0
Scientific Article   |    
Chondrosarcoma of the Pelvis A Review of Sixty-four Cases
Maya E. Pring, MD; Kristy L. Weber, MD; K. Krishnan Unni, MD; Franklin H. Sim, MD
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1630-1642 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Treatment of pelvic chondrosarcoma is a difficult problem for the musculoskeletal oncologist. Poor rates of survival and high rates of local recurrence after surgical treatment have been reported in previous studies. The present study was designed to review the long-term oncologic and functional outcomes of surgical management in a large series of patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma who were treated at a single institution.

Methods: The cases of sixty-four patients with localized pelvic chondrosarcoma that had been surgically treated between 1975 and 1996 were reviewed retrospectively. The study was limited to patients who had received no previous treatment for chondrosarcoma. There were forty-one male and twenty-three female patients who had a mean age of forty-seven years (range, fifteen to eighty-eight years). The patients were followed for a minimum of three years or until death. The median duration of follow-up of the living patients was 140 months (range, thirty-nine to 295 months).

Results: Thirty-three of the sixty-four patients were first seen with grade-1 chondrosarcoma; twenty-three, with grade-2; one, with grade-3; and seven, with grade-4 (dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma). Thirteen patients had a hemipelvectomy to achieve local tumor control, whereas fifty-one patients underwent a limb-salvage procedure. Twelve patients (19%) had local recurrence, and eleven (17%) had distant metastases. At the time of the final follow-up, forty-four patients (69%) were alive without evidence of disease, thirteen (20%) had died of the disease, six (9%) had died of unrelated causes, and one (2%) was alive with disease. Less than a wide surgical margin correlated with local recurrence (p = 0.014). High-grade tumors correlated with poor overall survival (p < 0.001). All patients who had a limb-salvage procedure were able to walk at the time of the final follow-up, and they had a mean functional score of 77%, according to the system of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society.

Conclusions: Aggressive surgical resection of pelvic chondrosarcoma results in long-term survival of the majority of patients. There is a high correlation between tumor grade and overall or disease-free survival.

Figures in this Article
    Chondrosarcoma is the second most frequent malignant bone tumor after osteosarcoma. It most often occurs in the pelvis1-5. These tumors can arise de novo or in previously existing benign cartilaginous tumors such as osteochondromas and enchondromas1,6. Chondrosarcoma requires surgical excision; radiation therapy and chemotherapy have not been shown to be reliably effective7-9. The goal of surgery is to resect the entire tumor with a wide margin of normal (uninvolved) tissue. Pelvic tumors can grow to a large size before diagnosis, and the pelvic viscera and lumbosacral trunk may be involved, making wide resection difficult10-13. Bjornsson et al.1 showed that pelvic chondrosarcoma has a higher rate of local recurrence than does stage-matched chondrosarcoma of the long bones. Several studies have demonstrated a correlation between the margin of resection and the prevalence of local recurrence; wide surgical margins significantly improve local control (range of p values, <0.0001 to 0.0021,11,14-16). Intralesional or debulking surgical procedures can result in a recurrence rate as high as 93%15,17. Patients with a high-grade tumor are at increased risk for metastasis and have decreased overall survival11,14,16. The purpose of the present study was to review the outcome of surgical resection of pelvic chondrosarcoma in a large group of patients and to further delineate the prognostic factors related to local recurrence, metastasis, and survival.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:A drawing illustrating the various types of pelvic resection. Type I includes only the ilium; type IA, the ilium and gluteal muscles; and type I/S, the ilium and a portion of the sacrum. Type II is a periacetabular resection, and type IIA includes the hip joint. Type III is a resection of all or a portion of the ischium and pubis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C A thirty-four-year-old man with a grade-II chondrosarcoma in the right sacroiliac region. Fig. 2-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. Note the calcified cartilage in this area.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Computed tomography scan of the pelvis, revealing a large soft-tissue mass extending anteriorly and posteriorly at the level of the right sacroiliac joint.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C:Reconstruction after a type-I/S resection with laminectomy at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae and decompression of the nerve roots. A vascularized bone graft was used to create a sacroiliac fusion, which consolidated three months postoperatively.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A, 3-B, and 3-C A fifty-eight-year-old man with a grade-I chondrosarcoma arising from the right, anterior aspect of the pelvis. Fig. 3-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the hip.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Computed tomography scan revealing the soft-tissue extension of the lesion toward the midline of the pelvis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C:Anteroposterior radiograph made four months after a type-II/III wide excision and reconstruction, showing a successful iliofemoral arthrodesis with use of a cobra plate and screws for fixation.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C A seventy-year-old patient with a grade-I chondrosarcoma of the right acetabulum. Fig. 4-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The lines of the resection are delineated.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Computed tomography scan showing the lesion confined primarily to the osseous acetabulum.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-C:The patient underwent a type-II/III resection and reconstruction with a saddle prosthesis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve with death due to disease as the end point, illustrating overall survival (and 95% confidence intervals) of patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve illustrating the effect of tumor grade on overall survival of patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve illustrating the effect of the surgical margin of resection on survival free of local recurrence in patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Patient Demographics*
    *The mean age of the patients was forty-seven years (range, fifteen to eighty-eight years). †Primary disease.
    CategoryNo. of Patients
    Male41
    Female23
    Grade
          133
          223
          3?1
          4 (dedifferentiated)?7
    Tumor size
          10 cm32
          <10 cm32
    Tumor stage19
          IA?6
          IB50
          IIB?8
    Primary lesion49
    Secondary lesion15
          Solitary osteochondroma†?8
          Multiple hereditary exostoses†?5
          Ollier disease†?2
    Type of surgery
          Limb salvage51
          Hemipelvectomy13
    Surgical margins
          Wide40
          Marginal13
          Contaminated wide?5
          Contaminated marginal?3
          Intralesional?3
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Types of Resections and Reconstructions
    *P1 = iliac lesion, P2 = acetabular lesion, and P3 = ischiopubic lesion.
    Location of Lesion* (No. of Patients)Type of Resection10(No. of Patients)Type of Reconstruction (No. of Patients)
    P1 (15)I or IA (8)None (7)
      Sacroiliac arthrodesis (1)
    I/S or IA/S (7)Sacroiliac/lumbar arthrodesis (3)
      Fibular strut allograft (1)
      None (3)
    P2 (39) II (4)Acetabular allograft (1)
      Acetabular allograft and total hip arthroplasty (2)
      None (1)
    I/II (2)Ischiofemoral pseudarthrosis (2)
    I/S/II or IA/S/II/IIA (3)Ischiofemoral pseudarthrosis (3)
    II/III or IIA/III (15)Iliofemoral arthrodesis (10)
      Iliofemoral pseudarthrosis (1)
      Acetabular allograft and total hip arthroplasty (1)
      Saddle prosthesis (2)
    None (1)
    IA/II/III (1)Sacrofemoral pseudarthrosis (1)
    I/IIA/III (1)Iliofemoral arthrodesis (1)
    IA/IIA/III (1)None (1)
    I/S/IIA/III (1)None (1)
    Hemipelvectomy (11)None (11)
    P3 (10)III (8)None (8)
    Hemipelvectomy (2)None (2)
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Functional Evaluation According to the System of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society34
    ProcedureMean Score (%)
    Resection
          I98
          IA87
          II (I/II, II/III, I/II/III)76
          IIA (I/IIA, IIA/III, I/IIA/III)62
          III90
          S (I/S, I/S/II, I/S/II/III)54
          Limb salvage77
          Hemipelvectomy43
    Reconstruction
          Iliofemoral arthrodesis73
          Sacroiliac arthrodesis60
          Allograft and total hip arthroplasty66
          Pseudarthrosis47
          No reconstruction90
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Complications
    *Type of treatment of complication.
    TypeNo. of Patients (%)
    None43 (67)
    Intraoperative or perioperative death?0 (0)
    Infection?8 (13)
          Incision and drainage*?1
          Delayed flap reconstruction*?4
          Hardware and allograft removal*?2
          Amputation*?1
    Wound necrosis?8 (13)
          Incision and drainage*?5
          Delayed rotational flap*?3
    Nonunion?3 (5)
    Hardware failure?1 (2)
    Coagulopathy or bleeding?5 (8)
    Deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism ?2 (3)
    Myocardial infarction or pericardial effusion?2 (3)
    Between January 1975 and July 1996, sixty-four patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma were treated surgically at our institution (Table I). Patients who were first seen with a recurrent lesion after initial surgical resection elsewhere were excluded. No patient had regional or distant metastasis. All operative procedures were performed by an orthopaedic oncologist.
    There were forty-one male and twenty-three female patients, with a mean age at diagnosis of forty-seven years (range, fifteen to eighty-eight years). The patients were followed for a minimum of three years or until death, with the living patients followed for a median of 140 months (range, thirty-nine to 295 months). No patient was lost to follow-up. Approval from the Institutional Review Board at our institution was obtained before the study was begun. Medical records, including notes on the operative procedure, clinical follow-up examinations, and pathologic findings, were reviewed in detail. Preoperative staging studies generally included routine radiography, computed tomography scanning, magnetic resonance imaging, and nuclear scanning. The grade and size of the tumor, type of surgical resection, surgical margin, development of local recurrence or metastasis, and patient outcome were evaluated. At the time of follow-up, patients either were seen in the clinic or responded to a telephone questionnaire about their status.

