0
Instructional Course Lecture   |    
Operative Treatment of Common Displaced and Unstable Fractures of the Hand
Alan E. Freeland, MD; William B. Geissler, MD; Arnold-Peter C. Weiss, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
An Instructional Course Lecture, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons
Alan E. Freeland, MD
William B. Geissler, MD
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, University of Mississippi Medical Center, 2500 North State Street, Jackson, MS 39216. E-mail addresYCs for A.E. Freeland: afreeland@orthopedics.umsmed.edu E-mail address for W.B. Geissler: wgeissler@orthopedics.umsmed.edu

Arnold-Peter C. Weiss, MD
University Orthopedics, 2 Dudley Street, #200, Providence, RI 02905-3211. E-mail address: arnold-peter_weiss@brown.edu

Printed with permission of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. This article, as well as other lectures presented at the Academy’s Annual Meeting, will be available in March 2002 in Instructional Course Lectures, Volume 51. The complete volume can be ordered online at www.aaos.org, or by calling 800-626-6726 (8 a.m.-5 p.m., Central time).

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding (AO Research Grant 1993). In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (AO/ASIF, Harcourt Medical Publishing, and Acumed). Also, commercial entities (AO/ASIF and Harcourt Medical Publishing) paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, benefits to a research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which one or more of the authors are affiliated or associated.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:928-945 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
The hand is an instrument of performance and protection. Whether at war, work, competition, or recreation, an individual’s reflexes routinely place the hand in harm’s way to protect the head and body. Accidents inevitably occur, resulting in fractures of the metacarpals and phalanges and other injuries. This Instructional Course Lecture addresses, in particular, the craft of reduction and stabilization of displaced, irreducible, and unstable fractures of the hand as an integral part of reestablishing skeletal integrity and refined digital function. The goals of treatment include returning manual laborers to their work or to the practice of their special skills, professionals to their tasks, students to their classrooms, writers to their pens, musicians to their instruments, artists to their brushes and easels, athletes to their contests, parents to their families, children to life’s enjoyments, and increasing numbers of the world’s population to a variety of digital keyboards and computers.
Fracture management should be principle-driven. These principles include the attainment of anatomical (or near-anatomical) position, adequate stability to allow both fracture-healing and early active digital motion, and minimization of additional soft-tissue damage when fixation of the fracture is required1.
Function follows form. Although there is some tolerance for deformity, excessive angulation or rotation of a fractured digit may obstruct the motion and function of an adjacent digit and, consequently, the hand. Bone angulation, shortening, or a combination of the two affects muscle-tendon tension, leading to digital deformity as well as to loss of motion, strength, power, and endurance.
While the prevalence, rate of development, and severity of posttraumatic arthritis and pain in the joints of the hand may be less than those in larger joints, particularly weight-bearing joints, there should be no complacency in the pursuit to reestablish joint congruity when repairing an intra-articular fracture2-4. A single millimeter of incongruity may be acceptable, but an effort should always be made to correct an offset of 2 mm or more, especially if it is accompanied by joint subluxation.
Fracture stability need not be rigid but must be reliable. The method or the implant or implants selected do not necessarily have to be the strongest available, but a threshold of stabilizing force that will reliably allow fracture-healing in concert with early rehabilitation must be achieved. Fracture fixation only needs to be strong enough to immobilize the fracture until the strength of the healing callus surpasses that of the fixation. Although stability may not hasten healing, it ensures the process by protecting tissue revascularization during repair. Fracture stability may also inhibit infection.
Surgical incision, especially when it is accompanied by periosteal violation and particularly when flexor-tendon zone II is involved5, carries the risk of functionally limiting scar formation. The physician must balance the potential benefit of the increased biomechanical stability that may be gained through surgical treatment against the risk of consequent digital stiffness.
Anatomical reduction and fracture stability help to control and minimize pain and are instrumental in permitting the early active range-of-motion exercises that are the cornerstone of rehabilitation and recovery. Placement of the hand and wrist in a functional or "safe" ("rehabilitation-ready") position neutralizes and balances the muscle forces acting at the fracture site. (In a rehabilitation-ready position, the wrist is extended 15° to 20°, the metacarpophalangeal joints are flexed 70° or more, and the proximal interphalangeal joints are in 0° to 10° of flexion.) This position also places the digital joint ligaments at maximum length to prevent permanent contracture and is particularly important in reduced fractures that are considered stable without the application of implants. A functional hand and wrist position is also instrumental in placing the extrinsic and intrinsic muscles at or near their resting tension, at which point they can generate the maximum strength and power that are so critical for the recovery of digital motion. Once motion is regained, further muscle strength, power, and endurance follow more easily. The treatment of edema and the promotion of softening, mobilization, and desensitization of integumentary scar tissue may proceed concurrently.
Plain radiographs alone are almost always adequate for the evaluation of hand fractures. Metacarpal fractures may be difficult to evaluate in the lateral plane because of overlap of adjacent metacarpals. Oblique radiographs with the hand pronated or supinated (or both) at 30° to 45° are helpful. Oblique radiographs are also helpful in the evaluation of intra-articular fractures. Avulsion fractures of the proximal, dorsal, and palmar lips of the phalanges as well as their extent and degree of displacement sometimes may be seen and fully appreciated only on true lateral radiographs. The true extent of the angulation of an extra-articular proximal phalangeal fracture near a joint often may be accurately assessed only on a true lateral radiograph6. Oblique radiographs may create an optical illusion of less angulation than truly exists, which may lead the surgeon into the complacency of accepting angulation that should actually be corrected. A computerized axial tomography scan occasionally may be useful, especially in the assessment of an intra-articular fracture, particularly when there is intra-articular comminution.
The majority of hand fractures are closed, simple, and stable. They are unlikely to move from the position that they are in when they are initially seen, even during the process of rehabilitation of the digits. Radiographs demonstrate minimal displacement (less than 1 to 2 mm of translation and less than 10° to 20° of angulation) or no displacement. These fractures may not be associated with any apparent clinical deformity on visual inspection. A digital or wrist block may allow the physician to recognize the presence of functional deformity or instability. These fractures require only a brief period of static or dynamic splinting or even buddy-taping to an adjacent finger, and a short period of rehabilitation7-14. Some comparable but displaced fractures may be stable following closed manipulative reduction, and they may be treated similarly. They should be monitored during the first few weeks after reduction until fracture callus is visualized on radiographs, as loss of reduction may occur. The course of treatment is typically uncomplicated, and the functional outcomes are commonly good.
More severe fractures may be displaced and may be associated with visible deformities because of their configuration, periosteal disruption, and unbalanced muscle forces. If these fractures are unstable following reduction, they will require fixation with an implant to maintain anatomical position during fracture-healing and to allow simultaneous rehabilitation. A digital nerve block with local anesthesia followed by observation of digital motion or by stress-testing may assist the physician in determining whether the fracture is stable and whether fixation is necessary.
The vast majority of reducible but unstable closed simple fractures may be reliably treated with transcutaneous Kirschner-wire fixation. This type of treatment has been termed closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF)15,16. Soft-tissue damage from insertion of this type of implant is usually minimal.
While closed reduction and internal fixation may be performed with use of ordinary radiographic control, c-arm fluoroscopy substantially simplifies the procedure by allowing instantaneous adjustments of the fracture reduction and of the insertion site, angle, and depth of the wire in two planes or more. A pointed reduction forceps is instrumental in achieving and maintaining fracture reduction. If the reduction forceps is cannulated, wire insertion is further simplified. An assistant holds and stabilizes the hand or finger while the surgeon drills the wire into the proper position.
Open reduction is usually required for fractures that are irreducible because of swelling, soft-tissue interposition, or interlocking of the fragments. Following open reduction, internal fixation is usually indicated because of fracture instability. It may also be prudent to allow earlier and more intensive rehabilitation in these situations in which more than ordinary scar-tissue formation is anticipated. This type of treatment is designated as open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Other relative indications for open reduction and internal fixation include open fractures (especially those associated with bone loss or other complex injuries); intra-articular, periarticular, comminuted, and multiple fractures; fractures that have occurred in association with other fractures in the same extremity; and fractures in multiply injured or noncompliant patients. Open reduction and fixation with Kirschner wires may be necessary in certain situations in which closed reduction and internal fixation would ordinarily have been done with radiographic assistance. Widgerow et al., for example, reported that open reduction and internal fixation was successfully performed in the absence of radiographic capability in a third-world country17. This technique may also be important when radiographic equipment is unavailable, broken down, or malfunctioning or when there is a power failure. Meticulous attention to surgical detail may overcome an absence or failure of technical equipment in some situations. Mini-screws have been inserted through small "portal-sized" 1 to 2-mm incisions. This procedure is termed limited open reduction and internal fixation (LORIF).
