0
Articles   |    
Arthroscopically Assisted Treatment of Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament from the Tibia
Sung-Jae Kim, MD; Sang-Jin Shin, MD; Nam-Hong Choi, MD; Shin-Kang Cho, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Investigation performed at the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Sung-Jae Kim, MD Sang-Jin Shin, MD Shin-Kang Cho, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, C.P.O. Box 8044, 120-752, Seoul, Korea. E-mail address for S.-J. Kim: os@yumc.yonsei.ac.kr
Nam-Hong Choi, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nowon Eulji Medical Center, Eulji Medical College, Hakae 1-Dong, Nowon-ku 280-1, Seoul, Korea
No benefits in any form have been received or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article. No funds were received in support of this study.
A commentary is available with the electronic versions of this article, on our web site (www.jbjs.org) and on our CD-ROM (call 781-449-9780, ext. 140, to order).

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:698-708 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament to the posterior intercondylar fossa of the tibia is in a location that is difficult to access for arthroscopic surgical procedures. This report presents a variety of arthroscopically assisted reduction and fixation methods for managing avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament from the tibia.

Methods: Thirteen patients (fourteen knees) who had an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament were treated with an arthroscopic procedure. Eleven patients underwent the operation in the acute phase (four to ten days after the injury), and two patients had delayed surgery (at nineteen and twenty months after the injury) because of nonunion. The choice of fixation method was based on the size of the avulsed fragment. Six knees that had a small bone fragment (<10 mm) with comminution were fixed with use of multiple sutures. Two knees that had a small bone fragment without comminution were fixed with 23-gauge wires. Two knees that had a medium-sized fragment (10 to 20 mm) were fixed with Kirschner wires. Four knees that had a large single fragment of bone (>20 mm) that involved the condyles were fixed with one or two cannulated screws.

Results: All patients had osseous union as determined on radiographs. Three injured knees in two patients showed limitation of motion after the operation. These patients had been immobilized for two or three months after the surgery because of concomitant fractures. The eleven patients who had undergone the operation in the acute phase, including two in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis had developed, showed no or trace posterior instability following the procedure. However, the two patients in whom the surgery had been delayed had residual grade-I posterior instability. The postoperative side-to-side differences, when measured with use of the KT-2000 arthrometer and posterior stress radiographs, showed better results in the patients in whom the surgery had been performed in the acute phase than in the patients in whom the operation had been delayed.

