0
Articles   |    
Posterior Cruciate Ligament-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis
Michael J. Archibeck, MD; Richard A. Berger, MD; Regina M. Barden, RN; Joshua J. Jacobs, MD; Mitchell B. Sheinkop, MD; Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD; Jorge O. Galante, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
Michael J. Archibeck, MD
New Mexico Orthopaedics, 201 Cedar Street S.E., Suite 6600, Albuquerque, NM 87106

Richard A. Berger, MD
Regina M. Barden, RN
Joshua J. Jacobs, MD
Mitchell B. Sheinkop, MD
Aaron G. Rosenberg, MD
Jorge O. Galante, MD
Midwest Orthopaedics, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, 1725 West Harrison Street, Suite 1063, Chicago, IL 60612

One or more of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. In addition, benefits have been or will be directed to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other nonprofit organization with which one or more of the authors is associated. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1231-1236 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Although initial reports on posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have been encouraging, a high rate of late instability necessitating revision has been reported recently. The purpose of the present prospective study was to analyze the results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Methods: Seventy-two posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasties in fifty-one patients with rheumatoid arthritis were studied prospectively. All procedures were performed with the Miller-Galante I prosthesis. Eighteen patients (twenty-four knees) died before the eight-year follow-up and one patient (two knees) was lost to follow-up, leaving forty-six knees (thirty-two patients) for review. These forty-six knees were evaluated clinically (with particular attention to posterior instability) and radiographically at annual intervals for a mean of 10.5 years (range, eight to fourteen years).

Results: Forty-four (95%) of forty-six knees had a good or excellent result at a mean of 10.5 years. However, nine (13%) of the original seventy-two knees had revision of the implant, with six of the revisions performed because of failure of a metal-backed patellar component. The rate of survival at ten years was 93% 4% with femoral or tibial revision for any reason as the end point and 81% 5% with any reoperation as the end point. There was no aseptic loosening in any knee. Posterior instability was identified clinically and/or radiographically in two (2.8%) of the original seventy-two knees; both unstable knees were in the same patient.

Conclusion: Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty yielded satisfactory clinical and radiographic results in patients with rheumatoid arthritis at intermediate-term follow-up (mean, 10.5 years). Therefore, we believe that it remains an excellent treatment option for these patients.