Open reduction and mini-internal fixation in the hand is less controversial for the treatment of nonunion or malunion, for early arthrodesis of an irreparable intra-articular fracture, and for later arthrodesis in a hand with symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis than it is for the treatment of acute fractures. Strong, reliable long-term fixation is needed to support bone grafts, osteotomy sites, and arthrodesis sites, which may need a longer healing time because of the extensive osseous defects and the extensive dissection associated with these procedures. Additionally, firm fixation is required so that early and intensive therapy may be applied to inhibit or prevent adjacent tendon and joint adhesions, especially when tenolysis or capsulotomy has been performed concurrently.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:Dorsal approach to the proximal phalanx. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Pratt DR. Exposing fractures of the proximal phalanx of the finger longitudinally through the dorsal extensor apparatus. Clin Orthop. 1959;15:24.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Mid-axial approach to the proximal phalanx. Line A indicates the mid-lateral line; line B, the mid-axial line; and line C, the interphalangeal joint flexion crease. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Littler JW, Cramer LM, Smith JW, editors. Symposium on reconstructive hand surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1974. p 90.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 3:Approaches to the metacarpals. A: Radial approach to the second (index) metacarpal. B: Approach to the third and fourth metacarpal shafts through a single incision. C: Ulnar approach to the fifth metacarpal. D: Approach to the bases of the second and third metacarpals through a single incision. E: Approach to the head of the third metacarpal and the base of the fourth metacarpal through a single incision. F: Approach to the heads of the fourth and fifth metacarpals through a single incision. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Freeland AE, Geissler WB. Plate fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. In: Blair WF, Steyers CM, editors. Techniques in hand surgery. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p 257.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:A fifty-one-year-old right-handed patient who worked on an assembly line had weakness, cramping, and loss of endurance in the right hand. A: Radiograph showing healed fractures of the index and ring metacarpals and a malunion of both (arrowheads). Digital motion was nearly normal. The patient had no pain at rest and no swelling, warmth, discoloration, or tenderness. B: Five-position grip-testing demonstrated a 30% loss of strength. C: Single sustained grip-testing revealed a similar loss. Although there is a certain amount of anatomical forgiveness in hand-fracture management, disregard of the principle of a stable anatomical (or near-anatomical) reduction of a hand fracture is not always entirely innocuous.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:An adolescent boy who had severely displaced transverse fractures of the second and third metacarpals. A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and oblique radiographs. C and D: Anteroposterior and oblique radiographs made after Kirschner wires were inserted into the medullary canals of both metacarpals.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:An adult patient who had a transverse fracture in the middle of the fifth metacarpal shaft that was irreducible by closed manipulation. A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. C and D: Radiographs made after open reduction and internal fixation with a four-hole straight low-contact mini-plate applied under dynamic compression. A gradual bend of 5° was contoured over the entire length of the plate prior to its application. A small amount of pre-bend in the mini-plate ensures that the cortex across from the plate will be under compression and that there will be uniform compression across the entire fracture. If the plate is left straight, the opposite cortex will distract as the mini-plate is placed under tension. If a plate is bent at a single site rather than across the entire plate, the bend will occur at the weakest site (a plate-hole), increasing the risk of fatigue fracture of the plate.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:A: A malrotated irreducible spiral oblique fracture of the third metacarpal. B: Radiograph made after the fracture was stabilized by insertion of mini-screws along the fracture plane. The proximal mini-screw (black arrow) is perpendicular to both the fracture (for maximum compression) and the long axis of the bone (for maximum resistance to shear displacement). The distal mini-screw (white arrow) is perpendicular to the fracture (for maximum compression). The mini-screws neutralize rotational and bending forces. The third metacarpal is also protected by intact metacarpal pillars on either side.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:A: Preoperative radiograph showing a closed, unstable comminuted subcapital fracture of the second metacarpal. B: Radiograph made after the fracture was reduced and stabilized by the application of a mini-condylar plate applied from the lateral side.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:A: Preoperative radiograph showing open, displaced, highly unstable fractures of the third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals and a closed extra-articular fracture of the base of the proximal phalanx of the index finger (arrow). B: Radiograph made after open reduction and stabilization of the metacarpal fractures with use of mini-plates and screws and after closed reduction and fixation of the proximal phalanx of the index finger with use of crossed Kirschner wires (arrow).
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a closed displaced transverse fracture of the shaft of the proximal phalanx of the right ring finger. C and D: Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. A small (limited) dorsal incision was made to complete the fracture reduction, and an intramedullary Kirschner wire was used to hold the reduction.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:A: Preoperative radiograph of a displaced uniplanar oblique fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. B: Radiograph made after closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with mini-screws.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:A: Radiograph showing a slightly displaced unicondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. The fracture was treated with open reduction through a limited mid-axial incision and alignment of the proximal portion of the fracture without opening the interphalangeal joint. B: Radiograph showing fixation of the fragment with a mini-screw.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 13:A: Preoperative radiograph of a displaced Bennett fracture. B: Radiograph made after reduction with closed traction and manipulation and stabilization with transcutaneous Kirschner wires. C: The wire across the fracture site has been replaced by a transcutaneously applied mini-lag screw. The "buttressing" Kirschner wire remains. D: The "buttressing" Kirschner wire was removed three weeks after surgery.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:A: Oblique radiograph of a closed, displaced transverse subcondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb and a closed Rolando fracture. B: The Rolando fracture was reduced with traction and manipulation. The joint surface was aligned, and the major metaphyseal fragments were stabilized with two Kirschner wires inserted parallel to the articular plane. The repaired metaphysis was then fixed to the diaphysis with crossed Kirschner wires. The transverse subcondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx was reduced and transcutaneously pinned with crossed Kirschner wires.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 15:A: A comminuted subcapital fracture of the fifth metacarpal was inadequately stabilized with a circumferential malleable wire, resulting in a painful nonunion (arrowhead). A fracture of the fourth metacarpal healed after fixation with a mini-plate. Both the ring and small fingers were stiff. B: An extensor tenolysis and implant removal was performed on both fingers. The sclerotic bone fragments were removed from the fracture site (arrowhead) of the fifth metacarpal. The ununited fracture was stabilized, and bone-grafting was done with compressed cancellous bone obtained from the distal aspect of the ipsilateral radius. C: The fracture of the fifth metacarpal (arrowhead) healed. The motion of both fingers substantially improved.
Kirschner wires are the cornerstone of hand-fracture fixation7-18. They may be inserted either transcutaneously after closed reduction of a fracture or following open reduction. They do not compress but internally splint the bone while the fracture heals. The fracture reduction should be as precise as possible prior to the insertion of the wires in order to ensure optimal stability of the fracture-implant construct.
Kirschner wires are inexpensive and almost universally available. They require little additional instrumentation, may be inserted with either hand or power-driven drills, and create little additional soft-tissue trauma. They may form an integral component of other open wiring techniques, such as figure-of-eight tension-band wiring and circumferential wiring. They may also be used adjunctively to enhance the stability of almost any other form of internal or external fixation. An oblique Kirschner wire may add substantial additional stability to a construct that is less than adequately stable. These wires are generally left in place until fracture callus or healing is visible on radiographs or for as long as they are tolerated. Fracture-healing is usually sufficiently advanced at three to four weeks after insertion so that the Kirschner wires may be removed.
Kirschner wires with a 0.045-in (1.1-mm) diameter may be used almost universally in the hand. Occasionally, for larger bones, such as the metacarpal or the proximal phalanx, Kirschner wires with a 0.062-in (1.6-mm) diameter may be selected. For children and for smaller bones, such as the middle or distal phalanges, wires with a 0.035-in (0.9-mm) diameter may be the best choice.
Kirschner wires or their equivalents may be inserted into the medullary canal of metacarpals and phalanges for fracture fixation15,16,19,20. When used in this fashion, these devices may be left in place temporarily or permanently. The principal difficulties include a lack of rotational control and delayed union or nonunion. Fracture collapse may occur when Kirschner wires are removed prematurely, which may result in nonunion or malunion of the fracture and consequent digital stiffness. This risk increases with fracture comminution21. Mini-screws, and even mini-plates, may obviate this risk.
Mini-screws, mini-plates, and the instruments necessary to apply them are relatively expensive compared with Kirschner wires and other wiring systems. Their insertion is technically more demanding than that of Kirschner wires, and there is less margin for error. Specialized training and surgical experience are definite advantages that enhance an individual’s proficiency in their use. A sterile operating environment is mandatory. Good lighting, experienced personnel, and reliable radiographic support are often critical to obtain a successful result. The advantages of these implants are the added stability provided by fracture compression and the resultant or independent neutralization of bending, rotational, and shear forces acting upon the fracture site. These features help to ensure timely fracture-healing and to allow earlier and more intensive digital rehabilitation.
A mini-screw is little more than a Kirschner wire with threads and a head. Insertion of a mini-screw is associated with little if any additional soft-tissue trauma compared with that associated with insertion of a Kirschner wire22. Drilling the proximal cortex to the same diameter as the screw threads creates a "gliding hole" through which the mini-screw slides without resistance until it engages the "core hole" that has been drilled in the opposite cortex. The "core hole" has the same diameter as the core of the mini-screw. This creates a lag effect, resulting in compression at the fracture site.
Mini-plates must be used judiciously, especially on phalanges, since the dissection necessary for their application may disrupt periosteal circulation at the fracture site and may stimulate substantial fibroplasia (scar formation)10,12,14. Mini-plates are particularly useful for the treatment of open fractures associated with bone loss and extensive comminution. Mini-plates have generic anatomical or descriptive names; examples of those devices include straight tubular and limited-contact mini-plates, mini-condylar plates, mini-T or mini-L plates, and angled mini-plates. Mini-H plates have been designed to facilitate digital replantations. Physiologically, these mini-plates stabilize fractures by compression, neutralization, or buttressing. In some instances they may compress the fracture and neutralize the external forces acting upon it, and in others they may buttress the fracture and neutralize the external forces acting upon it. Compression and buttressing cannot take place concurrently because they are diametrically opposed forces.
When a mini-plate is applied to compress a fracture, the fracture must first be accurately reduced. The mini-plate is then stabilized on one side of the fracture with mini-screws. On the other side of the fracture, a hole is drilled eccentrically through the plate-hole most distant from the fracture. When the mini-screw is inserted into this hole and the screw head engages the plate-hole, it pulls the mini-plate and the attached fragment toward the screw, placing the fracture under compression. This is called the "spherical gliding principle" of screw-head engagement of the plate-hole1. The fracture is placed under compression while the mini-plate is placed under an equal amount of tension. Thus, this construct is called a "compression plate" or a "tension-band plate". The terms are synonymous. The bone will not move until and unless the compressive force of this "preload" is exceeded.
