0
Scientific Article   |    
The Dorsiflexion-Eversion Test for Diagnosis of Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome
Mitsuo Kinoshita, MD; Ryuzo Okuda, MD; Junichi Morikawa, MD; Tsuyoshi Jotoku, MD; Muneaki Abe, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki City, Osaka, Japan

Mitsuo Kinoshita, MD
Ryuzo Okuda, MD
Junichi Morikawa, MD
Tsuyoshi Jotoku, MD
Muneaki Abe, MD
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Osaka Medical College, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan. E-mail address for M. Kinoshita: mitsuok@poh.osaka-med.ac.jp

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:1835-1839 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The clinical diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome lacks objectivity and consistency. We have devised a new diagnostic physical examination test in which the tibial nerve is compressed as it runs beneath the flexor retinaculum behind the medial malleolus. In this test, the ankle is passively maximally everted and dorsiflexed while all of the metatarsophalangeal joints are maximally dorsiflexed and held in this position for five to ten seconds.

Methods: We performed this test on fifty normal volunteers (100 feet) and on thirty-seven patients (forty-four feet) treated operatively for tarsal tunnel syndrome between 1987 and 1997. We performed the maneuver both preoperatively and postoperatively and recorded any consequent changes in the signs and symptoms; during the operation we observed the altered anatomical relationships in the tarsal tunnel that were produced by the maneuver. The average duration of follow-up was three years and eleven months.

Results: Before the operation, the signs and symptoms of tarsal tunnel syndrome were intensified or induced by the maneuver in fifteen of the twenty feet of the patients who reported numbness, in fifteen of the seventeen feet of those who reported pain alone, and in six of the seven feet of those who had combined numbness and pain. Local tenderness was intensified in forty-two of forty-three feet, and it was induced in one foot in which it had been previously absent. A Tinel sign became more pronounced in forty-one feet, and the sign was induced in three feet in which it had been absent previously. During the operation, the tibial nerve was stretched and compressed beneath the laciniate ligament when the ankle was dorsiflexed, the heel was everted, and the toes were dorsiflexed. Preoperative signs and symptoms disappeared on an average of 2.9 months after the operation, and they could not be induced by repeating the test except in three patients, all of whom had tarsal tunnel syndrome subsequent to a fracture of the calcaneus. In the normal volunteers, no symptoms or signs could be induced by the test.

Conclusion: This new physical examination test is effective in facilitating the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome.