Figures in this Article
    Total knee arthroplasty has been very successful in reducing pain and restoring function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing, posterior cruciate ligament-retaining, and posterior cruciate ligament-substituting designs have all met with excellent clinical success and ten to twenty-year revision-free survivorship1-5. Posterior cruciate ligament-sacrificing implants, such as the original total condylar knee prosthesis, provide anterior and posterior stability by means of their highly congruent articulating surfaces. Posterior cruciate ligament-retaining designs permit femoral rollback with flexion by incorporating a relatively flat articulating surface. Posterior cruciate ligament-substituting knee designs provide posterior rollback with flexion by means of a post-and-cam mechanism. Studies comparing modern cruciate-retaining with cruciate-substituting designs have demonstrated similar results with regard to range of motion, aseptic loosening, proprioception, gait patterns, polyethylene wear, and stability6-8.
    Although posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis has been very successful in some series9-13, a relatively high rate of late posterior instability requiring revision has been reported recently14. The purpose of the present study was to review our experience with posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with particular attention to the identification of late posterior instability, after a minimum of eight years.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Radiographs made fourteen years postoperatively, showing well-fixed components and rollback consistent with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Radiographs made fourteen years postoperatively, showing well-fixed components and rollback consistent with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:The contact-point ratio (a/b) was calculated as the distance from the posterior edge of the tibial component to the tibiofemoral contact point (a) divided by the total width of the component (b).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Radiographs made ten years postoperatively, demonstrating gross sagittal plane instability consistent with an incompetent posterior cruciate ligament.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Radiographs made ten years postoperatively, demonstrating gross sagittal plane instability consistent with an incompetent posterior cruciate ligament.
    From January 1984 through August 1989, seventy-two consecutive posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties were performed in fifty-one patients with a primary diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. There were thirty-nine women and twelve men. The mean age at the time of the arthroplasty was fifty-seven years (range, thirty to seventy-eight years). Twenty-one patients underwent bilateral total knee arthroplasty; thirteen of these patients had simultaneous procedures and eight had staged procedures. Eighteen patients (twenty-four knees) died before a minimum of eight years of clinical follow-up. Although these twenty-four knees are included in the survivorship analysis, they are not included in the analysis of the clinical and radiographic results after a minimum follow-up of eight years. Two knees in one patient were lost to follow-up, leaving forty-six knees in thirty-two patients available for evaluation at a mean of 10.5 years (range, eight to fourteen years).
    The relatively unconstrained Miller-Galante I prosthesis (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) was used in all patients (Figs. 1-A and 1-B). The tibial component featured a Ti6Al4V-alloy tray with four small fixation pegs and a posterior recess to accommodate the retained posterior cruciate ligament. The tibial component was inserted either with cement (in which case it was precoated with polymethylmethacrylate) or without cement (in which case it was fixed with screws that were placed through holes in the fixation pegs). The polyethylene tibial insert had a relatively flat articular surface. The femoral component also was made of Ti6Al4V and could be inserted either with or without cement. Overall, forty-eight arthroplasties were performed with cement (Simplex-P; Howmedica, Rutherford, New Jersey), twenty-one were performed without cement, and three were hybrid procedures (two involved a cemented tibial and a cementless femoral component, and one involved a cemented femoral and a cementless tibial component). All patellar components were metal-backed (Ti6Al4V); fifty were inserted with cement and twenty-two were inserted without cement.
    All procedures were performed through a medial parapatellar arthrotomy. A bone island was preserved around the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. The posterior cruciate ligament was not recessed or otherwise balanced. The tibial cut was made with 10° of posterior slope with use of an extramedullary guide. The femoral component was slightly undersized, when possible, to avoid placing excessive tension on the posterior cruciate ligament in flexion. A synovectomy was not performed routinely.
    Physical therapy for range of motion and walking was initiated on the first postoperative day. Continuous passive-motion machines were not used. The postoperative weight-bearing protocol prescribed full weight-bearing for knees with cemented and hybrid components and protected weight-bearing for six weeks for those with cementless prostheses. Perioperative antibiotics were administered to all patients for forty-eight hours, and warfarin was administered for four weeks for thromboembolic prophylaxis.

    Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

    The clinical evaluation, which included an examination of the knee and completion of the Hospital for Special Surgery knee-evaluation form15, was conducted preoperatively and at six weeks, three months, six months, one year, and annually thereafter. Mediolateral and posterior ligamentous stability were assessed by means of a manual examination, and the posterior drawer test and the posterior sag test were used to assess posterior cruciate ligament integrity.
    Weight-bearing anteroposterior, non-weight-bearing lateral, and Merchant radiographs of the involved knee were made preoperatively and at each follow-up visit (at six weeks, three months, six months, one year, and annually thereafter). The radiographs were analyzed for component position and sizing, radiolucent lines, and osteolysis. The alignment of the femoral component was determined by measuring the angle between the distal condylar surfaces and the shaft of the femur on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. Similarly, the position of the tibial component was determined by measuring the angle between the surface of the plateau and the shaft of the tibia on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. The position of the patellar component was assessed by measuring the angle between the cut surface of the patella and a line drawn along the medial and lateral anterior extensions of the trochlear groove on the skyline radiograph. Medial or lateral displacement of the patellar component from the trochlear groove was recorded as a measure of patellar tracking. Sizing of the tibial component was assessed on the anteroposterior radiographs and on the basis of whether the edges of the component lined up with the edges of the cut tibial surface, overhung the edges of the bone (indicating an oversized component), or did not reach the edges of the bone (indicating an undersized component). Radiolucent lines were characterized by width (<1 mm, 1 to 2 mm, or >2 mm), and they were classified by location with use of a nine-quadrant zoning system for the femur, tibia, and patella. Osteolysis was evaluated on all radiographs, with the findings on the preoperative or early postoperative radiographs used as a baseline.
    An attempt to determine posterior cruciate ligament integrity was made by examining plain radiographs. The tibiofemoral contact point, defined as the point at which the femoral component contacted the articular surface of the tibial polyethylene, was identified on non-weight-bearing lateral radiographs made with the knee in 45° of flexion. The distance from the posterior edge of the tibial component to the tibiofemoral contact point was measured and expressed as a percentage of the total width of the tibial component (from the anterior to the posterior edge) (Fig. 2). The resulting contact-point ratio was calculated on the initial postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs.
    Survivorship analysis was performed with use of the Kaplan-Meier method. Chi-square tests with Yates and Bonferroni corrections were used for comparisons of partial radiolucencies and contact-point ratios.
    The average Hospital for Special Surgery score increased from 42 points (range, 13 to 75 points) preoperatively to 87 points (range, 46 to 100 points) at the final follow-up examination. Of the forty-six knees that were followed for at least eight years, thirty (65%) had an excellent result; fourteen (30%), a good result; one (2%), a fair result; and one, a poor result. The one poor result was for a patient who required a contralateral below-the-knee amputation. At the final follow-up examination, twenty-nine knees (63%) were pain-free, twelve (26%) were slightly painful during long walks, three (7%) were moderately painful during stair-climbing, two (4%) were painful during walking on a level surface, and none were painful at rest. Thirty-five knees (76%) caused no limp, eight (17%) caused a slight limp, two (4%) caused a moderate limp, and one (2%) caused a severe limp. Twenty-eight knees (61%) were in patients who did not require a cane, eight (17%) were in patients who required a cane only for long walks, six (13%) were in patients who required a cane full-time, and four (9%) were in patients who required a walker. No patient required two canes. All but two knees demonstrated anterior-posterior stability in flexion, with negative results on the posterior drawer and posterior sag tests. Two knees in one patient had posterior instability on clinical examination.
    Total knee flexion averaged 98° (range, 5° to 135°) preoperatively and 104° (range, 45° to 130°) at the final follow-up examination. Flexion contractures decreased from a mean of 7° (range, 0° to 35°) preoperatively to a mean of 1° (range, 0° to 10°) at the final follow-up.
    Nine (13%) of the original seventy-two knees had revision of the implant. Six knees had revision of the patellar component because of delamination of the metal backing. The six patellar failures occurred at a mean of fifty-nine months (range, twenty-three to 116 months) postoperatively. One of these six knees also had revision of a well-fixed femoral component because of surface abrasions resulting from metal-on-metal contact with the patellar component. Three additional knees had revision of a well-fixed component. Specifically, one knee had revision of the tibial component because of pain of unknown cause at seventeen months, one knee had an arthrodesis because of severe wound complications at three months, and one knee had removal of the femoral component and insertion of an allograft-prosthesis composite because of a periprosthetic femoral fracture at 123 months. There were no revisions for aseptic loosening.
    There were three additional repeat operations that did not involve component revision. Two separate patellar-realignment procedures were performed in one knee because of patellar subluxation, and one below-the-knee amputation was performed one week postoperatively because of vascular insufficiency in a patient who had preexisting peripheral vascular disease.
    No revisions were performed because of tibiofemoral instability. Two knees in one patient were found to have posterior instability secondary to posterior cruciate ligament deficiency on both clinical examination and lateral radiographs (Figs. 3-A and 3-B). At the time of the primary knee arthroplasties, the posterior cruciate ligament had been intact bilaterally. The patient had progressive evidence of anterior femoral translation on flexion radiographs, beginning at the forty-eight-month follow-up examination. She first demonstrated clinically symptomatic posterior instability and a positive posterior drawer sign at the ten-year follow-up examination. Although the patient’s weight of 340 lb (154 kg) may have contributed to the symptoms, there was no antecedent trauma. The patient’s knee score was 74 points bilaterally at the last evaluation (at ten years), compared with 25 points preoperatively. The patient required a walker for household ambulation (walking inside the home). Although a revision procedure was offered, it was declined.
    The ten-year survival rate was 81% ± 5% with any reoperation as the end point, 93% ± 4% with femoral or tibial revision for any reason as the end point, 88% ± 5% with patellar revision for any reason as the end point, and 100% with femoral or tibial revision for aseptic loosening as the end point.
    Eighteen patients (twenty-four knees) died before a minimum follow-up of eight years, and one patient (two knees) was also lost to follow-up. The patients in this group were followed for a mean of thirty-five months (range, three to eighty-four months). At the time of the last follow-up examination, ten knees (38%) had an excellent result; ten (38%), a good result; three (12%), a fair result; and three (12%), a poor result. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery score increased from 35 points (range, 11 to 59 points) preoperatively to 74 points (range, 31 to 97 points) at the final examination. There were no cases of instability, no revisions, and no repeat operations in this group at the time of the last follow-up.

