0
Articles   |    
Long-Term Results Following Ankle Arthrodesis for Post-Traumatic Arthritis
Lisa M. Coester, MD; Charles L. Saltzman, MD; John Leupold, MD; William Pontarelli, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa
Lisa M. Coester, MD Charles L. Saltzman, MD John Leupold, MD
William Pontarelli, MD Departments of Orthopaedic Surgery (L.M.C., C.L.S., J.L., and W.P.), LL-JPP, and Biomedical Engineering (C.L.S.), LL-JPP 01017, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address for C.L. Saltzman: charles-saltzman@uiowa.edu
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.A video supplement to this article is available from the Video Journal of Orthopaedics. A video clip is available at the JBJS web site, www.jbjs.org. The Video Journal of Orthopaedics can be contacted at (805) 962-3410, web site: www.vjortho.com.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:219-219 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Ankle arthrodesis is considered by many to be the standard operative treatment for end-stage ankle arthritis; however, the long-term effect of ankle arthrodesis on other lower-extremity joints remains largely unknown. The purpose of this study was to perform a clinical and radiographic review to determine the effect of ankle arthrodesis on the development of osteoarthritis in other lower-extremity joints.

Methods: Twenty-three patients who had had an isolated ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of painful post-traumatic arthritis of the ankle were followed for a mean of twenty-two years (range, twelve to forty-four years) after the operation. Each completed standardized, self-reported outcome questionnaires (the Foot Function Index, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC], and Short Form-36 [SF-36]), was examined clinically by two of the investigators, and underwent complete radiographic examination of the knee, ankle, and foot bilaterally. The radiographic grade of osteoarthritis was determined for each joint, and the levels of overall activity limitation, pain, and disability were determined for each patient from the clinical findings and questionnaire information.

Results: Osteoarthritis of the ipsilateral subtalar (p < 0.0001), talonavicular (p < 0.0001), calcaneocuboid (p < 0.0001), naviculocuneiform (p = 0.0012), tarsometatarsal (p = 0.0009), and first metatarsophalangeal joints (p = 0.0012) was consistently more severe than the osteoarthritis of those joints on the contralateral side. Osteoarthritis did not develop more frequently in the ipsilateral knee or lesser metatarsophalangeal joints than it did on the contralateral side. Significant differences between the two sides were found with regard to overall activity limitation (p < 0.0001), pain (p < 0.0001), and disability (p < 0.0001), with the involved side consistently more symptomatic.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, the present series represents the longest follow-up study of ankle arthrodesis to date. Our cohort of patients all had isolated post-traumatic ankle arthritis, and each underwent a successful isolated ankle arthrodesis. At a mean of twenty-two years, the majority of the patients had substantial, and accelerated, arthritic changes in the ipsilateral foot but not the knee. They were often limited functionally by foot pain. Although ankle arthrodesis may provide good early relief of pain, it is associated with premature deterioration of other joints of the foot and eventual arthritis, pain, and dysfunction.