Figures in this Article
    In his 1962 report on a patient who had anesthesia over the sensory distribution of the tibial nerve and in whom mild localized tenderness and paresthesias into the sole of the foot were produced by percussion just posterior to the medial malleolus, Keck1 first defined this tibial nerve-entrapment neuropathy at the ankle as "tarsal tunnel syndrome." In the same year, Lam2 reported another case of tarsal tunnel syndrome and suggested that this condition should be considered in the diagnosis of any patient reporting localized pain or paresthesias of the sole of the foot. Typical clinical signs and symptoms of tarsal tunnel syndrome were described in these reports. However, in the clinical situation, the physical findings are variable3; consequently, the syndrome is often not diagnosed and is sometimes misdiagnosed1,3-5.
    A diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome should be based on a complete history and physical examination6. Clear physical findings, such as sensory disturbances, including burning, tingling, numbness, or pain in the medial portion of the ankle and/or the plantar aspect of the foot, local tenderness behind the medial malleolus, and a positive Tinel sign, should be present, but often the complete constellation of signs and symptoms is not found.
    Although electrodiagnostic studies may be helpful in the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome, they are not definitive and the diagnosis cannot be based solely on electrodiagnostic results5,7.
    Ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging make it possible to visualize abnormal bone and soft-tissue lesions in and around the tarsal tunnel8. The information provided by these images can enhance surgical planning through the identification of space-occupying lesions that require resection.
    One of our patients with a flatfoot deformity and tarsal tunnel syndrome reported severe pain when toeing off forcefully. During toe-off, the heel remained in a slight valgus position, the hindfoot was slightly pronated, and the metatarsophalangeal joints were dorsiflexed. This patient’s symptoms suggested to us that a specific position of the ankle, foot, and toes might reproduce the typical symptoms and signs of tarsal tunnel syndrome. When we passively maintained this patient’s foot and ankle in a position in which the ankle was fully dorsiflexed, the heel was everted, and all of the toes were maximally dorsiflexed, even for only a few seconds, we reproduced the signs and symptoms of tarsal tunnel syndrome (Fig. 1). When we tried the same maneuver on normal volunteers, none of them reported pain or sensory disturbances in the foot or the ankle. We evaluated the role of this test in the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome in our subsequent patients with tarsal tunnel syndrome who were treated surgically.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:The maneuver used in the physical examination test. The ankle is maximally everted and dorsiflexed while all of the metatarsophalangeal joints are maximally dorsiflexed.
    Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Symptoms
    SymptomAreaNo. of Feet
    Numbness20 (45%)
    Medial aspect of sole16
    Whole sole?4
    Pain17 (39%)
    Medial aspect of sole?6
    Whole sole?6
    Tarsal tunnel to medial aspect of sole?5 ?
    Numbness and pain?7 (16%)
    Medial aspect of sole?2
    Whole sole?5
    Between 1987 and 1997, we surgically treated tarsal tunnel syndrome in thirty-seven patients with a total of forty-four involved feet (twenty-three right and twenty-one left feet). Of the thirty-seven patients, seventeen were male and twenty were female, and the average age was thirty-one years (range, eleven to sixty-five years). Six patients had a history of trauma to the foot and/or the ankle. Three of them had been treated nonoperatively for a fracture of the calcaneus; two had had a sprained foot or ankle, which was not treated; and the other one had had a contusion in the region of the tarsal tunnel. Flatfoot deformity was found in four patients (seven feet); two of these patients (four feet) were found to have an accessory navicular bone bilaterally. Diabetes mellitus was present in two patients.
    The chief symptom of these patients was numbness or pain in the foot or a combination of the two symptoms (Table I). The severity of the pain and the numbness varied, both among the patients and within an individual patient, and the intensity of the symptoms varied according to the amount of daily activity or sports participation. Five patients had pain or numbness after vigorous exercise. Seven patients (seven feet) reported nighttime pain in the foot. The mean interval between the onset of symptoms and the final diagnosis in our clinic was four months (range, one to twelve months).
    The physical examination revealed sensory disturbances, ranging from slight to moderate hypoesthesias, in all of the patients. Thirty-five feet had hypoesthesias on the medial side of the sole in the distribution of the medial plantar nerve, seven had hypoesthesias across the whole sole in the distribution of both the medial and the lateral plantar nerve, and two had hypoesthesias in the distribution of both the medial plantar nerve and the medial calcaneal branch of the tibial nerve. Local tenderness was induced by gentle compression behind the medial malleolus, with the ankle in a neutral position, in forty-three feet. The degree of tenderness varied dramatically, however. In the same position, a Tinel sign, ranging from vague to definite, was noted in forty-one feet and was absent in three.
    Electrodiagnostic studies were carried out on thirty-eight feet. The terminal motor latency of the medial plantar nerve was prolonged in thirteen feet. The sensory nerve-conduction velocity between the medial malleolus and the great toe was reduced in seven feet. Action potentials of the tibial sensory nerve could not be elicited in sixteen feet.
    In twenty-two patients (twenty-five feet), a space-occupying lesion or a talocalcaneal coalition was confirmed by imaging examinations. In nineteen feet without a well-defined lesion, a surgical procedure was performed because of the failure of nonoperative treatment (medication, physical therapy, or the use of orthotic devices) after three to four months. The tibial nerve was completely decompressed in all of the procedures. The decompression was combined with the Kidner procedure9 in two patients (four feet) with a flatfoot deformity, and it was combined with a medial displacement osteotomy of the calcaneus as well as the Kidner procedure in one patient (two feet).
    The physical test of dorsiflexion of the ankle, eversion of the foot, and dorsiflexion of all of the toes that was described above was performed before, during, and after the operation in all of the patients. Before the operation, we held the foot in the test position for five to ten seconds and questioned the patient about any changes in symptoms. With the foot held in the same position, we checked for the Tinel sign and for local tenderness of the nerve.
    The surgical procedure was performed under tourniquet control, with a curved medial skin incision extending from above to below the medial malleolus. The flexor retinaculum was cut, but the laciniate ligament was left intact. Then the tibial nerve, the posterior tibial vessels, and both the flexor hallucis longus and the flexor digitorum longus tendons were identified. When the physical test was performed during the operation, we observed the change in the anatomical relationship of the structures within the tarsal tunnel. Then we cut the laciniate ligament, completely releasing the tibial nerve. Again, we observed the anatomical relationship of the structures within the tunnel as the test was repeated.
    Postoperatively, the patient wore a short leg cast, with the ankle and foot in a neutral position, for two weeks. Periodically, we assessed whether the symptoms and the signs disappeared, and when they had, we determined whether the physical test could reproduce them. The average duration of follow-up was three years and eleven months (range, two years to thirteen years and three months).