    Radiographic Results

    A complete series of radiographs was available for thirty-six of the forty-six knees that were followed for at least eight years. The mean duration of radiographic follow-up in this group was 10.5 years (range, eight to fourteen years). At the time of the latest follow-up, the femoral component was in a mean of 5° of valgus (range, 1° to 8° of valgus) and 2° of flexion (range, 4° of extension to 8° of flexion). The tibial tray was in a mean of 1 of varus (range, 6° of varus to 3° of valgus) and had a mean of 8° of posterior slope (range, 2° to 13° of posterior slope). The tibial tray was oversized in four knees and undersized in none. The patellar component had a mean of 1 mm of lateral displacement (range, 5 mm of medial displacement to 8 mm of lateral displacement) and 4° of lateral tilt (range, 0 to 18 of lateral tilt).
    There were no complete radiolucent lines around any component in any knee, all radiolucent lines measured less than 2 mm in width, and no partial radiolucent lines were noted to be progressive. No component was radiographically loose, and there was no migration or subsidence of any component in any knee. None of the patellar fixation pegs had failed.
    The mean tibiofemoral contact point, expressed as a percentage of the width of the tibial tray as measured from the posterior to the anterior margin, was 47% (range, 22% to 61%) on the initial postoperative lateral radiographs and 45% (range, 28% to 98%) on the most recent radiographs. This difference was not significant (p = 0.61). Only two knees (one patient) demonstrated a change of more than 20%. One of these knees progressed from 41% to 79%, and the contralateral knee progressed from 54% to 98%. These radiographic findings were seen in the one patient who had clinical evidence of bilateral posterior instability secondary to deficiency of the posterior cruciate ligament.
    A complete series of postoperative radiographs was available for nineteen of the twenty-six knees in the nineteen patients who died or were lost to follow-up before the eight-year examination. No complete radiolucent lines or osteolytic lesions were seen on the radiographs of any of these knees. Two patients who had a cementless prosthesis had an incomplete radiolucent line around the tibial component; these lines were nonprogressive and measured <2 mm in width. No femoral or patellar radiolucencies were identified. Eight patients had both early postoperative and follow-up radiographs made with the knee in 45° of flexion. None of these patients had a change of >20% in the contact-point ratio.
    Although many studies of posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis have demonstrated good results9-13, the issue of late posterior instability remains a concern14,16,17. The purpose of the present prospective study was to analyze the results of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. We found that the procedure yielded excellent clinical and radiographic results, with a ten-year survival rate of 93% ± 4% with tibial or femoral revision or loosening used as the end point. The ten-year survival rate with use of any reoperation as the end point was 81% ± 5%. Only two knees in one patient had posterior instability secondary to late posterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. We therefore believe that posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty remains an excellent treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    In this series, the most common mode of failure (accounting for six of the nine revision procedures) involved the patellar component. Several factors affected the patellofemoral articulation. One was the metal backing of the patellar component, with resultant decreased polyethylene thickness and increased edge-loading, leading to delamination and failure18. In addition, at the time that these operations were performed, the standard surgical technique involved rotationally aligning the femoral component parallel to the posterior condyles. This technique led to internal rotation of the femoral component, with resultant lateral maltracking of the patellar component. The femoral component also had a more prominent anterior patellar-flange profile, which has been shown to result in increased quadriceps moment in late stance and thus greater patellar loads19. Today, these are well-recognized causes of patellofemoral complications and failure. The guides that we currently use for the femoral component include the epicondylar axis, 3° of external rotation from the posterior condylar line, and the anteroposterior axis of Whiteside20.
