0
Articles   |    
Loosening and Osteolysis with the Press-Fit Condylar Posterior-Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Replacement
Stephen A. Mikulak, MD; Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD; Mylene A. delaRosa, BS; Thomas P. Schmalzried, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, Los Angeles, California
Stephen A. Mikulak, MD Ormonde M. Mahoney, MD Mylene A. dela Rosa, BS Thomas P. Schmalzried, MD Joint Replacement Institute at Orthopaedic Hospital, 2400 South Flower Street, Los Angeles, CA 90007
One or more of the authors has received or will receive benefits for personal or professional use from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. Funds were received in total or partial support of the research or clinical study presented in this article. The funding source was the Los Angeles Orthopaedic Foundation.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:398-398 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Aseptic loosening and osteolysis are rarely associated with cemented posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements. Consequently, there is a paucity of information on this topic.

Methods: After a mean follow-up interval of fifty-six months (range, thirty-seven to eighty-nine months), sixteen (2.9%) of 557 posterior-cruciate-substituting primary total knee replacements were revised by a single surgeon because of loosening and osteolysis. Clinical, radiographic, and retrieval analyses were conducted to determine the mechanism of loosening and to identify associated risk factors.

Results: All sixteen knees (fifteen patients) were rated as good or excellent at one year after the primary replacement, with mean clinical and functional Knee Society scores of 95 and 86 points, respectively. Nine of the fifteen patients who had a revision because of loosening and osteolysis had had a total knee arthroplasty on the contralateral side compared with only 18% of the patients who did not have a revision (p = 0.026). No evidence of transmission of substantial anteroposterior stresses from the posterior-cruciate-substituting mechanism was found. All twelve retrieved knee implants, however, had damage to the lateral and medial side walls of the polyethylene posterior-cruciate-substituting post. Damage to the inferior surface of the polyethylene inserts had a rotational pattern, with the axis of rotation in the medial compartment. Surface damage in a rotational pattern was also present on the superior and inferior surfaces of the titanium tibial base-plates.

Conclusions: In the knees in our study, rotational forces were generated by impingement of the side walls of the intercondylar box on the polyethylene post. Such box-post impingement can occur throughout the range of motion. Rotational stresses are transmitted to the modular interfaces and to the metal-cement interfaces, resulting in loosening and osteolysis. A reduction in rotational constraint would be desirable. Patients with bilateral total knee replacement may be at increased risk for this type of loosening.