The Pratt incision (or a variation of it) has been the classic dorsal utilitarian approach for fractures of the proximal phalanx23 (Fig. 1). A mid-axial incision may be preferable for some fractures in an effort to move the zone of injury away from the extensor mechanism and to minimize the risk of adhesions to this tendon24,25 (Fig. 2). Metacarpals may be approached through a direct longitudinal incision. If two adjacent metacarpals are fractured, they usually may be approached through a single incision made between them26,27 (Fig. 3). The fracture is exposed by subperiosteal dissection initiated from the lateral side in an effort to protect the gliding tissue on either side of the extensor tendon.
Mini-external fixators may be used to treat a variety of hand fractures. While their advantages include minimal or no exposure of the fracture site and adequate stability, they have no compelling advantage over Kirschner wires in the treatment of simple closed fractures of the hand. Conversely, they may be especially useful for comminuted intra-articular fractures; for the initial provisional and, sometimes, permanent definitive fixation of severe open fractures; and for mutilating injuries associated with soiling, comminution, bone loss, and full-thickness skin loss28.
Ideally, a minimum of two threaded or smooth half-pins are inserted on either side of the fracture. Pins with a 0.062-in (1.6-mm) diameter are ordinarily used for smaller adult bones such as the middle and distal phalanges and for children, whereas pins with a 0.08-in (2.0-mm) diameter are used for adult metacarpals and proximal phalanges. Kirschner wires with similar diameters may be substituted for half-pins. Smooth pins are sufficient for short-term application (four to six weeks). They are further stabilized when the mini-external fixator compresses or distracts the fracture. Threaded pins provide more stability than smooth pins, especially when a mini-external fixator is applied for long-term (six-to-ten-week) definitive fixation of a fracture with a defect that requires bone-grafting. Ancillary Kirschner wires or mini-screws may be used in conjunction with a mini-external fixator to secure larger fracture fragments. Occasionally, a mini-external fixator may be used to support a mini-plate that spans but does not independently secure a fracture.
Extensor tendon transfixion is more easily avoided in metacarpal applications than in phalangeal applications. A longitudinal incision of approximately 1 cm in the dorsal apparatus may avoid irritation and allow limited motion of the digit. Pin sites are a source of risk for infection and require daily wound care (cleaning and antiseptic application). The prevalence of nonunion is related to the size and severity of the bone defect while the prevalence of infection is related to the size and severity of the wound and the degree of initial contamination.
Bone-grafting may be indicated when there is a cortical defect at the site of fixation of a mini-plate, comminution, a bone defect, or atrophic nonunion1. Cancellous bone from the proximal part of the ipsilateral ulna, the distal part of the ipsilateral radius, or the ilium is the mainstay for bone-grafting of defects in the hand. Cancellous bone may be placed in the barrel of a syringe and compressed by the plunger29. The compacted cancellous bone may then be disengaged from the barrel with use of a long spinal needle inserted through the barrel outlet. This dense cancellous bone then can be inserted to provide additional structural support at the site of the defect. If there are any viable cells in the cancellous bone, compacting increases their numbers per unit of volume. Although not scientifically confirmed to date, it is our impression that revascularization and incorporation occur more rapidly in compacted than in noncompacted cancellous bone graft.
Unicortical bone grafts from the ilium, the proximal part of the ipsilateral ulna, or the distal part of the ipsilateral radius, or tricortical bone grafts from the iliac crest may be sculpted to fit larger defects (1.5 cm in length or greater) or may be used when the stability afforded by cortical bone is needed. Ball-and-socket or mortise articulations at the bone graft-fracture junctions reestablish bone length, alignment, and stability while providing a large cancellous interface area for healing. Donor-site defects may be packed with synthetic bone graft to minimize the risk of later fracture at that site.
The unbalanced pull of the interosseous muscles and extrinsic digital flexors on the distal fragment may cause dorsal angulation of metacarpal fractures30,31. Dorsal angulation of as much as 10° more than the motion afforded at the carpometacarpal joints does not ordinarily cause a functional deficit26,27. Compensatory carpometacarpal motion allows accommodation of the metacarpal head in the palm of the hand in slightly angulated fractures and prevents painful pressure from a palmarly displaced metacarpal head when tools and implements with a handle are grasped and used. The intermetacarpal ligaments prevent more than 3 to 4 mm of shortening32. The second and fifth metacarpals are more likely to shorten since they have the suspensory effect of only one intermetacarpal ligament. Approximately 7° of extensor lag develops in the fingers for each 2 mm of residual metacarpal shortening after fracture-healing33. In any case, angulation of more than 30°, shortening of more than 4 mm, or a combination of these findings interferes with normal intrinsic muscle-tension dynamics and may cause weakness, loss of endurance, cramping, and clawing, each of which should be prevented by correction of the deformity30-34 (Fig. 4). The metacarpals are very intolerant of malrotation. As little as 5° of malrotation may translate into 1.5 cm of digital overlap during finger flexion27,35.
Metacarpal shaft fractures may be classified by pattern. Simple fractures may be transverse or oblique. Oblique fractures may be short (less than twice the diameter of the bone adjacent to or at the site of the fracture) or long (at least twice the adjacent bone diameter). Long oblique fractures may be uniplanar or spiral. Short oblique fractures are essentially always uniplanar. Other metacarpal shaft fractures may have comminuted patterns or bone loss.
Transverse metacarpal shaft fractures may be caused by axial loading but usually result from a dorsal impact. Undisplaced, minimally displaced, and fully reduced fractures may be successfully treated with protective splinting or functional bracing9,36,37. Skin necrosis overlying the fracture is a risk. If displacement recurs during the first three to four weeks of healing and before fracture callus is visualized on radiographs, closed remanipulation and percutaneous Kirschner-wire stabilization is indicated. Thereafter, open reduction and either re-creation of the fracture or corrective osteotomy may be necessary. In such cases, some type of internal fixation, often a mini-plate, is indicated.
Some closed transverse metacarpal fractures may be accompanied by such extensive swelling that reduction is impossible. Others may redisplace after reduction because of extensive periosteal disruption. In such instances, either intramedullary splinting (Fig. 5)20 or fixation with Kirschner or composite wire38 or with straight tubular or low-contact dynamic compression mini-plates26,27,39-48 may provide an optimal solution. The use of two plate-holes on both sides of the fracture, allowing the secure purchase of four cortices (also on both sides of the fracture), provides sufficient and reliable fixation (Fig. 6)26,27.
The treatment of short oblique fractures of the metacarpal shaft may be similar to that of transverse fractures of the metacarpal shaft. Alternatively, sagittal short oblique fractures may be treated with a laterally inserted mini-lag (compression) screw. A five-hole mini-plate is then centered with the middle hole over the fracture site and is secured without compression by the insertion of mini-screws into the center of the two plate-holes on either end of the mini-plate. The center hole is left free to accommodate the underlying laterally applied mini-lag screw26,27. A mini-plate applied in this fashion is called a "neutralization mini-plate." Such plates counteract the bending, rotational, and shear forces that might act on the mini-lag screw. Coronal short oblique fractures may be treated by application of a five-hole straight tubular or low-contact dynamic compression mini-plate that drives the adjacent corner of the fracture into the mini-plate. A mini-lag screw is then inserted through the center plate-hole and across the fracture26,27. This is the strongest of the mini-plate constructs because it compresses the fracture by both mini-plate and screw application.
An unstable long oblique fracture of the metacarpal shaft may be treated with transcutaneous Kirschner wires if closed reduction is performed and with either Kirschner wires or two or more mini-lag screws if open reduction is performed26,27,39-46. Although Kirschner wires may be used in cases of open reduction, mini-lag screws provide more secure fixation and require no more dissection than Kirschner wires do. The length of the fracture is divided by the width of the bone adjacent to or at the site of the fracture to determine the number of mini-screws that should be used. If the fracture is twice as long as the adjacent bone diameter, the fracture is divided into thirds and the mini-screws are inserted at the juncture of each third. If the fracture is three times as long as the adjacent bone diameter, the fracture is divided into quarters and the mini-screws are inserted at the juncture of each quarter. A mini-lag screw provides maximum compression when inserted perpendicular to the fracture (in which case it is known as a compression screw) and maximum shear resistance when inserted perpendicular to the long axis of the bone (in which case it is known as a neutralization screw). Uniplanar fractures are treated with at least one neutralization screw. The remaining screw or screws may be inserted as compression screws. In spiral long oblique fractures, the intervals for division and insertion remain the same, but the spiral fracture plane is followed (Fig. 7). At one or more points, a mini-screw may be inserted both perpendicular to the fracture and perpendicular to the long axis of the bone (such a screw is known as a perfect screw). Again, once the requirement for neutralization (one mini-screw) is satisfied, the remaining mini-screws may be inserted in the compression mode. If they neutralize as well, so much the better.
Mini-plates are almost always essential for unstable comminuted metacarpal fractures (Fig. 8) and metacarpal fractures with bone loss. Multiple displaced metacarpal fractures (Fig. 9) are usually unstable and require closed or open internal fixation.
An axial load resulting from impact against a clenched fist causes most subcapital or metacarpal neck fractures (boxer fractures). The fifth metacarpal is most commonly injured, followed by the fourth metacarpal. Rotational and lateral deviation deformities should be corrected. Shortening may occur as a result of impaction, angulation, or a combination of the two. There is some latitude for acceptance of dorsal angulation. As noted above, in general, dorsal angulation of as much as 10° more than the amount of motion in the respective carpometacarpal joint may be accepted. Consequently, up to 15° of dorsal angulation may be accepted in the second and third metacarpals. Subcapital fractures with as much as 50° of dorsal angulation in the fourth metacarpal and 70° in the fifth metacarpal have healed without pain or subjective functional deficit, although with varying degrees of cosmetic deformity49-51. A functional deficit may also be masked by low demand. The greater the dorsal angulation upon presentation, the more likely that there is an injury to an adjacent metacarpal at the carpometacarpal joint in the form of a fracture, dislocation, or a combination of the two27. Consequently, it is important to survey these areas for coexisting injury during physical examination and when viewing radiographs.