Figures in this Article
    Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the ankle is a difficult clinical problem. Treatment options include the use of walking aids, orthotic devices, intra-articular steroids, open rather than arthroscopic d�bridement, periarticular osteotomy, and arthroplasty-all of which have provided inconsistent relief. Although ankle arthroplasty has been used to treat such patients, variable results have been reported and the traditional operative treatment for ankle osteoarthritis has been tibiotalar arthrodesis1-3. However, little has been reported on the long-term effects of ankle arthrodesis on other lower-extremity joints. It is clear that arthrodesis of other major lower-extremity joints is associated with painful, premature degenerative arthritis of contiguous joints4,5. The lack of knowledge of the long-term effects of ankle arthrodesis limits the ability of physicians to counsel their patients appropriately when they are faced with the decision of whether to undergo this procedure.
    Many reports have suggested that ankle arthrodesis reliably provides a painless, plantigrade, stable foot. Since 1879, when Albert first described arthrodesis of the ankle6, more than thirty different techniques have been described. In series ranging in size from twelve to 101 patients, rates of successful primary fusion of 80% to 100% have been reported7-14. Similarly, in series ranging in size from five to sixty-two patients, pain relief has generally followed fusion, with reported rates of substantial pain relief ranging from 80% to 100% after successful fusion8,11,12,15-18. However, reports based on a mean duration of follow-up of eight to twelve years have shown that some patients eventually become limited by pain and degenerative changes elsewhere in the foot7,10,12. We could not find information on the longer-term results of arthrodesis with respect to the likelihood of the development of pain, functional limitation, and degenerative changes in other joints of the ipsilateral foot and knee.
    We performed this retrospective clinical and radiographic review to assess the clinical outcomes of ankle arthrodesis over a long period of time. We performed a radiographic assessment of the degree of osteoarthritis of other joints (foot and knee) of both extremities to determine its influence, if any, on the patient's overall activity level, pain, and disability.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-J A woman who sustained an open posterior fracture-dislocation of the right ankle in a motor-vehicle accident at the age of thirty-three years. Fig. 1-A Preoperative lateral radiograph showing no evidence of trauma to the subtalar joint.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:After d�bridement, open reduction and fixation was performed with threaded Steinmann pins; the medial malleolus was not reduced.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:After d�bridement, open reduction and fixation was performed with threaded Steinmann pins; the medial malleolus was not reduced.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:One year postoperatively, the patient had painful ankle osteoarthritis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:One year postoperatively, the patient had painful ankle osteoarthritis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:The patient underwent an ankle arthrodesis with use of the Charnley compression technique with pins in the neck of the talus and tibia. There was no evidence of arthritis in the subtalar joint.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-G:The patient underwent an ankle arthrodesis with use of the Charnley compression technique with pins in the neck of the talus and tibia. There was no evidence of arthritis in the subtalar joint.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-H:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-I:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-J:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Radiographic Grading of Osteoarthritis According to the Classification System of Kellgren and Moore23
    GradeClassificationDescription
    1NormalNo features of osteoarthritis
    2DoubtfulMinute osteophyte, doubtful importance
    3MinimalDefinite osteophyte, undiminished joint space
    4Moderate Moderate diminution of joint space
    5SevereJoint space greatly diminished with sclerosis of subchondral bone
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Data on the Ankles
    *MTP = metatarsophalangeal joint.
    CaseScore on Foot Function Index (points) Degenerative Changes According to the System of Kellgren and Moore23* (Ipsilateral Side/Contralateral Side) (points)
    Ipsilateral SideContralateral Side
    Activity LimitationFoot PainFoot DisabilityActivity LimitationFoot PainFoot DisabilityFirst MTPLesser MTPsTarso-metatarsalCalcaneo-cuboidNaviculo-cuneiformTalonavicularSubtalarMedial KneeLateral KneePatello-femoral
      1  23  36  51  0    0    03/11/14/14/14/14/25/22/22/12/2
      2    0  81  58  0  64  412/11/12/11/11/12/24/31/11/11/1
      3  14    4  11  0    0    01/11/13/23/13/23/25/12/11/11/2
      4  19  10  31  7  10  423/21/13/53/23/33/34/21/42/34/5
      5  66  89  80  0    0    01/11/14/22/12/13/13/11/11/12/2
      6  35  36  67  0    0    02/11/14/14/14/15/25/11/11/12/2
      7    0  50  17  0    0    01/11/13/22/12/12/24/12/21/12/2
      8  78  37  8378  37  834/31/13/13/13/24/24/21/11/13/3
      9  83  80  8983    0  334/22/15/23/24/35/25/22/35/25/3
    10  17    0  33  0    0    04/21/13/12/14/44/15/25/42/22/2
    11    8  35  49  8  35  492/21/11/13/23/33/34/31/11/11/1
    12  17  23  40  0    6    74/23/14/13/13/24/35/35/15/14/1
    13  35  35  73  0    0    03/42/24/24/13/14/25/22/41/42/3
    14  38  57  5930  45  473/21/15/34/15/14/25/12/11/12/2
    15  17  49  69  8  24  24-/3-/14/23/24/24/35/22/21/23/3
    16  31  42  58  0    0    01/11/13/23/23/24/34/21/42/23/3
    17  43  49  39  0    0    02/11/14/44/34/55/25/14/43/24/4
    18  17  28  12  0    0    03/-4/-5/-
    19  32  44  66  0  31    64/41/22/22/22/23/34/11/11/12/2
    20  17  57  4317    6    63/22/23/23/22/24/24/11/12/22/2
    21    1    0  22  1    0  224/41/32/3-/23/25/32/24/42/2
    22  14    0  22  0    0    03/11/13/11/-2/12/24/15/43/34/4
    23  14    3  22  0    0    04/31/11/11/13/23/12/32/22/2
    24  40  54  38  0    0    6
    Mean  27  38  47  10  11  152.8/2.01.2/1.23.2/1.92.9/1.53.0/2.03.6/2.24.4/1.72.1/2.22.0/1.82.5/2.4
    Standard deviation        22.4        25.9        23.3        22.9          18.2        22.51.1/1.10.5/0.51.1/1.10.9/0.61.1/1.10.9/0.60.7/0.81.4/1.31.3/1.01.1/1.0
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Grade of Osteoarthritis According to the System of Kellgren and Moore23
    JointNo. of Subjects with Moderate or Severe Osteoarthritis (Grade 4 or 5)No. of Subjects with No, Doubtful, or Minimal Osteoarthritis (Grade 1, 2, or 3)Total No. of Subjects with Adequate Radiographs
    Ipsilateral
      Subtalar21  223
      Talonavicular131023
      Calcaneocuboid  51621
      Naviculocuneiform  71421
      Tarsometatarsal  91322
      First metatarsophalangeal  71421
      Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints  02121
      Medial knee  41822
      Lateral knee  31922
      Patellofemoral  51722
    Contralateral
      Subtalar  02222
      Talonavicular  02222
      Calcaneocuboid  01919
      Naviculocuneiform  22022
      Tarsometatarsal  22022
      First metatarsophalangeal  31922
      Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints  02222
      Medial knee  61622
      Lateral knee  22022
      Patellofemoral  31922
    The present study was performed with approval of our institution's Human Subjects Review Board, and all participants signed an approved informed-consent form.
    A manual search through medical records revealed 447 patients who had undergone any type of arthrodesis between January 1951 and December 1966 at our institution. A computer-generated search identified an additional 150 patients who had undergone a foot arthrodesis or an ankle arthrodesis, or both, between January 1967 and December 1978, and 142 patients who had undergone an ankle arthrodesis during the period between January 1979 and May 1997. These 739 charts were reviewed to identify patients who had undergone an isolated tibiotalar arthrodesis for the treatment of post-traumatic or primary ankle osteoarthritis more than ten years prior to 1997. Exclusion criteria included another arthrodesis of the midfoot or hindfoot, rheumatoid arthritis, poliomyelitis, congenital deformity, and a Charcot joint. Fifty-five patients treated at our institution who met the criteria were included in the study. An additional nine patients who met the same criteria were identified and included after a computer-generated search from the local community hospital, Mercy Hospital of Iowa City.
    Patients were located through medical-record identification information and the state Department of Motor Vehicles registry, and by contract with a private search service (Choice Point, McLean, Virginia). Of the sixty-four available patients, forty-eight (75%) were located and sixteen were lost to follow-up. Of the forty-eight patients, thirteen had died, four had had a below-the-knee amputation because of intractable infection related to the arthrodesis and other procedures, two had had an additional midfoot arthrodesis, five declined to participate, and one completed the questionnaires but would not return for radiographic or clinical evaluation. The remaining twenty-three patients (eleven men and twelve women), all of whom had had a diagnosis of post-traumatic osteoarthritis at the time of the arthrodesis and none of whom were known to have arthritis of other foot joints, were included in the study. The mean age at the time of the operation was forty-one years (range, twelve to seventy years), and the mean age at the time of the latest follow-up examination was sixty-four years (range, thirty-eight to eighty-nine years). The mean duration of follow-up was twenty-two years (range, twelve to forty-four years). Information on surgical technique and postoperative immobilization was obtained from the charts.
    Preoperatively, the etiology of the ankle arthritis in all of the patients was considered to be post-traumatic. The mechanisms of injury included a fall from a height (ten patients), an automobile accident (six), a motorcycle accident (two), chronic recurrent ankle sprain (two), a lawn-mower injury (one), an auger injury (one), and a tractor rollover (one).
    The mean time from the injury to the arthrodesis was thirty-one months (range, one to ninety-six months). Information on the findings of physical examination prior to the ankle arthrodesis was varied. A limited range of motion of the ankle was noted in fourteen patients. Subtalar motion was reported to be good in four patients and decreased in five patients.
    Of the twenty-three patients who had a comprehensive examination at the time of the latest follow-up, eleven had had internal fixation and twelve had had external fixation. Of those with external fixation, five had the Charnley type and seven had pins placed through the calcaneus. In terms of postoperative management, the mean time to weight-bearing was eight and one-half weeks (range, two to sixteen weeks) and the mean duration of immobilization was four and one-half months (range, one and one-half to eleven months).