Conclusion: Arthroscopic procedures can be used to treat tibial avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Figures in this Article
    Arthroscopically assisted treatment of avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament from the tibia has been well documented1-3. However, avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament are not as common, and many surgeons prefer an open surgical technique4-8. The tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament is located in an area that is difficult to access. Martinez-Moreno and Blanco-Blanco9 performed experimental percutaneous fixation of avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament in cadaveric knees under arthroscopic control. We know of two reports describing the technique for arthroscopic screw fixation to treat avulsion of large fragments of bone with the posterior cruciate ligament10,11. However, if the fracture fragment is small or comminuted, firm fixation cannot be achieved with screws or pins. We designed a new arthroscopic technique for repairing small or comminuted avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament. The purpose of this study is to present a variety of arthroscopic reduction and fixation methods for repairing variously sized avulsion fracture fragments.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Posterior view of a right knee. The arthroscope is placed through a posteromedial portal (A). A plastic sheath that has a waterproof diaphragm is passed through a posterolateral portal (B). Another sheath is placed through an anteromedial portal (C).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Axial view (Fig. 2-A) and sagittal section (Fig. 2-B) of the perforation made through the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament. The perforation is made with use of a switching stick passed through the posterolateral portal.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Axial view (Fig. 2-A) and sagittal section (Fig. 2-B) of the perforation made through the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament. The perforation is made with use of a switching stick passed through the posterolateral portal.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Viewed through the posteromedial portal, avulsion of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can be seen (arrows).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:A tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide (A) placed through the anteromedial portal is used to secure the fracture fragment (C) and to guide insertion of a threaded Kirschner wire (arrow). A dural elevator (B) passed through the posterolateral portal is used to prevent migration of the fragment during drilling. PCL = posterior cruciate ligament.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:A long 18-gauge spinal needle is inserted through the posterolateral sheath and passed through the posterior cruciate ligament just proximal to the fracture fragment, and a 23-gauge wire is passed through the lumen of the needle.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:The 23-gauge wire or multiple sutures are pulled out through a sheath placed in the anteromedial portal, and the needle is removed.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:Two bone tunnels are made from the anterior tibial cortex to the medial and lateral margins of the fracture bed. Two looped wires are passed through the bone tunnels and the posterolateral and anteromedial sheaths.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 8:Two looped wires are pulled distally, leading each end of the 23-gauge wire or the multiple sutures through the medial and lateral bone tunnels.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 9:Each end of the previously passed 23-gauge wire or multiple sutures is pulled distally with even tension until the fracture fragment is accurately reduced. Then the wire or sutures are tied tightly over the tibial cortex.
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10-A:Case 8. Preoperative radiographs of a small fragment without comminution (Fig. 10-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with a 23-gauge wire (Fig. 10-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10-B:Case 8. Preoperative radiographs of a small fragment without comminution (Fig. 10-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with a 23-gauge wire (Fig. 10-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11-A:Case 10. Preoperative radiographs of a medium- sized fragment (Fig. 11-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two Kirschner wires (Fig. 11-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11-B:Case 10. Preoperative radiographs of a medium- sized fragment (Fig. 11-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two Kirschner wires (Fig. 11-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12-A:Case 13. Preoperative magnetic resonance image of a definite large one-piece avulsed fragment (Fig. 12-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two cannulated screws (Fig. 12-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12-B:Case 13. Preoperative magnetic resonance image of a definite large one-piece avulsed fragment (Fig. 12-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two cannulated screws (Fig. 12-B).
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Patients
    *ACL = anterior cruciate ligament, and MCL = medial collateral ligament. †As assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form.
    CaseGender, Age (yr)SideInterval to Op. (days)Mechanism of InjuryAssociated Injury*TreatmentDuration of Follow-up (mo)ComplicationsKnee Function†Posterior Translation (mm)
    KT-2000 ArthrometerStress Radiograph
    ?1F, 26L?4FallFract., phalanx PDS #0 ¥ 5, Endobutton72A1.42.5
    ?2M, 19L10Motor-veh. acc.Fract., femur PDS #1 ¥ 6, Endobutton42Stiff kneeB1.82.7
    ?3M, 39L20 moMotor-veh. acc.Avulsion, ACL; fract., femur, tibia, fibulaPDS #1 ¥ 6, Endobutton36C3.35.0
    ?4M, 26L19 moMotor-veh. acc.Fract., lat. tibial condyle; posterolat. instabilityPDS #1 ¥ 5, Endobutton54C4.15.2
    ?5F, 17L?4FallEthibond #2 ¥ 528A1.32.5
    ?6M, 33L?7Motor-veh. acc.Fract., femur, tibia Ethibond #2 ¥ 530Stiff kneeB2.13.5
    ?7RFract., femur, lat. tibial condyle23-gauge wire ¥ 1Stiff kneeB1.52.7
    ?8M, 19R?4Motor-veh. acc.23-gauge wire ¥ 124A0.71.2
    ?9F, 23L?5FallKirschner wire ¥ 251A0.51.5
    10F, 57R?6FallKirschner wire ¥ 226B1.01.4
    11M, 52L10Motor-veh. acc.Avulsion, ACLKirschner wire ¥ 2, cannulated screw ¥ 140B1.62.9
    12F, 49R?7FallRupture, MCLCannulated screw ¥ 136B2.22.4
    13F, 43R?5FallCannulated screw ¥ 239A0.81.2
    14F, 54R?7FallCannulated screw ¥ 224B0.51.5
     
