0
Instructional Course Lecture   |    
Periacetabular Osteotomy: the Bernese Experience
Klaus A Siebenrock, MD; Michael Leunig, MD; Reinhold Ganz, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Klaus A. Siebenrock, MD Michael Leunig, MD Reinhold Ganz, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Bern, Inselspital, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland. E-mail address for K.A. Siebenrock: klaus.siebenrock@insel.ch. E-mail address for M. Leunig: michael.leunig@insel.ch. E-mail address for R. Ganz: reinhold.ganz@insel.ch
Printed with permission of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This article, as well as other lectures presented at the Academy’s Annual Meeting, will be available in March 2001 in Instructional Course Lectures, Volume 50. The complete volume can be ordered online at www.aaos.org, or by calling 800-626-6726 (8 a.m.-5 p.m., Central time).
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:449-449 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
The first periacetabular osteotomy was performed in April 1984. More than 700 osteotomies have been performed since then at our institute. Increasing experience over the years has resulted in the addition of several new aspects with respect to patient assessment, indications for surgery, surgical exposure, and evaluation of acetabular reorientation. Some of the issues have been addressed in previous reports and will now be correlated with our recently published results of the first seventy-five periacetabular osteotomies1,2.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-A:Anteroposterior radiograph showing symptomatic bilateral hip dysplasia with femoral head subluxation in a seventeen-year-old girl.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-B:False-profile radiograph of the left hip, showing severely deficient anterior coverage.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-C:Anteroposterior pelvic (Fig. 1-C) and false-profile (Fig. 1-D) radiographs made eleven and one-half and nine years after surgery with an excellent clinical result on both sides.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-D:Anteroposterior pelvic (Fig. 1-C) and false-profile (Fig. 1-D) radiographs made eleven and one-half and nine years after surgery with an excellent clinical result on both sides.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Previous Operations on Twenty-three Affected Hip Joints
Previous OperationNo. of Hip Joints
Intertrochanteric osteotomy9
Combined pelvic and intertrochanteric osteotomies8
Pelvic osteotomy4
Shelfplasty and intertrochanteric osteotomy2
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Overview of Scoring System of Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7*
*The result is rated as good or excellent when the total score is 15 to 18 points; fair when it is 12, 13, or 14 points; and poor when it is less than 12 points.
PointsPainRange of MotionWalking Ability
6NoneFlexion > 90º, normal abductionNormal
5OccasionalFlexion = 80-90º, abduction > 15ºSlight limp
4Disappears on restFlexion = 60-80º, can reach footShort distance without cane
3Limits activityFlexion = 40-60ºPermanent use of 1 cane
2Prevents activityFlexion < 40º 2 canes
1Night painAnkylosis, good hip position2 crutches
0Permanent intenseAnkylosis, bad hip positionNone
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Radiographic Parameters on Preoperative and Immediate Postoperative Radiographs in Sixty-six Hips
ParameterPreoperativePostoperative
Lateral center-edge angle (degrees)?6 (-24 to +25)34 (10 to 55)
Anterior center-edge angle (degrees)?4 (-20 to +24)26 (12 to 50)
Acetabular index (degrees)26 (12 to 50)?6 (-15 to +18)
Lateralization (mm)16 (6 to 30)10 (-9 to +24)
Shenton line intact (no. of hips)26 (39%)41 (62%)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Preoperative and Postoperative Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7 Scores in Fifty-eight Preserved Hips
*The score was significantly different from the preoperative score (p < 0.0001).
Preoperative (points)Postoperative (points)
Total14.6 (7 to 17)16.3* (12 to 18)
Pain?3.9 (2 to 5)?5.3* (3 to 6)
Walking ability?4.9 (1 to 6)?5.6* (4 to 6)
Range of motion?5.8 (4 to 6)?5.4 (3 to 6)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE V:  Grades of Osteoarthritis According to Tönnis System6*
*The values are given as the number of hips. †Three hips with incomplete radiographs are not included. ‡Two hips with incomplete radiographs are not included. §Before the osteotomy.
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Preserved hip joints (n = 55†)
Preoperative27 (49%)19 (35%)7 (13%)2 (4%)
Last follow-up18 (33%)26 (47%)8 (15%)3 (5%)
Replaced hip joints (n = 11‡)
Preoperative§1 (9%)?4 (36%)6 (55%)
The first seventy-five periacetabular osteotomies were performed in sixty-three patients between April 1984 and December 1987. The male:female ratio was 1:3.4, and the average age was 29.3 years (range, thirteen to fifty-six years). An underlying neurological disease was found in six hip joints, a posttraumatic acetabular deficiency was found in two, and a proximal femoral focal dysplasia was seen in another two. Twenty-three hip joints (31 percent) had undergone previous surgery because of dysplasia (Table I). Thirty-seven hips (49 percent) were classified as having group-III dysplasia (dysplasia without subluxation of the femoral head) according to the Severin system3. Thirty-three hips (44 percent) were classified as group IV (with femoral head subluxation); four hips (5 percent), as group V (a secondary acetabulum); and one hip (1 percent), as group II. All patients presented with pain at the time of surgery, and fifty-five (73 percent) of the hips restricted the patients’ ability to walk.
Radiographic evaluations were performed on a standard anteroposterior pelvic radiograph and a false-profile radiograph according to the technique described by Lequesne and de Sèze4. The dysplasia was measured on the basis of the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg5, the anterior center-edge angle of Lequesne and de Sèze4, and the acetabular index described by Tönnis6 for the obliquity of the acetabular roof. Lateralization of the femoral head was measured as the distance between the medial edge of the femoral head and the ilioischial line. The distance was measured preoperatively and postoperatively and was compared, when possible, with that of the normal, contralateral hip. The integrity of the Shenton line was recorded preoperatively and postoperatively. The osteoarthritis at the time of surgery was graded on radiographs according to the criteria of Tönnis6. Grade 1 indicates a widened sclerotic zone and minimal osteophytes; grade 2, a moderate loss of joint width and cysts; and grade 3, degenerative findings with a joint width of less than one millimeter.
The clinical evaluation included scoring of the overall result as well as the pain level, range of motion, and walking ability, with a maximum of 6 points for each, with the system of Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7 (Table II). The acetabular rim was assessed for lesions with the impingement test8.
The surgery was performed with the technique described earlier by the senior author (R. G.) and colleagues1. After reorientation of the acetabulum, intraoperative radiographs were made routinely. As a result, an additional intertrochanteric osteotomy was judged to be necessary to improve joint congruency in sixteen hips. An abduction osteotomy was done in thirteen of these hips; an adduction osteotomy, in two; and an extension osteotomy, in one. The operating time averaged 3.5 hours (range, two to five hours), blood loss averaged 2000 milliliters (range, 750 to 4500 milliliters), and an average of four red blood-cell units (range, one to eleven units) was required.
Seventy-one hips (95 percent) had adequate follow-up, at an average of 11.3 years (range, ten to 13.8 years). One patient with two involved hips (3 percent) died during the observation period, six years after the periacetabular osteotomy. Two patients (3 percent) were lost to follow-up early after the osteotomy.