    Clinical Evaluation

    At the time of the latest follow-up, all subjects were personally interviewed about pain and overall function of the lower extremities and they had a complete physical examination of the lower extremities bilaterally to determine gait; knee and hindfoot alignment; range of motion of the knees, ankles, and subtalar joints; neurovascular status; and presence or absence of tenderness and swelling. Two reviewers assessed each patient clinically. The contralateral extremity was used as a control.

    Self-Reported Questionnaires

    Twenty-four patients completed a Foot Function Index and a slightly shortened version of the Hip and Knee Registry Preoperative Patient Form. They also completed a slightly shortened version of the Hip and Knee Registry Postoperative Patient Form, answering all questions with regard to the "Patient Self-Assessment of Medical Conditions" and filling out the SF-36 health survey. In addition, they completed a full Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); however, the questions referring to the hips were eliminated. The patients answered all general questions except the last two, which concerned the status of the hip or knee at that time compared with the status at the last time that the patient filled out the form, and the patient's level of satisfaction with the joint replacement.
    The Foot Function Index is a validated and reliable visual analog scale for measuring activity limitation, pain, and disability19,20. The Hip and Knee Registry Preoperative Patient Form shares components with the WOMAC and the SF-36. The WOMAC is a disease-specific, health-related, quality-of-life measure. The scale was designed to be used in clinical trials for assessing patients with osteoarthritis of the hips and knees21. The SF-36 is a generic health profile. Derived from the Rand Health Insurance long form, it measures health in seven dimensions (physical functioning, role limitations, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, vitality, and general health perceptions). Its test-retest reliability, internal consistency, responsiveness, construct validity, discriminant validity, and convergent validity have all been supported21. These instruments were utilized to determine each respondent's activity limitations, pain, and disability, and the interaction of each of these factors with the radiographic and clinical findings. Three additional questions were posed to the subjects about their overall satisfaction with the results of the operation.

    Radiographic Examination

    Radiographs made at the time of the arthrodesis were available for only one patient (Fig. 1-AFigs. 1-A, Fig. 1-B, Fig. 1-C, Fig. 1-D, Fig. 1-E, Fig. 1-F, Fig. 1-G, Fig. 1-H, Fig. 1-I, and Fig. 1-J). However, the records of fourteen patients had a description of radiographic findings of ankle osteoarthritis and either no mention of the other joints (twelve patients) or specific mention that other joints had no radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (two patients). Three patients had evidence of osteonecrosis of the talus as well as degenerative joint disease of the ankle on preoperative radiographs.
    At the time of the latest follow-up, the patients underwent a comprehensive radiographic examination that included (1) bilateral standing anteroposterior radiographs of the foot, (2) bilateral standing mortise radiographs of the ankle, (3) bilateral standing lateral radiographs of the foot and ankle, (4) bilateral standing anteroposterior radiographs of the knee, (5) bilateral standing lateral radiographs of the knee, (6) bilateral standing hindfoot alignment radiographs, and (7) bilateral Broden radiographs22. One patient agreed to only two radiographs (a lateral standing radiograph of the foot and ankle and a hindfoot alignment radiograph, both on the ipsilateral side). Two reviewers measured the position of the fusion and graded the osteoarthritis seen on each radiograph according to the system of Kellgren and Moore23 (Table ITable I). These measurements were performed simultaneously, and consensus was obtained for each one. We separately evaluated and graded the degenerative changes in the patellofemoral, medial knee, lateral knee, subtalar, talonavicular, calcaneocuboid, naviculocuneiform, tarsometatarsal, first metatarsophalangeal, and lesser metatarsophalangeal joints. Some of the radiographs did not demonstrate a joint well enough to be graded: the calcaneocuboid joint could not be seen well enough on the radiographs of two patients; the naviculocuneiform joint, on the radiographs of two; the first metatarsophalangeal joint, on the radiographs of two; one of the tarsometatarsal joints, on the radiographs of one; and the lesser metatarsophalangeal joints, on the radiographs of two.
    On the standing lateral radiographs of the ankle and the foot, we determined the tibiotalar angle (the angle subtended by the longitudinal axes of the tibia and the talus) and the tibiotalar translation (anterior translation of the head of the talus in front of the anterior border of the tibia). On the hindfoot alignment radiographs, we measured the tibiocalcaneal angle (the angle subtended by the longitudinal axes of the tibia and the calcaneus) and the calcaneal-tibial displacement (the distance between the central longitudinal axis of the tibia and the inferior surface of the calcaneus as previously described)22.