Figures in this Article
    When total knee components with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design were introduced, there was ­concern that the cam-and-post posterior-cruciate-substituting mechanism would transmit anteroposterior sheer stresses to the cement-bone interfaces and cause loosening. Sub­sequent clinical experience with posterior-cruciate-sub­stituting total knee replacement designs has produced good or excellent clinical and functional results1-6. Few knees fail to achieve 90° of flexion7. Aseptic loosening of cemented posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements has been rarely reported8,9, and in several studies with follow-up intervals of five to ten years there was no aseptic loosening1-6. Because of low rates of wear, osteolysis, and loosening1-4,6, posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements are currently being used more frequently in younger, more active patients. With patients making higher demands on the knee replacements and with longer durations of follow-up, aseptic loosening may become more common.
    Because of the low prevalence of failure, there is a paucity of information regarding the mechanism or mechanisms of loosening of posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements. In the present study, we performed an analysis of sixteen posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements that were revised because of aseptic loosening and osteolysis. The goal was to determine, through a review of the clinical history, radiographic analysis, and implant retrieval analysis, the factors that predispose or contribute to aseptic loosening and osteolysis.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Fig. 1-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the knee, made in the early postoperative period.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Fig. 1-B Anteroposterior radiograph made before revision. The tibial component is grossly loose and in a more varus position. Lucencies at the metal-cement interface indicate loosening at that interface (large arrow). Osteolysis is evident peripherally under the plateau and distally (small arrows).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C Surface damage on the tibial cruciate-substituti­ng polyethylene post. Fig. 2-A Variable burnishing (thin arrow) of the side wall of the post and an anteromedial groove (thick arrow), both resulting from repetitive contact with the inner walls of the femoral component.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Fig. 2-B Anterior groove (arrow) on the post, resulting from impingement on the femoral component with extesnsion.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C:Fig. 2-C Anterior view of articulated femoral and tibial components in midflexion, showing box-post impingement. As the tibia rotates externally relative to the femur, the inferior aspect of the femoral box impinges on the side wall of the polyethylene post, resulting in surface damage to the post. The superior aspect of the post makes asymmetric contact with the roof of the box, resulting in additional damage.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Photographs of inserts, showing a rotational pattern of back-side wear. Fig. 3-A Inferior surface of the retrieved tibial polyethylene insert. The thick arrow points to the radial lateral scratching, and the thin arrow points to the medial burnishing, indicating rotation about this axis in the medial compartment.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Rotational scratches on the titanium tibial base-plate. Note the cement particles scattered over the surface.
    From July 20, 1989, to October 14, 1994, 557 consecutive total knee arthroplasties were performed in 467 patients by a single surgeon (O.M.M.). The press-fit condylar modular total knee prosthesis with a posterior-cruciate-substituting design (PFC; Johnson and Johnson Orthopaedics, Raynham, Massachusetts) was used in all knees. All components were implanted with vacuum-mixed bone cement (Simplex P; Howmedica, Rutherford, New Jersey), with the exception of eighty-three porous-coated femoral components that were implanted without cement. All patellae were resurfaced with an all-polyethylene dome-shaped component implanted with bone cement.
    The patients were treated with a standardized protocol. Thirty-six-inch (91-cm) radiographs of the lower extremity were used in preoperative planning in order to establish a ­neutral mechanical axis in the frontal plane10. A subvastus approach was used in all patients. Intramedullary femoral and extramedullary tibial alignment guides were utilized. Soft-tissue releases were performed as necessary. The cement was in a doughy state when it was pressurized into bone. No cement was applied to any prosthetic surface except the posterior condyles of the femoral component. The postoperative regimen consisted of continuous passive motion that was started in the recovery room, with gait-training beginning on the first postoperative day and weight-bearing increased as tolerated.
    At a mean of fifty-six months (range, thirty-seven to eighty-nine months), twenty-two (3.9%) of the 557 primary knee arthroplasties had been revised. Four (0.7%) were revised because of infection; two (0.4%), because of a supracondylar femoral fracture; and sixteen (2.9%), because of aseptic loosening and osteolysis. The sixteen knee replacements (fifteen patients) that were revised because of aseptic loosening and osteolysis are the subject of this report.
    The preoperative clinical and functional Knee Society scores11 for these sixteen knees were a mean of 37 points (range, 15 to 53 points) and 47 points (range, 30 to 55 points), respectively. The postoperative activity level was quantified with use of the method of Zahiri et al.12. Standing anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and patellar skyline radiographs were assessed for alignment and for radiolucencies, according to the system described by Ewald13, preoperatively, at one year after the index arthroplasty, and immediately prior to the revision surgery.
    Retrieved implants were inspected for surface damage14. Damage to the tibial cruciate-substituting polyethylene post was specifically assessed. The top of the post as well as the ­anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral faces were analyzed ­separately. Four polyethylene implants were inadvertently discarded by the hospital pathology department. The change in the minimum thickness of the medial and lateral condylar surfaces of the polyethylene inserts was defined as the dif­ference between the nominal minimum thickness of the as-manufactured component and that of the retrieved implant as measured with vernier calipers and calculated as the mean of three measurements of each condylar surface15. The nominal minimum thickness of the polyethylene inserts used for the primary total knee arthroplasties ranged from 6 to 13 mm. The mean length of time between sterilization of the polyethylene insert and implantation, the so-called shelf life, was 7.2 months (range, 0.9 to 35.9 months).
    Prepared tissue samples from osteolytic regions of the knee that had been obtained intraoperatively and stained with hematoxylin and eosin were examined under plain and polarized light microscopy for evidence of inflammation, barium sulfate crystals from the bone cement, and metal and polyethylene particles16.
    Given the small sample size, statistical analysis for regression was performed with the Spearman nonparametric correlation, rather than the Pearson product-moment correlation, for putative related phenomena.