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Treatment Guidelines for Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament
    Fragment SizeFixation
    Large (>20 mm)Cannulated screw
    Medium (10-20 mm) Multiple pins
    Small (<10mm)
    Without comminutionWire suture
    With comminutionMultiple sutures
    Thirteen patients (fourteen knees) who had an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament from the tibia between 1993 and 1997 were analyzed retrospectively (Table I). All patients were treated by the senior author (S.-J.K.) with use of an arthroscopic procedure. The six male and seven female patients in the study were between the ages of seventeen and fifty-seven years (average, thirty-five years) at the time of the operation. Eight left and six right knees were injured. The injury was caused by a motor-vehicle accident in the six male patients and by a fall in the seven female patients (some of whom fell while skiing). Three of the motor-vehicle accidents involved the patient striking the dashboard of an automobile, and three were motorcycle accidents resulting in direct trauma to the proximal part of the tibia while the knee was flexed. The falls resulted in a twisting injury to the knee in two patients and a hyperflexion injury in three; the injury mechanism was unknown in two patients.
    Eleven patients had an acute fracture, and two (Cases 3 and 4) had a nonunion of a tibial avulsion fracture. Eleven patients underwent surgery four to ten days (average, 6.3 days) after the injury. In the two patients with a nonunion, the surgery was done at nineteen and twenty months after the injury. One of these patients (Case 3) had ipsilateral open comminuted fractures of the tibia and fibula and a contralateral femoral fracture, and the avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament was overlooked at the initial examination. The patient still demonstrated grade-II posterior instability (grading system described below) and knee discomfort twenty months after the injury. The other patient (Case 4) had grade-II posterior instability and posterolateral rotatory instability nineteen months after the injury. Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament was planned for these patients, but when the ligament was viewed arthroscopically the fibers were found to be intact and fibrotic scar tissue was seen to cover the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament.
    The diagnosis of avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament was made when the patient demonstrated posterior instability on physical examination and a bone fragment was seen on radiographs. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in six patients in whom fracture fragments could not be identified accurately on radiographs or in whom intra-articular injury was suspected. Six patients had an isolated avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament, and seven had additional ligament injuries or fractures. Four associated ligament injuries included avulsion of the anterior cruciate ligament (in two patients), rupture of the medial collateral ligament (in one patient), and posterolateral rotatory instability (in one patient). Five patients (six knees) who had concomitant fractures (distal femoral, proximal tibial, tibial condylar, and phalangeal) underwent open reduction and internal fixation before the arthroscopic surgery. No patient had a neurovascular injury.
    Surgery was performed in patients who had an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament and posterior knee instability of at least grade II. Posterior instability was determined by performing the posterior drawer test, making posterior stress radiographs, and measuring knee laxity with use of the knee ligament arthrometer (KT-2000; MEDmetric, San Diego, California). The posterior drawer test was performed at 90° of knee flexion and was graded according to the amount of posterior translation (grade I indicates <5 mm; grade II, 5 to 10 mm; and grade III, >10 mm). The posterior translation was estimated by palpating the amount of step-off of the medial tibial plateau under the medial femoral condyle. The side-to-side difference in the posterior translation was measured on the posterior stress radiographs and with use of the knee arthrometer. Lateral radiographs were made with the knee flexed 90° while maximal manual load was applied to the proximal part of the tibia12. Posterior translation of the tibia on stress radiographs was determined by measuring the distance between the posterior aspect of the medial tibial plateau and the posterior part of the medial femoral condyle (as determined by drawing the most posterior tangent line to each plateau and condyle). Measurement of the corrected posterior translation with the KT-2000 arthrometer (with the testing done at a 30-lb [133-N] force) was performed as described by Daniel et al.13.
    Examination under anesthesia before the surgery revealed grade-II posterior instability in eleven knees and grade-III in three knees. Two patients (Cases 3 and 11) who had an associated avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament also demonstrated grade-II anterior instability, as determined by the Lachman test (grade I indicates <5 mm of tibial excursion; grade II, 5 to 10 mm; and grade III, >10 mm). One patient (Case 12) had a grade-II rupture of the medial collateral ligament as revealed by the valgus stress test at 30° of knee flexion (grade I indicates <5 mm of opening of the joint surface; grade II, 5 to 10 mm; and grade III, >10 mm).
    The size of the bone fragment determined the fixation method. Bone fragment size was measured with a ruler on preoperative radiographs. The sizes of small or comminuted fragments were estimated at the time of arthroscopy with use of the 5-mm vertical tip of a probe. If a fragment involved one or both tibial condyles and was >20 mm (classified as large), fixation was performed with one or two cannulated screws. A 10 to 20-mm (medium) fragment was fixed with more than one Kirschner wire, regardless of tibial condylar involvement. A <10-mm (small) fragment that was not comminuted was fixed with 23-gauge wire suture. Small comminuted fragments were fixed with multiple sutures (PDS [polydioxanone] or Ethibond [polyester], Ethicon, Somerville, New Jersey) through a single tibial tunnel with use of Endobutton (Acufex, Mansfield, Massachusetts) or through two tibial tunnels (Table II).
    Patients were seen for final follow-up twenty-four to seventy-two months (average, thirty-nine months) following surgery. All patients were examined by one of us (S.-J.K.) and had radiographs made of the knees. The postoperative function of the knee was evaluated according to the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form14.