    Criteria for Distinguishing Between Benign Cartilage Tumors and Chondrosarcomas

    A preliminary diagnosis of chondrosarcoma was frequently based on the clinical and radiographic findings. A definitive diagnosis was then established by correlation of the clinical and radiographic findings, the gross pathologic findings, and the histopathologic findings. In addition to the characteristic histopathologic hallmarks of malignancy (described below), an important pattern distinguishing chondrosarcoma from enchondroma or osteochondroma is permeation, which is best recognized when the tumor is seen to fill the marrow spaces entrapping preexisting osseous trabeculae. Secondary chondrosarcomas that developed in patients with Ollier disease, a single osteochondroma, or multiple osteochondromas were clearly malignant lesions according to the review of the musculoskeletal pathologist. The diagnosis of chondrosarcoma arising in an osteochondroma is based on the radiographic, gross, and histologic features. Radiographically, the lesion has a thick, irregular cartilage cap and lack of uniform mineralization. Grossly, the cartilage cap is abundant (often >2 cm in thickness) with myxoid change in the matrix (seen as cystic spaces), and the surface is irregular and bosselated. Histologically, small foci of cartilage are separated from the main mass and permeate through the surrounding tissue. The usual organized columnar arrangement of chondrocytes is lost.
    No benign cartilage tumors, particularly large osteochondromas, were included in the present series.

