0
Articles   |    
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Interosseous Membrane of the Forearm
David W. Starch, MD; Eugene J. Dabezies, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas
David W. Starch, MD Eugene J. Dabezies, MD Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street, Lubbock, TX 79430. E-mail address for D. Starch: dstarch@bcm.tmc.edu.
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:235-235 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Diagnosis of damage to the interosseous membrane of the forearm after trauma is difficult. Patients with a proximal radial fracture and associated damage to the interosseous membrane may have wrist pain in association with subluxation or dislocation of the distal radioulnar joint. Accurate identification of injury to the interosseous membrane may allow better planning of surgical treatment.

Methods: T1 and T2-weighted magnetic resonance images that were made in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes were used to evaluate the interosseous membrane in the forearms of cadavera, volunteers, and patients. The images were evaluated subjectively by two orthopaedic surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist.

Results: The interosseous membrane was most consistently visualized on the axial images. Axial T2-weighted images showed the interosseous membrane clearly. The addition of fat-suppression techniques allowed abnormalities to be identified more accurately. Fast-spin-echo techniques were used to obtain data quickly and accurately.

Conclusions: The intact and disrupted interosseous membrane can be evaluated with use of magnetic resonance imaging. Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo images with fat suppression in the middle one-third of the forearm provide the most accurate information.

Figures in this Article
    The importance of the interosseous membrane in controlling proximal and distal migration of the radius and ulna has been demonstrated in studies of forearm injuries associated with radial head injury. Hotchkiss et al. showed that the central one-third of the interosseous membrane was responsible for 71% of the longitudinal stiffness of the forearm after removal of the radial head1. Patients who have a radial head fracture with disruption of the distal radioulnar joint and acute proximal migration of the radius, the so-called Essex-Lopresti lesion, consistently report wrist symptoms following isolated excision of the comminuted radial head2-5. Problems associated with late proximal migration of the radius also have been reported when the forearm is stabilized initially with a prosthetic radial head or with cross-pinning of the radius and ulna2,3,5. These problems are thought to develop secondary to disruption of the interosseous membrane at the time of the injury2,3,6. The need for more definitive information with which to guide the acute treatment of injuries involving the interosseous membrane was the stimulus for our investigation.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a volunteer. The interosseous membrane is intact.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a volunteer. The interosseous membrane is intact.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a patient, showing increased signal intensity in the volar musculature. The interosseous membrane is intact.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A and 4-B Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance images of the forearm of the patient who had an Essex-Lopresti lesion. Increased signal intensity is visible in the area of the interosseous membrane. There is disruption of the interosseous membrane near its radial attachment.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Figs. 4-A and 4-B Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance images of the forearm of the patient who had an Essex-Lopresti lesion. Increased signal intensity is visible in the area of the interosseous membrane. There is disruption of the interosseous membrane near its radial attachment.
    A magnetic resonance imaging machine (Signa Horizon-LX; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with echo speed gradients to 1.5 T was used to evaluate the forearms of cadavera, volunteers, and patients during the period from January through May 1998. A flex coil was utilized for imaging of the extremities. Fast-spin-echo techniques were used to obtain the images more quickly. The forearms of the cadavera and volunteers were held in supination as this position has been shown to increase tension in the interosseous membrane7. The injured patients were encouraged to hold the forearm in this position as tolerated. Full extension of the elbow with the arm by the side or extended above the head was the desired position for evaluation of the patients and volunteers.
    Axial, sagittal, and coronal images were used to evaluate eight forearms from fresh cadavera as well as four forearms of uninjured volunteers. T1 and T2-weighted images, with and without utilization of fat-suppression techniques for the T2-weighted images, were made in the three planes. After these initial evaluations, four of the cadaveric forearms underwent limited dissection with a scalpel to disrupt the central one-third of the interosseous membrane. The images were then repeated in the three planes with use of the previously described techniques.
    Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo images with fat suppression were used to evaluate the forearms of five patients who had forearm trauma and an associated fracture of the radial head. One of these patients had clinical and radiographic findings that were consistent with disruption of the distal radioulnar joint. Four of the five patients were able to tolerate nearly full extension of the elbow, without joint aspiration or lidocaine injection, with the arm by the side or extended above the head. The other patient could not tolerate extension of the elbow beyond 70 degrees even after the administration of pain medication; therefore, the forearm was positioned across the chest and the patient attempted to hold her breath during periods of imaging.
    All images were evaluated by two orthopaedic surgeons (D.W.S. and E.J.D.) and a musculoskeletal radiologist. The interosseous membrane was consistently identified on the axial images. The thicker, ligamentous portion could be differentiated from the thinner, membranous portions in cuts from the middle one-third of the forearm. The interosseous membrane was not clearly defined on the coronal and sagittal images.
    Axial T1-weighted images of the uninjured forearms of cadavera and volunteers showed the interosseous membrane as a dark line with crisp detail (Fig. 1Fig. 1). The simulated injuries in the four cadaveric specimens that had undergone limited dissection were also clearly visualized. Axial T2-weighted images demonstrated the intact and disrupted interosseous membranes clearly as well. The use of fat suppression more clearly delineated the areas of edema and injury in the trauma patients. Uninjured muscle tissue in the forearms of volunteers and patients demonstrated low signal intensity (Fig. 2Fig. 2), whereas areas of injury and edema were reflected by increased signal intensity.