    Surgical Procedures

    Three arthroscopic portals are used (Fig. 1). The posteromedial portal is located adjacent to the posterior aspect of the medial femoral condyle and 3 cm proximal to the joint line. The posterolateral portal is located along the posterior edge of the lateral femoral condyle and 1 to 2 cm proximal to the joint line. The anteromedial portal is located just medial to the medial border of the patellar tendon and adjacent to the patella. While the knee is viewed through the posteromedial portal, the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament is perforated with use of a switching stick that is introduced through the posterolateral portal (Figs. 2-A and 2-B). If mobilization and manipulation of the fracture fragment is necessary, the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament should be removed with use of a motorized shaver.
    While the knee is viewed through the posteromedial portal (Fig. 3), hematoma and soft tissue interposed in the fracture bed are debrided with use of a curet and a motorized shaver that are passed through the posterolateral portal. The size of the fracture fragment is measured by comparing it with the 5-mm vertical tip of a probe. The fracture fragment is manipulated and temporarily reduced into the anatomical position with use of a probe that is passed through the posterolateral portal.
    If the fracture fragment is large enough (10 mm), it is fixed with cannulated screws or multiple pins. A tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide (Acufex) placed through the anteromedial portal is used to secure the fracture fragment and to insert one or two guide-pins to temporarily fix it. A curet or dural elevator passed through the posterolateral portal may be used to prevent migration of the fragment during drilling (Fig. 4). An image intensifier can be used to confirm the reduction of the fragment and to identify the position of the pin inside the fragment. After confirmation of the reduction and the placement of the guide-pins into the fragment, one or two cannulated screws are inserted along the guide-pins if there is a single bone fragment of >20 mm. If the fracture fragment is too small to be fixed with a cannulated screw, the guide-pins or Kirschner wires can be used for permanent fixation.
    If the fracture fragment is <10 mm, or if the large fragment becomes comminuted during the insertion of screws, a 23-gauge wire or multiple sutures can be used. A long 18-gauge spinal needle is inserted through the posterolateral sheath and passed through the posterior cruciate ligament just proximal to the fracture fragment. A 23-gauge wire is passed through the lumen of the needle (Fig. 5). The end of the wire is grasped with use of a grasper and is pulled out through the sheath placed in the anteromedial portal (Fig. 6).
    For the fixation of small comminuted fragments with use of multiple sutures, a looped 26-gauge wire is passed through the lumen of a spinal needle. The end of the looped wire is extracted through a sheath placed in the anteromedial portal and a strand of suture is passed through the looped wire, which is then pulled back through the posterolateral portal. Thus, the strand of suture passes through the posterolateral portal, through the posterior cruciate ligament, and out of the anteromedial portal. To achieve firm suture fixation, this procedure should be repeated at least five or six times.
    With use of the tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide, a bone tunnel is then made from the anterior tibial cortex to the lateral edge of the site of the avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament. Before the guide-pin is inserted, an appropriate-length stop is attached to the guide-pin to prevent overdrilling. As soon as the guide-pin is removed, a looped wire is passed through the tunnel until the looped tip appears out of the posterior aperture. After confirmation that the looped wire is through the tunnel lateral to the avulsion site, the tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide is removed. Another bone tunnel is made on the medial edge of the avulsion site. A second looped wire is passed through the medial bone tunnel with use of the same method. The tip of the medial looped wire is grasped with a grasper introduced through a sheath in the anteromedial portal, and the looped wire is pulled out through the sheath. The looped wire that was placed laterally can be extracted through a sheath in the posterolateral portal (Fig. 7). Each end of the 23-gauge wire or the multiple sutures previously sewn through the posterior cruciate ligament is passed through the looped wire outside of the anteromedial and posterolateral sheaths. Each looped wire is pulled distally, leading each end of the 23-gauge wire or the multiple sutures through the medial and lateral bone tunnels (Fig. 8). Each end of the 23-gauge wire or the multiple sutures is pulled tightly and tied over the tibial cortex while an anteriorly directed force is applied to the tibia with the knee flexed at an angle of 70° to 90° (Fig. 9). While the wire or sutures are tied, the fracture fragment is held reduced in anatomical position. The reduction can be confirmed by viewing with the arthroscope. During the arthroscopic procedures, the potential for extravasation of fluid into the leg with resultant compartment syndrome should be monitored, especially in patients who have severe soft-tissue or osseous injuries.