    Clinical Findings

    The study population consisted of eight women and seven men, with a mean age of sixty-five years (range, forty-six to eighty years). All sixteen knees had good or excellent function at one year after the primary total knee arthroplasty. The mean Knee Society clinical and functional scores at that time had increased to 95 and 86 points, respectively, from preoperative means of 37 and 47 points. The mean activity score was 5.2 points (range, 1 to 9 points). All but one knee had synovitis between two months and three years prior to the radiographic appearance of loosening or osteolysis. Prior to revision, the mean clinical and functional scores had declined to 48 and 45 points, respectively.
    The percentage of patients who had had a total knee arthroplasty on the contralateral side was significantly greater in the group that had had a revision because of loosening and osteolysis (nine of fifteen patients) than in the group that did not have a revision (eighty-two [18%] of 452 patients) (Fisher exact test for independence, p = 0.026). The percentage of patients who had had bilateral primary total knee arthroplasty under the same anesthetic was also significantly greater in the group that had had a revision because of loosening and osteolysis (five of fifteen) than in the group that did not have a revision (thirty [7%] of 452) (Fisher exact test for independence, p = 0.045).
    Two knees had isolated loosening of the tibial component with osteolysis, three had isolated loosening of the femoral component with osteolysis, six had loosening of the tibial and femoral components with osteolysis, three had loosening of the femoral component with osteolysis around a well-fixed tibial component, and two had loosening of the tibial component with osteolysis around a well-fixed femoral component. No knee had loosening of, or osteolysis associated with, the patellar component.

    Radiographic Findings

    The mean coronal alignment (anatomic axis) preoperatively, following the primary total knee arthroplasty, and immediately prior to the revision total knee arthroplasty was 0°, 3° of valgus, and 3° of varus, respectively. There was a mean 6° progression into varus (range, 1° of valgus movement to 15° of varus movement) postoperatively (Figs. 1-A and 1-B). The femoral component demonstrated the greatest amount of movement into varus, from a mean of 5° of valgus to a mean of 1° of valgus. The tibial component averaged 1.5° of varus change postoperatively (from a mean of 1.5° to a mean of 3° of varus). Although there were individual changes in femoral component flexion and tibial component slope, there was no trend and the mean for the group was unchanged.
    The mean scores for radiolucent lines seen around the femoral component on the lateral radiograph, around the tibial component on the anteroposterior radiograph, and around the tibial component on the lateral radiograph increased from 2.0, 1.6, and 0.4, respectively, at one year postoperatively to 8.9, 10.6, and 7.7, respectively, just prior to revision. The highest scores were found consistently in the peripheral zones. According to linear regression analysis, the anterior and posterior ­peripheral femoral zones demonstrated significantly higher scores for radiolucent lines than did the combined internal zones (p = 0.004), and the medial and lateral tibial peripheral zones had significantly higher scores for radiolucent lines than did the internal zones (p < 0.001).

    Revision

    The femoral component had been inserted without cement in three of the sixteen knees that had had a revision because of loosening and in eighty (14.8%) of the 541 knees that had no loosening (p > 0.05). Loose components (nine femoral and ten tibial) that had been inserted with cement were easily removed by hand from the cement mantle, indicating loosening at the metal-cement interface. All knees had as much as 2 mm of gross motion of the polyethylene insert in the tibial tray.

