoid fract., prox. ulnar fract. ORIF of coronoid & ulna with bone graft from radial head excis., LCL repair42
    ?2M, 28 III††Essex-Lopresti injury, type-1 coronoid fract., MCL & LCL strains, bilat. perilunate disloc.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair, ORIF of bilat. perilunate disloc.33
    ?3M, 52 IV††Type-3B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon with ICBG, LCL repair49
    ?4F, 44 IIILocked ant. radiocapitellar disloc.MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos. 29
    ?5F, 76 IVType-3 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. submusc. ulnar nerve transpos. 39
    ?6M, 48 IVType-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair29
    ?7F, 64 IVType-1 capitellar fract., undisplaced scaphoid waist fract., [undisplaced radial neck fract.]ORIF of capitellum, LCL repair30
    ?8F, 27 IVType-1 coronoid fract.; capitellar impression fract.; undisplaced scaphoid, trapezial, capitate fracts. Coronoid tip excis., MCL & LCL repair39
    ?9M, 71 IV††Type-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair54
    10F, 56 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.47
    11M, 84 IVType-3B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon with ICBG, LCL repair48
    12F, 45 III††Bado type-2 Monteggia injury, capitellar impression fract., [undisplaced radial head fract.]ORIF of olecranon with bone graft from radial head excis., LCL repair27
    13M, 55 III††Type-1 coronoid fract., MCL tear, displaced scaphoid fract. Lat. epicondyle osteot., coronoid tip excis., ORIF of scaphoid37
    14F, 33 IIIEssex-Lopresti injury, capitellar impression fract., MCL strainLat. epicondyle osteot.58
    15M, 45 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.29
    16M, 59 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.46Good (83)1510?-8/13990/67Yes
    17F, 63 III††Prox. ulnar fract., bilat. distal radial fract. ORIF of ulna, LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos., distal radial ORIF & ext. fixat. with ICBG, contralat. distal radial closed reduct. and percut. pin.50Fair (68)2010-10/15272/68YesIpsilat. wrist fusion 15 mo postinjury, litigation pursued, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    18F, 69 IV††Type-1 coronoid fract., distal radial dorsal Barton fract., undisplaced 5th metacarpal fract.Coronoid tip excis., radial neck cerclage wires, LCL repair, distal radial ORIF 39Good (85)19?7-20/13090/61YesOlecranon implants removed 18 mo postinjury, mild posttraumatic arthritis
    19F, 42 III††MCL strainLCL repair33Fair (70)36?9?-2/14085/67NoUlnar nerve dysesthesia (resolved), fibromyalgia
    20M, 55 IIIEssex-Lopresti injury, type-1 coronoid fract., 50% LCL avulsionCoronoid tip excis., LCL repair40Fair (61)32?6-23/11684/65YesAsymp. mild MCL laxity, rheumatoid arthritis for 9 yr preinjury
    21F, 45 III††LCL repair38Excel. (100)?7?9-11/14878/85NoLitigation pursued, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    22M, 51 IVType-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.26Good (83)1110?-2/14870/90Yes
    23M, 59 IV††Type-2B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon, LCL repair29Fair (61)12?8?-5/15074/74YesPersistent ulnar neuropathy, jumped 20 ft (6 m) out of window (suicide attempt), depression, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    24F, 62 Good (85)?410?-1/13784/68Yes
    Dom. armIII††LCL repair48Excel. (98)?310?-4/14084/76NoDepression
    Nondom. armIVType-1 coronoid fract., olecranon fract., no preop. radiog. availableCoronoid tip excis., ORIF of olecranon, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.41Good (81)?010-15/13675/65YesSuperficial elbow wound infect. (resolved)
    Total 10 type III, 15 type IVFair (65)3310??0/14485/76YesWCC, chronic ant. elbow pain (normal exam.)
    Mean and stand. dev. 54 1439 9Poor (42)7310?-7/13572/40NoWCC, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  General Health and Region-Specific Outcome Measures
    *SF-36 = Short Form-36 Health Survey, DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, MEPI = Mayo Elbow Performance Index, ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and VAS = Visual Analog Scale. †For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows).
    ?Measure*Score
    Mean and Standard Deviation†Range†Interpretation
    Normal ScoreWorst ScoreBest Score
    General health: SF-36
    Physical function47 1015-6550 10
    Mental function49 1315-6250 10
    Region-specific
    DASH17 19?0-65100??0
    MEPI
    Total80 1642-100??0100
    Pain29 13?0-45??0?45
    Motion20 115-20??0?20
    Stability10 1?5-10??0?10
    Function22 5?9-25??0?25
    ASES VAS Pain Scores
    At rest?1 2?0-8?10??0
    At its worst?4 4?0-10?10??0
    Lifting heavy object?4 4?0-10?10??0
    Repeated movements?3 4?0-10?10??0
    At night?1 2?0-6?10??0
    Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation17 21?0-77100??0
    Wrist Outcome Score60 1033-70??0?70
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Objective Physical Outcome Measures
    *For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows). †The variable differed significantly between the affected and unaffected arms (p < 0.05, paired t test).
    Range of Motion or Muscle PowerMean and Standard Deviation (Range)*
    Affected ArmUnaffected Arm
    Elbow flexion† (deg)140 9 (116-152)143 7 (122-158)
    Elbow extension† (deg)-8 7 (—23-0)0 6 (-11-17)
    Pronation (deg)78 9 (58-90)79 10 (48-90)
    Supination† (deg)69 10 (40-90)77 7 (63-90)
    Wrist flexion (deg)77 16 (15-95)78 10 (52-90)
    Wrist extension (deg)77 17 (15-90)82 8 (60-90)
    Grip strength†(kg)28 12 (11-52)34 14 (14-65)
    Elbow flexion power (Nm)37 24 (10-97)44 22 (17-89)
    Elbow extension power (Nm)31 20 (0-83)36 19 (11-80)
    Supination power† (Ncm)541 253 (211-1115)661 259 (343-1096)
    Pronation power† (Ncm)513 278 (192-1055)615 306 (230-1465)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Radiographic Outcome Measures
    *For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows). No variable differed significantly between the affected and unaffected arms (p > 0.05, paired t test).
    Mean and Standard Deviation (Range)* (mm)
    Affected ArmUnaffected Arm
    Medial ulnohumeral joint space 2.74 0.65 (1.41-4.25)2.90 0.67 (2.02-5.21)
    Lateral ulnohumeral joint space 2.99 0.75 (2.02-5.02)3.20 0.59 (2.48-4.81)
    Ulnar variance1.24 1.61 (-1-7)0.57 1.62 (-2-5)
    Over a six-year period at a single hospital, twenty-seven consecutive patients with an unreconstructible Mason1 type-III or Mason-Johnston6 type-IV fracture of the radial head had an arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant (Smith and Nephew Richards, Memphis, Tennessee) inserted by one of the two senior surgeons. The outcomes of twenty-five arthroplasties in twenty-four patients (thirteen women and eleven men) were reviewed. Two patients were lost to follow-up, and one had died as a result of an unrelated illness. The mean age (and standard deviation) was 54 ± 14 years (range, twenty-seven to eighty-four years ) (Table I). The mean duration of follow-up was 39 ± 9 months (range, twenty-six to fifty-eight months). The mean time from the injury to the surgery was 3 ± 3 days (range, zero to eleven days). One patient had a bilateral fracture. Of the remaining twenty-three patients, eleven had a fracture of the dominant arm and twelve, of the nondominant arm. Twenty-three patients were injured in a fall, and one was dragged by a tractor. Ten of the unreconstructible radial head fractures were Mason type III, and fifteen were Mason-Johnston type IV. Two patients had an isolated radial head fracture, whereas the others had concurrent ipsilateral elbow, forearm, and/or wrist injuries.
    Olecranon fractures were classified with use of the Mayo system26; coronoid fractures, with use of the classification described by Regan and Morrey27 ; and capitellar fractures, with use of the system described by Jupiter and Morrey28.
    There were forty-four associated injuries involving the affected upper limb and four injuries affecting the contralateral upper limb (Table I). In addition to the radial head arthroplasties, fifty-two other, simultaneous ipsilateral elbow procedures were performed. Four other procedures were performed on the injured arm at sites distant to the elbow, and two injuries involving the contralateral limb were treated surgically.
    Four patients (Cases 2, 3, 17, and 24) underwent a subsequent surgical procedure (Table I). One of them had a distal radial external fixator and ulnar Kirschner wires removed six weeks postoperatively. Two patients had the olecranon plate removed: one at seventeen months postoperatively and one at eighteen months postoperatively. One patient underwent ipsilateral total wrist fusion fifteen months postoperatively because of persistent pain due to perilunate dislocation.