    Postoperative Rehabilitation

    The limb is placed in a long leg hinged brace that is locked in full extension for three weeks after the surgery. While wearing the brace, patients are encouraged to start quadriceps muscle-strengthening exercises and to walk using crutches. Weight-bearing is not permitted during the first three weeks. After three weeks, passive range-of-motion exercises are started and walking with partial weight-bearing and the use of crutches is permitted. The brace is locked in full extension during walking. At six weeks, the brace is unlocked to allow motion and full weight-bearing is permitted. At eight weeks, the brace is removed and patients are encouraged to increase activity gradually. If multiple pins have been used, they are removed eight weeks after the operation.
    Four injuries of the posterior cruciate ligament with a small comminuted bone fragment were fixed with multiple absorbable sutures (PDS #1 or #0) with Endobutton, and two were fixed with multiple nonabsorbable sutures (Ethibond #2). Two injuries with a small bone fragment that was not comminuted were fixed with a 23-gauge wire (Figs. 10-A and 10-B). Two knees that had a medium-sized fragment were fixed with two Kirschner wires (Figs. 11-A and 11-B). A medium-sized fragment in one knee (Case 2) was fixed with multiple absorbable sutures because the fragment became comminuted during the insertion of the Kirschner wire. In four patients, a large single bone fragment that involved the condyles was fixed with one or two cannulated screws (Figs. Figs. 12-A and 12-B). A concomitant avulsion injury of the anterior cruciate ligament was fixed with multiple absorbable sutures at the same time in two patients. One patient who had a nonunion and posterolateral instability was treated with Clancy’s biceps rerouting technique15.
    All avulsion fractures had osseous union, at an average of three months after the procedure. A fracture was considered to be united when the fracture line was no longer visible radiographically. The eleven patients who underwent the operation in the acute phase, including two patients (three knees) in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis developed, showed no or trace posterior instability as determined with the posterior drawer test following the procedure. However, the two patients who had a delayed operation had grade-I posterior instability after the surgery. The average side-to-side difference in the posterior translation measured on posterior stress radiographs was 1.9 mm (range, 1.2 to 2.9 mm) in the patients who underwent the operation in the acute phase (and in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis did not develop), 3.0 mm (2.7, 2.7, and 3.5 mm) in the patients in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis developed, and 5.1 mm (5.0 and 5.2 mm) in the patients who had a delayed operation. The postoperative side-to-side difference in the corrected posterior translation as measured with the KT-2000 arthrometer averaged 1.1 mm (range, 0.5 to 2.2 mm) in the patients who underwent the operation in the acute phase, 1.8 mm (1.5, 1.8, and 2.1 mm) in the patients in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis developed, and 3.7 mm (3.3 and 4.1 mm) in the patients in whom the surgery was delayed. According to the assessment with the IKDC form at the final evaluation, of the nine patients who underwent the operation in the acute phase, five were classified as having grade-A function and four were classified as having grade-B function. The two patients in whom postoperative arthrofibrosis developed were classified as having grade-B function, and the two who had a delayed operation had grade-C.