    Statistical Analysis

    Before we performed the study, a power analysis was done to determine adequate sample size. The presence of radiographically proven subtalar arthritis (grade 4 or 5, according to the system of Kellgren and Moore) was considered the primary outcome variable. With use of a one-tailed McNemar chi-square test with the level of significance at 0.05 with 90% power, and assuming a difference in the prevalence of subtalar osteoarthritis consisting of 50% on the affected side compared with 5% on the nonaffected side, a sample size of twenty subjects was determined to be sufficient.
    Paired t tests and one-tailed McNemar chi-square tests comparing the results on the ipsilateral side with those on the control, contralateral side were used to determine the significance of the findings. Spearman and Kendall-tau-b correlation coefficients were used to determine significant relationships between variables. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

    Findings on Clinical Examination

    Most (twenty-two [96%]) of the twenty-three patients had a slight-to-moderate limp. Clinical hindfoot alignment on the ipsilateral side varied: nine patients (39%) had varus alignment, eight (35%) had valgus alignment, and six (26%) had neutral alignment. Alignment of the contralateral hindfoot was neutral in twenty-one patients (91%) and valgus in two. The ranges of motion of ipsilateral and contralateral knees were comparable. Most (twenty [87%]) of the patients had full and painless motion of the uninvolved ankle. The ipsilateral subtalar range of motion was decreased in every patient, with no motion in nine (39%), 10% to 50% of the range of motion on the contralateral side in thirteen (57%), and 70% of the motion on the contralateral side in one patient. All patients had intact neurovascular function. Eleven patients (48%) had tenderness and swelling in the hindfoot and nine (39%), in the midfoot.
    The majority (fifteen [65%]) of the patients did not use any supports for walking. Six patients (26%) used a cane, and two (9%) used a walker or assistance from another person for support.

    Questionnaire Results

    There was more severe overall activity limitation on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side (mean, 27 compared with 10 points; p < 0.0001). There was also more overall foot pain (mean, 38 compared with 11 points; p < 0.0001) and more overall foot disability (mean, 47 compared with 15 points; p < 0.0001) (Table IITable II). Self-reported responses to direct queries from the examiner about pain in the subtalar and midfoot regions revealed significantly more pain on the ipsilateral side than on the contralateral side (p = 0.0002).
    As the degree of dependence on walking aids increased, the overall activity limitation (r = 0.66, p = 0.0004), foot pain (r = 0.57, p = 0.004), and foot disability (r = 0.70, p = 0.0002) all increased.
    Pain did not differ significantly between the ipsilateral and the contralateral knee. The ratings on the WOMAC osteoarthritis scale provided by twenty-four patients indicated that sixteen (67%) had difficulty climbing stairs and twelve (50%) had difficulty standing upright because of the knee. The patients who reported that the knee caused difficulty with stair-climbing and standing also tended to have more foot problems. As the difficulty with stair-climbing increased, the overall activity limitation (r = 0.57, p = 0.004), foot pain (r = 0.49, p = 0.01), and foot disability (r = 0.65, p = 0.001) also increased. As the subjects' reported difficulty with standing upright increased, the overall activity limitation (r = 0.51, p = 0.01), foot pain (r = 0.67, p = 0.0004), and foot disability (r = 0.72, p < 0.0001) increased as well.
    The SF-36 results for the twenty-four patients revealed that most of them were limited secondary to their general health perceptions with regard to their participation in vigorous activities (twenty-three patients [96%]) and walking more than 1 mile (1.6 km) (twenty patients [83%]). The findings on the SF-36 correlated with those on the Foot Function Index. As patients became more limited with regard to their participation in vigorous activities, their scores for overall activity limitation (r = 0.60, p = 0.002) and foot disability (r = 0.54, p = 0.007) increased. Similarly, as patients became more limited with regard to their ability to walk more than 1 mile, their scores for overall activity limitation (r = 0.56, p = 0.004) and foot disability (r = 0.56, p = 0.004) increased.
    Three additional questions, with regard to overall satisfaction with the outcome of the operation, were posed to the subjects. The answers revealed that sixteen (67%) of the twenty-four patients were happy with the overall outcome of the ankle arthrodesis, twenty-one (88%) said that they would have the ankle arthrodesis again under the same circumstances, and twenty-two (92%) stated that they would recommend an ankle arthrodesis to a friend who had the same degree of arthritis and symptoms in the ankle as they had had prior to the operation.