Although we have detailed the extremes of acceptable parameters, if a fracture approaches or exceeds these limitations and is seen early enough that reduction can be achieved, an effort to achieve anatomical or near-anatomical reduction should be undertaken. The coexistence of clawing, apparent angular deformity, malrotation, or any obstruction of digital motion makes fracture reduction even more compelling. The Jahss maneuver is an effective reduction method52. In this maneuver, the metacarpophalangeal joint is flexed 70° to 90°. The proximal fragment is compressed in a palmar direction by the physician’s fingers while the physician’s thumb applies dorsally directed axial pressure to the metacarpal head through the proximal phalanx. When a reduced fracture is unstable, any of a number of transcutaneous Kirschner-wire applications is effective for splinting the site until callus is visualized on a radiograph. In the rare case when open reduction is needed, Kirschner wires may still be used just as with closed reduction. More secure fixation may provide the advantage of allowing earlier and more intensive rehabilitation with no additional soft-tissue dissection other than that necessary for the open reduction itself. Mini-condylar plates are ideal in terms of both size and design47,48. They also have a lower profile than mini-T, mini-L, or angled plates, and they are more versatile in that they may be applied dorsally on any metacarpal and laterally on the metacarpals of the thumb, the index finger, and the small finger.
Fractures of the metacarpal base of a finger are generally stable, but even minor rotational malalignments at this level are greatly magnified at the fingertips and may interfere with function. These fractures are easily missed at the time of initial evaluation because of poor-quality radiographs or poor positioning. Treatment of an extra-articular fracture of the metacarpal base is similar to that of a fracture of the shaft. Mini-condylar plates are more adaptive than straight plates in the region of the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction. Displaced articular fractures are reduced and stabilized with Kirschner wires or mini-lag screws.
An intra-articular fracture of the metacarpal base of a finger may be unicondylar (a reverse Bennett fracture) or comminuted. Displaced unicondylar and bicondylar fractures are reduced and stabilized with pins, screws, metaphyseal plates, or a combination of these implants. Subluxated and dislocated carpometacarpal joints must be reduced and incorporated into the fixation.
Intra-articular fractures of the metacarpal head of the fingers and thumb are treated similarly53. A condylar fracture of the metacarpal head may be associated with a complex metacarpophalangeal joint dislocation. This fracture is usually on the ulnar side of the metacarpal head when the complex dislocation occurs in a finger. Whenever an articular fracture is treated with open reduction, great care should be taken to preserve soft-tissue attachments to the articular fragments to preserve their blood supply.
Proximal phalangeal shaft fractures typically exhibit palmar angulation because of muscle imbalance. The proximal fragment is flexed by the interossei insertions. The distal fragment is extended by the central extensor slip30,31. Palmar angulation causes commensurate shortening of the proximal phalanx. This compromises extensor tendon function and causes an extensor lag that averages 12° at the proximal interphalangeal joint for every millimeter of bone-tendon discrepancy54. Palmar angulation may also prevent full digital flexion, with commensurate weakness of pinch and grip and a loss of endurance. More than 25° of palmar angulation causes a functional deficit accompanied by a cosmetic deformity and should usually be corrected6.
The majority of simple undisplaced phalangeal fractures may be treated by static protective or dynamic functional splinting for up to four weeks regardless of configuration because of the integrity and stabilizing effect of the periosteum and adjacent soft-tissue structures7-14. When functional splinting techniques are used, the extensor mechanism acts as a tension band and exerts a progressive compression force on the phalangeal fracture site during finger flexion9.
Undisplaced or minimally displaced simple extra-articular fractures of any configuration are usually stable because of an intact periosteum. Some physicians have successfully treated these fractures with buddy-splinting (or taping) alone7,13, while others have used static or dynamic functional splinting7-14. These fractures should be monitored during the course of treatment and should be reduced and stabilized if they displace. Transcutaneous pinning is usually sufficient6,8,12,14-16, but open fixation with Kirschner or another type of wire or application of mini-screws or a plate may be required in some instances12,14,17,19,39-48,55-57.
Displaced transverse and short oblique extra-articular phalangeal fractures may be stable after reduction, especially with the hand and digits functionally positioned to balance the muscles. They may then be treated similar to undisplaced fractures, with the exception that buddy-splinting alone is insufficient. No more than 25° of palmar angulation should be accepted6. One or more intramedullary or two crossed Kirschner wires should be inserted by either transcutaneous or open technique to stabilize unstable fractures15,16. Fractures that cannot be reduced with closed manipulation should be opened and internally stabilized (Fig. 10). To avoid distraction, the Kirschner wires should cross proximal or distal to but not at the fracture. Mini-plates may be applied when the fracture is irreducible or open or when there are multiple fractures. They may also be used when there is comminution or bone loss and when a patient has multiple traumatic injuries or is noncompliant39-48,55,56. Mini-condylar plates are designed for proximal and distal phalangeal fractures and may be applied on either the radial or the ulnar side of the proximal phalanx47,48. Distal application of a mini-condylar plate on either the radial or the ulnar side of the proximal phalanx minimizes injury to or impingement on the central slip and the consequent risk of a boutonniere deformity at the proximal interphalangeal joint.
Displaced long oblique extra-articular phalangeal fractures are almost always unstable. Transcutaneous transverse or oblique Kirschner-wire pinning provides sufficient fixation and a good outcome in a compliant patient15,16. Mini-screws can be used at the surgeon’s discretion, with an increase in stability and little additional soft-tissue damage22 (Fig. 11). Such fractures are rarely treated with open reduction unless closed reduction or transcutaneous fixation fails. Open injury; multiple fractures in the hand, extremity, spine, or pelvis; and patient noncompliance are all indications for open treatment58-60.
Undisplaced unicondylar articular fractures of the base of the proximal or middle phalanx and displaced unicondylar articular fractures involving less than 25% of the articular surface that are not associated with joint subluxation or deformity may be treated with buddy-splinting (or taping) to the finger adjacent to the fracture and with early mobilization7,44. If more than 25% of the articular surface is involved and the fracture is displaced, closed reduction should be performed. This is best accomplished with use of c-arm fluoroscopy, digital traction, and pointed reduction forceps. Use of a cannulated reduction forceps facilitates placement of the Kirschner wire. If closed reduction is not possible, open reduction is recommended. A mid-axial incision is centered over the fracture fragment and is extended obliquely over the metacarpal head, parallel with the Langer lines. Although the incision is drawn to allow an extensive exposure of the fracture, the smallest possible portion of this incision is used to reduce the fracture. The goal is to reduce the fracture by aligning its superior border while preserving the soft-tissue attachments and blood supply to the condylar fragment. Fluoroscopy provides additional assistance with this task. Regardless of whether the fracture is reduced with a closed or open technique, fixation with two or more Kirschner wires or with one or more mini-lag screws is appropriate44,55,56. Tension-banding may be added to smaller or less stable fragments61-63. Fragments of any size associated with subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joint should be reduced and fixed.
Bicondylar fractures of the base of the proximal or middle phalanx are almost always displaced. If closed reduction (a combination of traction, manipulation, and use of transcutaneously applied pointed reduction forceps) is possible, transcutaneous Kirschner-wire fixation may be carried out. This method of fracture reduction and Kirschner-wire insertion and its governing principles may be used for any bicondylar intra-articular fracture of the hand. The major condylar fragments and their articular surfaces are reduced and stabilized with one or more transverse Kirschner wires inserted parallel or nearly parallel to the joint surface. Smaller ("vassal") fragments either follow the major fragments during their reduction or may be ignored. This is called the "rule of the majority" or the "vassal rule."55 The repaired metaphysis is then reduced, aligned, and secured to the diaphysis with two Kirschner wires inserted at or near the tip of each condyle proximally. Both of these Kirschner wires are driven past the fracture site and into the medullary canal of the distal fragment, where they may continue down the canal to or near the end of the diaphysis or may engage or traverse the diaphyseal cortex. If they traverse the diaphysis, their points should go just slightly past the exterior cortex in order to avoid any abrasion or penetration of either the extensor mechanism or the flexor tendons. This same technique may be applied if open reduction is necessary, and it is especially useful for smaller condylar fragments. When there are larger fragments, a mini-condylar plate may be applied laterally. The lateral band and oblique retinacular fibers may be excised to allow access for insertion of a mini-condylar plate25. Excision of this single lateral band prevents the intrinsic tightness, adhesions, or rubbing over the mini-plate that might occur with incision and repair. The major condylar fragments and their adjacent joint surfaces are reduced and are stabilized by the spike of the mini-condylar plate. This spike is measured and cut to the proper length prior to insertion. The metaphysis and the stem of the mini-condylar plate are reduced, aligned, and secured to the diaphysis. The remaining plate-holes are filled with mini-screws to complete the fixation.
While early mobilization of joints adjacent to undisplaced intra-articular fractures of the base of the proximal phalanx may be safe, digits with undisplaced unicondylar fractures of the distal portion of the proximal or middle phalanx are probably more safely mobilized only after transcutaneous pin fixation or limited open mini-screw fixation through a portal-sized (1 to 2-cm) incision7,44,55,64. Displaced unicondylar fractures may be treated similarly following closed or open reduction (Fig. 12). A small mid-axial incision is preferred. This allows fracture reduction with a minimum of soft-tissue dissection. The condyle can be reduced without opening the proximal interphalangeal joint by aligning the proximal spike of the condylar fragment with the shaft of the phalanx. Intraoperative fluoroscopy is helpful. A more extensive dorsal incision may be made, and the joint may be exposed between the lateral band and the extensor slip if more exposure is needed. Sometimes such an incision is necessary, but it is associated with a greater risk of scarring and stiffness. Fixation with Kirschner wires or mini-lag screws results in the best final motion. Tension-band wiring may be added for smaller and less stable fragments61-63. A bicondylar fracture of the distal portion of the proximal phalanx is treated with similar methods, principles, and implants, as is a bicondylar fracture of the base of the proximal phalanx.