    Complications

    Of the eleven knees that were treated in the acute phase, three (Cases 2, 6, and 7) had residual limitation of motion after the surgery. These patients were immobilized for two or three months after the procedure because of concomitant injury. One patient (Case 2) had a comminuted fracture of the distal part of the femur, which was treated by open reduction and internal fixation with use of a dynamic compression plate. However, the patient could not start early rehabilitation because of insecure fixation, and the range of motion of the knee was 5° to 50° four months after the surgery. The other two stiff knees were in one patient who had bilateral avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament as well as a traumatic hemothorax with multiple fractures, including comminuted fractures of both femoral shafts, a fracture of the left tibial shaft, and a fracture of the right lateral tibial condyle. The range of flexion of the right knee was 25° to 70° and that of the left knee was 10° to 95° six months after the surgery. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions was performed in all three stiff knees. After subsequent physiotherapy, all three knees recovered a nearly normal range of motion (average, 5° of flexion contracture to 135° of flexion).
    The posterior cruciate ligament is an important stabilizer of the knee joint; therefore, when the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament is avulsed the knee subluxates posteriorly16. There is general consensus that avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament from the tibia should be treated surgically. Meyers4 reported that five avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament that were treated nonoperatively did not unite; he recommended early repair of even minimally displaced avulsion fractures. Torisu6 reported that open reduction led to a satisfactory result in all of twelve patients with an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament (eight had an excellent result and four had a good result). However, open reduction requires the patient to be in a prone position, and the dissection is difficult.
    Recently, a variety of arthroscopically assisted techniques for the treatment of intra-articular fractures of the knee joint have been reported. Arthroscopic techniques with use of sutures, Kirschner wires, screws, and staples to repair avulsion fractures of the anterior cruciate ligament from the tibia have been described17-19.
    Martinez-Moreno and Blanco-Blanco9 first reported an experimental percutaneous fixation technique with use of arthroscopic visualization to fix avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament in cadaveric knees. They showed that an arthroscopic technique was possible, and they considered it to be an effective alternative to arthrotomy and percutaneous pinning. Littlejohn and Geissler11 reported on one patient who had an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament that was reduced with the aid of an arthroscope and was stabilized with use of three cannulated screws with the help of a tibial anterior cruciate ligament guide. In 1997, we reported that we had treated an avulsion fracture of the posterior cruciate ligament with use of arthroscopic reduction and internal fixation with two cannulated screws10. In that operation, a tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide was used to manipulate and anatomically reduce the avulsion fragment and to hold it in place while the Kirschner wires were guided.
    If the avulsed fragment is small or comminuted, a screw cannot be placed into it. We do not know of any report describing an arthroscopic or open technique for fixation of small or comminuted fracture fragments. In the new technique described here, we use two tibial tunnels to fix avulsed fragments. Sutures passed through the small comminuted fragments are then passed through the two tibial tunnels and tied to one another. This creates a wide contact area between the fragments and the fracture bed. We recommend wire fixation for small fragments that are not comminuted; however, wire fixation is not effective for comminuted fracture fragments because the wire has a tendency to split the stump of the posterior cruciate ligament as well as the fracture fragments.
    All patients in our study had union of the fracture site. Eleven patients who had undergone the operation within ten days after the injury had good stability on posterior drawer testing. Posterior instability was found in two patients, both of whom had had a delayed operation. Torisu7 reported that excellent results were obtained when operations were done within seven weeks after injuries and that results were less satisfactory when operations were delayed more than eleven weeks after injuries. Meyers4 also reported that knees treated with a delayed operation had a slightly positive posterior drawer sign at the time of follow-up. We concur that early surgical fixation of the avulsed fragment is important to achieve stability. However, a delayed operation can be effective if the patient has discomfort in the posteriorly subluxated knee despite conservative treatment.
    Arthrofibrosis developed in two patients (three knees) after arthroscopic reduction and fixation. These patients had sustained multiple fractures around the knee or damage to other structures and had been immobilized for a prolonged period. Early range of motion after surgery may prevent the development of arthrofibrosis.
    Although the arthroscopic reduction and fixation technique is difficult, we found the method effective in the treatment of avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament. We were able to anatomically reduce the fractures under direct vision and also to identify and treat associated intra-articular pathology without arthrotomy. Except for arthrofibrosis, there was no serious morbidity or complication. Arthroscopically assisted suture repair was especially useful for the treatment of small or comminuted avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament.
    In conclusion, we have demonstrated that avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament can be fixed with use of arthroscopic methods. If the fracture fragment is large or medium-sized, screws or multiple pins can be used. Small or comminuted fragments can be fixed with use of wire or multiple sutures.
    Ando T, and Nishihara K: Arthroscopic internal fixation of fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. Arthroscopy,1996.12: 616-22, 12616  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Matthews DE, and Geissler WB: Arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 418-23, 10418  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Medler RG, and Jansson KA: Arthroscopic treatment of fractures of the tibial spine. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 292-5, 10292  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Meyers MH: Isolated avulsion of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1975.57: 669-72, 57669  1975  [PubMed]
     
    Suprock MD, and Rogers VP: Posterior cruciate avulsion. Orthopedics,1990.13: 659-62, 13659  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Torisu T: Isolated avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977.59: 68-72, 5968  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Torisu T: Avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Indications and results of delayed repair. Clin Orthop,1979.143: 107-14, 143107  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Trickey EL: Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment of early injuries and reconstruction of late instability. Clin Orthop,1980.147: 76-81, 14776  1980  [PubMed]
     
    Martinez-Moreno JL, and Blanco-Blanco E: Avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. An experimental percutaneous rigid fixation technique under arthroscopic control. Clin Orthop,1988.237: 204-8, 237204  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Choi NH, and Kim SJ: Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament of the tibia. Arthroscopy,1997.13: 759-62, 13759  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Littlejohn SG, and Geissler WB: Arthroscopic repair of a posterior cruciate ligament avulsion. Arthroscopy,1995.11: 235-8, 11235  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Staubli HU; Noesberger B; and Jakob RP: Stressradiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl,1992.249: 1-27, 2491  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Daniel DM; Malcom LL; Losse G; Stone ML; Sachs R; and Burks R: Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 720-6, 67720  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Hefti F; Muller W; Jakob RP; and Staubli HU: Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,1993.1: 226-34, 1226  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Clancy WG Jr. Repair and reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. In: Chapman MW, editor. Operative orthopaedics. 2nd ed, volume 3. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993. p 2093-107 
     
    Hughston JC; Bowden JA; Andrews JR; and Norwood LA: Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1980.62: 438-50, 62438  1980  [PubMed]
     