Radiographic Results

The lateral center-edge angle, the anterior center-edge angle, and the acetabular index improved between the preoperative and postoperative evaluations (Table III). The Shenton line was restored in forty-one (62 percent) of the sixty-six hips with available radiographs. Lateralization of the femoral head was reduced postoperatively to an average of ten millimeters (range, -9 to +24 millimeters) compared with eleven millimeters (range, -3 to +18 millimeters) in the unaffected hips. All of the differences between the preoperative and postoperative values were significant, with a p value between 0.001 and 0.0001.
The hip joint was preserved in fifty-eight (82 percent) of the seventy-one cases that were followed for an average of 11.3 years. Thirteen hip joints were revised subsequently, to either a total hip arthroplasty (twelve) or a hip fusion. These procedures were performed at an average of 6.1 years (range, one to 13.2 years) after the periacetabular osteotomy. In four of these cases, total hip replacement was done after an interval of ten years or more.

Clinical Results

The average Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7 score for the fifty-eight preserved hip joints increased from 14.6 points (range, 7 to 17 points) preoperatively to 16.3 points (range, 12 to 18 points) at the time of the last follow-up (p < 0.0001) (Table IV). There was a significant improvement in the scores for pain and walking. The range of motion, especially flexion and internal rotation, decreased in the majority of the hip joints (Table IV). Six of the fifty-eight preserved hip joints had only a fair result (12, 13, or 14 points). Thus, fifty-two (73 percent) of the seventy-one hip joints were preserved and had a good or excellent clinical rating.