    The test was also performed on fifty normal volunteers (100 feet) who did not have a history of trauma to the feet or ankles. Twenty-five of the volunteers were male, with an average age of thirty-five years (range, ten to eighty-two years), and twenty-five were female, with an average age of forty-one years (range, eleven to eighty-six years). We judged whether each subject’s arch was normal, low, or high by observing the standing heel profile from behind and by measuring the shape of the sole with a pedoscope10. Eighty-eight feet were found to have a normal longitudinal arch, six had a low arch, and the remaining six had a high arch. We observed whether any symptoms or signs could be induced by performing the test on the feet of the volunteers.
    Performance of the test induced no signs or symptoms in the feet of the normal volunteers.
    When the test was performed before the surgical procedure, nine of the twenty feet with numbness had an intensification of the numbness, five of the twenty had no change, and six (four with a ganglion cyst and two with flatfoot deformity) had pain. Of the seventeen feet with pain, fifteen had an intensification of the pain and two had no change. Of the seven feet with both symptoms, four had intensification of the pain, two had intensification of the numbness, and one had no change. The tenderness intensified in forty-two of the forty-three feet that had had tenderness previously, and it was induced in the one that had not. The pain usually was induced immediately after the foot was placed in the test position; however, it took several seconds for numbness to develop. A Tinel sign became more pronounced in forty-one feet, and the sign was induced in three feet in which it had been absent.
    During the surgical procedure, some changes were observed in the patients who did not have a space-occupying lesion. After the flexor retinaculum was cut, except for the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve did not appear to be compressed by the laciniate ligament and the mobility of the nerve was not restricted when the ankle joint was plantar flexed and the foot was inverted. When the ankle joint was dorsiflexed and the foot was everted maximally, the tibial nerve was stretched and it bulged medially. When all of the toes were then forcibly dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle belly entered farther into the tarsal tunnel and pressed upon the stretched tibial nerve from behind. The tibial nerve became markedly constricted by the superior edge of the laciniate ligament (Fig. 2-A). This constriction of the nerve disappeared after the laciniate ligament was released (Fig. 2-B).
    In twenty-five feet, a space-occupying lesion was identified within the tarsal canal, and, in nineteen feet, no such lesion was identified. The lesions found at surgery included a talocalcaneal coalition (in sixteen feet), a ganglion cyst (in five feet), venous varicosities (in four feet), and an anomalous muscle (in four feet). In these patients, the anatomical relationships of the tibial nerve and its surrounding structures were more complicated and were more difficult to observe without completely cutting the flexor retinaculum, including the laciniate ligament. The osseous mass of the coalition between the talus and the calcaneus bulged out between the flexor digitorum longus tendon and the neurovascular bundle into the tarsal tunnel. The tibial nerve overrode the osseous bulge and became extremely stretched in the test position.
    Similarly, in the patients whose symptoms were caused by an accessory flexor digitorum longus muscle, the muscle belly was located in the tarsal tunnel. During the performance of the physical test, the tibial nerve became compressed by both the flexor hallucis longus muscle and the accessory muscle. Complete decompression of the tibial nerve occurred after excision of the anomalous muscle.
    The pain and the uncomfortable feelings in the feet were relieved immediately after the operation in all patients. Numbness, local tenderness, and the Tinel sign disappeared in 0.5 to 10.5 months (average, 2.9 months) postoperatively, except in the three patients whose symptoms were caused by a fracture of the calcaneus. In these three patients, a weakly positive Tinel sign and local tenderness were still noted at the final follow-up examination, and the same signs were elicited by the physical test. The symptoms could not be reproduced by a repeat performance of the test in any of the other patients.
    The diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome is made primarily on the basis of the medical history and the findings of the physical examination. The use of a reliable provocative test may increase diagnostic accuracy.
    Tourniquet tests that reproduce the symptoms by inflating a pneumatic cuff around the leg have been reported by several authors4,11,12; however, their accuracy and specificity are not known. The physical findings of this syndrome can be exacerbated by compression of the tibial nerve or by applying tension to it. Linscheid et al.12 described a test in which compression was applied distal to the medial malleolus for sixty seconds; positive findings were elicited in twenty-seven of thirty-four patients. Other tests have been performed with the foot and ankle placed in specific positions—that is, they have been performed with the heel forced into a valgus position3, with the foot dorsiflexed during straight-leg raises13, and with the foot held in inversion4,11,14. However, details of the reliability of these tests, except for Lam’s inversion test11, were not described in the reports. As for Lam’s test, it reproduced the symptoms in only two of ten patients.
    When our test was performed, the symptoms did not change in eight (18%) of forty-four feet. This percentage is similar to the results of Linscheid et al. (20.5%)12. Less time is required for patients to experience increased numbness or pain with use of our method; when the symptoms changed, they did so within ten seconds. However, it took sixty seconds to reproduce symptoms with the method of Linscheid et al.12.
    The pain induced by our test is different from that of plantar fasciitis, although forced extension of the toes does resemble the method used to stretch and irritate the plantar structures attached to the heel in that condition. The pain induced by our test is also different in character from and more severe than that caused by a talocalcaneal coalition.
    To confirm the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome, both a positive Tinel sign and local tenderness over the tibial nerve should be verified by tapping on or compressing the tibial nerve at the tarsal tunnel in the position described. In addition to inducing a Tinel sign in patients in whom it had not been evoked previously, testing in this position resulted in already existing signs becoming more pronounced.
    It should be noted that neither symptoms nor signs were detected in the feet of the normal volunteers who were tested. Therefore, our method seems to be more specific than the other methods previously described for the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome.
    In the tarsal tunnel, the neurovascular bundle is accompanied by loose adipose tissue and is fixed relatively firmly to its surroundings. In one cadaveric study, tibial nerve tension was also significantly increased by eversion (p = 0.0001), dorsiflexion (p = 0.0006), and combined dorsiflexion-eversion (p = 0.0001)15. In another study, tarsal tunnel pressure was shown to increase when the foot and ankle were positioned in full eversion16. Our operative findings indicated that our physical test is different from the previously reported ones because it applies both tension and compression to the tibial nerve. In addition, the flexor hallucis longus muscle belly comes in proximity to the nerve and compresses it when both the great and the lesser toes are maximally dorsiflexed.
    Clinical symptoms and signs of tibial nerve compression at the tarsal tunnel were reproduced and/or intensified by this provocative test in the vast majority of our patients. The maneuver is safe for the patient and easy for the clinician to perform. This technique will help to increase the sensitivity of the physical examination in the diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome, especially when the clinical signs are vague. References
    Keck C. The tarsal-tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1962;44: 180-2. 44180  1962 
     