    Radiographic Findings

    The radiographic grade of osteoarthritis, according to the system of Kellgren and Moore23, was consistently higher for each joint of the ipsilateral foot than it was for the same joint of the contralateral foot (Table IITable II). Additionally, the numbers of subjects with moderate or severe osteoarthritis (as opposed to doubtful or minimal arthritis) of the joints of the ipsilateral foot were consistently greater than the numbers with such involvement of the joints of the contralateral foot (Table IIITable III). The subtalar, calcaneocuboid, talonavicular, tarsometatarsal, naviculocuneiform, and first metatarsophalangeal joints on the ipsilateral side all revealed a significantly increased level of osteoarthritis compared with those joints on the contralateral side (p < 0.01). There was no difference with respect to the level of osteoarthritis between the lesser metatarsophalangeal, lateral knee, medial knee, and patellofemoral joints on the ipsilateral side and those joints on the contralateral side.
    The joints in the ipsilateral extremity that were significantly more degenerated included, in rank order from the most involved to the least involved, the subtalar (p < 0.0001), talonavicular (p < 0.0001), tarsometatarsal (p = 0.0009), naviculocuneiform (p = 0.0012), calcaneocuboid (p < 0.0001), and first metatarsophalangeal joints (p = 0.0012) (Table IITable II). On the involved side, twenty-one of twenty-three subtalar, thirteen of twenty-three talonavicular, five of twenty-one calcaneocuboid, seven of twenty-one naviculocuneiform, nine of twenty-two tarsometatarsal, and seven of twenty-one first metatarsophalangeal joints had moderate or severe osteoarthritis (Table IIITable III). The prevalence of moderate or severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint was not found to be higher for the patients who had had external fixation placed across the subtalar joint than it was for those who had not had such fixation.
    The mean and median tibiotalar angles on the fused side, measured on a standing lateral radiograph of the foot and ankle, were both 114° (range, 98° to 141°), while the mean and median tibiotalar angle on the contralateral side were both 110° (range, 96° to 131°); the difference was significant (p = 0.007). The mean and median tibiotalar translations (anterior displacement of the talus under the tibia), measured on a standing lateral radiograph, were 25 and 24 mm (range, 11 to 43 mm), respectively, on the ipsilateral side, which were not significantly different from the mean and median translations of 21 mm each (range, 13 to 27 mm) on the contralateral side.
    The mean calcaneal-tibial displacement, measured on the hindfoot alignment radiograph, was -1.5 mm (medially displaced 1.5 mm), with a range of -28 mm (medially displaced) to +52 mm (laterally displaced), on the ipsilateral side, and +0.5 mm (laterally displaced), with a range of -14 (medially displaced) to +21 mm (laterally displaced), on the contralateral side; the difference was not significant. Likewise, the mean calcaneotibial angle on the hindfoot alignment radiograph was 1º of valgus (range, 23º of varus to 26º of valgus) on the ipsilateral side and 7º of valgus (range, 10º of varus to 22º of valgus) on the contralateral side; the difference was not significant.