    Perez; Carro L; Garcia Suarez G; and Gomez Cimiano F: Technical note. The arthroscopic knot technique for fracture of the tibia in children. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 698-9, 10698  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Lubowitz JH, and Grauer JD: Arthroscopic treatment of anterior cruciate ligament avulsion. Clin Orthop,1993.294: 242-6, 294242  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Veselko M; Senekovic V; and Tonin M: Simple and safe arthroscopic placement and removal of cannulated screw and washer for fixation of tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy,1996.12: 259-62, 12259  1996  [PubMed]
     

    Submit a comment

    Topics

    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 1:Posterior view of a right knee. The arthroscope is placed through a posteromedial portal (A). A plastic sheath that has a waterproof diaphragm is passed through a posterolateral portal (B). Another sheath is placed through an anteromedial portal (C).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-A:Axial view (Fig. 2-A) and sagittal section (Fig. 2-B) of the perforation made through the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament. The perforation is made with use of a switching stick passed through the posterolateral portal.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 2-B:Axial view (Fig. 2-A) and sagittal section (Fig. 2-B) of the perforation made through the posterior septum behind the posterior cruciate ligament. The perforation is made with use of a switching stick passed through the posterolateral portal.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 3:Viewed through the posteromedial portal, avulsion of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can be seen (arrows).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 4:A tibial posterior cruciate ligament guide (A) placed through the anteromedial portal is used to secure the fracture fragment (C) and to guide insertion of a threaded Kirschner wire (arrow). A dural elevator (B) passed through the posterolateral portal is used to prevent migration of the fragment during drilling. PCL = posterior cruciate ligament.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 5:A long 18-gauge spinal needle is inserted through the posterolateral sheath and passed through the posterior cruciate ligament just proximal to the fracture fragment, and a 23-gauge wire is passed through the lumen of the needle.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 6:The 23-gauge wire or multiple sutures are pulled out through a sheath placed in the anteromedial portal, and the needle is removed.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 7:Two bone tunnels are made from the anterior tibial cortex to the medial and lateral margins of the fracture bed. Two looped wires are passed through the bone tunnels and the posterolateral and anteromedial sheaths.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 8:Two looped wires are pulled distally, leading each end of the 23-gauge wire or the multiple sutures through the medial and lateral bone tunnels.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 9:Each end of the previously passed 23-gauge wire or multiple sutures is pulled distally with even tension until the fracture fragment is accurately reduced. Then the wire or sutures are tied tightly over the tibial cortex.
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10-A:Case 8. Preoperative radiographs of a small fragment without comminution (Fig. 10-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with a 23-gauge wire (Fig. 10-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 10-B:Case 8. Preoperative radiographs of a small fragment without comminution (Fig. 10-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with a 23-gauge wire (Fig. 10-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11-A:Case 10. Preoperative radiographs of a medium- sized fragment (Fig. 11-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two Kirschner wires (Fig. 11-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 11-B:Case 10. Preoperative radiographs of a medium- sized fragment (Fig. 11-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two Kirschner wires (Fig. 11-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12-A:Case 13. Preoperative magnetic resonance image of a definite large one-piece avulsed fragment (Fig. 12-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two cannulated screws (Fig. 12-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
    +Fig. 12-B:Case 13. Preoperative magnetic resonance image of a definite large one-piece avulsed fragment (Fig. 12-A), and postoperative radiographs showing reduction and fixation with two cannulated screws (Fig. 12-B).
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE I:  Data on the Patients
    *ACL = anterior cruciate ligament, and MCL = medial collateral ligament. †As assessed with the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form.
    CaseGender, Age (yr)SideInterval to Op. (days)Mechanism of InjuryAssociated Injury*TreatmentDuration of Follow-up (mo)ComplicationsKnee Function†Posterior Translation (mm)
    KT-2000 ArthrometerStress Radiograph
    ?1F, 26L?4FallFract., phalanx PDS #0 ¥ 5, Endobutton72A1.42.5
    ?2M, 19L10Motor-veh. acc.Fract., femur PDS #1 ¥ 6, Endobutton42Stiff kneeB1.82.7
    ?3M, 39L20 moMotor-veh. acc.Avulsion, ACL; fract., femur, tibia, fibulaPDS #1 ¥ 6, Endobutton36C3.35.0
    ?4M, 26L19 moMotor-veh. acc.Fract., lat. tibial condyle; posterolat. instabilityPDS #1 ¥ 5, Endobutton54C4.15.2
    ?5F, 17L?4FallEthibond #2 ¥ 528A1.32.5
    ?6M, 33L?7Motor-veh. acc.Fract., femur, tibia Ethibond #2 ¥ 530Stiff kneeB2.13.5
    ?7RFract., femur, lat. tibial condyle23-gauge wire ¥ 1Stiff kneeB1.52.7
    ?8M, 19R?4Motor-veh. acc.23-gauge wire ¥ 124A0.71.2
    ?9F, 23L?5FallKirschner wire ¥ 251A0.51.5
    10F, 57R?6FallKirschner wire ¥ 226B1.01.4
    11M, 52L10Motor-veh. acc.Avulsion, ACLKirschner wire ¥ 2, cannulated screw ¥ 140B1.62.9
    12F, 49R?7FallRupture, MCLCannulated screw ¥ 136B2.22.4
    13F, 43R?5FallCannulated screw ¥ 239A0.81.2
    14F, 54R?7FallCannulated screw ¥ 224B0.51.5
    Anchor for JumpAnchor for JumpTABLE II:  Treatment Guidelines for Avulsion Fractures of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament
    Fragment SizeFixation
    Large (>20 mm)Cannulated screw
    Medium (10-20 mm) Multiple pins
    Small (<10mm)
    Without comminutionWire suture
    With comminutionMultiple sutures
    Ando T, and Nishihara K: Arthroscopic internal fixation of fractures of the intercondylar eminence of the tibia. Arthroscopy,1996.12: 616-22, 12616  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Matthews DE, and Geissler WB: Arthroscopic suture fixation of displaced tibial eminence fractures. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 418-23, 10418  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Medler RG, and Jansson KA: Arthroscopic treatment of fractures of the tibial spine. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 292-5, 10292  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Meyers MH: Isolated avulsion of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1975.57: 669-72, 57669  1975  [PubMed]
     