Osteoarthritis

The immediate preoperative radiographs of fifty-five of the preserved hip joints were available and could be graded for osteoarthritis. Twenty-seven (49 percent) had no preoperative signs of osteoarthritis (Table V). At the time of the last follow-up, forty-four hip joints (80 percent) had no or grade-1 osteoarthritis (Table V). Degenerative signs had progressed in fourteen hips (25 percent), including ten with progression from no to grade-1 osteoarthritis. In four hips, there was a radiographic improvement of one grade. Complete preoperative radiographic documentation was available for eleven of the thirteen nonpreserved hip joints. Six of them had grade-2 osteoarthritis prior to the periacetabular osteotomy (Table V). Of a total of fifty-one hip joints with no or grade-1 osteoarthritis preoperatively, five (10 percent) had undergone total hip arthroplasty, whereas six (46 percent) of thirteen hip joints with grade-2 osteoarthritis had been replaced by the time of the last follow-up. The two hip joints with grade-3 preoperative osteoarthritis were preserved at the time of the last follow-up.

Labral Lesions

Although arthrotomy was not done routinely in this early period, a labral lesion was detected in fifteen hips (21 percent), which had a significantly worse outcome (p < 0.001). Twenty-seven (38 percent) of the seventy-one hip joints had a positive impingement test on the initial physical examination. Over the years, the results of this test have been found to be closely associated with pathological changes of the acetabular rim8 and detectable labral lesions on magnetic resonance arthrography9. The labral lesion was left untreated in twelve hips in the present series. Resuturing of the torn labrum in two hips failed, and joint revision with resection of the labrum was performed later while still preserving the hip.

Additional Intertrochanteric Osteotomy

A simultaneous intertrochanteric osteotomy was performed in sixteen hip joints (21 percent) as a second step after the periacetabular osteotomy. The decision to carry out this procedure was predominantly based on the findings on the intraoperative radiographs made after the acetabular correction was performed. In many of these sixteen hips, one could suspect additional benefit from an intertrochanteric osteotomy on the basis of the preoperative radiographs. In addition to the routine intraoperative anteroposterior pelvic radiographs, an abduction or adduction radiograph was made after the acetabular correction to simulate the effects of an additional intertrochanteric osteotomy in hips with insufficient joint congruency, joint-space width, or femoral head coverage. Thirteen of the sixteen hip joints underwent an abduction osteotomy; two, an adduction osteotomy; and one, an extension osteotomy. However, seven of the thirteen abduction osteotomies were performed to reverse the effects of a former adduction osteotomy.

Prognostic Factors

The Wilcoxon signed rank-sum test was used to evaluate the significance of differences between preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic variables. Patient groups with different variables (for example, preoperative osteoarthritis or a labral tear) were compared with use of the Mann-Whitney U test. Logistic regression analysis of the different variables was used to detect independent factors that may have prognostic relevance. Significant variables predicting a negative outcome were older age at the time of surgery (p < 0.0001), presence and grade of osteoarthritis (p < 0.0001), and presence of a labral lesion (p < 0.001). A low anterior center-edge angle after correction and an acetabular index outside of the range of 0 to 10 degrees after correction were also associated with a less favorable outcome (p < 0.0058).