    Surgical Technique and Postoperative Care

    All of the metal radial head implants were placed through a midline posterior elbow incision29. The interval between the anconeus and the extensor carpi ulnaris was developed, and the attachment of the lateral collateral ligament complex was, when necessary, elevated off of the lateral epicondyle to provide adequate exposure of the radial head injury. In patients with concurrent ulnohumeral dislocation, the lateral collateral ligament complex was already avulsed from its humeral attachment, facilitating surgical exposure. Patients with a concomitant olecranon fracture had the radial head implant inserted prior to fixation of the olecranon. A noncemented titanium radial head prosthesis (Smith and Nephew Richards) was used in all patients. During the study period, this implant was available in four different head sizes with diameters of 20, 23, 25, and 26 mm as a monoblock design with a stem size of 5.5 mm. The implants were press-fit into the proximal part of the radius to function as a spacer. Implant size was selected on the basis of the size of the reassembled native radial head. The diameter closest to that of the native radial head was employed. If a perfect size match was not available, the next larger size of implant was used.
    The medial collateral ligament was repaired if the elbow was unstable following radial head replacement and internal fixation of all fractures. The lateral collateral ligament complex was repaired through drill-holes in the lateral epicondyle during closure in all patients except for two who had had an osteotomy of the lateral epicondyle. In both patients, the osteotomy had been performed to facilitate exposure for internal fixation of the radial head. It was then found that fixation was not feasible because of severe comminution, and a metal radial head was implanted. The osteotomy sites were secured with two cancellous 4.0-mm distally threaded screws.
    The surgical goals were to establish a congruous and stable elbow joint that would allow an active range of motion. Immediately postoperatively, all patients performed active-assisted range-of-motion exercises of the elbow and wrist (except for the patients with a wrist injury requiring immobilization), supervised by a hand therapist, and wore a nighttime elbow extension splint and a daytime 90° resting splint. This regimen was continued for the first six weeks postoperatively, after which active and passive stretching and strengthening exercises were begun. Postoperative rehabilitation was individualized. If there was only a lateral-sided ligament injury or detachment, the forearm was splinted in pronation at 90° of elbow flexion between active range-of-motion exercise sessions for the first six weeks. If a medial-sided ligament injury was present, the forearm was splinted in supination at 90° of elbow flexion between active range-of-motion exercise sessions for the first six weeks. If there were lateral and medial-sided injuries (in fracture-dislocations), the forearm was placed in neutral rotation for the first six weeks. Pronation and supination movements of the forearm were allowed only with the elbow at 90° of flexion for the first six weeks. Treatment of, and rehabilitation following, concurrent injuries to the ipsilateral and/or contralateral upper extremity were performed on an individual basis.
    Postoperatively, twenty patients were given prescriptions for both indomethacin (25 mg three times daily) and misoprostal (200 mg twice daily) for prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification for six weeks.