    Criteria for Grading of the Degree of Malignancy in Chondrosarcomas

    Grading of primary chondrosarcoma is difficult and varies among institutions. The histopathologic analysis is based primarily on morphologic and cytologic criteria, including cellularity, nuclear size (including anisocytosis), and intensity of nuclear staining. The three-tiered grading system described by Lichtenstein and Jaffe was used18. Cytologically, increased cellularity and cytological atypia are the most important features, and these characteristics are used to determine the grade of the chondrosarcoma. With the current grading system used at our institution, the majority of pelvic chondrosarcomas are classified as low-grade (grade-1 or 2), with few high-grade (grade-3 or 4) tumors. In the present series, thirty-three patients had a grade-1 lesion; twenty-three patients, a grade-2 lesion; one patient, a grade-3 lesion; and seven patients, a grade-4 lesion (dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma). The last diagnosis is made when a high-grade spindle-cell sarcoma is juxtaposed with a low-grade chondrosarcoma.
    Another histologic differentiation was made between chondroblastic osteosarcoma and high-grade chondrosarcoma. To be called a chondroblastic osteosarcoma, a lesion has to have sheets of spindle cells surrounding chondroid lobules and lace-like osteoid has to be present between the malignant spindle cells.
    Tumor size was defined as the maximum diameter of the tumor at the time of pathologic analysis. The mean tumor size was 10 cm (range, 2 to 24 cm). The staging system described by Enneking et al.19 was used to determine which patients had stage-IA disease (low-grade and intracompartmental), stage-IB disease (low-grade and extracompartmental), or stage-IIB disease (high-grade and extracompartmental). Forty-nine patients had a primary pelvic chondrosarcoma, and fifteen had a lesion that developed from a previous benign cartilage lesion (Table I). Tumor location was assigned according to the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society classification10,20. Fifteen patients had a type-P1 (iliac) lesion, with five of the lesions extending into the sacrum; thirty-nine had a type-P2 (acetabular) lesion; and ten had a type-P3 (ischiopubic) lesion.
    Adjuvant treatment (chemotherapy) was given to only two patients, and they both had a dedifferentiated lesion.
    The decision to perform either a hemipelvectomy or a limb-salvage procedure was made by the orthopaedic oncologist on the basis of whether clear margins and functional restoration could be obtained. As a general rule, if two of three structures (the lumbosacral plexus, femoral neurovascular bundle, and hip joint) could be maintained, the surgeons believed that a reasonably functional extremity could be salvaged. In this series, a limb-salvage procedure was performed on fifty-one patients, whereas thirteen patients required a hemipelvectomy. Eleven of the thirteen patients requiring amputation had a periacetabular lesion. When the preoperative imaging studies showed involvement of vital neurovascular structures and an adequate margin could not be achieved by limb-sparing resection, an external hemipelvectomy was performed. Considering the indication for limb-salvage procedures in this series, we thought that the expected recurrence rate should be comparable with that following amputation and should produce a superior functional result. A multidisciplinary team participated in the surgical removal of many of the pelvic tumors. Neurosurgeons often assisted if the tumor involved the lumbosacral plexus. Urologists performed preoperative cystoscopy and inserted urethral stents if the tumor was close to the genitourinary structures. When necessary, vascular, general, and plastic surgeons also assisted in the tumor resection or soft-tissue reconstruction.
    The resection of the tumor in the patients amenable to limb salvage was performed with a modification of the system reported by Enneking and Dunham10 (Fig. 1). Type-I resection includes only the ilium; type-IA, the ilium and the gluteal muscles; and type-I/S, the ilium and a portion of the sacrum. Type II is a periacetabular resection, and type-IIA includes the hip joint. Type III is a resection of all or a portion of the ischium and pubis. Multiple combinations of these resections were used, depending on the tumor location and the extent of osseous invasion (Table II).
    Of the fifteen patients who had an iliac lesion, eight had removal of all or a portion of the ilium (type-I excision) or of both the ilium and the surrounding gluteal muscles (type-IA excision). When the plane of dissection extended across the sacroiliac joint to include a portion of the sacrum or spinal column, the excision was classified as a type I/S or IA/S (seven patients). In four of the seven patients who had a type-I/S or type-IA/S excision, the procedure included lumbar or sacral laminotomy and sacrifice of nerve roots.
    A variety of resections were performed for the thirty-nine periacetabular lesions. Four patients underwent resection of a portion of the acetabulum without removal of any portion of the surrounding ilium or ischium (a type-II excision). Seven patients required removal of all or a portion of the acetabulum as well as all or a portion of the pubis and ischium (type-II/III excision). Eight patients required an extracapsular excision of the proximal portion of the femur in addition to all or a portion of the acetabulum and all or a portion of the ischium and pubis (type-IIA/III excision). Five patients required resection of all or a portion of the acetabulum in addition to all or a portion of the ilium and sacrum (type-I/II or type-I/S/II excision). Four patients required excision of the entire hemipelvis extending into the sacrum. Eleven patients required a hemipelvectomy.
    Of the ten patients with an ischiopubic lesion, eight had a type-III excision of all or a portion of the pubis and ischium and two had a hemipelvectomy.
    The primary oncologic goal at the time of surgery was to achieve uncontaminated, clear margins, with recognition of the difficulty of obtaining wide margins in the pelvis according to the standard definition. If the intrapelvic extension of the tumor was resected with the overlying iliacus muscle, the surgical margin was considered wide. If the tumor abutted the surrounding genitourinary structures or bowel and the peritoneum or bladder could be clearly delineated and separated easily from the tumor, the resection was considered marginal. If there was involvement of the viscera or portions thereof, a partial resection of the involved structures (that is, a partial cystectomy) was performed. Similarly, for tumors in the posterior part of the pelvis, an extended limb-sparing resection or an amputation through the sacrum or vertebrae was often necessary to achieve an adequate margin. In this particular series, surgical margins were classified as wide in forty patients and marginal in thirteen. The wide or marginal excision was considered to be contaminated if a focal area of tumor was noted on frozen section. The excision was then widened, at the same operative setting, to yield negative margins. Five patients had a contaminated wide excision, and three patients had a contaminated marginal excision. Three patients had an intralesional excision. An intralesional margin was defined as a resection violating the substance of the tumor, with positive margins noted on final histologic evaluation.
    Reconstructive procedures were individualized (Table II) on the basis of such variables as patient age, functional demands, and extent of the tumor and according to surgeon preference. The primary goal of each procedure was to completely excise the tumor with wide margins; the secondary goal was to maintain a stable, functional limb. If the acetabulum was maintained, minimal reconstruction was necessary. However, if a periacetabular resection was completed, maintenance of a functional limb often required reconstruction. General reconstructive options for patients undergoing limb salvage included arthrodesis, creation of a pseudarthrosis, allograft reconstruction with or without total hip arthroplasty, and insertion of a saddle prosthesis21-33.
    The most common type of reconstruction was an arthrodesis, which was done in sixteen patients. Five had a sacroiliac arthrodesis (Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C), and eleven had an iliofemoral arthrodesis (Figs. 3-A, 3-B, and 33-C). Seven patients had an attempted creation of a pseudarthrosis, which was sacrofemoral in one, iliofemoral in one, and ischiofemoral in five. A saddle prosthesis was used in two patients (Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C). A segmental acetabular allograft alone was used in one patient, and an acetabular allograft combined with a total hip replacement was used in three patients. The patients who had an ischiopubic resection did not require reconstruction.
    Of the five patients who had an attempted sacroiliac arthrodesis, four had solid healing and one required removal of the allograft because of infection. Of the eleven patients who had an attempted iliofemoral arthrodesis, eight had union, two had a nonunion that did not require surgical intervention and were left with a pseudarthrosis, and one required an amputation because of infection. The only patient with a large segmental acetabular allograft alone had good healing. Of the three patients who had a large acetabular allograft and a total hip replacement, one had solid union, one had a nonunion requiring removal of the allograft and placement of a saddle prosthesis, and one required hardware removal and amputation because of local recurrence.
    At the time of the final follow-up, patient function was assessed with a lower-extremity functional evaluation developed by the International Society of Limb Salvage and modified by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society, as described by Enneking et al.34. Five points each were assigned on the basis of pain, disability, emotional acceptance, support, walking, and gait. The points were totaled (with a maximum possible total score of 30 points), and percentages were assigned. Finally, patients were followed clinically and radiographically on a regular basis postoperatively. The timing of local recurrence or distant metastasis was recorded, and the recommended treatment was noted for all patients in whom a recurrence developed.
    Summary statistics were presented as the mean (and the standard deviation) for continuous variables and as frequencies and percentages for categorical data. Rates of overall survival, local recurrence, metastasis, and disease-free survival were estimated with use of Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors for these end points were compared with use of the log-rank test. The effects of continuous variables and time-dependent variables were assessed with use of Cox proportional-hazards models. The threshold of significance of all statistical tests was set at a = 0.05. All analysis was done with the SAS software program (version 6.12; SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina) on a Sun Ultra 2 computer (Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, California).