    Retrieval

    In six of the twelve retrieved polyethylene inserts, the machine marks on the posterior aspect of the polyethylene post had been preserved, indicating a lack of substantial or repetitive contact between the tibial post and the femoral cam of the posterior-cruciate-substituting mechanism. There was no apparent relationship between wear on the posterior aspect of the post and the range of motion of that knee (r = 0.02), the tibial slope (r = 0.2), or femoral flexion (r = 0.15).
    All twelve inserts had burnishing of both the medial and lateral side walls; the burnishing was always present at the base, with a variable degree of burnishing over the remainder of the side wall (Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C). In ten knees, the polyethylene post of the insert had grooves of variable depth, associated with burnishing and delamination, at the anteromedial and anterolateral edges. A horizontal burnished groove across the anteroinferior aspect of the polyethylene post was seen in nine of the twelve inserts.
    The superior aspect of the polyethylene post had beveled corners on the medial side in ten components and on the lateral side in eight components. With as little as a 1-mm reduction in the nominal thickness of the tibial condylar surfaces, the top of the polyethylene post impinged on the roof of the femoral box. An asymmetric loss of material from the top of the post reflects asymmetric loading and condylar wear, rotation, or lift-off17, or a combination of these factors.
    The change in the minimum thickness of the twelve retrieved components was greater on the medial side (mean, 1.4 mm; range, 0.7 to 2.4 mm) than on the lateral side (mean, 0.7 mm; range, 0.5 to 1.6 mm) (p = 0.001, paired t test). The change in the minimum polyethylene thickness on the medial side was correlated with that on the lateral side (r = 0.69, p < 0.05). The change on the medial side was correlated with the size of the component (r = 0.58, p = 0.049) but not with the thickness. The mean rate of change in the minimum polyethylene thickness of 0.30 mm/yr on the medial side was significantly greater than that of 0.16 mm/yr on the lateral side (p = 0.001, paired t test).
    With the numbers available, the time in situ was not correlated with a reduction in the minimum polyethylene thickness. The body weight of the patient was mildly related to the change in the minimum thickness (r = 0.52, p = 0.08). A reduction in the minimum thickness on the medial side was correlated with patient activity (r = 0.67, p = 0.017). A younger age and greater height both were correlated with wear on the medial side (r = 0.64 and 0.58, respectively, p < 0.05). The shelf life of the tibial insert was moderately correlated with the reduction in the minimum thickness on the medial side (r = 0.55, p = 0.067).
    A rotational pattern of scratching and burnishing on the inferior polyethylene surfaces, the so-called back side, was seen on all twelve inserts. Longer scratches were present laterally, with the rotational axis offset into the medial compartment (Figs. 3-A and 3-B). A similar pattern of scratching and burnishing was seen on the superior surface of the titanium-alloy tibial base-plates. A rotational pattern of surface damage also was seen on the inferior surfaces and keels of the tibial base-plates.
    The present analysis did not reveal evidence of transmission of substantial anteroposterior stresses from the posterior-cruciate-substituting mechanism. On the contrary, six of the twelve retrieved tibial components demonstrated little, if any, evidence of cam-post engagement, despite a good range of motion. Of the six specimens that demonstrated wear of the pos­terior aspect of the tibial polyethylene post, none had an anteroposterior pattern of any type of surface damage on the ­inferior surface of the tibial insert or on the superior or inferior aspect of the tibial tray. This finding is consistent with the design principle of the posterior-cruciate-substituting knee: the vector sum of the tibiofemoral forces and the cam-post forces is compression into the tibia18.
    All twelve retrieved components had evidence of damage to the anterolateral and anteromedial aspects of the posterior-cruciate-substituting post as well as to the bases of the side walls of the post. The damage to the inferior surface of the polyethylene inserts consistently had a rotational pattern, with the axis of rotation in the medial compartment. Surface damage due to relative rotational motion was also found on the superior and inferior surfaces of the titanium tibial trays. These observations indicated that rotational stresses can be transmitted to the modular interfaces and to the metal-cement­ interfaces. These stresses result in relative motion, mode-4 wear (that is, wear particles generated from two surfaces that are not the primary or intended bearing surfaces)19, progressive loosening, and osteolysis.
    With this design, rotational forces were generated by impingement of the side walls of the intercondylar box on the polyethylene post. This box-post impingement can occur throughout the range of motion. The top of the polyethylene post can also impinge on the roof of the box. Even without rotation, with reduction in the tibial condylar polyethylene surfaces due to wear, the top of the polyethylene post can contact the roof of the intercondylar box.
    Normal tibiofemoral rotation encompasses approximately 5° of internal rotation at heel-strike and toe-off and approximately 9° of external rotation during swing phase. The screw-home motion has been described as relative external rotation of the tibia during terminal extension20. It has been shown that some posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements have altered kinematics, demonstrating a negative screw-home movement in approximately half of the knees in one study17. As much as 12° each of internal and external rotation have been shown to occur during level walking and stair-climbing, most commonly at flexion angles of 0° to 40°. Up to 15° of external rotation has been demonstrated following total knee replacement21.
    The present retrieval analysis indicated that a reduction in the rotational constraint caused by the design of the box-post mechanism would be desirable. However, considering the low prevalence of loosening, the rotation allowed may be sufficient in the majority of knees. This type of rotational constraint could be reduced by modifications in the design of the polyethylene post or the femoral box, or both. The design of the roof of the femoral box, whether metal or bone, should allow several millimeters of clearance throughout the entire range of motion in order to accommodate reductions in the thickness of the tibial condylar surfaces that can occur as a result of normal use and wear.