Complications

All major complications in this series occurred in the first eighteen hips to be treated. The complications included an intra-articular osteotomy in two hips. In one of them, the joint was replaced by a total hip prosthesis nineteen months later. A fair result was seen in the other patient, who died in a traffic accident six years later. Three hip joints underwent repeat osteotomy: two, because of a loss of correction due to too early weight-bearing, and one, because of excessive lateralization of the fragment. Posterior subluxation of the femoral head occurred in three hip joints with a lack of posterior coverage postoperatively. In two of these hips, a subsequent posterior shelfplasty was performed. One transient femoral nerve palsy was observed in this series. There was no damage to major blood vessels. Heterotopic ossification with restricted motion occurred in four hips (6 percent). Subsequent successful resection of ectopic bone was performed in two of them. Nonunion of a pubic osteotomy site was seen in one patient. Extreme correction at the osteotomy site had created a large gap. Consolidation did not occur despite subsequent autogenous bone-grafting. An extensive study of the complications after 508 Bernese periacetabular osteotomies was performed by Hussell et al.10.
Our report on the first seventy-five periacetabular osteotomies summarizes the results in a heterogeneous, predominantly adult patient group with variable features and degrees of hip dysplasia. The series included patients with underlying neurological disease, and the rates of previous operations (31 percent) and advanced osteoarthritic changes (23 percent) were high. There were even four hips (5 percent) with a false acetabulum. Our series also represents the early learning curve with a new surgical technique, as the major complications in this series occurred in the group treated with the first eighteen osteotomies. Nevertheless, the results after a minimum of ten years are encouraging, with 87 percent of the hip joints lasting at least ten years and 82 percent preserved at the time of the last follow-up. A good or excellent clinical result was seen in 73 percent of the hips at that time (Figs. 1-A, 1-B, 1-C, and 1-D).
Comparison with the results of triple or spherical osteotomies for acetabular reorientation in adults is difficult since there have been only a few long-term studies of these procedures with a duration of follow-up of ten years or more. In a study of the results after a triple osteotomy11, performed according to the technique described by Tönnis6, postoperative radiographic angles showed large variations. Postoperative radiographs of hips with Severin grade-III or IV dysplasia showed a lateral center-edge angle of less than 20 degrees in 26 percent of hips and an anterior center-edge angle of less than 20 degrees in 39 percent of hips. Though the scoring system used was not the same as the one employed in our study, a good or excellent result was seen in 85 percent of the Severin grade-III or IV hips at an average of 7.7 years. Thirty-six percent of the patients were less than eighteen years old. Younger age is significantly associated with a favorable outcome, as was shown in the present study and by other authors11-15.
Ninomiya16 reported the results in forty-one hips at an average of 7.9 years after a rotational acetabular osteotomy. Again, there was a large variation in the corrected angles, with a postoperative lateral center-edge angle ranging from -20 to +50 degrees and an acetabular index ranging from -15 to +35 degrees. Twenty-nine percent of the hips showed progression of osteoarthritis, and a good or excellent result was reported for 76 percent. Recently published long-term results for 145 hips followed for an average of thirteen years after rotational acetabular osteotomy showed a good or excellent result in 68 percent17.
Schramm et al.18 reported marked progression of osteoarthritis in 27 percent of sixty-eight hip joints at two to twenty-five years (average, 11.2 years) after spherical reorientation performed with the method described by Wagner14.
Compromised blood supply and avascular necrosis of the acetabular fragment after a periacetabular osteotomy were concerns in the early period when these procedures were performed. Anatomical studies have shown that this technique can be applied safely1,19. In the present series, persistent sclerotic density of the supra-acetabular region in one hip (one of the two in which the osteotomy had intra-articular extension) was interpreted as being due to partial osteonecrosis of the acetabular fragment. The surgical exposure was modified, and the gluteus medius muscle is not extensively detached from the outer iliac wing anymore. The muscle is now elevated from the bone over the length of a few centimeters with a curved blunt instrument, allowing a blunt retractor to be inserted in a posterior direction into the greater sciatic notch. This decreases the risk of compromise of the acetabular blood supply and decreases the postoperative recovery time of this muscle group, without ectopic ossification. For many years now, no routine prophylaxis against heterotopic ossification has been given. In a series of more than 500 periacetabular osteotomies, revision for resection of heterotopic ossification was necessary after less than 1 percent10.
Several factors indicating the need for an additional intertrochanteric osteotomy have been identified8,20. They include a high extrusion index of the femoral head, abnormal femoral anteversion angles, and a deformed femoral head and signs of osteoarthritis8,20. The most important predictive factor, however, is a previous adduction osteotomy20. An adduction osteotomy alone is insufficient for correction of hip dysplasia in the majority of cases since only the usually less involved femoral side is addressed. Over the years, a decrease in the number of hips with combined intertrochanteric osteotomy and periacetabular osteotomy has been observed at our institute. This may be partially due to a decrease in the number of attempted corrections through an intertrochanteric osteotomy alone. In addition, our increased experience with the degree of acetabular correction that can be achieved and our awareness of the negative effects of overcorrection (especially the creation of too abundant anterosuperior coverage) has led to a more restrictive attitude toward additional intertrochanteric osteotomies.
A significant association (p < 0.05) between advanced osteoarthritis and an unsatisfactory clinical outcome after periacetabular osteotomy has been reported: at an average of four years after periacetabular osteotomy, eight of nine patients with grade-3 osteoarthritis had a Harris hip score of less than 70 points21. Similar results have been reported after other reconstructive procedures12-15,21. This has led to a more restrictive attitude toward the indications for periacetabular osteotomy, especially in hips with grade-3 osteoarthritis. The decision to perform a joint-preserving procedure, however, has to be based on the sum of all of the patient’s individual clinical and radiographic variables, with patient age and other treatment alternatives especially taken into account. The two patients with grade-3 osteoarthritis in the current study had preservation of the hip joint at the time of the last follow-up. The alternative of total hip arthroplasty has considerable shortcomings, especially in adolescents and young adults, and may lead to increasingly complex operations22-27.
Over the years, it has become evident that labral lesions and fractures of the acetabular rim, as consequences of an overload of the dysplastic rim8,28, are more frequently encountered than had been earlier thought, and they are now verified by routine intraoperative capsulotomy9. Conventional radiography is insufficient to demonstrate these changes. Reorientation of the acetabular fragment reduces the load on the acetabular rim and the torn labrum. Resection of the labrum may be necessary initially only in hips with an extended lesion, and repeat fixation of a lesion of the osseous acetabular rim seems to be beneficial when the lesion is large29,30. The present study revealed a significantly worse outcome in the presence of a labral lesion. Of the forty-eight hip joints in the present study with no or grade-1 osteoarthritis and without a known labral lesion, forty-two (88 percent) had a good or excellent outcome. This finding is consistent with that of Dorrell and Catterall31, who observed rapid progression of osteoarthritis in dysplastic hips with a labral tear.
The present study also revealed an unexpected finding that made us aware of the danger of markedly limited clearance after reorientation due either to overcorrection or, more frequently, to the shape of the anterior head-neck junction, which has little or no offset in many dysplastic hips. At the time of the last follow-up, seventeen (29 percent) of the fifty-eight preserved hip joints had a positive impingement test, which was a new finding in seven of them. Impingement of the femoral head and neck against the anterosuperior aspect of the acetabular rim, with new labral lesions, was identified in five patients undergoing revision surgery because of this newly developed impingement sign32. As a consequence, a routine arthrotomy is now done during periacetabular osteotomy to visualize hip-joint motion and avoid impingement. Impingement in flexion and internal rotation is addressed by trimming of the anterosuperior head and neck area until the range of motion necessary for daily activities is obtained. Furthermore, a lateral approach to the hip joint for the performance of a simultaneous periacetabular osteotomy and joint revision for femoral head subluxation has been developed. This procedure is reserved for hips with a pathological morphology of the proximal part of the femur, such as a short neck or a head diameter that does not exceed the neck diameter, both of which are associated with an increased risk of impingement during flexion and internal rotation.
Developmental hip dysplasia is not a unique entity but rather a pathoanatomical condition with wide variance in the shape and orientation of the acetabulum, including retroversion, combined with potential abnormalities of the proximal part of the femur33,34. The difference between insufficient coverage, normal coverage, and overcoverage is rather small and is influenced by a multitude of factors. Isolated measurement of radiographic angles may be less helpful than the combined evaluation of all radiographic parameters. Our understanding of what is an optimal correction has improved considerably over time. It is a balancing of the maloriented horseshoe-shaped acetabular cartilage over the femoral head, which leads to an optimal use of a limited area of hyaline cartilage for weight-bearing. In recent years, more emphasis has been placed on outlining the relation between anterior and posterior coverage as seen on an anteroposterior pelvic radiograph made during surgery. Surgeons performing acetabular reorientation now aim to achieve less extensive anterior correction in order to avoid acetabulofemoral impingement. Intra-articular inspection and trimming of areas of impingement have become routine. Improvements in surgical technique, better imaging methods, and an improved understanding of what is the optimal correction should lead to better definition of appropriate indications and should decrease the prevalence of unfavorable outcomes and complications.
Ganz R; Klaue K; Vinh TS; and Mast JW: A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop,1988.232: 26-36, 23226  1988  [PubMed]
 