    Patient Evaluation

    The magnetic resonance images for the patient who had held the forearm across the chest during periods of imaging could not be analyzed because of motion artifact. The images for three of the remaining four patients demonstrated increased signal intensity in the volar musculature but no evidence of an injury of the interosseous membrane (Fig. 3Fig. 3). The last patient, who had clinical findings that were consistent with an Essex-Lopresti lesion, had a comminuted radial head fracture with an associated fracture of the proximal one-third of the ulna. The images for this patient showed increased signal intensity, representing edema and hemorrhage, in the area of the interosseous membrane (Fig. 4-AFig. 4-A). There also was evidence of disruption of the ligamentous portion in the middle one-third of the forearm as indicated by discontinuity of the low-intensity signal (Fig. 4-BFig. 4-B). This patient was managed with replacement of the radial head with a polyethylene-and-metal prosthesis as well as plate fixation of the proximal ulnar fracture and eventually required a midshaft radioulnar arthrodesis because of pain and instability at the radiocapitellar joint. We were therefore unable to perform a follow-up investigation to assess the interosseous membrane.
    The interosseous membrane of the forearm has been shown to be an important structure to consider in cases of forearm trauma. Hotchkiss reported that magnetic resonance imaging could be used to demonstrate disruption of the interosseous membrane in patients with a forearm injury but commented that his experience was too limited to assess the full utility of the method3. Despite recent advances in the understanding of forearm injuries, we are not aware of any reports in the English-language literature that have demonstrated the most effective use of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the interosseous membrane after trauma. Other investigators have reported on the use of magnetic resonance imaging to assess the upper extremity in cadavera and uninjured volunteers7-10. Nakamura et al. used three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the biomechanics of the interosseous membrane10.
    We evaluated the forearms of cadavera, volunteers, and patients in order to identify the best magnetic resonance imaging technique for the evaluation of damage to the interosseous membrane. We found that axial images were much better than coronal and sagittal images for visualization of this structure. Both T1 and T2-weighted axial images demonstrated the intact and disrupted interosseous membrane well. Soft-tissue injury and edema were more easily identified as areas of increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images. The use of fat suppression decreased undesirable tissue signals. Fast-spin-echo techniques yielded clearer images by limiting distortion and allowed the images to be produced more quickly.
    The wrist pain that can develop following injury to the interosseous membrane of the forearm in patients with an associated radial head fracture is often unanticipated. Excision of a comminuted radial head in a patient who has associated instability of the distal radioulnar joint may result in proximal migration of the radius. Several treatment options are available in this situation, including reconstruction of the interosseous membrane3. None of the options has yet proved to be the treatment of choice. The need for more definitive information with which to guide the treatment of these complex injuries was the impetus for our study. We found that axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo images with fat suppression provided the best information.
    Hotchkiss RN; An KN; Sowa DT; Basta S; and Weiland AJ.: An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg [Am],1989.14(2 Pt 1): 256-61, 14(2 Pt 1)256  1989 
     