    Clinical Patient Review

    In addition to chart reviews, the evaluation of the patients included administration of a series of questionnaires, a personal interview, a physical examination, and assessment of current radiographs. A physician who had not participated in the original care of the patients interviewed and examined each patient. Each patient’s history and current clinical status were evaluated, and a physical examination of both upper extremities was performed. The ranges of motion were measured with a goniometer with use of consistent anatomical landmarks30.

    Outcome Measures

    The Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey31 was completed. The physical and mental component summary scores of this instrument cover the two global aspects of overall health standardized to a United States population with a mean score of 50. Disability of the upper extremity was measured with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire32,33. Impairment and disability of the elbow were measured with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form34 and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index35. The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation36,37 and the Wrist Outcome Score38 were used to evaluate the status of the wrist (the distal radioulnar joint in particular) and its effect on patient outcome.
    Strength testing was performed in the clinical research laboratory. The NK Hand Evaluation System (NK Biomechanical Engineering, Minneapolis, Minnesota) was used to measure grip strength and range of motion30, whereas the LIDO Workset (Loredan Biomedical, West Sacramento, California) was used for isometric strength testing of elbow flexion, extension, pronation, and supination.
    Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of the elbow were made with the forearm in both pronation and supination. If a flexion contracture was present, anteroposterior radiographs of the distal part of the humerus and the proximal part of the forearm were made separately, in pronation and supination. Posteroanterior radiographs of both wrists, with the forearm in neutral rotation, were also made, to determine ulnar variance. A Digimatic micrometer (model CD-6; Mitutoyo, Tokyo, Japan) was used for all radiographic measurements. The Student paired t test was used for statistical comparisons.

    Outcome Measures

    The details of each patient’s injury, treatment, and outcome are presented in Table I. General health and region-specific measurements are shown in Table II, and objective physical measures are presented in Table III. At the time of follow-up, range-of-motion measurements demonstrated a significant loss of elbow flexion, elbow extension, and forearm supination in the affected extremity when compared with the unaffected extremity (p < 0.05). Grip strength was also found to be significantly decreased (by 18%) on the side of the injury, as were isometric forearm pronation (by 17%) and supination (by 18%) (p < 0.05).
    There were six complications, of which five (Cases 4, 5, 11, 19, and 20) were around the elbow. A regional sympathetic-mediated pain syndrome, extraneous to the elbow, developed in the ipsilateral upper limb of one patient (Case 15); it resolved without treatment. The complications in the six patients were all transient and had no residual effects at the time of final follow-up. Only one patient (Case 8) had a long-term sequela, due to persistent symptoms of a preoperative ulnar nerve injury. None of the metal radial head implants had to be removed. Sixteen patients did not require any analgesics at the time of follow-up. Three patients (12% of the elbows) were unable to return to their preinjury activities and/or employment because of the elbow injury. According to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, there were three poor results (Cases 13, 14, and 19). A review of the patients’ medical histories and outcome scores showed that these results could be attributed to non-treatment-related factors. Five patients (Cases 2, 4, 5, 8, and 12) had a fair result according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Index. The eight fair and poor results were associated with other injuries, a history of a psychiatric disorder, comorbid conditions, a Workers’ Compensation claim, or litigation. The SF-36 was useful in documenting when poorer outcomes might be attributed to mental health issues or comorbidities, as lower SF-36 scores were noted for these patients.