Siebenrock KA; Scholl E; Lottenbach M; and Ganz R: Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 9-20, 3639  1999  [PubMed]
 
Severin E : Contribution to the knowledge of congenital dislocation of the hip joint. Late results of closed reduction and arthrographic studies of recent cases. Acta Chir Scand,1941.63 Suppl: 63 Suppl  1941 
 
Lequesne M, and de Sèze S: Le faux profil du bassin. Nouvelle incidence radiographique pour l’étude de la hanche. Son utilité dans les dysplasies et les differentes coxopathies. Rev Rhum,1961.28: 643-52, 28643  1961  [PubMed]
 
Wiberg G: Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. With special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Parts I-IV. Acta Chir Scand,1939.Suppl 58: 7-38, Suppl 587  1939 
 
Tönnis D Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. New York: Springer; 1987. p 113-30, 167, 370-80 
 
Merle d’Aubigné RM, and Postel M: Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1954.36: 451-75, 36451  1954  [PubMed]
 
Klaue K; Durnin CW; and Ganz R. : The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 423-9, 73423  1991  [PubMed]
 
Leunig M; Werlen S; Ungersböck A; Ito K; and Ganz R: Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1997.79: 230-4, 79230  1997  [PubMed]
 
Hussell JG; Rodriguez JA; and Ganz R. : Technical complications of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 81-92, 36381  1999  [PubMed]
 
Tönnis D; Arning A; Bloch M; Heinecke A; and Kalchschmidt K: Triple pelvic osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B,1994.3: 54-67, 354  1994 
 
Calvert PT; August AC; Albert JS; Kemp HB; and Catterall A: The Chiari pelvic osteotomy. J. Bone Joint Surg Br,1987.69: 551-5, 69551  1987  [PubMed]
 