    Edwards GS Jr, and Jupiter JB.: Radial head fractures with acute distal radioulnar dislocation. Essex-Lopresti revisited. Clin Orthop,1988.234: 61-9, 23461  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Hotchkiss RN: Injuries to the interosseous ligament of the forearm. Hand Clin,1994.10: 391-8, 10391  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF; Chao EY; and Hui FC: Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979.61: 63-8, 6163  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Trousdale RT; Amadio PC; Cooney WP; and Morrey BF: Radio-ulnar dissociation. A review of twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1486-97, 741486  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Knight DJ; Rymaszewski LH; Amis AA; and Miller JH: Primary replacement of the fractured radial head with a metal prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993.75: 572-6, 75572  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Nakamura T; Yabe Y; and Horiuchi Y: In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J Hand Surg [Br],1999.24: 245-8, 24245  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Herzog RJ: Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Magn Reson Q,1993.9: 188-210, 9188  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Hodler J; Cotton A; Trudell D; and Resnick D: Magnetic resonance imaging of the forearm. Invest Radiology,1988.33: 6-11, 336  1988 
     
    Nakamura T; Yabe Y; Horiuchi Y; and Yamazaki N: Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of forearm: a new method using fuzzy reasoning. Magn Reson Imaging,1999.17: 463-70, 17463  1999  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Axial T1-weighted magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a volunteer. The interosseous membrane is intact.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2:Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a volunteer. The interosseous membrane is intact.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance image of the forearm of a patient, showing increased signal intensity in the volar musculature. The interosseous membrane is intact.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-A:Figs. 4-A and 4-B Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance images of the forearm of the patient who had an Essex-Lopresti lesion. Increased signal intensity is visible in the area of the interosseous membrane. There is disruption of the interosseous membrane near its radial attachment.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4-B:Figs. 4-A and 4-B Axial T2-weighted fast-spin-echo magnetic resonance images of the forearm of the patient who had an Essex-Lopresti lesion. Increased signal intensity is visible in the area of the interosseous membrane. There is disruption of the interosseous membrane near its radial attachment.
    Hotchkiss RN; An KN; Sowa DT; Basta S; and Weiland AJ.: An anatomic and mechanical study of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: pathomechanics of proximal migration of the radius. J Hand Surg [Am],1989.14(2 Pt 1): 256-61, 14(2 Pt 1)256  1989 
     
    Edwards GS Jr, and Jupiter JB.: Radial head fractures with acute distal radioulnar dislocation. Essex-Lopresti revisited. Clin Orthop,1988.234: 61-9, 23461  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Hotchkiss RN: Injuries to the interosseous ligament of the forearm. Hand Clin,1994.10: 391-8, 10391  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Morrey BF; Chao EY; and Hui FC: Biomechanical study of the elbow following excision of the radial head. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1979.61: 63-8, 6163  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Trousdale RT; Amadio PC; Cooney WP; and Morrey BF: Radio-ulnar dissociation. A review of twenty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1992.74: 1486-97, 741486  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Knight DJ; Rymaszewski LH; Amis AA; and Miller JH: Primary replacement of the fractured radial head with a metal prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1993.75: 572-6, 75572  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Nakamura T; Yabe Y; and Horiuchi Y: In vivo MR studies of dynamic changes in the interosseous membrane of the forearm during rotation. J Hand Surg [Br],1999.24: 245-8, 24245  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Herzog RJ: Magnetic resonance imaging of the elbow. Magn Reson Q,1993.9: 188-210, 9188  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Hodler J; Cotton A; Trudell D; and Resnick D: Magnetic resonance imaging of the forearm. Invest Radiology,1988.33: 6-11, 336  1988 
     
    Nakamura T; Yabe Y; Horiuchi Y; and Yamazaki N: Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging of the interosseous membrane of forearm: a new method using fuzzy reasoning. Magn Reson Imaging,1999.17: 463-70, 17463  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Sensibility following innervated free radial forearm flap for penile reconstruction.
    Plastic and reconstructive surgery: Issue date- 2011 Jan
    Biomechanical evaluation of braces used for the treatment of epicondylitis.
    Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery / American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons ... [et al.]: Issue date- 2002 May-Jun
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center