    Radiographic Review

    Radiographic review demonstrated congruent articulation of all radial head prostheses with the capitellum and the proximal part of the ulna at the time of final follow-up (Figs. 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, 1-D, 1-E, and 1-F). There were no fractures of any of the metal implants. There was no evidence of erosion or sclerosis of the proximal radioulnar joint at the lesser sigmoid notch of the ulna or at the capitellum. Capitellar osteopenia was evident in eighteen patients when anteroposterior radiographs of the affected and unaffected elbows were compared. It was graded as severe in two patients, as moderate in six, and as mild in ten. (The patient with bilateral radial head arthroplasty was not included in this analysis.) When postoperative radiographs were compared with those made at the time of follow-up, no progressive loss of bone from the radial neck region was observed adjacent to the base of the metal radial head implants.
    Seventeen patients displayed radiographic evidence of periprosthetic lucency within the radial medullary canal (Figs. 2-A and 2-B). We defined lucency as a 1-mm region of decreased bone density. The locations of the canal lucencies were fairly evenly distributed about the prosthesis, with no one specific pattern predominating. Only one patient (Case 24 [dominant elbow]) displayed osseous sclerosis at the distal tip of the metal prosthesis in the radial medullary canal (Table I).
    Nineteen patients had no radiographic evidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Five patients (Cases 3, 16, 18, 21, and 24) had subchondral sclerosis at the ulnohumeral joint with maintenance of the ulnohumeral joint space. There was no heterotopic ossification in seventeen elbows at the time of the latest follow-up. The system of Brooker et al.39 was used to classify the heterotopic ossification in the remaining eight elbows. Seven (Cases 2, 6, 8, 13, 14, 18, and 24 [nondominant elbow]) had class-1 ossification, and one (Case 22) had class-2.
    There were no significant differences between the affected and unaffected arms with regard to the size of the medial or lateral ulnohumeral joint space or with respect to ulnar variance (Table IV).
    We believe that this study is the first to evaluate the subjective and objective outcomes of arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant after Mason type-III and Mason-Johnston type-IV fractures of the radial head. We recognize the inherent weaknesses of a retrospective review; however, an 89% rate of follow-up (twenty-four of twenty-seven patients) was achieved. We performed a medium-term follow-up study (mean duration, 39 ± 9 months; range, twenty-six to fifty-eight months), and we realize that longer-term evaluation is necessary, particularly since these injuries often occur in younger patients.
    All patients included in this review were treated as soon after referral as was possible (mean time from injury to surgery, 3 ± 3 days; range, zero to eleven days). We believe that these injuries should be treated surgically as soon as possible in order to minimize the risk of elbow stiffness and heterotopic ossification. The latter risk was addressed by administering a six-week postoperative course of indomethacin as well as by avoiding early passive range-of-motion therapy. Although some heterotopic ossification was present in eight (32%) of the twenty-five elbows, in most cases only small amounts of ossification were evident in the collateral ligaments. In spite of the complex nature of our patients’ injuries, no patient appeared to have a substantial restriction of elbow or forearm motion as a consequence of heterotopic ossification. Determining whether indomethacin prevents heterotopic ossification in this patient population requires further study.
    Ten Mason type-III and fifteen Mason-Johnston type-IV unreconstructible fractures of the radial head were evaluated in this review. Only two patients had an isolated radial head fracture; the remaining patients sustained concurrent elbow and other upper-extremity injuries, which likely influenced the functional outcomes in this population. All of the patients had a stable elbow at the time of follow-up. It was impossible to determine whether the residual pain reported by some patients originated from the radial head implant or from the surrounding tissues.
    In this study, we evaluated multiple outcomes, including the scores derived from a number of different patient questionnaires. When these outcomes were reviewed together for specific patients, as shown in Table I, they allowed us to surmise reasons for poorer outcomes. For example, a low SF-36 mental component summary score for a patient with a diagnosis of depression indicates that, at the time that the outcome was evaluated, the patient was affected by clinically relevant depression, which would be expected to contribute to a patient’s perception of a poor outcome. While SF-36 physical component summary scores were close to normal in the series as a whole, individual patients with a low SF-36 physical component summary score were affected by comorbidities, which implicated the comorbidities, and not the radial head prosthesis, as the source of reduced physical-health-related quality of life.
    Capitellar osteopenia was present in eighteen (78%) of twenty-three patients, suggesting that changes in load transfer across the elbow may have occurred following the radial head arthroplasty. Bone lucencies surrounding the implant stem in the proximal part of the radial medullary canal were present in seventeen (68%) of the twenty-five elbows. These bone lucencies imply that there was movement at the stem-medullary canal interface in addition to movement at the implant-capitellar interface. We speculated that the implant may remain stationary while the radial shaft rotates around it during forearm pronation and supination. The implant stem employed in this study was much smaller in diameter than the radial medullary canal, and this mismatch may have been an important factor in the development of the lucencies. Longer-term follow-up is needed to assess the progression of bone lucencies surrounding the implant stem; however, it is our impression that lucencies tend to develop early and remain stable over time.
    Mild posttraumatic ulnohumeral osteoarthritis was present in five (20%) of the twenty-five elbows; however, the joint spaces were maintained. All but one of these patients had an associated fracture and/or dislocation, which may have contributed to the development of osteoarthritis.
    We are aware of only five reports on the clinical use of metal radial head prostheses for acute fractures3,18,19,40,41. Two of these studies were published in 194141 and 195140 and involved implant designs that are not in current use. In 1981, Harrington and Tountas reported, after a mean duration of follow-up of 6.9 years, on fifteen patients who had been treated with a titanium implant and two who had been treated with a silicone implant for gross elbow instability associated with a comminuted radial head fracture19. Numerous associated injuries had been present in these patients. Harrington and Tountas reported eight excellent results, six good results, two fair results, and one poor result. No elbow instability, valgus deformity, infection, or myositis ossificans was identified. One implant was removed because of pain, which then resolved. This group’s clinical results were similar to those in our study, although no comparisons were made with the uninjured extremity in the study by Harrington and Tountas.
    In 1993, Knight et al. reported the results at a mean of 4.5 years after arthroplasty with a press-fit Vitallium radial head implant in thirty-one patients3. There were ten isolated Mason type-III fractures and twenty-one fractures with concurrent elbow dislocations and fractures in that study. At the time of follow-up, twenty-four patients reported little or no pain, six had some lateral aching in the elbow with activity only, one had pain at rest, two had wrist pain, and one had asymptomatic valgus laxity. There were two mild ulnar nerve paresthesias, one radioulnar synostosis, and ten cases of weakness compared with the normal side. Two of the implants required removal because of painful loosening; however, the authors did not state whether the symptoms were relieved. Nonprogressive radiolucencies developed around seven of the prostheses. Our results were similar to those of Knight et al.
    In 1996, Judet et al. reviewed, after a mean duration of follow-up of forty-nine months, the results in five patients who had had an acute radial head fracture with medial collateral ligament injury18. Only one patient had had an associated coronoid fracture. Judet et al. initially used a bipolar titanium prosthesis and then later employed a cobalt-chromium prosthesis with a cemented stem and a polyethylene articulation with the head component (Tornier SA, Saint-Ismier, France). This implant was rigidly fixed in the radial medullary canal and therefore had different design characteristics than the metal implant used in our study. Three results were rated as excellent, and two were rated as good. There were no complications in these patients. Radiographically, Judet et al. noted no lucencies surrounding the cemented stems, no progressive joint-space narrowing, and no osteoporosis of the humeral condyle.
    In the current study, all but two of the patients sustained severe associated injuries of the elbow and/or other sites in the upper extremity. Only radial heads that were not amenable to open reduction and internal fixation were replaced. The results of the current study reflect the severity of the injury sustained to the elbow and the ipsilateral extremity. Our patients sustained more severe trauma to the extremity than did patients in other published studies of arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant, but their outcomes were similar. On the basis of our study, we concluded that if stable internal fixation of a radial head fracture cannot be achieved because of comminution or osteoporosis, arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant is a viable treatment option that appears to be both safe and effective.
    Mason ML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg,1954;42: 123-32. 42123  1954  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Hotchkiss RN,Weiland AJ. Valgus stability of the elbow. J Orthop Res,1987;5: 372-7. 5372  1987  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Knight DJ, Rymaszewski LA, Amis AA,Miller JH. Primary replacement of the fractured radial head with a metal prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993;75: 572-6. 75572  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey B,FAn KN. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med,1983;11: 315-9. 11315  1983  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sellman DC, Seitz WH Jr, Postak PD,Greenwald AS. Reconstructive strategies for radioulnar dissociation: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma,1995;9: 516-22. 9516  1995  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Johnston GW. A follow-up of one hundred cases of fracture of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Med J,1962;31: 51-6. 3151  1962  [PubMed]
     