Subluxation and dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint occurs either in a dorsal direction as a result of a volar lip fracture of the base of the middle phalanx adjacent to the insertion of the palmar plate or in a palmar direction as a result of a dorsal avulsion or marginal impact fracture at the dorsal base of the middle phalanx adjacent to the insertion of the central slip. True lateral radiographs are essential in the confirmation and evaluation of these diagnoses. Additional oblique radiographs may also be helpful. Dorsal fracture-dislocations result from axial compression and may be comminuted, often involving a substantial portion of the palmar articular surface. Reduction and extension block-splinting in moderate flexion usually maintains a reduced and congruent joint when less than 40% of the palmar articular surface is involved65,66. For fractures involving more than 40% of the palmar articular surface, internal fixation should be considered if there is a single large fragment67. Optimal treatment requires a stable congruent joint reduction, early motion, and smooth gliding of the middle phalanx around the proximal phalangeal head. Anatomical restoration of the articular surface is desirable but of less importance. Subluxation and hinging of the joint must be prevented. When the palmar fragments can be restored, they provide a restraint to dorsal subluxation and resurface an irregular and deficient palmar articular surface. These goals are much more easily stated than achieved. Buttress extension-block pinning, traction, and a variety of static and dynamic external fixation techniques are options when there is severe comminution and a congruent reduction cannot otherwise be maintained67,68. Arthroplasty with a palmar plate may be used as a salvage procedure after an early or late failure for up to two years after injury69-71.
Comminuted fractures of the articular surface of the base of the middle phalanx caused by axial compression are called "pilon fractures." One or more of the articular fragments may be depressed. Splinting, mini-skeletal traction, mini-external fixation, and open reduction, internal fixation, and bone-grafting are among the treatment options72-75. This is a devastating injury, and stiffness is the rule rather than the exception. The goal is to recover as much of the functional mid-range of motion as possible, recognizing that the extremes of flexion and extension may be lost. Patients treated with traction or dynamic mini-external fixation tend to have the best results with regard to the active range of motion, grip strength, radiographic appearance, and pain control. Immobilization produces the poorest results.
For irreparable interphalangeal joint fractures, primary or early arthroplasty or arthrodesis may provide the best and most timely outcome. Both procedures provide reliable pain relief and restore joint alignment and stability. Both constrained silicone and nonconstrained bicondylar implants are available for arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint76-78. The silicone implants are unstable to pinch in the index finger, but the bicondylar implants hold up quite well and provide an alternative to arthrodesis. Consequently, arthrodesis may be reserved for joint destruction that is beyond arthroplastic salvage79.
Although the forces acting to displace phalangeal fractures and metacarpal shaft fractures of the thumb may differ from those acting on the fingers, fractures of the thumb may be evaluated and treated similarly. The metacarpal of the thumb has no suspensory protection from shortening after fracture but is quite tolerant of this component of deformity. When intra-articular or extra-articular fractures of the base of the thumb metacarpal are unstable, the abductor pollicis longus and the adductor pollicis shorten the thumb and the adductor pollicis adducts the thumb. This narrows the thumb web space and results in a decreased span of grasp with accompanying limitations of pinch and grip. This may seriously limit hand function.
With an extra-articular fracture of the thumb metacarpal base, an adduction deformity of up to 30° is acceptable because of the compensatory capacity of the trapeziometacarpal joint, but greater deformity should usually be corrected79,80. A reduction should be performed for deformities accompanied by compensatory hyperextension of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Successful closed reduction may be stabilized with transcutaneous Kirschner wires. If open reduction is necessary, metaphyseal mini-fragment plates such as the mini-condylar, mini-T, or mini-L plates are appropriate for application.
An axial force along a partially flexed thumb may produce an articular fracture of the metacarpal base. This is termed a Bennett fracture and is distinguished by a nondisplaced palmar radial fragment attached to the anterior oblique ligament and by dorsal, radial, and proximal displacement of the base of the shaft caused by the unopposed pull of the abductor pollicis longus. The distal part of the metacarpal is adducted, and the thumb web space is narrowed by the adductor pollicis. Most surgeons strive to reestablish articular congruity in a fresh Bennett fracture by closed reduction. Reliable fixation of this inherently unstable fracture is achieved with Kirschner wires. Deformity is concurrently corrected. This fracture is especially suited for exchange of a Kirschner wire for one or more mini-lag screws, thus enhancing the stability of the construct (Fig. 13). While symptomatic posttraumatic arthritis does not always correlate with articular incongruity, minimally traumatic restitution of the joint surface and normal joint mechanics appears to be the most reliable deterrent3,4,81,82. Open reduction is rarely necessary or indicated. When a Bennett fracture that is detected more than two to three weeks after injury is solid or cannot be completely reduced by closed manipulation, an allowance for a small amount of joint step-off may be preferable to the operative trauma necessary to restore joint congruity.
Comminuted fractures of the base of the metacarpal of the thumb are caused by mechanisms similar to those that cause a Bennett fracture but with higher energy. A Rolando fracture is a T or Y-shaped intra-articular fracture of the base of the metacarpal of the thumb that has two major articular fragments. The deformity is similar to that occurring after a Bennett fracture. Closed reduction with use of ligamentotaxis and periosteotaxis is often possible by application of distal traction to the thumb. Temporary transcutaneous Kirschner-wire fixation may adequately stabilize this fracture during healing83 (Fig. 14). More highly comminuted fractures may require mini-external fixation or traction to reestablish and maintain congruity of the shattered base of the metacarpal of the thumb84. Larger fragments may be incorporated into the construct with Kirschner wires in most instances; occasionally, however, mini-screws are used. Compacted cancellous bone may be added if there are defects, which produce instability.
Infection at the site of an open fracture in the hand is uncommon, probably because of the excellent blood supply. The prevalence has been reported to range from 5% (nine of 173) to 11% (sixteen of 146)5. The infection rate has been shown to substantially increase in the presence of gross wound contamination, extensive soft-tissue and skeletal crush injury, systemic illness, or a delay in treatment exceeding twenty-four hours85,86. McLain et al. showed that a delay in treatment of up to twelve hours did not increase the infection rate or influence the outcome86. Swanson et al. found that infection rates were not increased by the presence of internal fixation, immediate wound closure, large wound size, or complex injury in well-debrided, surgically clean open fractures85. They recommended delayed wound closure in fractures associated with gross contamination.
Duncan et al. reported that the functional outcome of open hand fractures, evaluated on the basis of digital motion, correlated highly with the initial severity of the injury5. Metacarpal fractures had substantially better results than did proximal phalangeal fractures. Fractures of the proximal phalanx had the poorest outcome, especially if they were intra-articular or were associated with a tendon injury5,87. In mutilating injuries involving multiple fractures in a hand, the outcome may be predicted with use of the scoring system described by Campbell and Kay88.
Initial treatment consists of irrigation and débridement. Simple fractures may be definitively treated as we have outlined. Simple lacerations of tendons, nerves, and vessels as well as simple wounds may be repaired primarily. When comminution or bone loss is accompanied by simple wounds that may be closed primarily, and in most cases of low-velocity gunshot wounds, the fracture may be stabilized and treated with bone-grafting initially88-90. When comminution or bone loss is accompanied by integumentary loss, provisional fracture fixation is achieved with spacer wires, transfixation wires, or mini-external fixators. Definitive delayed primary treatment with mini-internal fixation, bone-grafting, and coverage is best done within three days after injury or as soon thereafter as possible59,89-92.
Stiffness resulting from tendon adhesions and joint contractures is the most common complication associated with hand fractures2,14. Stiffness has been shown to be directly correlated with the severity of the initial fracture, the presence and severity of soft-tissue injury, excessive immobilization (more than four weeks), and the extent of operative dissection necessary for mini-plate application5,14,87. Conversely, fractures that require mini-plate fixation but are treated without fixation or with inadequate fixation still lead to stiffness and are associated with an increased rate of nonunion and malunion21,60. Immobilization in inappropriate positions and an inadequate rehabilitation program may also contribute to stiffness.
Chronic pain is rarely a compelling long-term problem following hand fractures, even in the event of posttraumatic arthritis2-4. Occasionally, however, arthroplasty or arthrodesis is indicated and may improve function as well as relieve pain76-79.
Malunion and nonunion are more likely to occur at the site of unstable fractures that are inadequately reduced, poorly stabilized, and not treated with bone-grafting than they are at the site of those that are treated with adequate reduction, stable fixation, and bone-grafting of defects21,60. Adjacent joint stiffness and tendon adhesions are common. If malunion or nonunion is sufficiently symptomatic, operative reconstruction is indicated (Fig. 15). One must go back to the fundamentals of fracture treatment and start anew. Anatomical correction of deformity, sufficient stability to allow simultaneous bone-healing and digital rehabilitation, respect for soft-tissue and vascular integrity, pain control, and early intensive rehabilitation are required. Mini-plate fixation is usually the most reliable method of stabilizing these reconstructed fractures while they heal. Corrective osteotomies are performed for malunions, and some of these may require bone-grafting. A nonunion often requires compression, bone-grafting, or both. Tenolysis, capsulotomy, or both may be done concurrently if aggressive rehabilitation can begin immediately after surgery or independently at a later time.
Botte et al., in a review in which 422 pins were used to stabilize hand and wrist fractures in 137 patients, reported thirty-four complications involving forty-five pins (11%) in twenty-four patients (18%)93. Sixty-nine percent of the complications, which included infection, pin-loosening, loss of reduction, symptomatic nonunion, and impaled extensor and flexor tendons, occurred in the phalanges. Poor initial pin placement and patient noncompliance correlated most highly with these complications. In most cases of poor pin placement, the problem was not discovered until after surgery. Therefore, pin placement should be confirmed by radiographs at the time of surgery. Care of the skin surrounding the pins and removal of the pins as soon as bone-healing (radiographic evidence of callus) allows (usually three to six weeks after insertion) eliminates much of the risk of pin-loosening and pin-track infection.
The complication rate associated with mini-plate fixation has been reported to be 67% (six of nine) when phalangeal fractures were involved and 34% (ten of twenty-nine) when metacarpal shaft fractures were involved14,94. Stiffness was the most common complication. The soft-tissue dissection necessary for mini-plate application and the interference with tendon excursion were the main causes. Twenty-five percent of the mini-plates were removed because of discomfort or stiffness. The smaller lower-profile mini-plates that are currently available may provide better results.
Kirschner wires are almost always used for temporary fixation and are removed after the early appearance of fracture callus on radiographs. Mini-screws and plates are usually only removed for cause. Reasons for removal may include prominence and irritation under the skin, loosening, pull-out, or breakage. Loosening or breakage may herald delayed union, nonunion, or malunion. Implants may also be removed at the time of tenolysis or capsulotomy.
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME, Hughes JL. Stable fixation of the hand and wrist. New York: Springer; 1986. p 3-35.  
 