    Patients with bilateral total knee replacement appear to be at greater risk (p = 0.026) for rotational loosening and osteolysis than are patients with a unilateral total knee replacement. This finding warrants additional investigation, as there is no precedent or obvious explanation as to why these patients would be at greater risk. Fourteen of the sixteen knees had progression into varus. In nine of them, the varus mechanical axis was incompletely corrected, but seven knees were well aligned. Varus malalignment could facilitate box-post impingement; however, the same types of surface damage due to rotational stresses were present in the well-aligned knees.
    Rotational malalignment may play a role in the loosening of these and other total knee replacements. The rotational positions of the components, relative to each other and to the patient’s bone and soft-tissue anatomy, are an important consideration in total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, these relationships are difficult to assess on physical examination and with plain radiographs. Even computerized tomography has limited value because the scan is static while the rotational relationships are dynamic.
    As has been described for the femoral component of total hip arthroplasties, loosening at the metal-cement inter­face22, so-called debonding23,24, was seen in the sixteen total knee replacements in our study. Although the benefit of maintaining the metal-cement bond in total hip replacement has been debated, maintaining this bond in total knee replacement is desirable. Attention should be given to the preparation of the cement-prosthesis interface. In the present series, the prosthesis was inserted into the cement when it was in a doughy state. The metal-cement bond appears to be strongest when the cement is applied to the implant in a low-viscosity state, soon after mixing25.
    Wear between the modular tibial polyethylene and the base-plate, so-called back-side wear, was observed in all knees. Damage was also seen on the inferior surface of the base-plates. Factors that contribute to this type of mode-4 wear19 include relative motion, contact area, and wear characteristics of the apposed materials26. The retrieved components had evidence of relative motion of approximately 2 mm, which is an order of magnitude greater than that reported in studies involving in vitro testing27; however, such laboratory tests have not reproduced the complex in vivo loading indicated by the present retrieval analysis. Compared with cobalt-chromium alloys, titanium alloys have lower hardness; thus, the surface is more easily damaged and less wear resistant19,28,29. In order to minimize mode-4 wear in modular, cemented total knee replacements, use of locking mechanisms that minimize relative motion during off-axis loading and base-plates made of harder materials, such as cobalt-chromium alloys, is desirable.
    In summary, loosening and osteolysis are rarely asso­ciated with cemented posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacements. In the knees in the present study, we found no ­evidence that anteroposterior shear forces from the posterior-cruciate-substituting mechanism contributed to failure. Our findings indicate that loosening was a result of the transmission of tibiofemoral rotational stresses to the modular interfaces and to the metal-cement interfaces. With this design, the primary source of the rotational stress was box-post impingement. A reduction in rotational constraint would be desirable.
    Note: The authors thank Frederick J. Dorey, PhD, for his assistance in the statistical analysis of these data.
    Colizza WA; Insall JN; and Scuderi GR : The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 1713-20, 771713  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Diduch DR; Insall JN; Scott WN; Scuderi GR; and Font-Rodriguez D : Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. ,1997.79: 575-82, 79575  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Martin SD; McManus JL; Scott RD; and Thornhill TS: Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty,1997.12: 603-14, 12603  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Ranawat CS; Luessenhop CP; and Rodriguez JA: The press-fit condylar modular total knee system. Four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substitutin­g design. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1997.79: 342-8, 79342  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Ries MD; Guiney W Jr; and Lynch F: Osteolysis associated with cemented total knee arthroplasty. A case report. J Arthroplasty ,1994.9: 555-8, 9555  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Schai PA; Thornhill TS; and Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1998.80: 850-8, 80850  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hirsch HS; Lotke PA; and Morrison LD: The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute. Clin Orthop,1994.309: 64-8, 30964  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Duffy GP; Berry DJ; and Rand JA: Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1998.356: 66-72, 35666  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hirakawa K; Bauer TW; Stulberg BN; Wilde AH; and Borden LS: Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin Orthop,1996.331: 151-8, 331151  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Moreland JR; Bassett LW; and Hanker GJ: Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 745-9, 69745  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Dorr LD; Scott RD; and Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 13-4, 24813  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Zahiri CA; Schmalzried TP; Szuszczewicz ES; and Amstutz HC: Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty,1998.13: 890-5, 13890  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Ewald FC: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 9-12, 2489  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Hood RW; Wright TM; and Burstein AH: Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res,1983.17: 829-42, 17829  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Argenson JN, and O’Connor JJ: Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br ,1992.74: 228-32, 74228  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Mirra JM; Marder RA; and Amstutz HC : The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1982.170: 175-83, 170175  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Stiehl JB; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; and Crane HS : In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty,1999.14: 293-9, 14293  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Lachiewicz PF; and Burstein AH: The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1982.64: 1317-23, 641317  1982  [PubMed]
     