    Furry KL,Clinkscales CM. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Arthroplasty versus internal fixation. Clin Orthop,1998;353: 40-52. 35340  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Coleman DA, Blair WF,Shurr D. Resection of the radial head for fracture of the radial head. Long-term follow-up of seventeen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 385-92. 69385  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg I, Peylan J,Yosipovitch Z. Late results of excision of the radial head for an isolated closed fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 675-9. 68675  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF, Chao EY,Hui FC. Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979;61: 63-8. 6163  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Radin EL,Riseborough EJ. Fractures of the radial head. A review of eighty-eight cases and analysis of the indications for excision of the radial head and non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1966;48: 1055-64. 481055  1966  [PubMed]
     
    McDougall A,White J. Subluxation of the inferior radio-ulnar joint complicating fracture of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1957;39: 278-87. 39278  1957  [PubMed]
     
    Mikic ZD,Vukadinovic SM. Late results in fractures of the radial head treated by excision. Clin Orthop,1983;181: 220-8. 181220  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF. Fracture of the radial head. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 383-404 
     
    Taylor TKF,O’Connor BT. The effect upon the inferior radio-ulnar joint of excision of the head of the radius in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1964;46: 83-8. 4683  1964  [PubMed]
     
    Cherry JC. Use of acrylic prosthesis in the treatment of fracture of the head of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1953;35: 70-1. 3570  1953  [PubMed]
     
    Swanson AB, Jaeger SH,La Rochelle D. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. The role of silicone-implant replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 1039-49. 631039  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Judet T, Garreau de Loubresse C, Piriou P,Charnley G. A floating prosthesis for radial-head fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1996;78: 244-9. 78244  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Harrington IJ,Tountas AA. Replacement of the radial head in the treatment of unstable elbow fractures. Injury,1981;12: 405-12. 12405  1981  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Carn RM, Medige J, Curtain D,Koenig A. Silicone rubber replacement of the severely fractured radial head. Clin Orthop,1986;209: 259-69. 209259  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF, Askew L,Chao EY. Silastic prosthetic replacement for the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 454-8. 63454  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Stoffelen DV,Holdsworth BJ. Excision or Silastic replacement for comminuted radial head fractures. A long-term follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg,1994;60: 402-7. 60402  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Vanderwilde RS, Morrey BF, Melberg MW,Vinh TN . Inflammatory arthritis after failure of silicone rubber replacement of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1994;76: 78-81. 7678  1994  [PubMed]
     
    King GJ, Zarzour ZD, Rath DA, Dunning CE, Patterson SD,Johnson JA. Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow. Clin Orthop,1999;368: 114-25. 368114  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Pribyl CR, Kester MA, Cook SD, Edmunds JO,Brunet ME. The effect of the radial head and prosthetic radial head replacement on resisting valgus stress at the elbow. Orthopedics,1986;9: 723-6. 9723  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Fractures of the proximal ulna and olecranon. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 405-25. 
     
    Regan W,Morrey BF. Classification and treatment of coronoid process fractures. Orthopedics,1992;15: 845-8. 15845  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Jupiter JB, Morrey BF. Fractures of the distal humerus in the adult. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 328-66. 
     
    Dowdy PA, Bain GI, King GJ,Patterson SD. The midline posterior elbow incision. An anatomical appraisal. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1995;77: 696-9. 77696  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Armstrong AD, MacDermid JC, Chinchalkar S, Stevens RS,King GJ. Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1998;7: 573-80. 7573  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994. p 1.1-10.12. 
     
    Hudak PL, Amadio PC,Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med,1996;29: 602-8. erratum, 1996;30:37229602  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Amadio P, Beaton D, Bombardier C, Davis A, Hawker G, Hudak P, Katz J, Marx R, Punnett L, Wright J, Shields S,for the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Measuring disability and symptoms of the upper limb: a validation study of the DASH questionnaire [abstract]. Arthrit Rheum,1996;39: 112. 39112  1996 
     
    King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC,Woo SL. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1999;8: 351-4. 8351  1999  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Morrey BF, An KN, Chao EYS. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 85-97. 
     
    MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther,1996;9: 178-83. 9178  1996  [PubMed]
     
    MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M,Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma,1998;12: 577-86. 12577  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    MacDermid JC. Baseline predictors of pain and disability 6 months following distal radius fracture. London, ON: University of Western Ontario; 1999. Towards a performance-based scale for wrist impairment; p 278-88. 
     
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA,Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973;55: 1629-32. 551629  1973  [PubMed]
     
    Carr CR,Howard JW. Metallic cap replacement of radial head following fracture. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol,1951;59: 539-46. 59539  1951  [PubMed]
     
    Speed K. Ferrule caps for the head of the radius. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1941;73: 845-50. 73845  1941 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-F Case 6. Figs. 1-A and 1-B Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-eight-year-old man, demonstrating a fracture-dislocation of the left elbow that was sustained in a fall while the man was roller-blading.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Figs. 1-A through 1-F Case 6. Figs. 1-A and 1-B Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-eight-year-old man, demonstrating a fracture-dislocation of the left elbow that was sustained in a fall while the man was roller-blading.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:Figs. 1-C and 1-D Postreduction radiographs demonstrating a comminuted fracture of the radial head with a type-I coronoid fracture.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:Figs. 1-C and 1-D Postreduction radiographs demonstrating a comminuted fracture of the radial head with a type-I coronoid fracture.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:Figs. 1-E and 1-F Radiographs demonstrating congruent articulation of the metal radial head implant two and one-half years postoperatively. The patient was asymptomatic.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:Figs. 1-E and 1-F Radiographs demonstrating congruent articulation of the metal radial head implant two and one-half years postoperatively. The patient was asymptomatic.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Case 21. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-five-year-old woman, demonstrating lucencies (arrows) around the stem of a metal radial head implant three years following surgical management of a comminuted fracture of the radial head. The patient had no pain with normal activities of daily living, but she had mild residual discomfort with strenuous use of the arm.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Case 21. Anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a forty-five-year-old woman, demonstrating lucencies (arrows) around the stem of a metal radial head implant three years following surgical management of a comminuted fracture of the radial head. The patient had no pain with normal activities of daily living, but she had mild residual discomfort with strenuous use of the arm.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Patients
    *The injuries were classified as either a Mason1 type-III or a Mason-Johnston6 type-IV injury. The Mason-Johnston type-IV injuries were associated with posterior ulnohumeral dislocation. †MCL = medial collateral ligament, and LCL = lateral collateral ligament. ‡All patients had an arthroplasty with a metal radial head implant. ORIF = open reduction and internal fixation, ICBG = iliac crest bone graft, MCL = medial collateral ligament, and LCL = lateral collateral ligament. §MEPI = Mayo Elbow Performance Index. #PRWE = Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation. **WCC = Workers’ Compensation claim, and MCL = medial collateral ligament. †† = dominant arm.
    CaseGender, Age (yr)Fracture Type*Ipsilateral Injuries† [Contralateral Injuries]Op. Treatment‡Durat. of Follow-up (mo)MEPI§ Grade (Score)PRWE#Subjective Patient SatisfactionElbow Ext./Flex. (deg)Forearm Pron./Sup. (deg)Radiog. Stem LucencyComplications and Comments**
    ?1F, 68 IV††Type-2 coronoid fract., prox. ulnar fract. ORIF of coronoid & ulna with bone graft from radial head excis., LCL repair42
    ?2M, 28 III††Essex-Lopresti injury, type-1 coronoid fract., MCL & LCL strains, bilat. perilunate disloc.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair, ORIF of bilat. perilunate disloc.33
    ?3M, 52 IV††Type-3B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon with ICBG, LCL repair49
    ?4F, 44 IIILocked ant. radiocapitellar disloc.MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos. 29
    ?5F, 76 IVType-3 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. submusc. ulnar nerve transpos. 39
    ?6M, 48 IVType-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair29
    ?7F, 64 IVType-1 capitellar fract., undisplaced scaphoid waist fract., [undisplaced radial neck fract.]ORIF of capitellum, LCL repair30
    ?8F, 27 IVType-1 coronoid fract.; capitellar impression fract.; undisplaced scaphoid, trapezial, capitate fracts. Coronoid tip excis., MCL & LCL repair39
    ?9M, 71 IV††Type-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., LCL repair54
    10F, 56 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.47
    11M, 84 IVType-3B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon with ICBG, LCL repair48
    12F, 45 III††Bado type-2 Monteggia injury, capitellar impression fract., [undisplaced radial head fract.]ORIF of olecranon with bone graft from radial head excis., LCL repair27
    13M, 55 III††Type-1 coronoid fract., MCL tear, displaced scaphoid fract. Lat. epicondyle osteot., coronoid tip excis., ORIF of scaphoid37
    14F, 33 IIIEssex-Lopresti injury, capitellar impression fract., MCL strainLat. epicondyle osteot.58