    Correlations Between Foot Function Index and Kellgren Radiographic Scores

    The separate subsections of the Foot Function Index were used to determine whether each domain was associated with the radiographic findings. Activity limitation on the ipsilateral side correlated significantly with the Kellgren grade of the ipsilateral talonavicular (r = 0.79, p £ 0.0001), tarsometatarsal (r = 0.66, p = 0.0008), naviculocuneiform (r = 0.47, p = 0.029), calcaneocuboid (r = 0.47, p = 0.03), and patellofemoral (r = 0.46, p = 0.03) joints. Foot disability on the ipsilateral side correlated significantly with the Kellgren grade of the ipsilateral talonavicular (r = 0.59, p = 0.001) and tarsometatarsal (r = 0.49, p = 0.02) joints. Foot pain on the ipsilateral side was not significantly correlated with the Kellgren scores.
    The patients in the current study all had isolated post-traumatic arthritis of the ankle treated with an isolated ankle arthrodesis. The relatively frequent occurrence of osteoarthritis in the foot joints on the ispsilateral side but not on the contralateral side suggests that, at a mean of twenty-two years after ankle arthrodesis, substantial and accelerated deterioration of other foot joints is common. However, the etiology of the deterioration is unknown. Our initial power analysis indicated that this retrospective study of twenty-three patients had sufficient power to enable us to make this conclusion.
    To our knowledge, the present series represents the longest follow-up study to date on ankle arthrodesis for the treatment of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. In this study, we found radiographic signs of osteoarthritis in many of the joints in the involved foot by a mean of twenty-two years postoperatively. Likewise, overall pain was increased in the involved foot, and function was limited because of the involved foot. With the numbers available, these changes appeared to be independent of operative technique, radiographic alignment, and age at the time of the operation.
    Two patients were excluded from the study because, after the ankle arthrodesis, they had an arthrodesis of the ipsilateral midfoot. These two patients presumably had substantial problems with function and pain in the ipsilateral foot after ankle fusion. The exclusion of these two patients may have modestly skewed the results in favor of ankle arthrodesis.
    Ankle arthrodeses have been performed for more than a century, and our study is one of a long series of reports documenting potential problems with the procedure. Hallock was one of the earliest investigators to focus on diagnoses of post-traumatic osteoarthritis, and he reported postoperative evidence of subtalar, cuneonavicular, and talonavicular osteoarthritis after a mean duration of follow-up of 4.4 years24. In a 7.5-year follow-up analysis of eighteen patients who predominantly had post-traumatic osteoarthritis, Said et al. noted that sixteen of them had stiff subtalar joints14. Mazur et al., in an eight-year follow-up series of twelve patients, found radiographic changes of osteoarthritis in the subtalar and midtarsal joints in all of the patients12. Five ankles were rated as minimally affected; five, as moderately involved; and two, as severely affected. However, they also noted that radiographic changes did not strongly correlate with symptoms. Jackson and Glasgow, in a one to twenty-five-year follow-up study of thirty-seven patients, found radiographic degenerative changes in the tarsal joint of twenty-two patients and a stiff subtalar joint in all thirty-seven25. In studies with a mean duration of follow-up of ten years, Morgan et al.13 and Buck et al.10 described the experience with ankle arthrodesis at the University of Michigan and the Mayo Clinic, respectively. Morgan et al. reported a good or excellent result in 90% of the ankles and suggested that the results had not changed over the period of follow-up13. Buck et al. found that all nineteen patients in their study had decreased subtalar motion and difficulty with walking on uneven ground. Eight patients reported pain in the ankle; nine, in the subtalar joint; and eight, in the midtarsal region; however, no radiographic analysis of other joints was noted10.
    Until the present series, the study with the longest duration of follow-up was performed by Ahlberg and Henricson7. They evaluated thirty-one patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis at a mean of 12.3 years. Pain in the subtalar joint was noted in two-thirds of the patients. Of the twenty-seven patients who were examined radiographically, three (11%) had severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint; nine (33%), moderate osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint; fourteen (52%), no evidence of osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint; and one (4%), ankylosis of the subtalar joint. Seventy-five percent of the patients needed special footwear, and 84% had difficulty walking on uneven ground7.
    The effects of an ankle arthrodesis on the motion of other major lower-extremity joints have been studied in the gait-laboratory setting. Mazur et al.12 and Waters et al.26 found that ankle arthrodesis did not appreciably alter hip and knee motion. Gait after an ankle arthrodesis was thought to be 90% efficient in terms of measured oxygen consumption26. While wearing shoes, patients who had had an ankle arthrodesis showed excellent gait characteristics, with lost ankle motion compensated for by ipsilateral small-joint motion and altered motion within the foot on the contralateral side12.
    The increased stresses and functional demands placed on the joints of the ipsilateral foot, secondary to the fused ankle, may result in increased motion and abnormal chronic loading of other joints of the foot, ultimately leading to the development of osteoarthritis. Similar findings have been reported in association with other major lower-extremity arthrodesis procedures4,5,26. However, prolonged immobilization can also be implicated in the etiology of the degeneration seen in ipsilateral foot joints. Similarly, with the design of this retrospective study, we could not completely exclude the possibility that the patients had sustained an injury to other joints of the ipsilateral foot at the time of the initial injury and that the resulting arthritic changes were inevitable, regardless of the status of ankle motion.
    Ankle arthrodesis continues to be a standard operative treatment of severe post-traumatic ankle osteoarthritis. However, when counseling patients with regard to the potential long-term effects and trade-offs of ankle arthrodesis, it should be explained that if the patient lives long enough he or she can expect the development of symptomatic osteoarthritis in the other joints of the foot. Patients, and treating physicians, should also expect overall pain and functional limitations to increase over time. However, patients should be informed that most subjects in our cohort who had this procedure were satisfied with the overall outcome of the ankle arthrodesis, would choose the same treatment again, and would recommend it to another patient in a similar situation.
    Helm R, and Stevens J: Long-term results of total ankle replacement. J Arthroplasty,1986.1: 271-7, 1271  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Kofoed H, and Lundberg-Jensen A: Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int,1999.20: 501-6, 20501  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL : Total ankle arthroplasty: state of the art. Instr Course Lect,1999.48: 263-8, 48263  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan JJ; Brand RA; and Pedersen DR: Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 1328-35, 671328  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Sponseller PD; McBeath AA; and Perpich M: Hip arthrodesis in young patients. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984.66: 853-9, 66853  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Albert E: Zur Resektion des Kniegelenkes. Wien Med. Press,1879.20: 705-8, 20705  1879 
     
    Ahlberg A, and Henricson AS: Late results of ankle fusion. Acta Orthop Scand ,1981.52: 103-5, 52103  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Bishop AT; Wood MB; and Sheetz KK: Arthrodesis of the ankle with a free vascularized autogenous bone graft. Reconstruction of segmental loss of bone secondary to osteomyelitis, tumor, or trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1995.77: 1867-75, 771867  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Boobbyer GN: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis. Acta Orthop Scand,1981.52: 107-10, 52107  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Buck P; Morrey BF; and Chao EYS: The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 1052-62, 691052  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Lynch AF; Bourne RB; and Rorabeck CH: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1988.70: 113-6, 70113  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Mazur JM; Schwartz E; and Simon SR: Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979.61: 964-75, 61964  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Morgan CD; Henke JA; Bailey RW; and Kaufer H: Long-term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 546-9, 67546  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Said E; Hunka L; and Siller TN: Where ankle fusion stands today. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1978.60: 211-4, 60211  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Cheng YM; Lin SY; Tien YC; and Wu HS: Ankle arthrodesis. Kao Hsiung I Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsi Chih. ,1993.9: 524-31, 9524  1993 
     