Millis MB; Murphy SB; and Poss R: Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Osteotomies about the hip for the prevention and treatment of osteoarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 626-47, 77626  1995 
 
Wagner H. Osteotomies for congenital hip dislocation. In:The Hip. Proceedings of the Fourth Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1976. p 45-65 
 
Windhager R; Pongracz N; Schönecker W; and Kotz R: Chiari osteotomy for congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. Results after 20 to 34 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 890-5, 73890  1991  [PubMed]
 
Ninomiya S: Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the severely dysplastic hip in the adolescent and adult. Clin Orthop,1989.247: 127-37, 247127  1989  [PubMed]
 
Nakamura S; Ninomiya S; Takatori Y; Morimoto S; and Umeyama T: Long-term outcome of rotational acetabular osteotomy. 145 hips followed for 10-23 years. Acta Orthop Scand.,1998.69: 259-65, 69259  1998  [PubMed]
 
Schramm M; Pitto RP; Bär K; Meyer M; Rohm E; and Hohmann D : Prophylaxis of secondary osteoarthrosis with spherical osteotomy in residual acetabular dysplasia. Analysis of predictive factors of success. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.,1999.119: 418-22, 119418  1999  [PubMed]
 
Damsin JP; Lazennec JY; Gonzales M; Guerin-Surville H; and Hannoun L: Arterial supply of the acetabulum in the fetus: application to periacetabular surgery in childhood. Surg Radiol Anat,1992.14: 215-21, 14215  1992  [PubMed]
 
Hersche O; Casillas M; and Ganz R: Indications for intertrochanteric osteotomy after periacetabular osteotomy for adult hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop,1998.347: 19-26, 34719  1998  [PubMed]
 
Trousdale RT; Ekkernkamp A; Ganz R; and Wallrichs SL: Periacetabular and intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. ,1995.77: 73-85, 7773  1995  [PubMed]
 
Booth RE Jr: The closing circle: limitations of total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics ,1994.17: 757-9, 17757  1994  [PubMed]
 
Buckwalter JA, and Lohmander S: Current concepts review. Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1994.76: 1405-18, 761405  1994  [PubMed]
 
Chandler HP; Reineck FT; Wixson RL; and McCarthy JC: Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am ,1981.63: 1426-34, 631426  1981  [PubMed]
 
Dorr LD; Takei GK; and Conaty JP: Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1983.65: 474-9, 65474  1983  [PubMed]
 
Ilstrup DM; Nolan DR; Beckenbaugh RD; and Coventry MB: Factors influencing the results in 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. ,1973.95: 250-62, 95250  1973  [PubMed]
 
Kavanagh BF; Ilstrup DM; and Fitzgerald RH Jr: Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 517-26, 67517  1985  [PubMed]
 
Hasegawa Y; Fukatsu H; Matsuda T; Iwase T; and Iwata H.: Magnetic resnonance imaging in osteoarthrosis of the dysplastic hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.,1996.115: 243-8, 115243  1996  [PubMed]
 
Mast JW; Mayo KA; Chosa E; Berlemann U; and Ganz R.: The acetabular rim fracture: a variant of the acetabular rim syndrome. Sem Arthroplasty.,1997.8: 97-101, 897  1997 
 
Pitto RP; Klaue K; and Ganz R: Labrum lesions and acetabular dysplasia in adults. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb,1996.134: 452-6, German134452  1996  [PubMed]
 
Dorrell JH, and Catterall A.: The torn acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Br.,1986.68: 400-3, 68400  1986  [PubMed]
 
Myers SR; Eijer H; and Ganz R.: Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 93-9, 36393  1999  [PubMed]
 
Murphy SB; Kijewski PK; Millis MB; and Harless A.: Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop,1991.261: 214-23, 261214  1991 
 
Reynolds D; Lucas J; and Klaue K.: Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1999.81: 281-8, 81281  1999  [PubMed]
 