    McKellop HA; Sarmiento A; Schwinn CP; and Ebramzadeh E: In vivo wear of ­titanium-alloy hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990.72: 512-7, 72512  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Lafortune MA; Cavanagh PR; Sommer HJ 3d; and Kalenak A : Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomech,1992.25: 347-57, 25347  1992  [PubMed]
     
    el Nahass B; Madson MM; and Walker PS: Motion of the knee after condylar resurfacing—an in vivo study. J Biomech,1991.24: 1107-17, 241107  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen TA; McNeice GM; and Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop,1979.141: 17-27, 14117  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Jasty M; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Haire T; and Harris WH : Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990.72: 1220-9, 721220  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Maloney WJ; Jasty M; Rosenberg A; and Harris WH. : Bone lysis in well-fixed femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1990.72: 966-70, 72966  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Shepard MF; Kabo JM; and Lieberman JR: Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components. Clin Orthop,2000.381: 26-35, 38126  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Schmalzried TP, and Callaghan JJ: Current concepts review. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999.81: 115-36, 81115  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Parks NL; Engh GA; Topoleski LD; and Emperado J. : Modular tibial insert micromotion. A concern with contemporary knee implants. Clin Orthop,1998.356: 10-5, 35610  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Lombardi AV Jr; Mallory TH; Vaughn BK,; and Drouillard P: Aseptic loosening in tota­l hip arthroplasty secondary to osteolysis induced by wear debris from titaniu­m-alloy femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1989.71: 1337-42, 711337  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Nasser S; Campbell PA; Kilgus D; Kossovsky N; and Amstutz HC: Cementless total joint arthroplasty prostheses with titanium-alloy articular surfaces. A human retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop,1990.261: 171-85, 261171  1990  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-A:Fig. 1-A Anteroposterior radiograph of the knee, made in the early postoperative period.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1-B:Fig. 1-B Anteroposterior radiograph made before revision. The tibial component is grossly loose and in a more varus position. Lucencies at the metal-cement interface indicate loosening at that interface (large arrow). Osteolysis is evident peripherally under the plateau and distally (small arrows).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Figs. 2-A, 2-B, and 2-C Surface damage on the tibial cruciate-substituti­ng polyethylene post. Fig. 2-A Variable burnishing (thin arrow) of the side wall of the post and an anteromedial groove (thick arrow), both resulting from repetitive contact with the inner walls of the femoral component.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Fig. 2-B Anterior groove (arrow) on the post, resulting from impingement on the femoral component with extesnsion.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-C:Fig. 2-C Anterior view of articulated femoral and tibial components in midflexion, showing box-post impingement. As the tibia rotates externally relative to the femur, the inferior aspect of the femoral box impinges on the side wall of the polyethylene post, resulting in surface damage to the post. The superior aspect of the post makes asymmetric contact with the roof of the box, resulting in additional damage.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-A:Figs. 3-A and 3-B Photographs of inserts, showing a rotational pattern of back-side wear. Fig. 3-A Inferior surface of the retrieved tibial polyethylene insert. The thick arrow points to the radial lateral scratching, and the thin arrow points to the medial burnishing, indicating rotation about this axis in the medial compartment.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3-B:Rotational scratches on the titanium tibial base-plate. Note the cement particles scattered over the surface.
    Colizza WA; Insall JN; and Scuderi GR : The posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis. Assessment of polyethylene damage and osteolysis after a ten-year-minimum follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 1713-20, 771713  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Diduch DR; Insall JN; Scott WN; Scuderi GR; and Font-Rodriguez D : Total knee replacement in young, active patients. Long-term follow-up and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. ,1997.79: 575-82, 79575  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Martin SD; McManus JL; Scott RD; and Thornhill TS: Press-fit condylar total knee arthroplasty. 5- to 9-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty,1997.12: 603-14, 12603  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Ranawat CS; Luessenhop CP; and Rodriguez JA: The press-fit condylar modular total knee system. Four-to-six-year results with a posterior-cruciate-substitutin­g design. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1997.79: 342-8, 79342  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Ries MD; Guiney W Jr; and Lynch F: Osteolysis associated with cemented total knee arthroplasty. A case report. J Arthroplasty ,1994.9: 555-8, 9555  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Schai PA; Thornhill TS; and Scott RD: Total knee arthroplasty with the PFC system. Results at a minimum of ten years and survivorship analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1998.80: 850-8, 80850  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hirsch HS; Lotke PA; and Morrison LD: The posterior cruciate ligament in total knee surgery. Save, sacrifice, or substitute. Clin Orthop,1994.309: 64-8, 30964  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Duffy GP; Berry DJ; and Rand JA: Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1998.356: 66-72, 35666  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Hirakawa K; Bauer TW; Stulberg BN; Wilde AH; and Borden LS: Characterization of debris adjacent to failed knee implants of 3 different designs. Clin Orthop,1996.331: 151-8, 331151  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Moreland JR; Bassett LW; and Hanker GJ: Radiographic analysis of the axial alignment of the lower extremity. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987.69: 745-9, 69745  1987  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Dorr LD; Scott RD; and Scott WN: Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 13-4, 24813  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Zahiri CA; Schmalzried TP; Szuszczewicz ES; and Amstutz HC: Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty,1998.13: 890-5, 13890  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Ewald FC: The Knee Society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop,1989.248: 9-12, 2489  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Hood RW; Wright TM; and Burstein AH: Retrieval analysis of total knee prostheses: a method and its application to 48 total condylar prostheses. J Biomed Mater Res,1983.17: 829-42, 17829  1983  [PubMed]
     