    Corso SJ, and Zimmer TJ: Technique and clinical evaluation of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy,1995.11: 585-90, 11585  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen GS, and Mears DC: Arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joints. Clin Orthop,1991.268: 15-20, 26815  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Papa JA, and Myerson MS: Pantalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis of the ankle and hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1042-9, 741042  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Budiman-Mak E; Conrad KJ; and Roach KE: The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol,1991.44: 561-70, 44561  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Saag KG; Saltzman CL; Brown CK; and Budiman-Mak E: The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int,1996.17: 506-10, 17506  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL; Mueller C; Zwior-Maron K; and Hoffman RD: A primer on lower extremity outcome measurement instruments. Iowa Orthop J,1998.18: 101-11, 18101  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL, and el-Khoury GY: The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int,1995.16: 572-6, 16572  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Kellgren JH, and Moore R: Generalized osteoarthrosis and Heberden's nodes. Br Med J,1952.1: 181-7, 1181  1952  [PubMed]
     
    Hallock H: Arthrodesis of the ankle joint for old, painful fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1945.27: 49-58, 2749  1945 
     
    Jackson A, and Glasgow M: Tarsal hypermobility after ankle fusion-fact or fiction. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1979.61: 470-3, 61470  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Waters RL; Barnes G; Husserl T; Silver L; and Liss R: Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988.70: 1032-7, 701032  1988  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Figs. 1-A through 1-J A woman who sustained an open posterior fracture-dislocation of the right ankle in a motor-vehicle accident at the age of thirty-three years. Fig. 1-A Preoperative lateral radiograph showing no evidence of trauma to the subtalar joint.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:After d�bridement, open reduction and fixation was performed with threaded Steinmann pins; the medial malleolus was not reduced.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-C:After d�bridement, open reduction and fixation was performed with threaded Steinmann pins; the medial malleolus was not reduced.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-D:One year postoperatively, the patient had painful ankle osteoarthritis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-E:One year postoperatively, the patient had painful ankle osteoarthritis.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-F:The patient underwent an ankle arthrodesis with use of the Charnley compression technique with pins in the neck of the talus and tibia. There was no evidence of arthritis in the subtalar joint.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-G:The patient underwent an ankle arthrodesis with use of the Charnley compression technique with pins in the neck of the talus and tibia. There was no evidence of arthritis in the subtalar joint.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-H:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-I:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-J:Figs. 1-H, 1-I, and 1-J Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and a nonstanding Broden radiograph made twenty-one years postoperatively revealed severe osteoarthritis of the subtalar joint. The patient had a painful hindfoot and limitation in activities due to the pain.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Radiographic Grading of Osteoarthritis According to the Classification System of Kellgren and Moore23
    GradeClassificationDescription
    1NormalNo features of osteoarthritis
    2DoubtfulMinute osteophyte, doubtful importance
    3MinimalDefinite osteophyte, undiminished joint space
    4Moderate Moderate diminution of joint space
    5SevereJoint space greatly diminished with sclerosis of subchondral bone
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Data on the Ankles
    *MTP = metatarsophalangeal joint.
    CaseScore on Foot Function Index (points) Degenerative Changes According to the System of Kellgren and Moore23* (Ipsilateral Side/Contralateral Side) (points)
    Ipsilateral SideContralateral Side
    Activity LimitationFoot PainFoot DisabilityActivity LimitationFoot PainFoot DisabilityFirst MTPLesser MTPsTarso-metatarsalCalcaneo-cuboidNaviculo-cuneiformTalonavicularSubtalarMedial KneeLateral KneePatello-femoral
      1  23  36  51  0    0    03/11/14/14/14/14/25/22/22/12/2
      2    0  81  58  0  64  412/11/12/11/11/12/24/31/11/11/1
      3  14    4  11  0    0    01/11/13/23/13/23/25/12/11/11/2
      4  19  10  31  7  10  423/21/13/53/23/33/34/21/42/34/5
      5  66  89  80  0    0    01/11/14/22/12/13/13/11/11/12/2
      6  35  36  67  0    0    02/11/14/14/14/15/25/11/11/12/2
      7    0  50  17  0    0    01/11/13/22/12/12/24/12/21/12/2
      8  78  37  8378  37  834/31/13/13/13/24/24/21/11/13/3
      9  83  80  8983    0  334/22/15/23/24/35/25/22/35/25/3
    10  17    0  33  0    0    04/21/13/12/14/44/15/25/42/22/2
    11    8  35  49  8  35  492/21/11/13/23/33/34/31/11/11/1
    12  17  23  40  0    6    74/23/14/13/13/24/35/35/15/14/1
    13  35  35  73  0    0    03/42/24/24/13/14/25/22/41/42/3
    14  38  57  5930  45  473/21/15/34/15/14/25/12/11/12/2
    15  17  49  69  8  24  24-/3-/14/23/24/24/35/22/21/23/3
    16  31  42  58  0    0    01/11/13/23/23/24/34/21/42/23/3
    17  43  49  39  0    0    02/11/14/44/34/55/25/14/43/24/4
    18  17  28  12  0    0    03/-4/-5/-
    19  32  44  66  0  31    64/41/22/22/22/23/34/11/11/12/2
    20  17  57  4317    6    63/22/23/23/22/24/24/11/12/22/2
    21    1    0  22  1    0  224/41/32/3-/23/25/32/24/42/2
    22  14    0  22  0    0    03/11/13/11/-2/12/24/15/43/34/4
    23  14    3  22  0    0    04/31/11/11/13/23/12/32/22/2
    24  40  54  38  0    0    6
    Mean  27  38  47  10  11  152.8/2.01.2/1.23.2/1.92.9/1.53.0/2.03.6/2.24.4/1.72.1/2.22.0/1.82.5/2.4
    Standard deviation        22.4        25.9        23.3        22.9          18.2        22.51.1/1.10.5/0.51.1/1.10.9/0.61.1/1.10.9/0.60.7/0.81.4/1.31.3/1.01.1/1.0
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Grade of Osteoarthritis According to the System of Kellgren and Moore23
    JointNo. of Subjects with Moderate or Severe Osteoarthritis (Grade 4 or 5)No. of Subjects with No, Doubtful, or Minimal Osteoarthritis (Grade 1, 2, or 3)Total No. of Subjects with Adequate Radiographs
    Ipsilateral
      Subtalar21  223
      Talonavicular131023
      Calcaneocuboid  51621
      Naviculocuneiform  71421
      Tarsometatarsal  91322
      First metatarsophalangeal  71421
      Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints  02121
      Medial knee  41822
      Lateral knee  31922
      Patellofemoral  51722
    Contralateral
      Subtalar  02222
      Talonavicular  02222
      Calcaneocuboid  01919
      Naviculocuneiform  22022
      Tarsometatarsal  22022
      First metatarsophalangeal  31922
      Lesser metatarsophalangeal joints  02222
      Medial knee  61622
      Lateral knee  22022
      Patellofemoral  31922
    Helm R, and Stevens J: Long-term results of total ankle replacement. J Arthroplasty,1986.1: 271-7, 1271  1986  [PubMed]
     