Submit a comment

Topics

Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-A:Anteroposterior radiograph showing symptomatic bilateral hip dysplasia with femoral head subluxation in a seventeen-year-old girl.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-B:False-profile radiograph of the left hip, showing severely deficient anterior coverage.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-C:Anteroposterior pelvic (Fig. 1-C) and false-profile (Fig. 1-D) radiographs made eleven and one-half and nine years after surgery with an excellent clinical result on both sides.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1-D:Anteroposterior pelvic (Fig. 1-C) and false-profile (Fig. 1-D) radiographs made eleven and one-half and nine years after surgery with an excellent clinical result on both sides.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Previous Operations on Twenty-three Affected Hip Joints
Previous OperationNo. of Hip Joints
Intertrochanteric osteotomy9
Combined pelvic and intertrochanteric osteotomies8
Pelvic osteotomy4
Shelfplasty and intertrochanteric osteotomy2
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Overview of Scoring System of Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7*
*The result is rated as good or excellent when the total score is 15 to 18 points; fair when it is 12, 13, or 14 points; and poor when it is less than 12 points.
PointsPainRange of MotionWalking Ability
6NoneFlexion > 90º, normal abductionNormal
5OccasionalFlexion = 80-90º, abduction > 15ºSlight limp
4Disappears on restFlexion = 60-80º, can reach footShort distance without cane
3Limits activityFlexion = 40-60ºPermanent use of 1 cane
2Prevents activityFlexion < 40º 2 canes
1Night painAnkylosis, good hip position2 crutches
0Permanent intenseAnkylosis, bad hip positionNone
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE III:  Radiographic Parameters on Preoperative and Immediate Postoperative Radiographs in Sixty-six Hips
ParameterPreoperativePostoperative
Lateral center-edge angle (degrees)?6 (-24 to +25)34 (10 to 55)
Anterior center-edge angle (degrees)?4 (-20 to +24)26 (12 to 50)
Acetabular index (degrees)26 (12 to 50)?6 (-15 to +18)
Lateralization (mm)16 (6 to 30)10 (-9 to +24)
Shenton line intact (no. of hips)26 (39%)41 (62%)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE IV:  Preoperative and Postoperative Merle d’Aubigné and Postel7 Scores in Fifty-eight Preserved Hips
*The score was significantly different from the preoperative score (p < 0.0001).
Preoperative (points)Postoperative (points)
Total14.6 (7 to 17)16.3* (12 to 18)
Pain?3.9 (2 to 5)?5.3* (3 to 6)
Walking ability?4.9 (1 to 6)?5.6* (4 to 6)
Range of motion?5.8 (4 to 6)?5.4 (3 to 6)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE V:  Grades of Osteoarthritis According to Tönnis System6*
*The values are given as the number of hips. †Three hips with incomplete radiographs are not included. ‡Two hips with incomplete radiographs are not included. §Before the osteotomy.
Grade 0Grade 1Grade 2Grade 3
Preserved hip joints (n = 55†)
Preoperative27 (49%)19 (35%)7 (13%)2 (4%)
Last follow-up18 (33%)26 (47%)8 (15%)3 (5%)
Replaced hip joints (n = 11‡)
Preoperative§1 (9%)?4 (36%)6 (55%)
Ganz R; Klaue K; Vinh TS; and Mast JW: A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop,1988.232: 26-36, 23226  1988  [PubMed]
 
Siebenrock KA; Scholl E; Lottenbach M; and Ganz R: Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 9-20, 3639  1999  [PubMed]
 
Severin E : Contribution to the knowledge of congenital dislocation of the hip joint. Late results of closed reduction and arthrographic studies of recent cases. Acta Chir Scand,1941.63 Suppl: 63 Suppl  1941 
 
Lequesne M, and de Sèze S: Le faux profil du bassin. Nouvelle incidence radiographique pour l’étude de la hanche. Son utilité dans les dysplasies et les differentes coxopathies. Rev Rhum,1961.28: 643-52, 28643  1961  [PubMed]
 
Wiberg G: Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. With special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Parts I-IV. Acta Chir Scand,1939.Suppl 58: 7-38, Suppl 587  1939 
 
Tönnis D Congenital Dysplasia and Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. New York: Springer; 1987. p 113-30, 167, 370-80 
 
Merle d’Aubigné RM, and Postel M: Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1954.36: 451-75, 36451  1954  [PubMed]
 
Klaue K; Durnin CW; and Ganz R. : The acetabular rim syndrome. A clinical presentation of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 423-9, 73423  1991  [PubMed]
 
Leunig M; Werlen S; Ungersböck A; Ito K; and Ganz R: Evaluation of the acetabular labrum by MR arthrography. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1997.79: 230-4, 79230  1997  [PubMed]
 
Hussell JG; Rodriguez JA; and Ganz R. : Technical complications of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 81-92, 36381  1999  [PubMed]
 
Tönnis D; Arning A; Bloch M; Heinecke A; and Kalchschmidt K: Triple pelvic osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop B,1994.3: 54-67, 354  1994 
 
Calvert PT; August AC; Albert JS; Kemp HB; and Catterall A: The Chiari pelvic osteotomy. J. Bone Joint Surg Br,1987.69: 551-5, 69551  1987  [PubMed]
 