    15M, 45 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.29
    16M, 59 IVType-2 coronoid fract.ORIF of coronoid, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.46Good (83)1510?-8/13990/67Yes
    17F, 63 III††Prox. ulnar fract., bilat. distal radial fract. ORIF of ulna, LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos., distal radial ORIF & ext. fixat. with ICBG, contralat. distal radial closed reduct. and percut. pin.50Fair (68)2010-10/15272/68YesIpsilat. wrist fusion 15 mo postinjury, litigation pursued, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    18F, 69 IV††Type-1 coronoid fract., distal radial dorsal Barton fract., undisplaced 5th metacarpal fract.Coronoid tip excis., radial neck cerclage wires, LCL repair, distal radial ORIF 39Good (85)19?7-20/13090/61YesOlecranon implants removed 18 mo postinjury, mild posttraumatic arthritis
    19F, 42 III††MCL strainLCL repair33Fair (70)36?9?-2/14085/67NoUlnar nerve dysesthesia (resolved), fibromyalgia
    20M, 55 IIIEssex-Lopresti injury, type-1 coronoid fract., 50% LCL avulsionCoronoid tip excis., LCL repair40Fair (61)32?6-23/11684/65YesAsymp. mild MCL laxity, rheumatoid arthritis for 9 yr preinjury
    21F, 45 III††LCL repair38Excel. (100)?7?9-11/14878/85NoLitigation pursued, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    22M, 51 IVType-1 coronoid fract.Coronoid tip excis., MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.26Good (83)1110?-2/14870/90Yes
    23M, 59 IV††Type-2B olecranon fract.ORIF of olecranon, LCL repair29Fair (61)12?8?-5/15074/74YesPersistent ulnar neuropathy, jumped 20 ft (6 m) out of window (suicide attempt), depression, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    24F, 62 Good (85)?410?-1/13784/68Yes
    Dom. armIII††LCL repair48Excel. (98)?310?-4/14084/76NoDepression
    Nondom. armIVType-1 coronoid fract., olecranon fract., no preop. radiog. availableCoronoid tip excis., ORIF of olecranon, MCL & LCL repair, ant. subcut. ulnar nerve transpos.41Good (81)?010-15/13675/65YesSuperficial elbow wound infect. (resolved)
    Total 10 type III, 15 type IVFair (65)3310??0/14485/76YesWCC, chronic ant. elbow pain (normal exam.)
    Mean and stand. dev. 54 1439 9Poor (42)7310?-7/13572/40NoWCC, heterotopic ossificat. (Brooker 1)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  General Health and Region-Specific Outcome Measures
    *SF-36 = Short Form-36 Health Survey, DASH = Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire, MEPI = Mayo Elbow Performance Index, ASES = American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and VAS = Visual Analog Scale. †For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows).
    ?Measure*Score
    Mean and Standard Deviation†Range†Interpretation
    Normal ScoreWorst ScoreBest Score
    General health: SF-36
    Physical function47 1015-6550 10
    Mental function49 1315-6250 10
    Region-specific
    DASH17 19?0-65100??0
    MEPI
    Total80 1642-100??0100
    Pain29 13?0-45??0?45
    Motion20 115-20??0?20
    Stability10 1?5-10??0?10
    Function22 5?9-25??0?25
    ASES VAS Pain Scores
    At rest?1 2?0-8?10??0
    At its worst?4 4?0-10?10??0
    Lifting heavy object?4 4?0-10?10??0
    Repeated movements?3 4?0-10?10??0
    At night?1 2?0-6?10??0
    Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation17 21?0-77100??0
    Wrist Outcome Score60 1033-70??0?70
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Objective Physical Outcome Measures
    *For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows). †The variable differed significantly between the affected and unaffected arms (p < 0.05, paired t test).
    Range of Motion or Muscle PowerMean and Standard Deviation (Range)*
    Affected ArmUnaffected Arm
    Elbow flexion† (deg)140 9 (116-152)143 7 (122-158)
    Elbow extension† (deg)-8 7 (—23-0)0 6 (-11-17)
    Pronation (deg)78 9 (58-90)79 10 (48-90)
    Supination† (deg)69 10 (40-90)77 7 (63-90)
    Wrist flexion (deg)77 16 (15-95)78 10 (52-90)
    Wrist extension (deg)77 17 (15-90)82 8 (60-90)
    Grip strength†(kg)28 12 (11-52)34 14 (14-65)
    Elbow flexion power (Nm)37 24 (10-97)44 22 (17-89)
    Elbow extension power (Nm)31 20 (0-83)36 19 (11-80)
    Supination power† (Ncm)541 253 (211-1115)661 259 (343-1096)
    Pronation power† (Ncm)513 278 (192-1055)615 306 (230-1465)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Radiographic Outcome Measures
    *For twenty-four patients (twenty-five elbows). No variable differed significantly between the affected and unaffected arms (p > 0.05, paired t test).
    Mean and Standard Deviation (Range)* (mm)
    Affected ArmUnaffected Arm
    Medial ulnohumeral joint space 2.74 0.65 (1.41-4.25)2.90 0.67 (2.02-5.21)
    Lateral ulnohumeral joint space 2.99 0.75 (2.02-5.02)3.20 0.59 (2.48-4.81)
    Ulnar variance1.24 1.61 (-1-7)0.57 1.62 (-2-5)
    Mason ML. Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases. Br J Surg,1954;42: 123-32. 42123  1954  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Hotchkiss RN,Weiland AJ. Valgus stability of the elbow. J Orthop Res,1987;5: 372-7. 5372  1987  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Knight DJ, Rymaszewski LA, Amis AA,Miller JH. Primary replacement of the fractured radial head with a metal prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993;75: 572-6. 75572  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey B,FAn KN. Articular and ligamentous contributions to the stability of the elbow joint. Am J Sports Med,1983;11: 315-9. 11315  1983  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sellman DC, Seitz WH Jr, Postak PD,Greenwald AS. Reconstructive strategies for radioulnar dissociation: a biomechanical study. J Orthop Trauma,1995;9: 516-22. 9516  1995  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Johnston GW. A follow-up of one hundred cases of fracture of the head of the radius with a review of the literature. Ulster Med J,1962;31: 51-6. 3151  1962  [PubMed]
     