    Argenson JN, and O’Connor JJ: Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br ,1992.74: 228-32, 74228  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Mirra JM; Marder RA; and Amstutz HC : The pathology of failed total joint arthroplasty. Clin Orthop,1982.170: 175-83, 170175  1982  [PubMed]
     
    Stiehl JB; Dennis DA; Komistek RD; and Crane HS : In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty,1999.14: 293-9, 14293  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Insall JN; Lachiewicz PF; and Burstein AH: The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1982.64: 1317-23, 641317  1982  [PubMed]
     
    McKellop HA; Sarmiento A; Schwinn CP; and Ebramzadeh E: In vivo wear of ­titanium-alloy hip prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990.72: 512-7, 72512  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Lafortune MA; Cavanagh PR; Sommer HJ 3d; and Kalenak A : Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking. J Biomech,1992.25: 347-57, 25347  1992  [PubMed]
     
    el Nahass B; Madson MM; and Walker PS: Motion of the knee after condylar resurfacing—an in vivo study. J Biomech,1991.24: 1107-17, 241107  1991  [PubMed]
     
    Gruen TA; McNeice GM; and Amstutz HC: "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop,1979.141: 17-27, 14117  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Jasty M; Maloney WJ; Bragdon CR; Haire T; and Harris WH : Histomorphological studies of the long-term skeletal responses to well fixed cemented femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990.72: 1220-9, 721220  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Maloney WJ; Jasty M; Rosenberg A; and Harris WH. : Bone lysis in well-fixed femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1990.72: 966-70, 72966  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Shepard MF; Kabo JM; and Lieberman JR: Influence of cement technique on the interface strength of femoral components. Clin Orthop,2000.381: 26-35, 38126  2000  [PubMed]
     
    Schmalzried TP, and Callaghan JJ: Current concepts review. Wear in total hip and knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999.81: 115-36, 81115  1999  [PubMed]
     
    Parks NL; Engh GA; Topoleski LD; and Emperado J. : Modular tibial insert micromotion. A concern with contemporary knee implants. Clin Orthop,1998.356: 10-5, 35610  1998  [PubMed]
     
    Lombardi AV Jr; Mallory TH; Vaughn BK,; and Drouillard P: Aseptic loosening in tota­l hip arthroplasty secondary to osteolysis induced by wear debris from titaniu­m-alloy femoral heads. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1989.71: 1337-42, 711337  1989  [PubMed]
     
    Nasser S; Campbell PA; Kilgus D; Kossovsky N; and Amstutz HC: Cementless total joint arthroplasty prostheses with titanium-alloy articular surfaces. A human retrieval analysis. Clin Orthop,1990.261: 171-85, 261171  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center