O’Rourke SK, Gaur S,Barton NJ. Long-term outcome of articular fractures of the phalanges: an eleven year followup. J Hand Surg [Br],1989;14: 183-93. 14183  1989  [PubMed]
 
Kjaer-Petersen K, Langhoff O,Andersen K. Bennett’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 58-61. 1558  1990  [PubMed]
 
Livesley PJ. The conservative management of Bennett’s fracture-dislocation: a 26-year follow-up. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 291-4. 15291  1990  [PubMed]
 
Duncan RW, Freeland AE, Jabaley ME,Meydrech EF. Open hand fractures: an analysis of the recovery of active motion and of complications. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 387-94. 18387  1993  [PubMed]
 
Coonrad RW,Pohlman MH. Impacted fractures in the proximal portion of the proximal phalanx of the finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969;51: 1291-6. 511291  1969  [PubMed]
 
Barton N. . Fractures of the phalanges of the hand. Hand,1977;9: 1-10. 91  1977  [PubMed]
 
Barton NJ. . Fractures of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1984;66: 159-67. 66159  1984  [PubMed]
 
Burkhalter WE. Hand fractures. Instr Course Lect,1990;39: 249-53. 39249  1990  [PubMed]
 
Corley FG Jr,Schenck RC Jr. Fractures of the hand. Clin Plast Surg,1996;23: 447-62. 23447  1996  [PubMed]
 
Ip WY, Ng KH,Chow SP. A prospective study of 924 digital fractures of the hand. Injury,1996;27: 279-85. 27279  1996  [PubMed]
 
Kozin SH, Thoder JJ,Lieberman G. Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2000;8: 111-21. 8111  2000  [PubMed]
 
Maitra A,Burdett-Smith P. The conservative management of proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand in an accident and emergency department. J Hand Surg [Br],1992;17: 332-6. 17332  1992  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ. Management of fractures of the hand over the last 25 years. J Hand Surg [Am],2000;25: 817-23. 25817  2000  [PubMed]
 
Green DP,Anderson JR. Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of fractured phalanges. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973;55: 1651-4. 551651  1973  [PubMed]
 
Belsky MR, Eaton RG,Lane LB. . Closed reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1984;9: 725-9. 9725  1984  [PubMed]
 
Widgerow AD, Edinburg M,Biddulph SL. An analysis of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1987;12: 134-9. 12134  1987  [PubMed]
 
Edwards GS Jr, O’Brien ET,Heckman MM. Retrograde cross-pinning of transverse metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Hand,1982;14: 141-8. 14141  1982  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH, Igram CM,Hall RF. . Intramedullary nailing of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1995;20: 808-12. 20808  1995  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH,Hall RF Jr. Intramedullary fixation of metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 47-54. 32747  1996  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB, Koniuch MP,Smith RJ. . The management of delayed union and nonunion of the metacarpals and phalanges. J Hand Surg [Am],1985;10: 457-66. 10457  1985  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE. Hand fractures. Repairreconstructionand rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p 25-9.  
 
Pratt DR. Exposing fractures of the proximal phalanx of the finger longitudinally through the dorsal extensor apparatus. Clin Orthop,1959;15: 22-6. 1522  1959  [PubMed]
 
Littler JW. Hand, wrist, and forearm incisions. In: Littler JW, Cramer LM, Smith JW, editors. Symposium on reconstructive hand surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1974. p 202. 
 
Field LD, Freeland AE,Jabaley ME. Midaxial approach to the proximal phalanx for fracture fixation. Contemp Orthop,1992;25: 133-7. 25133  1992 
 
Freeland AE, Geissler WB. Plate fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. In: Blair WF, Steyers CM, editors. Techniques in hand surgery. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p 255-64.  
 