    Oncologic Evaluation

    At the time of the final follow-up (maximum duration, nearly twenty-five years), forty-five (70%) of the original sixty-four patients were alive. All were contacted by telephone and were asked to complete a questionnaire. Of the living patients, twenty-eight returned for updated clinical evaluations. The remainder of the patients were followed by a local physician, and the majority sent follow-up radiographs for review.

    Survival

    Forty-four patients (69%) were alive without evidence of disease at a mean of 152 months (range, thirty-nine to 295 months). Thirteen patients (20%) died of the disease at a mean of thirty-five months (range, four to 139 months). Six patients died of other causes but had no evidence of chondrosarcoma at the time of death. These patients had been followed for a mean of seventy-five months (range, eighteen to 190 months). One patient remained alive but had slowly progressive pulmonary metastases at 110 months. The overall survival rate was 94% at one year, 82% at five years, 80% at ten years, and 77% at fifteen years. Survivorship curves with 95% confidence intervals, with death due to disease as the end point, are shown in Figure 5. Univariate analysis revealed that high grade (p < 0.001), high stage (p < 0.001), and a primary lesion (p = 0.029) significantly affected the overall survival rate. Multivariate analysis also revealed that high grade was significantly related (p = 0.0001) to the overall survival rate.
    The overall survival rates were calculated according to tumor grade. The ten-year survival rate was 97% for patients with a grade-1 lesion, 75% for those with a grade-2 lesion, and 14% for those with a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (Fig. 6). The one patient with a grade-1 lesion who died had a local recurrence, classified as a grade-3 lesion, and subsequent systemic metastasis. The disease-free survival rate was 80% at one year, 69% at five years, 67% at ten years, and 63% at fifteen years. Univariate analysis revealed that high grade (p < 0.001), high stage (p < 0.001), a primary lesion (p = 0.019), and an age of more than forty-five years (p = 0.028) significantly affected disease-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that high grade (p < 0.0001) and less than a wide margin (p = 0.05) were significantly related to disease-free survival.
    As mentioned above, patients with a secondary chondrosarcoma had a significantly better overall rate of survival compared with those with a primary chondrosarcoma. Of the fifteen patients with Ollier disease or single or multiple osteochondromas, thirteen were alive and disease-free and two had died of other causes at the time of the final follow-up. When the thirteen patients with a pelvic chondrosarcoma secondary to an osteochondroma were excluded, the overall survival rate was slightly lower: with death due to disease as the end point, the survival rate was 92% at one year, 78% at five years, 75% at ten years, and 71% at fifteen years.

    Local Recurrence

    Twelve patients (19%) had a local recurrence at a mean of twenty-four months (range, seven to fifty-six months). Ten of them had additional surgical intervention, and seven were alive and disease-free at the time of the final follow-up. Two of the patients who had a local recurrence had concurrent distant metastasis. Less than a wide margin at the time of the initial operation correlated with an increased chance of local recurrence (p = 0.014) (Fig. 7). In addition, high grade correlated with an increased chance of local recurrence (p = 0.001). Local recurrence was associated with an increased risk of death (p = 0.0001). The cumulative probability of local recurrence at ten years was 8% for forty patients with a wide surgical margin at the initial operation, 38% for thirteen patients with a marginal margin, and 43% for eleven patients with contamination during the operation. Three patients in the series had an intralesional curettage as the primary surgical treatment. One of them, who had a grade-2 lesion, had systemic metastasis twenty-one months after surgery and died three months later. The second patient, who had a grade-1 chondrosarcoma, had a local recurrenceæa grade-3 tumor as previously mentioned. This patient had an internal hemipelvectomy after the first recurrence. There was a second recurrence, and the patient required an external hemipelvectomy. Systemic metastasis subsequently developed, and the patient later died. The third patient remained free of disease with no evidence of local recurrence nearly twelve years after the initial operation. Age, gender, and tumor size were not found to be correlated with local recurrence.

    Metastasis

    Distant metastases developed in eleven patients (17%), including the two with concomitant local recurrence, at a mean of twenty-one months (range, two to seventy-nine months). Metastasis developed after a grade-1 chondrosarcoma had recurred as a grade-3 tumor in one patient; it developed from a grade-2 lesion in four patients, and it developed from a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma in six patients. Ten of the eleven patients died of the disease at a mean of twelve months (range, four to eighty-one months) after the diagnosis of the metastasis. One patient was alive but had multiple unresectable pulmonary metastases thirty-one months after the initial diagnosis of systemic spread. High tumor grade (p < 0.001) and stage (p < 0.0001) were highly correlated with distant metastasis. Distant metastasis increased the overall risk of death (p = 0.0001). Tumor size, location, and margins were not correlated with development of distant metastasis.

    Function

    All living patients were contacted to evaluate their current functional status, which was graded as a percentage of a possible total score of 30 points. The patients who lived more than twenty years after the initial operation often lost function secondary to comorbid conditions. All patients who had a limb-salvage procedure were able to walk at the time of the final follow-up, and they had substantially improved function compared with those who had hemipelvectomy (77% and 43%, respectively) (Table III). However, all patients contacted were satisfied with the results and their current ability to perform activities of daily living. Patients who had had a type-I or type-III resection tended to have higher functional scores than did those in whom the acetabulum or sacrum had been involved. This finding was also observed in a previous series of patients with a pelvic tumor and subsequent reconstruction20. Patients who had not required a reconstruction had higher scores compared with those who had had a reconstructive procedure, a finding that was related to the extent of the initial lesion. Of the patients who had had a reconstruction, those with a stable extremity had higher scores than those with a pseudarthrosis.
    Twenty-four (53%) of the forty-five living patients required no assistive devices for walking; five required a cane; nine, crutches; five, a walker; and two, a wheelchair. At the time of the final follow-up, twenty-two (49%) of the forty-five patients had no pain, fourteen patients had mild pain, two had moderate-to-severe pain, and seven had no pain at the surgical site but complained of varying degrees of phantom pain.