    Suprock MD, and Rogers VP: Posterior cruciate avulsion. Orthopedics,1990.13: 659-62, 13659  1990  [PubMed]
     
    Torisu T: Isolated avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1977.59: 68-72, 5968  1977  [PubMed]
     
    Torisu T: Avulsion fracture of the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Indications and results of delayed repair. Clin Orthop,1979.143: 107-14, 143107  1979  [PubMed]
     
    Trickey EL: Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment of early injuries and reconstruction of late instability. Clin Orthop,1980.147: 76-81, 14776  1980  [PubMed]
     
    Martinez-Moreno JL, and Blanco-Blanco E: Avulsion fractures of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee. An experimental percutaneous rigid fixation technique under arthroscopic control. Clin Orthop,1988.237: 204-8, 237204  1988  [PubMed]
     
    Choi NH, and Kim SJ: Arthroscopic reduction and fixation of bony avulsion of the posterior cruciate ligament of the tibia. Arthroscopy,1997.13: 759-62, 13759  1997  [PubMed]
     
    Littlejohn SG, and Geissler WB: Arthroscopic repair of a posterior cruciate ligament avulsion. Arthroscopy,1995.11: 235-8, 11235  1995  [PubMed]
     
    Staubli HU; Noesberger B; and Jakob RP: Stressradiography of the knee. Cruciate ligament function studied in 138 patients. Acta Orthop Scand Suppl,1992.249: 1-27, 2491  1992  [PubMed]
     
    Daniel DM; Malcom LL; Losse G; Stone ML; Sachs R; and Burks R: Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1985.67: 720-6, 67720  1985  [PubMed]
     
    Hefti F; Muller W; Jakob RP; and Staubli HU: Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,1993.1: 226-34, 1226  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Clancy WG Jr. Repair and reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. In: Chapman MW, editor. Operative orthopaedics. 2nd ed, volume 3. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1993. p 2093-107 
     
    Hughston JC; Bowden JA; Andrews JR; and Norwood LA: Acute tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. Results of operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1980.62: 438-50, 62438  1980  [PubMed]
     
    Perez; Carro L; Garcia Suarez G; and Gomez Cimiano F: Technical note. The arthroscopic knot technique for fracture of the tibia in children. Arthroscopy,1994.10: 698-9, 10698  1994  [PubMed]
     
    Lubowitz JH, and Grauer JD: Arthroscopic treatment of anterior cruciate ligament avulsion. Clin Orthop,1993.294: 242-6, 294242  1993  [PubMed]
     
    Veselko M; Senekovic V; and Tonin M: Simple and safe arthroscopic placement and removal of cannulated screw and washer for fixation of tibial avulsion fracture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Arthroscopy,1996.12: 259-62, 12259  1996  [PubMed]
     
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center