    Lam SJS. A tarsal-tunnel syndrome. Lancet,1962;2: 1354-5. 21354  1962  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    DeLisa JA,Saeed MA. The tarsal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve,1983;6: 664-70. 6664  1983  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    DiStefano V, Sack JT, Whittaker R,Nixon JE. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Review of the literature and two case reports. Clin Orthop,1972;88: 76-9. 8876  1972  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Galardi G, Amadio S, Maderna L, Meraviglia MV, Brunati L, Dal Conte G,Comi G. Electrophysiologic studies in tarsal tunnel syndrome. Diagnostic reliability of motor distal latency, mixed nerve and sensory nerve conduction studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,1994;73: 193-8. 73193  1994  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Pfeiffer WH,Cracchiolo A 3rd. Clinical results after tarsal tunnel decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1994;76: 1222-30. 761222  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Mann RABaxter ED. Diseases of the nerves. In: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, editors. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 6th ed, vol 1. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p 554-8. 
     
    Frey C,Kerr R. Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle,1993;14: 159-64. 14159  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Kidner FC. The prehallux (accessory scaphoid) in its relation to flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1929;11: 831-7. 11831  1929 
     
    Klenerman L. Examination of the foot. In: Klenerman L, editor. The foot and its disorders. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1991. p 27-31. 
     