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME. Open reduction internal fixation: metacarpal fractures. In: Strickland JW, editor. The hand. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p 3-33.  
 
Freeland AE. External fixation for the skeletal stabilization of severe open fractures of the hand. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 93-100. 21493  1987  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE, Geissler WB.Distal radial fractures: open reduction internal fixation. In: Wiss DA, editor. Fractures. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p 185-209.  
 
Smith RJ. Balance and kinetics of the fingers under normal and pathologic conditions. Clin Orthop,1974;104: 92-111. 10492  1974  [PubMed]
 
Smith RJ. Intrinsic muscles of the fingers: functiondysfunctionand surgical reconstruction. Instr Course Lect,1975;24: 200-20. 24200  1975 
 
Eglseder WA Jr, Juliano PJ,Roure R. Fractures of the fourth metacarpal. J Orthop Trauma,1997;11: 441-5. 11441  1997  [PubMed]
 
Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP,Lunt JG. Metacarpal shaft fractures: the effect of shortening on the extensor mechanism. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 519-23. 23519  1998  [PubMed]
 
Birndorf MS, Daley R,Greenwald DP. Metacarpal fracture angulation decreases flexor mechanical efficiency in human hands. Plast Reconstr Surg,1997;99: 1079-83. discussion 1084-5991079  1997  [PubMed]
 
Royle SG. Rotational deformity following metacarpal fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 124-5. 15124  1990  [PubMed]
 
Viegas SF, Tencer A, Woodard P,Williams CR. Functional bracing of fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals. J Hand Surg [Am],1987;12: 139-43. 12139  1987  [PubMed]
 
Konradsen L, Nielsen PT,Albrecht-Beste E. Functional treatment of metacarpal fractures 100 randomized cases with or without fixation. Acta Orthop Scand,1990;61: 531-4. 61531  1990  [PubMed]
 
Greene TL, Noellert RC, Belsole RJ,Simpson LA. Composite wiring of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1989;14: 665-9. 14665  1989  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG,Burke FD. Fractures of the metacarpals: treatment by AO screw and plate fixation. J Hand Surg [Br],1987;12: 34-7. 1234  1987  [PubMed]
 
Bosscha K,Snellen JP. Internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with AO minifragment screws and plates: a prospective study. Injury,1993;24: 166-8. 24166  1993  [PubMed]
 
Chen SH, Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC,Noordhoff S. Miniature plates and screws in acute complex hand injury. J Trauma,1994;37: 237-42. 37237  1994  [PubMed]
 
Pun WK, Chow SP, So YC, Luk KD, Ip FK, Chan KC, Ngai WK, Crosby C,Ng C. A prospective study on 284 digital fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1989;14: 474-81. 14474  1989  [PubMed]
 
Dabezies EJ,Schutte JP. Fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature plates and screws. J Hand Surg [Am],1986;11: 283-8. 11283  1986  [PubMed]
 
Hastings H. Unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fracture treatment with screws and plates. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 37-52. 21437  1987  [PubMed]
 
Melone CP. Rigid fixation of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Orthop Clin North Am,1986;17: 421-35. 17421  1986  [PubMed]
 
Diwaker HN,Stothard J. The role of internal fixation in closed fractures of the proximal phalanges and metacarpals in adults. J Hand Surg [Br],1986;11: 103-8. 11103  1986  [PubMed]
 
Buchler U,Fischer T. Use of a minicondylar plate for metacarpal and phalangeal periarticular injuries. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 53-8. 21453  1987  [PubMed]
 
Ouellette EA,Freeland AE. Use of the mini condylar plate in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 38-46. 32738  1996  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, Ali MS,Steel WM. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary. J Hand Surg [Br],1989;14: 165-7. 14165  1989  [PubMed]
 
McKerrell J, Bowen V, Johnston G,Zondervan J. Boxer’s fractures—conservative or operative management. J Trauma,1987;27: 486-90. 27486  1987  [PubMed]
 
Ashkenaze DM,Ruby LK. Metacarpal fractures and dislocations. Orthop Clin North Am,1992;23: 19-33. 2319  1992  [PubMed]
 
Jahss SA. Fractures of the metacarpals. A new method of reduction and immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg,1938;20: 178-86. 20178  1938 
 
Light TR,Bednar MS. Management of intra-articular fractures of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 303-14. 10303  1994  [PubMed]
 
Vahey JW, Wegner DA,Hastings H. Effect of proximal phalangeal fracture deformity on extensor tendon function. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 673-81. 23673  1998  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AESennett BJ. Phalangeal fractures. In: Peimer CA 
 
editor. Surgery of the hand and upper extremity. Volume 1. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p 921-37.  
 
Baratz ME,Divelbiss B. Fixation of phalangeal fractures. Hand Clin,1997;13: 541-55. 13541  1997  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG,Burke FD. Fractures of the phalanges: results of internal fixation using 1.5mm and 2mm A. O. screws. J Hand Surg [Br],1987;12: 28-33. 1228  1987  [PubMed]
 
Hall RF Jr. Treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in noncompliant patients. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 31-6. 21431  1987  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE,Jabaley ME. Stabilization of fractures of the hand and wrist with traumatic soft tissue and bone loss. Hand Clin,1988;4: 425-36. 4425  1988  [PubMed]
 
Lester B,Mallik A. Impending malunions of the hand. Treatment of subacutemalaligned fractures. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 55-62. 32755  1996  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB,Sheppard JE. Tension wire fixation of avulsion fractures in the hand. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 113-20. 214113  1987  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB,Lipton HA. Open reduction and internal fixation of avulsion fractures in the hand: the tension band wiring technique. Tech Orthop,1991;6: 10-8. 610  1991 
 
Bischoff R, Buechler U, De Roche R,Jupiter J. Clinical results of tension band fixation of avulsion fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1994;19: 1019-26. 191019  1994  [PubMed]
 
Weiss AP,Hastings H. Distal unicondylar fractures of the proximal phalanx. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 594-9. 18594  1993  [PubMed]
 
Dobyns JH,McElfresh EC. Extension block splinting. Hand Clin,1994;10: 229-37. 10229  1994  [PubMed]
 
Inoue G,Tamura Y. Treatment of fracture-dislocaton of the proximal interphalangeal joint using extension-block Kirschner wire. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1991;10: 564-8. 10564  1991  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE,Benoist LA. Open reduction and internal fixation method for fractures at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 239-50. 10239  1994  [PubMed]
 
Kiefhaber TR,Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 368-80. 23368  1998  [PubMed]
 
Eaton RG,Malerich MM. Volar plate arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a review of ten years’ experience. J Hand Surg [Am],1980;5: 260-8. 5260  1980  [PubMed]
 
Malerich MM,Eaton RG. The volar plate reconstruction for fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 251-60. 10251  1994  [PubMed]
 
Durham-Smith G,McCarten GM. Volar plate arthroplasty for closed proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. J Hand Surg [Br],1992;17: 422-8. 17422  1992  [PubMed]
 
Schenck RR. Advances in reconstruction of digital joints. Clin Plast Surg,1997;24: 175-89. 24175  1997  [PubMed]
 
Morgan JP, Gordon DA, Klug MS, Perry PE,Barre PS. Dynamic digital traction for unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1995;20: 565-73. 20565  1995  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ, Roman RJ, Kiefhaber TR,McDonough JJ. Pilon fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 844-50. 16844  1991  [PubMed]
 
Weiss AP. Cerclage fixation for fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 21-8. 32721  1996  [PubMed]
 
Nagle DJ, af Ekenstam FW,Lister GD. Immediate Silastic arthroplasty for non-salvageable intraarticular phalangeal fractures. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg,1989;23: 47-50. 2347  1989  [PubMed]
 
Gerard F, Garbuio P, Galleze B, Obert L,Tropet Y. Value of Swanson implants in complex traumatic lesions of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1996;15: 158-66. French15158  1996  [PubMed]
 
Buchler U,Aiken MA. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint by solid bone grafting and plate fixation in extensive injuries to the dorsal aspect of the finger. J Hand Surg [Am],1988;13: 589-94. 13589  1988  [PubMed]
 
Linscheid RL, Murray PM, Vidal MA,Beckenbaugh RD. Development of a surface replacement arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg [Am],1997;22: 286-98. 22286  1997  [PubMed]
 
Surzur P, Rigault M, Charissoux JL, Mabit C,Amaud JP. Recent fractures of the base of the 1st metacarpal bone. A study of a series of 138 cases. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1994;13: 122-34. French13122  1994  [PubMed]
 
Kahler DM. Fractures and dislocations of the base of the thumb. J South Orthop Assoc,1995;4: 69-76. 469  1995  [PubMed]
 
Cannon SR, Dowd GS, Williams DH,Scott JM. A long-term study following Bennett’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1986;11: 426-31. 11426  1986  [PubMed]
 