    Complications

    Considerable morbidity and mortality after extensive pelvic resection and reconstruction have been reported in the literature20,35,36. In the present series of sixty-four patients, there were no intraoperative or perioperative deaths. Forty-three patients (67%) had no important complications (Table IV). Twenty-one patients had a total of twenty-nine complications. Of these twenty-one patients, fifteen (71%) had had a limb-salvage procedure and six (29%) had had a hemipelvectomy. Of the fifty-one patients who initially had a limb-salvage procedure, fifteen (29%) had a complication. Six of the thirteen patients who initially required an amputation had postoperative complications.
    Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis poses a difficult treatment problem. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy are not reliably effective, in either the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, for the treatment of classic chondrosarcoma. Therefore, the adequacy of surgical resection determines the outcome5,14,16. In general, the literature suggests that patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma do worse than patients with chondrosarcoma in an extremity1. Presumably, this tendency results from the anatomic complexity of the pelvis and the close proximity of the tumor to surrounding neurovascular and visceral structures. Recent studies on pelvic chondrosarcoma have documented a five-year survival rate of approximately 65% and a ten-year survival rate of approximately 54%8,11,16. These findings are consistent with the results of other series on chondrosarcoma of the entire skeleton, which have demonstrated five-year survival rates of 67% to 79% and ten-year survival rates of 50% to 66%1,5,14. The five-year survival rate of 82% and the ten-year survival rate of 80% in the present series compare favorably with those in the previous studies.
    Sheth et al.16, in a series of sixty-seven patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma, reported a ten-year survival rate of 52%; however, thirteen patients in their series had a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. The fact that they included a higher number of patients with a dedifferentiated lesion may partially account for their lower overall survival rate. In addition, they used different inclusion criteria and included eight patients with a recurrent lesion, who clearly had a worse prognosis. It is of note that twenty-eight (43%) of the sixty-five patients in their series who could be evaluated had positive margins at the time of surgery, which likely contributed to the higher rate (28%) of local recurrence.
    The grade of the tumor proved to be extremely significant in terms of overall and disease-free survival in the current series. A marked difference was demonstrated among the ten-year survival rates associated with grade-1 lesions (97%), grade-2 lesions (75%), and dedifferentiated lesions (14%). These findings are similar to those reported by Sheth et al.16. Grade has been shown to be prognostically significant (p < 0.001) for chondrosarcomas in all skeletal sites5,14 as well as for those in the pelvis37,38.
    It is difficult to compare clinical series of patients with chondrosarcoma because the grading varies among institutions. Although most pathologists agree with the three-tiered system of grading cartilage lesions, there seems to be differences in the percentages of grade-1, 2, and 3 tumors among large centers. The percentage of grade-1 chondrosarcomas has ranged from 26% to 61%; that of grade-2 chondrosarcomas, from 34% to 61%; and that of grade-3 chondrosarcomas, from 9% to 28%1,5,14,37. Mayo Clinic series tend to have a higher proportion of grade-1 and grade-2 tumors1,5, whereas those from the Rizzoli Institute and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center have a higher proportion of grade-3 tumors14,16,39. While it is possible that referral patterns are different for patients with pelvic chondrosarcoma, it is unlikely that patients with higher-grade tumors are referred to centers other than ours. It has been the practice of the musculoskeletal pathologists at our institution to classify the majority of chondrosarcomas as grade 1 or 2. As evidenced by a large series of 344 chondrosarcomas throughout the musculoskeletal system reviewed at the Mayo Clinic1,5, the percentage of high-grade tumors has remained consistent over the eighty years spanning these studies. As mentioned, it would be unlikely that all patients with high-grade tumors were being referred elsewhere. The mean tumor size in the current series was 10 cm. In general, these are extremely large tumors with intrapelvic or extrapelvic extension and are representative of pelvic chondrosarcoma. We believe that it is not the tumors but the grading systems in the various clinical reports that are different. It is most important for the orthopaedic oncologist to understand the particular grading scheme at his or her own institution. However, we recommend a wide surgical resection of all pelvic chondrosarcomas, regardless of their specific grade. Grade-1 tumors are likely to recur locally and need to be treated aggressively.
    The local recurrence rate of 19% (twelve patients) in the current series compares favorably with those in other studies of pelvic chondrosarcoma, which have ranged from 28% to 45%8,11,16. We believe that aggressive surgical resection with an attempt to obtain adequate surgical margins in all cases has led to this decrease in the local recurrence rate. Although there has been a trend toward the removal of low-grade chondrosarcomas of the extremities by curettage, we believe that this approach should be avoided in the pelvis because of the consequences of recurrence in this location. Of the twelve patients who did have a local recurrence in the current series, seven were disease-free after additional aggressive surgery.
    Systemic metastasis developed in eleven patients (17%) in the current series. This rate compares favorably with those in other reports on pelvic chondrosarcoma, in which the prevalence of distant metastasis has ranged from 19% to 36%8,11,16, as well as with those in general series on chondrosarcoma of the entire skeleton, in which the prevalence of systemic disease has ranged from 6% to 37%1,5,14,37. Metastases are more likely to develop in patients with a higher-grade lesion and are almost uniformly present in patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma40. All but one of our patients with metastases died of the disease, at an average of one year after the diagnosis of the metastasis. However, one patient with a dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma was alive and disease-free at 152 months after the operation. In addition, a patient with a grade-3 chondrosarcoma died of other causes with no evidence of the chondrosarcoma 190 months after the operation. The majority of patients in this series did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. A continued search for better chemotherapeutic agents for patients with dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma might extend overall survival in this subset. In view of the fact that, in one of our patients, a grade-1 chondrosarcoma recurred at a grade-3 level with subsequent development of systemic metastasis and death, we again stress the importance of complete resection of the initial lesion. If the tumor recurs, it may do so at a higher grade, which puts the patient at increased risk for systemic disease and death. Local recurrence and systemic metastasis were independent predictors of poor overall survival in the present series.
    Patients who had a primary chondrosarcoma of the pelvis had worse rates of overall and disease-free survival than those in whom a secondary chondrosarcoma had developed from a previously benign cartilaginous lesion. When the thirteen patients (20%) in whom a secondary chondrosarcoma developed from an osteochondroma were analyzed separately, overall survival improved approximately 5% at all time-points. The percentage of patients with a secondary chondrosarcoma in the present series was higher than that in other series. Sheth et al.16 reported that 10% of their patients had a secondary tumor. In the current series, the same grading system was used for all patients regardless of whether they had a primary or secondary chondrosarcoma. The patients with a chondrosarcoma arising from a previous osteochondroma had clear evidence of a malignancy on the basis of standard histologic criteria. Every tumor in this series was reviewed in detail by a highly trained musculoskeletal pathologist. Of the thirteen patients with a secondary chondrosarcoma from an osteochondroma, eleven were considered to have a grade-1 tumor and two had a grade-2 tumor. It is likely that patients with single or multiple osteochondromas were followed more closely over an extended period of time; therefore, transformation into a malignant lesion was discovered earlier, when it was easier to remove it completely.
    The indications for hemipelvectomy have not changed over the course of this study. If adequate margins cannot be obtained with a limb-salvage procedure, or if two of three structures (the femoral neurovascular bundle, lumbosacral plexus, or hip joint) are involved by tumor, a hemipelvectomy is performed. The improved imaging modalities, better surgical techniques, and clearer understanding of the margins required for complete tumor resection that have been developed over the past twenty-five years have allowed a higher percentage of patients to safely undergo limb-salvage procedures.
    The functional outcome analysis in this series revealed that patients who had had limb salvage had an improved functional score compared with those who had had a hemipelvectomy. In our series, hemipelvectomy was indicated only if inadequate margins would be obtained with a limb-salvage procedure. After attaining adequate resection margins, limb-salvage procedures could be completed in 80% of our patients. In the study by Sheth et al.16, external hemipelvectomy was performed in thirty-five (52%) of sixty-seven patients. Patients who had had partial sacral or periacetabular resection had a worse functional outcome than did those who had had a type-I or type-III resection. This finding may be due to the fact that resection of the sacroiliac joint or periacetabular region creates deficiencies that are difficult to reconstruct into a stable extremity. In the majority of patients in the present series, the desired reconstructive result was achieved. Our reconstructive choice is based on multiple factors, including the experience of the surgeon, the age and physical condition of the patient, and the available bone stock after tumor resection. In general, patients had better function when pelvic stability was restored, a finding that is similar to those of O’Connor and Sim12,20. Older patients with lower activity demands who had a P2 lesion were often treated with planned iliofemoral or ischiofemoral pseudarthrosis. Fewer complications are associated with this type of surgery, although the extremity is not as stable as that in patients who have a successful iliofemoral arthrodesis.
    Although pelvic chondrosarcoma is a difficult treatment problem, the present series revealed that the majority of patients survive for a long time after aggressive surgical resection. We continue to see patients with recurrent pelvic chondrosarcoma, which suggests that the initial surgical resection of these tumors is often inadequate41. It is extremely important to obtain an adequate margin during resection of these pelvic tumors, regardless of their grade. This may require amputation or resection of portions of the pelvic viscera and neurovascular structures. A continued search for better reconstructive options should improve the functional outcome of these patients. Improved chemotherapeutic options for high-grade and dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma may improve overall patient survival.
    Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Ilstrup DM,Pritchard DJ. Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer,1998;83: 2105-19. 832105  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Buirski G, Ratliff AH,Watt I. Cartilage-cell-containing tumours of the pelvis: a radiological review of 40 patients. Br J Radiol,1986;59: 197-204. 59197  1986  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Healey JH,Lane JM. Chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop,1986;204: 119-29. 204119  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Henderson ED,Dahlin DC. Chondrosarcoma of bone—a study of two hundred and eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1963;45: 1450-8. 451450  1963  [PubMed]
     
    Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Dahlin DC,Medley BE. Chondrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and statistical analysis. Cancer,1980;45: 149-57. 45149  1980  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Garrison RC, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ,Dahlin DC. Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer,1982;49: 1890-7. 491890  1982  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Dahlin DC,Henderson ED. Chondrosarcoma, a surgical and pathological problem. Review of 212 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1956;38: 1025-38. 381025  1956  [PubMed]
     
    Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Blasius S,Winkelmann W. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Clin Orthop,1997;337: 226-39. 337226  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sanerkin NG,Gallagher P. A review of the behaviour of chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1979;61: 395-400. 61395  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking WF,Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1978;60: 731-46. 60731  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Lin PP, Huvos AG,Meyers PA. Prog- nostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bones. Cancer,1998;82: 851-9. 82851  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    O’Connor MI. Malignant pelvic tumors: limb-sparing resection and reconstruction. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 49-54.. 1349  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    van Loon CJ, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M, Wobbes T, Lemmens JA,van Horn J. Chondrosarcoma of bone: oncologic and functional results. J Surg Oncol,1994;57: 214-21. 57214  1994  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Gitelis S, Bertoni F, Picci P,Campanacci M. Chondrosarcoma of bone. The experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 1248-57. 631248  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Ozaki T, Lindner N, Hillmann A, Rodl R, Blasius S,Winkelmann W. Influence of intralesional surgery on treatment outcome of chondrosarcoma. Cancer,1996;77: 1292-7. 771292  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Johnson ME, Ayala AG, Murray JA,Romsdahl MM. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Prognostic factors for 67 patients treated with definitive surgery. Cancer,1996;78: 745-50. 78745  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Ball AB, Barr L,Westbury G. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: the role of palliative debulking surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol,1991;17: 135-8.. 17135  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Lichtenstein L,Jaffe HL. Chondrosarcoma of bone. Am J Pathol,1943;19: 553-89. 19553  1943  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking WF, Spanier SS,Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop,1980;153: 106-20. 153106  1980  [PubMed]
     
    O’Connor MI,Sim FH. Salvage of the limb in the treatment of malignant pelvic tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1989;71: 481-94. 71481  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Aboulafia AJ,Malawer MM. Surgical management of pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma. Cancer,1993;71(10 Suppl): 3358-66. 71(10 Suppl)3358  1993  [CrossRef]
     
    Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W,Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop,1995;314: 203-13. 314203  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, Buconjic T, McGoveran B,Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma. Intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1997;79: 1663-74. 791663  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Choong PF,Sim FH. Limb-sparing surgery for bone tumors: new developments. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 64-9. 1364  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Erikson U,Hjelmstedt A. Limb-saving radical resection of chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1976;58: 568-70. 58568  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Harrington KD. The use of hemipelvic allografts or autoclaved grafts for reconstruction after wide resections of malignant tumors of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992;74: 331-41. 74331  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Malawer MM,Chou LB. Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995;77: 1154-65. 771154  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Nieder E, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, Kasselt MR, Keller A,Steinbrink K. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1990;72: 1014-22. 721014  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Sim FH, Bowman WE Jr, Wilkins RM,Chao EY. Limb salvage in primary malignant bone tumors. Orthopedics,1985;8: 574-81. 8574  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Steel HH. Partial or complete resection of the hemipelvis. An alternative to hindquarter amputation for periacetabular chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1978;60: 719-30.. 60719  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Stephenson RB, Kaufer H,Hankin FM. Partial pelvic resection as an alternative to hindquarter amputation for skeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop,1989;242: 201-11. 242201  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Uchida A, Myoui A, Araki N, Yoshikawa H, Ueda T,Aoki Y. Prosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular malignant tumors. Clin Orthop,1996;326: 238-45.. 326238  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Windhager R, Karner J, Kutschera HP, Polterauer P, Salzer-Kuntschik M,Kotz R. Limb salvage in periacetabular sarcomas: review of 21 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop,1996;331: 265-76.. 331265  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M,Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop,1993;286: 241-6. 286241  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Frassica FJ, Chao EY,Sim FH. Special problems in limb-salvage surgery. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 55-63. 1355  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Masterson EL, Davis AM, Wunder JS,Bell RS. Hindquarter amputation for pelvic tumors. The importance of patient selection. Clin Orthop,1998;350: 187-94. 350187  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Marcove RC, Mike V, Hutter RV, Huvos AG, Shoji H, Miller TR,Kosloff R. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and upper end of the femur. An analysis of factors influencing survival time in one hundred and thirteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1972;54: 561-72. 54561  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Shin KH, Rougraff BT,Simon MA. Oncologic outcomes of primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis. Clin Orthop,1994;304: 207-17. 304207  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Evans HL, Ayala AG,Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer,1977;40: 818-31. 40818  1977  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Frassica FJ, Unni KK, Beabout JW,Sim FH. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. A report of the clinicopathological features and treatment of seventy-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 1197-1205. 681197  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Weber KL, Pring ME, Sim FH. Management and outcome of recurrent pelvic chondrosarcoma. Unpublished data 
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:A drawing illustrating the various types of pelvic resection. Type I includes only the ilium; type IA, the ilium and gluteal muscles; and type I/S, the ilium and a portion of the sacrum. Type II is a periacetabular resection, and type IIA includes the hip joint. Type III is a resection of all or a portion of the ischium and pubis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C A thirty-four-year-old man with a grade-II chondrosarcoma in the right sacroiliac region. Fig. 2-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. Note the calcified cartilage in this area.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Computed tomography scan of the pelvis, revealing a large soft-tissue mass extending anteriorly and posteriorly at the level of the right sacroiliac joint.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C:Reconstruction after a type-I/S resection with laminectomy at the fourth and fifth lumbar vertebrae and decompression of the nerve roots. A vascularized bone graft was used to create a sacroiliac fusion, which consolidated three months postoperatively.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A, 3-B, and 3-C A fifty-eight-year-old man with a grade-I chondrosarcoma arising from the right, anterior aspect of the pelvis. Fig. 3-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the hip.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Computed tomography scan revealing the soft-tissue extension of the lesion toward the midline of the pelvis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-C:Anteroposterior radiograph made four months after a type-II/III wide excision and reconstruction, showing a successful iliofemoral arthrodesis with use of a cobra plate and screws for fixation.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A, 4-B, and 4-C A seventy-year-old patient with a grade-I chondrosarcoma of the right acetabulum. Fig. 4-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the pelvis. The lines of the resection are delineated.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Computed tomography scan showing the lesion confined primarily to the osseous acetabulum.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-C:The patient underwent a type-II/III resection and reconstruction with a saddle prosthesis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve with death due to disease as the end point, illustrating overall survival (and 95% confidence intervals) of patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve illustrating the effect of tumor grade on overall survival of patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:Kaplan-Meier survivorship curve illustrating the effect of the surgical margin of resection on survival free of local recurrence in patients who had chondrosarcoma of the pelvis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Patient Demographics*
    *The mean age of the patients was forty-seven years (range, fifteen to eighty-eight years). †Primary disease.
    CategoryNo. of Patients
    Male41
    Female23
    Grade
          133
          223
          3?1
          4 (dedifferentiated)?7
    Tumor size
          10 cm32
          <10 cm32
    Tumor stage19
          IA?6
          IB50
          IIB?8
    Primary lesion49
    Secondary lesion15
          Solitary osteochondroma†?8
          Multiple hereditary exostoses†?5
          Ollier disease†?2
    Type of surgery
          Limb salvage51
          Hemipelvectomy13
    Surgical margins
          Wide40
          Marginal13
          Contaminated wide?5
          Contaminated marginal?3
          Intralesional?3
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Types of Resections and Reconstructions
    *P1 = iliac lesion, P2 = acetabular lesion, and P3 = ischiopubic lesion.
    Location of Lesion* (No. of Patients)Type of Resection10(No. of Patients)Type of Reconstruction (No. of Patients)
    P1 (15)I or IA (8)None (7)
      Sacroiliac arthrodesis (1)
    I/S or IA/S (7)Sacroiliac/lumbar arthrodesis (3)
      Fibular strut allograft (1)
      None (3)
    P2 (39) II (4)Acetabular allograft (1)
      Acetabular allograft and total hip arthroplasty (2)
      None (1)
    I/II (2)Ischiofemoral pseudarthrosis (2)
    I/S/II or IA/S/II/IIA (3)Ischiofemoral pseudarthrosis (3)
    II/III or IIA/III (15)Iliofemoral arthrodesis (10)
      Iliofemoral pseudarthrosis (1)
      Acetabular allograft and total hip arthroplasty (1)
      Saddle prosthesis (2)
    None (1)
    IA/II/III (1)Sacrofemoral pseudarthrosis (1)
    I/IIA/III (1)Iliofemoral arthrodesis (1)
    IA/IIA/III (1)None (1)
    I/S/IIA/III (1)None (1)
    Hemipelvectomy (11)None (11)
    P3 (10)III (8)None (8)
    Hemipelvectomy (2)None (2)
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Functional Evaluation According to the System of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society34
    ProcedureMean Score (%)
    Resection
          I98
          IA87
          II (I/II, II/III, I/II/III)76
          IIA (I/IIA, IIA/III, I/IIA/III)62
          III90
          S (I/S, I/S/II, I/S/II/III)54
          Limb salvage77
          Hemipelvectomy43
    Reconstruction
          Iliofemoral arthrodesis73
          Sacroiliac arthrodesis60
          Allograft and total hip arthroplasty66
          Pseudarthrosis47
          No reconstruction90
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Complications
    *Type of treatment of complication.
    TypeNo. of Patients (%)
    None43 (67)
    Intraoperative or perioperative death?0 (0)
    Infection?8 (13)
          Incision and drainage*?1
          Delayed flap reconstruction*?4
          Hardware and allograft removal*?2
          Amputation*?1
    Wound necrosis?8 (13)
          Incision and drainage*?5
          Delayed rotational flap*?3
    Nonunion?3 (5)
    Hardware failure?1 (2)
    Coagulopathy or bleeding?5 (8)
    Deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism ?2 (3)
    Myocardial infarction or pericardial effusion?2 (3)
    Bjornsson J, McLeod RA, Unni KK, Ilstrup DM,Pritchard DJ. Primary chondrosarcoma of long bones and limb girdles. Cancer,1998;83: 2105-19. 832105  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Buirski G, Ratliff AH,Watt I. Cartilage-cell-containing tumours of the pelvis: a radiological review of 40 patients. Br J Radiol,1986;59: 197-204. 59197  1986  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Healey JH,Lane JM. Chondrosarcoma. Clin Orthop,1986;204: 119-29. 204119  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Henderson ED,Dahlin DC. Chondrosarcoma of bone—a study of two hundred and eighty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1963;45: 1450-8. 451450  1963  [PubMed]
     
    Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Dahlin DC,Medley BE. Chondrosarcoma: a clinicopathologic and statistical analysis. Cancer,1980;45: 149-57. 45149  1980  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Garrison RC, Unni KK, McLeod RA, Pritchard DJ,Dahlin DC. Chondrosarcoma arising in osteochondroma. Cancer,1982;49: 1890-7. 491890  1982  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Dahlin DC,Henderson ED. Chondrosarcoma, a surgical and pathological problem. Review of 212 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1956;38: 1025-38. 381025  1956  [PubMed]
     
    Ozaki T, Hillmann A, Lindner N, Blasius S,Winkelmann W. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Clin Orthop,1997;337: 226-39. 337226  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sanerkin NG,Gallagher P. A review of the behaviour of chondrosarcoma of bone. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1979;61: 395-400. 61395  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking WF,Dunham WK. Resection and reconstruction for primary neoplasms involving the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1978;60: 731-46. 60731  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Kawai A, Healey JH, Boland PJ, Lin PP, Huvos AG,Meyers PA. Prog- nostic factors for patients with sarcomas of the pelvic bones. Cancer,1998;82: 851-9. 82851  1998  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    O’Connor MI. Malignant pelvic tumors: limb-sparing resection and reconstruction. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 49-54.. 1349  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    van Loon CJ, Veth RP, Pruszczynski M, Wobbes T, Lemmens JA,van Horn J. Chondrosarcoma of bone: oncologic and functional results. J Surg Oncol,1994;57: 214-21. 57214  1994  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Gitelis S, Bertoni F, Picci P,Campanacci M. Chondrosarcoma of bone. The experience at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1981;63: 1248-57. 631248  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Ozaki T, Lindner N, Hillmann A, Rodl R, Blasius S,Winkelmann W. Influence of intralesional surgery on treatment outcome of chondrosarcoma. Cancer,1996;77: 1292-7. 771292  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Sheth DS, Yasko AW, Johnson ME, Ayala AG, Murray JA,Romsdahl MM. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. Prognostic factors for 67 patients treated with definitive surgery. Cancer,1996;78: 745-50. 78745  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Ball AB, Barr L,Westbury G. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis: the role of palliative debulking surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol,1991;17: 135-8.. 17135  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Lichtenstein L,Jaffe HL. Chondrosarcoma of bone. Am J Pathol,1943;19: 553-89. 19553  1943  [PubMed]
     
    Enneking WF, Spanier SS,Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop,1980;153: 106-20. 153106  1980  [PubMed]
     
    O’Connor MI,Sim FH. Salvage of the limb in the treatment of malignant pelvic tumors. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1989;71: 481-94. 71481  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Aboulafia AJ,Malawer MM. Surgical management of pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma. Cancer,1993;71(10 Suppl): 3358-66. 71(10 Suppl)3358  1993  [CrossRef]
     
    Aboulafia AJ, Buch R, Mathews J, Li W,Malawer MM. Reconstruction using the saddle prosthesis following excision of primary and metastatic periacetabular tumors. Clin Orthop,1995;314: 203-13. 314203  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Bell RS, Davis AM, Wunder JS, Buconjic T, McGoveran B,Gross AE. Allograft reconstruction of the acetabulum after resection of stage-IIB sarcoma. Intermediate-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1997;79: 1663-74. 791663  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Choong PF,Sim FH. Limb-sparing surgery for bone tumors: new developments. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 64-9. 1364  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Erikson U,Hjelmstedt A. Limb-saving radical resection of chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1976;58: 568-70. 58568  1976  [PubMed]
     
    Harrington KD. The use of hemipelvic allografts or autoclaved grafts for reconstruction after wide resections of malignant tumors of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992;74: 331-41. 74331  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Malawer MM,Chou LB. Prosthetic survival and clinical results with use of large-segment replacements in the treatment of high-grade bone sarcomas. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995;77: 1154-65. 771154  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Nieder E, Elson RA, Engelbrecht E, Kasselt MR, Keller A,Steinbrink K. The saddle prosthesis for salvage of the destroyed acetabulum. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1990;72: 1014-22. 721014  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Sim FH, Bowman WE Jr, Wilkins RM,Chao EY. Limb salvage in primary malignant bone tumors. Orthopedics,1985;8: 574-81. 8574  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Steel HH. Partial or complete resection of the hemipelvis. An alternative to hindquarter amputation for periacetabular chondrosarcoma of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1978;60: 719-30.. 60719  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Stephenson RB, Kaufer H,Hankin FM. Partial pelvic resection as an alternative to hindquarter amputation for skeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop,1989;242: 201-11. 242201  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Uchida A, Myoui A, Araki N, Yoshikawa H, Ueda T,Aoki Y. Prosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular malignant tumors. Clin Orthop,1996;326: 238-45.. 326238  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Windhager R, Karner J, Kutschera HP, Polterauer P, Salzer-Kuntschik M,Kotz R. Limb salvage in periacetabular sarcomas: review of 21 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop,1996;331: 265-76.. 331265  1996  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Enneking WF, Dunham W, Gebhardt MC, Malawar M,Pritchard DJ. A system for the functional evaluation of reconstructive procedures after surgical treatment of tumors of the musculoskeletal system. Clin Orthop,1993;286: 241-6. 286241  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Frassica FJ, Chao EY,Sim FH. Special problems in limb-salvage surgery. Semin Surg Oncol,1997;13: 55-63. 1355  1997  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Masterson EL, Davis AM, Wunder JS,Bell RS. Hindquarter amputation for pelvic tumors. The importance of patient selection. Clin Orthop,1998;350: 187-94. 350187  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Marcove RC, Mike V, Hutter RV, Huvos AG, Shoji H, Miller TR,Kosloff R. Chondrosarcoma of the pelvis and upper end of the femur. An analysis of factors influencing survival time in one hundred and thirteen cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1972;54: 561-72. 54561  1972  [PubMed]
     
    Shin KH, Rougraff BT,Simon MA. Oncologic outcomes of primary bone sarcomas of the pelvis. Clin Orthop,1994;304: 207-17. 304207  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Evans HL, Ayala AG,Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone: a clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer,1977;40: 818-31. 40818  1977  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Frassica FJ, Unni KK, Beabout JW,Sim FH. Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma. A report of the clinicopathological features and treatment of seventy-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1986;68: 1197-1205. 681197  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Weber KL, Pring ME, Sim FH. Management and outcome of recurrent pelvic chondrosarcoma. Unpublished data 
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center