    Lam SJ. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1967;49: 87-92. 4987  1967  [PubMed]
     
    Linscheid RL, Burton RC,Fredericks EJ. Tarsal-tunnel syndrome. South Med J,1970;63: 1313-23.. 631313  1970  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Mann RA. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am,1974;5: 109-15. 5109  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Janecki CJ,Dovberg JL. Tarsal-tunnel syndrome caused by neurilemmoma of the medial plantar nerve. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977;59: 127-8. 59127  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Daniels TR, Lau JT,Hearn TC. The effects of foot position and load on tibial nerve tension. Foot Ankle Int,1998;19: 73-8. 1973  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Trepman E, Kadel NJ, Chisholm K,Razzano L. Effect of foot and ankle position on tarsal tunnel compartment pressure. Foot Ankle Int,1999;20: 721-6. 20721  1999  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:The maneuver used in the physical examination test. The ankle is maximally everted and dorsiflexed while all of the metatarsophalangeal joints are maximally dorsiflexed.
    Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Figs. 2-A and 2-B Intraoperative findings during the test maneuver. Asterisk = tibial nerve, and arrow = flexor hallucis longus muscle. Fig. 2-A Before the laciniate ligament is cut, as the ankle joint is dorsiflexed, the foot is everted, and all of the toes are dorsiflexed, the flexor hallucis longus muscle enters farther into the tunnel and the tibial nerve is stretched, compressed against the laciniate ligament, and constricted by its superior edge. Fig. 2-B After release of the laciniate ligament, the tibial nerve is no longer compressed in the test position.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Symptoms
    SymptomAreaNo. of Feet
    Numbness20 (45%)
    Medial aspect of sole16
    Whole sole?4
    Pain17 (39%)
    Medial aspect of sole?6
    Whole sole?6
    Tarsal tunnel to medial aspect of sole?5 ?
    Numbness and pain?7 (16%)
    Medial aspect of sole?2
    Whole sole?5
    Keck C. The tarsal-tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1962;44: 180-2. 44180  1962 
     
    Lam SJS. A tarsal-tunnel syndrome. Lancet,1962;2: 1354-5. 21354  1962  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    DeLisa JA,Saeed MA. The tarsal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve,1983;6: 664-70. 6664  1983  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    DiStefano V, Sack JT, Whittaker R,Nixon JE. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Review of the literature and two case reports. Clin Orthop,1972;88: 76-9. 8876  1972  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Galardi G, Amadio S, Maderna L, Meraviglia MV, Brunati L, Dal Conte G,Comi G. Electrophysiologic studies in tarsal tunnel syndrome. Diagnostic reliability of motor distal latency, mixed nerve and sensory nerve conduction studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil,1994;73: 193-8. 73193  1994  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Pfeiffer WH,Cracchiolo A 3rd. Clinical results after tarsal tunnel decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1994;76: 1222-30. 761222  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Mann RABaxter ED. Diseases of the nerves. In: Mann RA, Coughlin MJ, editors. Surgery of the foot and ankle. 6th ed, vol 1. St. Louis: Mosby; 1993. p 554-8. 
     
    Frey C,Kerr R. Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of tarsal tunnel syndrome. Foot Ankle,1993;14: 159-64. 14159  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Kidner FC. The prehallux (accessory scaphoid) in its relation to flat-foot. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1929;11: 831-7. 11831  1929 
     
    Klenerman L. Examination of the foot. In: Klenerman L, editor. The foot and its disorders. 3rd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific; 1991. p 27-31. 
     
    Lam SJ. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1967;49: 87-92. 4987  1967  [PubMed]
     
    Linscheid RL, Burton RC,Fredericks EJ. Tarsal-tunnel syndrome. South Med J,1970;63: 1313-23.. 631313  1970  [PubMed][CrossRef]
     
    Mann RA. Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Orthop Clin North Am,1974;5: 109-15. 5109  1974  [PubMed]
     
    Janecki CJ,Dovberg JL. Tarsal-tunnel syndrome caused by neurilemmoma of the medial plantar nerve. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977;59: 127-8. 59127  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Daniels TR, Lau JT,Hearn TC. The effects of foot position and load on tibial nerve tension. Foot Ankle Int,1998;19: 73-8. 1973  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Trepman E, Kadel NJ, Chisholm K,Razzano L. Effect of foot and ankle position on tarsal tunnel compartment pressure. Foot Ankle Int,1999;20: 721-6. 20721  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center