Millis MB; Murphy SB; and Poss R: Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Osteotomies about the hip for the prevention and treatment of osteoarthrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995.77: 626-47, 77626  1995 
 
Wagner H. Osteotomies for congenital hip dislocation. In:The Hip. Proceedings of the Fourth Open Scientific Meeting of the Hip Society. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1976. p 45-65 
 
Windhager R; Pongracz N; Schönecker W; and Kotz R: Chiari osteotomy for congenital dislocation and subluxation of the hip. Results after 20 to 34 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1991.73: 890-5, 73890  1991  [PubMed]
 
Ninomiya S: Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the severely dysplastic hip in the adolescent and adult. Clin Orthop,1989.247: 127-37, 247127  1989  [PubMed]
 
Nakamura S; Ninomiya S; Takatori Y; Morimoto S; and Umeyama T: Long-term outcome of rotational acetabular osteotomy. 145 hips followed for 10-23 years. Acta Orthop Scand.,1998.69: 259-65, 69259  1998  [PubMed]
 
Schramm M; Pitto RP; Bär K; Meyer M; Rohm E; and Hohmann D : Prophylaxis of secondary osteoarthrosis with spherical osteotomy in residual acetabular dysplasia. Analysis of predictive factors of success. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.,1999.119: 418-22, 119418  1999  [PubMed]
 
Damsin JP; Lazennec JY; Gonzales M; Guerin-Surville H; and Hannoun L: Arterial supply of the acetabulum in the fetus: application to periacetabular surgery in childhood. Surg Radiol Anat,1992.14: 215-21, 14215  1992  [PubMed]
 
Hersche O; Casillas M; and Ganz R: Indications for intertrochanteric osteotomy after periacetabular osteotomy for adult hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop,1998.347: 19-26, 34719  1998  [PubMed]
 
Trousdale RT; Ekkernkamp A; Ganz R; and Wallrichs SL: Periacetabular and intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. ,1995.77: 73-85, 7773  1995  [PubMed]
 
Booth RE Jr: The closing circle: limitations of total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics ,1994.17: 757-9, 17757  1994  [PubMed]
 
Buckwalter JA, and Lohmander S: Current concepts review. Operative treatment of osteoarthrosis. Current practice and future development. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1994.76: 1405-18, 761405  1994  [PubMed]
 
Chandler HP; Reineck FT; Wixson RL; and McCarthy JC: Total hip replacement in patients younger than thirty years old. A five-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am ,1981.63: 1426-34, 631426  1981  [PubMed]
 
Dorr LD; Takei GK; and Conaty JP: Total hip arthroplasties in patients less than forty-five years old. J Bone Joint Surg Am.,1983.65: 474-9, 65474  1983  [PubMed]
 
Ilstrup DM; Nolan DR; Beckenbaugh RD; and Coventry MB: Factors influencing the results in 2,012 total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop. ,1973.95: 250-62, 95250  1973  [PubMed]
 
Kavanagh BF; Ilstrup DM; and Fitzgerald RH Jr: Revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 517-26, 67517  1985  [PubMed]
 
Hasegawa Y; Fukatsu H; Matsuda T; Iwase T; and Iwata H.: Magnetic resnonance imaging in osteoarthrosis of the dysplastic hip. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg.,1996.115: 243-8, 115243  1996  [PubMed]
 
Mast JW; Mayo KA; Chosa E; Berlemann U; and Ganz R.: The acetabular rim fracture: a variant of the acetabular rim syndrome. Sem Arthroplasty.,1997.8: 97-101, 897  1997 
 
Pitto RP; Klaue K; and Ganz R: Labrum lesions and acetabular dysplasia in adults. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb,1996.134: 452-6, German134452  1996  [PubMed]
 
Dorrell JH, and Catterall A.: The torn acetabular labrum. J Bone Joint Surg Br.,1986.68: 400-3, 68400  1986  [PubMed]
 
Myers SR; Eijer H; and Ganz R.: Anterior femoroacetabular impingement after periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop,1999.363: 93-9, 36393  1999  [PubMed]
 
Murphy SB; Kijewski PK; Millis MB; and Harless A.: Acetabular dysplasia in the adolescent and young adult. Clin Orthop,1991.261: 214-23, 261214  1991 
 
Reynolds D; Lucas J; and Klaue K.: Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1999.81: 281-8, 81281  1999  [PubMed]
 
Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Hip
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
The periacetabular osteotomy. Minimum 2 year followup in more than 100 hips.
Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 1999 Jun
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
12/22/2011
ME - Central Maine Medical Center
12/22/2011
VA - Charleston Area Medical Center