    Kofoed H, and Lundberg-Jensen A: Ankle arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 50 years: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int,1999.20: 501-6, 20501  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL : Total ankle arthroplasty: state of the art. Instr Course Lect,1999.48: 263-8, 48263  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Callaghan JJ; Brand RA; and Pedersen DR: Hip arthrodesis. A long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 1328-35, 671328  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Sponseller PD; McBeath AA; and Perpich M: Hip arthrodesis in young patients. A long-term follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984.66: 853-9, 66853  1984  [PubMed]
     
    Albert E: Zur Resektion des Kniegelenkes. Wien Med. Press,1879.20: 705-8, 20705  1879 
     
    Ahlberg A, and Henricson AS: Late results of ankle fusion. Acta Orthop Scand ,1981.52: 103-5, 52103  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Bishop AT; Wood MB; and Sheetz KK: Arthrodesis of the ankle with a free vascularized autogenous bone graft. Reconstruction of segmental loss of bone secondary to osteomyelitis, tumor, or trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1995.77: 1867-75, 771867  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Boobbyer GN: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis. Acta Orthop Scand,1981.52: 107-10, 52107  1981  [PubMed]
     
    Buck P; Morrey BF; and Chao EYS: The optimum position of arthrodesis of the ankle. A gait study of the knee and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 1052-62, 691052  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Lynch AF; Bourne RB; and Rorabeck CH: The long-term results of ankle arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1988.70: 113-6, 70113  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Mazur JM; Schwartz E; and Simon SR: Ankle arthrodesis. Long-term follow-up with gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979.61: 964-75, 61964  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Morgan CD; Henke JA; Bailey RW; and Kaufer H: Long-term results of tibiotalar arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 546-9, 67546  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Said E; Hunka L; and Siller TN: Where ankle fusion stands today. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1978.60: 211-4, 60211  1978  [PubMed]
     
    Cheng YM; Lin SY; Tien YC; and Wu HS: Ankle arthrodesis. Kao Hsiung I Hsueh Ko Hsueh Tsi Chih. ,1993.9: 524-31, 9524  1993 
     
    Corso SJ, and Zimmer TJ: Technique and clinical evaluation of arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthroscopy,1995.11: 585-90, 11585  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen GS, and Mears DC: Arthrodesis of the ankle and subtalar joints. Clin Orthop,1991.268: 15-20, 26815  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Papa JA, and Myerson MS: Pantalar and tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for post-traumatic osteoarthrosis of the ankle and hindfoot. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1042-9, 741042  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Budiman-Mak E; Conrad KJ; and Roach KE: The Foot Function Index: a measure of foot pain and disability. J Clin Epidemiol,1991.44: 561-70, 44561  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Saag KG; Saltzman CL; Brown CK; and Budiman-Mak E: The Foot Function Index for measuring rheumatoid arthritis pain: evaluating side-to-side reliability. Foot Ankle Int,1996.17: 506-10, 17506  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL; Mueller C; Zwior-Maron K; and Hoffman RD: A primer on lower extremity outcome measurement instruments. Iowa Orthop J,1998.18: 101-11, 18101  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Saltzman CL, and el-Khoury GY: The hindfoot alignment view. Foot Ankle Int,1995.16: 572-6, 16572  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Kellgren JH, and Moore R: Generalized osteoarthrosis and Heberden's nodes. Br Med J,1952.1: 181-7, 1181  1952  [PubMed]
     
    Hallock H: Arthrodesis of the ankle joint for old, painful fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1945.27: 49-58, 2749  1945 
     
    Jackson A, and Glasgow M: Tarsal hypermobility after ankle fusion-fact or fiction. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1979.61: 470-3, 61470  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Waters RL; Barnes G; Husserl T; Silver L; and Liss R: Comparable energy expenditure after arthrodesis of the hip and ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988.70: 1032-7, 701032  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Medium- to long-term outcome of ankle arthrodesis.
    Foot & ankle international / American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society [and] Swiss Foot and Ankle Society: Issue date- 2011 Oct
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center