    Furry KL,Clinkscales CM. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. Arthroplasty versus internal fixation. Clin Orthop,1998;353: 40-52. 35340  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Coleman DA, Blair WF,Shurr D. Resection of the radial head for fracture of the radial head. Long-term follow-up of seventeen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987;69: 385-92. 69385  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Goldberg I, Peylan J,Yosipovitch Z. Late results of excision of the radial head for an isolated closed fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 675-9. 68675  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF, Chao EY,Hui FC. Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979;61: 63-8. 6163  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Radin EL,Riseborough EJ. Fractures of the radial head. A review of eighty-eight cases and analysis of the indications for excision of the radial head and non-operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1966;48: 1055-64. 481055  1966  [PubMed]
     
    McDougall A,White J. Subluxation of the inferior radio-ulnar joint complicating fracture of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1957;39: 278-87. 39278  1957  [PubMed]
     
    Mikic ZD,Vukadinovic SM. Late results in fractures of the radial head treated by excision. Clin Orthop,1983;181: 220-8. 181220  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF. Fracture of the radial head. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 383-404 
     
    Taylor TKF,O’Connor BT. The effect upon the inferior radio-ulnar joint of excision of the head of the radius in adults. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1964;46: 83-8. 4683  1964  [PubMed]
     
    Cherry JC. Use of acrylic prosthesis in the treatment of fracture of the head of the radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1953;35: 70-1. 3570  1953  [PubMed]
     
    Swanson AB, Jaeger SH,La Rochelle D. Comminuted fractures of the radial head. The role of silicone-implant replacement arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 1039-49. 631039  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Judet T, Garreau de Loubresse C, Piriou P,Charnley G. A floating prosthesis for radial-head fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1996;78: 244-9. 78244  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Harrington IJ,Tountas AA. Replacement of the radial head in the treatment of unstable elbow fractures. Injury,1981;12: 405-12. 12405  1981  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Carn RM, Medige J, Curtain D,Koenig A. Silicone rubber replacement of the severely fractured radial head. Clin Orthop,1986;209: 259-69. 209259  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF, Askew L,Chao EY. Silastic prosthetic replacement for the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 454-8. 63454  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Stoffelen DV,Holdsworth BJ. Excision or Silastic replacement for comminuted radial head fractures. A long-term follow-up. Acta Orthop Belg,1994;60: 402-7. 60402  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Vanderwilde RS, Morrey BF, Melberg MW,Vinh TN . Inflammatory arthritis after failure of silicone rubber replacement of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1994;76: 78-81. 7678  1994  [PubMed]
     
    King GJ, Zarzour ZD, Rath DA, Dunning CE, Patterson SD,Johnson JA. Metallic radial head arthroplasty improves valgus stability of the elbow. Clin Orthop,1999;368: 114-25. 368114  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Pribyl CR, Kester MA, Cook SD, Edmunds JO,Brunet ME. The effect of the radial head and prosthetic radial head replacement on resisting valgus stress at the elbow. Orthopedics,1986;9: 723-6. 9723  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Fractures of the proximal ulna and olecranon. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 405-25. 
     
    Regan W,Morrey BF. Classification and treatment of coronoid process fractures. Orthopedics,1992;15: 845-8. 15845  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Jupiter JB, Morrey BF. Fractures of the distal humerus in the adult. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 328-66. 
     
    Dowdy PA, Bain GI, King GJ,Patterson SD. The midline posterior elbow incision. An anatomical appraisal. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1995;77: 696-9. 77696  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Armstrong AD, MacDermid JC, Chinchalkar S, Stevens RS,King GJ. Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1998;7: 573-80. 7573  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user’s manual. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1994. p 1.1-10.12. 
     
    Hudak PL, Amadio PC,Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med,1996;29: 602-8. erratum, 1996;30:37229602  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Amadio P, Beaton D, Bombardier C, Davis A, Hawker G, Hudak P, Katz J, Marx R, Punnett L, Wright J, Shields S,for the Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Measuring disability and symptoms of the upper limb: a validation study of the DASH questionnaire [abstract]. Arthrit Rheum,1996;39: 112. 39112  1996 
     
    King GJ, Richards RR, Zuckerman JD, Blasier R, Dillman C, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Iannotti JP, Murnahan JP, Mow VC,Woo SL. A standardized method for assessment of elbow function. Research Committee, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1999;8: 351-4. 8351  1999  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Morrey BF, An KN, Chao EYS. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF, editor. The elbow and its disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 1993. p 85-97. 
     
    MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther,1996;9: 178-83. 9178  1996  [PubMed]
     
    MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M,Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma,1998;12: 577-86. 12577  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    MacDermid JC. Baseline predictors of pain and disability 6 months following distal radius fracture. London, ON: University of Western Ontario; 1999. Towards a performance-based scale for wrist impairment; p 278-88. 
     
    Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA,Riley LH Jr. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973;55: 1629-32. 551629  1973  [PubMed]
     
    Carr CR,Howard JW. Metallic cap replacement of radial head following fracture. West J Surg Obstet Gynecol,1951;59: 539-46. 59539  1951  [PubMed]
     
    Speed K. Ferrule caps for the head of the radius. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1941;73: 845-50. 73845  1941 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clavicle anatomy and the applicability of intramedullary midshaft fracture fixation.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.]: Issue date- 2012 Jan 21
    Guidelines
    Results provided by:
    PubMed
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center