    Radiographs demonstrated that the tibiofemoral contact point was anteriorly displaced by >20% of the width of the tibial tray in only two knees (one patient), both of which were also found to be posteriorly unstable on clinical examination. However, no revision procedures were performed because of instability and none of the other knees in the study had clinical or radiographic signs of instability. Thus, in this group of patients with rheumatoid arthritis who were followed for a mean of 10.5 years (or until death), the rate of flexion stability secondary to posterior cruciate ligament deficiency was 2.8% (two of seventy-two knees) or 2.0% (one of fifty-one patients). In our study of patients without rheumatoid arthritis who were followed for at least eight years (or until death), the rate of revision for posterior instability was 2.0% (three of 151 knees) or 2.1% (three of 140 patients)21. Therefore, we found that the prevalence of late posterior instability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis was very low and was similar to that in patients without rheumatoid arthritis.
    The reported prevalence of late posterior instability of the knee in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who are treated with a posterior cruciate ligament-retaining prosthesis varies considerably. Studies ranging in size from fifty-five to 367 knees have demonstrated excellent results, with a rate of posterior instability of 0% to 0.5% after four to eleven years of follow-up10,11,22,23. Other studies ranging from twenty-five to 202 knees have identified a much higher prevalence of 8% to 50% at intermediate-term follow-up14,16,17. The reasons for the differing rates of late instability reported in the literature are not known; however, they may be related to prosthetic design, polyethylene wear, or surgical technique.
    In summary, posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis demonstrated satisfactory clinical and radiographic results, a minimal prevalence of late posterior instability, and excellent prosthetic fixation at a mean of 10.5 years of follow-up. In contrast to recent reports, the present study demonstrated a low prevalence of posterior cruciate-ligament insufficiency leading to posterior instability (found in approximately 2% of the patients). Therefore, we believe that posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty remains an excellent treatment option for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
    Emmerson KP, Moran CG,Pinder IM. Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1996;78: 441-5. 78441  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gill GS, Joshi AB,Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop,1999;367: 210-5. 367210  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudsen HM, Hvid I,Jensen J. Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up report on 348 cases. J Arthroplasty,1996;11: 7-10. 117  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Rand JA,Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1991;73: 397-409. 73397  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Scott WN, Rubinstein M,Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988;70: 1163-73. 701163  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Hirsch HS, Lotke PA,Morrison LD. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute?. Clin Orthop,1994;309: 64-8. 30964  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Pagnano MW, Cushner FD,Scott WN. Role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,1998;6: 176-87. 6176  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Shoji H, Wolf A, Packard S,Yoshino S. Cruciate retained and excised total knee arthroplasty. A comparative study in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1994;305: 218-22. 305218  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Hanyu T, Murasawa A,Tojo T. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty,1997;12: 913-9. 12913  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Knutson K, Lindstrand A,Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1986;68: 795-803. 68795  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Schai PA, Scott RD,Thornhill TS. Total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate retention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop, 1999;367: 96-106. 36796  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Sledge CB,Walker PS. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop,1984;182: 127-36. 182127  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Thomas BJ, Cracchiolo A 3rd, Lee YF, Chow GH, Navarro R,Dorey F. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of the polycentric and total condylar prostheses. Clin Orthop,1991;265: 129-36. 265129  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Laskin RS,O’Flynn HM. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop,1997;345: 24-8. 34524  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN. Total knee replacement. In: Insall JN, editor. Surgery of the knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984. p 589-695. 
     
    Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG,Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1998;356: 39-46. 35639  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Waslewski GL, Marson BM,Benjamin JB. Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1998;13: 763-7. 13763  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R,Galante JO. Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1988;236: 106-14. 236106  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Andriacchi TP, Yoder D, Conley A, Rosenberg A, Sum J,Galante JO. Patellofemoral design influences function following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty,1997;12: 243-9. 12243  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS,White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995;77: 1331-4. 771331  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Sheinkop MB, Jacobs JJ,Galante JO. The long-term follow-up of the Miller-Galante total knee arthroplasty. Unpublished data., 
     
    Armstrong RA,Whiteside LA. Results of cementless total knee arthroplasty in an older rheumatoid arthritis population. J Arthroplasty,1991;6: 357-62. 6357  1991  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Wright J, Ewald FC, Walker PS, Thomas WH, Poss R,Sledge CB. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. Results after five to nine years: a follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990;72: 1003-9. 721003  1990  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Radiographs made fourteen years postoperatively, showing well-fixed components and rollback consistent with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Radiographs made fourteen years postoperatively, showing well-fixed components and rollback consistent with an intact posterior cruciate ligament.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:The contact-point ratio (a/b) was calculated as the distance from the posterior edge of the tibial component to the tibiofemoral contact point (a) divided by the total width of the component (b).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Radiographs made ten years postoperatively, demonstrating gross sagittal plane instability consistent with an incompetent posterior cruciate ligament.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Radiographs made ten years postoperatively, demonstrating gross sagittal plane instability consistent with an incompetent posterior cruciate ligament.
    Emmerson KP, Moran CG,Pinder IM. Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1996;78: 441-5. 78441  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Gill GS, Joshi AB,Mills DM. Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results. Clin Orthop,1999;367: 210-5. 367210  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Nafei A, Kristensen O, Knudsen HM, Hvid I,Jensen J. Survivorship analysis of cemented total condylar knee arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up report on 348 cases. J Arthroplasty,1996;11: 7-10. 117  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Rand JA,Ilstrup DM. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1991;73: 397-409. 73397  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Scott WN, Rubinstein M,Scuderi G. Results after knee replacement with a posterior cruciate-substituting prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988;70: 1163-73. 701163  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Hirsch HS, Lotke PA,Morrison LD. The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute?. Clin Orthop,1994;309: 64-8. 30964  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Pagnano MW, Cushner FD,Scott WN. Role of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,1998;6: 176-87. 6176  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Shoji H, Wolf A, Packard S,Yoshino S. Cruciate retained and excised total knee arthroplasty. A comparative study in patients with bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1994;305: 218-22. 305218  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Hanyu T, Murasawa A,Tojo T. Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis in patients who have rheumatoid arthritis. J Arthroplasty,1997;12: 913-9. 12913  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Knutson K, Lindstrand A,Lidgren L. Survival of knee arthroplasties. A nation-wide multicentre investigation of 8000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1986;68: 795-803. 68795  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Schai PA, Scott RD,Thornhill TS. Total knee arthroplasty with posterior cruciate retention in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop, 1999;367: 96-106. 36796  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Sledge CB,Walker PS. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop,1984;182: 127-36. 182127  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Thomas BJ, Cracchiolo A 3rd, Lee YF, Chow GH, Navarro R,Dorey F. Total knee arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis. A comparison of the polycentric and total condylar prostheses. Clin Orthop,1991;265: 129-36. 265129  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Laskin RS,O’Flynn HM. Total knee replacement with posterior cruciate ligament retention in rheumatoid arthritis. Problems and complications. Clin Orthop,1997;345: 24-8. 34524  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN. Total knee replacement. In: Insall JN, editor. Surgery of the knee. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1984. p 589-695. 
     
    Pagnano MW, Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG,Stuart MJ. Flexion instability after primary posterior cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop, 1998;356: 39-46. 35639  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Waslewski GL, Marson BM,Benjamin JB. Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 1998;13: 763-7. 13763  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Rosenberg AG, Andriacchi TP, Barden R,Galante JO. Patellar component failure in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1988;236: 106-14. 236106  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Andriacchi TP, Yoder D, Conley A, Rosenberg A, Sum J,Galante JO. Patellofemoral design influences function following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty,1997;12: 243-9. 12243  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Arima J, Whiteside LA, McCarthy DS,White SE. Femoral rotational alignment, based on the anteroposterior axis, in total knee arthroplasty in a valgus knee. A technical note. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995;77: 1331-4. 771331  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Barden RM, Sheinkop MB, Jacobs JJ,Galante JO. The long-term follow-up of the Miller-Galante total knee arthroplasty. Unpublished data., 
     
    Armstrong RA,Whiteside LA. Results of cementless total knee arthroplasty in an older rheumatoid arthritis population. J Arthroplasty,1991;6: 357-62. 6357  1991  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Wright J, Ewald FC, Walker PS, Thomas WH, Poss R,Sledge CB. Total knee arthroplasty with the kinematic prosthesis. Results after five to nine years: a follow-up note. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990;72: 1003-9. 721003  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center