Timmenga EJ, Blokhuis TJ, Maas M,Raaijmakers EL. Long-term evaluation of Bennett’s fracture. A comparison between open and closed reduction. J Hand Surg [Br],1994;19: 373-7. 19373  1994  [PubMed]
 
Langhoff O, Andersen K,Kjaer-Petersen K. Rolando’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1991;16: 454-9. 16454  1991  [PubMed]
 
Swanson TV, Szabo RM,Anderson DD. Open hand fractures: prognosis and classification. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 101-7. 16101  1991  [PubMed]
 
McLain RE, Steyers C,Stoddard M. Infections in open fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 108-12. 16108  1991  [PubMed]
 
Strickland JW, Steichen JB, Kleinman WB,Hastings H. Phalangeal fractures: factors influencing digital performance. Orthop Rev,1982;11: 39-50. 1139  1982 
 
Campbell DA,Kay SP. The Hand Injury Severity Scoring System. J Hand Surg [Br],1996;21: 295-8. 21295  1996  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH,Hall RF Jr. Low-velocity gunshot wounds of the proximal phalanx: treatment by early stable fixation. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 150-5. 23150  1998  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH, McKay W,Hall RF. Low-velocity gunshot wounds of the metacarpal: treatment by early stable fixation and bone grafting. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 267-70. 18267  1993  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME, Burkhalter WE,Chavis AM. Delayed primary bone grafting in the hand and wrist after traumatic bone loss. J Hand Surg [Am],1984;9: 22-38. 922  1984 
 
Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg,1986;78: 285-92. 78285  1986  [PubMed]
 
Botte MJ, Davis JL, Rose BA, von Schroeder HP, Gellman H, Zinberg EM,Abrams RA. Complications of smooth pin fixation of fractures and dislocations in the hand and wrist. Clin Orthop,1992;276: 194-201. 276194  1992  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ, Wieser MJ,Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 59-65. 21459  1987  [PubMed]
 

Submit a comment

Topics

Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:Dorsal approach to the proximal phalanx. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Pratt DR. Exposing fractures of the proximal phalanx of the finger longitudinally through the dorsal extensor apparatus. Clin Orthop. 1959;15:24.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Mid-axial approach to the proximal phalanx. Line A indicates the mid-lateral line; line B, the mid-axial line; and line C, the interphalangeal joint flexion crease. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Littler JW, Cramer LM, Smith JW, editors. Symposium on reconstructive hand surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1974. p 90.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 3:Approaches to the metacarpals. A: Radial approach to the second (index) metacarpal. B: Approach to the third and fourth metacarpal shafts through a single incision. C: Ulnar approach to the fifth metacarpal. D: Approach to the bases of the second and third metacarpals through a single incision. E: Approach to the head of the third metacarpal and the base of the fourth metacarpal through a single incision. F: Approach to the heads of the fourth and fifth metacarpals through a single incision. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Freeland AE, Geissler WB. Plate fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. In: Blair WF, Steyers CM, editors. Techniques in hand surgery. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p 257.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:A fifty-one-year-old right-handed patient who worked on an assembly line had weakness, cramping, and loss of endurance in the right hand. A: Radiograph showing healed fractures of the index and ring metacarpals and a malunion of both (arrowheads). Digital motion was nearly normal. The patient had no pain at rest and no swelling, warmth, discoloration, or tenderness. B: Five-position grip-testing demonstrated a 30% loss of strength. C: Single sustained grip-testing revealed a similar loss. Although there is a certain amount of anatomical forgiveness in hand-fracture management, disregard of the principle of a stable anatomical (or near-anatomical) reduction of a hand fracture is not always entirely innocuous.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:An adolescent boy who had severely displaced transverse fractures of the second and third metacarpals. A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and oblique radiographs. C and D: Anteroposterior and oblique radiographs made after Kirschner wires were inserted into the medullary canals of both metacarpals.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:An adult patient who had a transverse fracture in the middle of the fifth metacarpal shaft that was irreducible by closed manipulation. A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. C and D: Radiographs made after open reduction and internal fixation with a four-hole straight low-contact mini-plate applied under dynamic compression. A gradual bend of 5° was contoured over the entire length of the plate prior to its application. A small amount of pre-bend in the mini-plate ensures that the cortex across from the plate will be under compression and that there will be uniform compression across the entire fracture. If the plate is left straight, the opposite cortex will distract as the mini-plate is placed under tension. If a plate is bent at a single site rather than across the entire plate, the bend will occur at the weakest site (a plate-hole), increasing the risk of fatigue fracture of the plate.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:A: A malrotated irreducible spiral oblique fracture of the third metacarpal. B: Radiograph made after the fracture was stabilized by insertion of mini-screws along the fracture plane. The proximal mini-screw (black arrow) is perpendicular to both the fracture (for maximum compression) and the long axis of the bone (for maximum resistance to shear displacement). The distal mini-screw (white arrow) is perpendicular to the fracture (for maximum compression). The mini-screws neutralize rotational and bending forces. The third metacarpal is also protected by intact metacarpal pillars on either side.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:A: Preoperative radiograph showing a closed, unstable comminuted subcapital fracture of the second metacarpal. B: Radiograph made after the fracture was reduced and stabilized by the application of a mini-condylar plate applied from the lateral side.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:A: Preoperative radiograph showing open, displaced, highly unstable fractures of the third, fourth, and fifth metacarpals and a closed extra-articular fracture of the base of the proximal phalanx of the index finger (arrow). B: Radiograph made after open reduction and stabilization of the metacarpal fractures with use of mini-plates and screws and after closed reduction and fixation of the proximal phalanx of the index finger with use of crossed Kirschner wires (arrow).
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:A and B: Preoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs of a closed displaced transverse fracture of the shaft of the proximal phalanx of the right ring finger. C and D: Postoperative anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. A small (limited) dorsal incision was made to complete the fracture reduction, and an intramedullary Kirschner wire was used to hold the reduction.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:A: Preoperative radiograph of a displaced uniplanar oblique fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. B: Radiograph made after closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with mini-screws.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:A: Radiograph showing a slightly displaced unicondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb. The fracture was treated with open reduction through a limited mid-axial incision and alignment of the proximal portion of the fracture without opening the interphalangeal joint. B: Radiograph showing fixation of the fragment with a mini-screw.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 13:A: Preoperative radiograph of a displaced Bennett fracture. B: Radiograph made after reduction with closed traction and manipulation and stabilization with transcutaneous Kirschner wires. C: The wire across the fracture site has been replaced by a transcutaneously applied mini-lag screw. The "buttressing" Kirschner wire remains. D: The "buttressing" Kirschner wire was removed three weeks after surgery.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:A: Oblique radiograph of a closed, displaced transverse subcondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx of the thumb and a closed Rolando fracture. B: The Rolando fracture was reduced with traction and manipulation. The joint surface was aligned, and the major metaphyseal fragments were stabilized with two Kirschner wires inserted parallel to the articular plane. The repaired metaphysis was then fixed to the diaphysis with crossed Kirschner wires. The transverse subcondylar fracture of the proximal phalanx was reduced and transcutaneously pinned with crossed Kirschner wires.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 15:A: A comminuted subcapital fracture of the fifth metacarpal was inadequately stabilized with a circumferential malleable wire, resulting in a painful nonunion (arrowhead). A fracture of the fourth metacarpal healed after fixation with a mini-plate. Both the ring and small fingers were stiff. B: An extensor tenolysis and implant removal was performed on both fingers. The sclerotic bone fragments were removed from the fracture site (arrowhead) of the fifth metacarpal. The ununited fracture was stabilized, and bone-grafting was done with compressed cancellous bone obtained from the distal aspect of the ipsilateral radius. C: The fracture of the fifth metacarpal (arrowhead) healed. The motion of both fingers substantially improved.
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME, Hughes JL. Stable fixation of the hand and wrist. New York: Springer; 1986. p 3-35.  
 
O’Rourke SK, Gaur S,Barton NJ. Long-term outcome of articular fractures of the phalanges: an eleven year followup. J Hand Surg [Br],1989;14: 183-93. 14183  1989  [PubMed]
 
Kjaer-Petersen K, Langhoff O,Andersen K. Bennett’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 58-61. 1558  1990  [PubMed]
 
Livesley PJ. The conservative management of Bennett’s fracture-dislocation: a 26-year follow-up. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 291-4. 15291  1990  [PubMed]
 
Duncan RW, Freeland AE, Jabaley ME,Meydrech EF. Open hand fractures: an analysis of the recovery of active motion and of complications. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 387-94. 18387  1993  [PubMed]
 
Coonrad RW,Pohlman MH. Impacted fractures in the proximal portion of the proximal phalanx of the finger. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969;51: 1291-6. 511291  1969  [PubMed]
 
Barton N. . Fractures of the phalanges of the hand. Hand,1977;9: 1-10. 91  1977  [PubMed]
 
Barton NJ. . Fractures of the hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br,1984;66: 159-67. 66159  1984  [PubMed]
 
Burkhalter WE. Hand fractures. Instr Course Lect,1990;39: 249-53. 39249  1990  [PubMed]
 
Corley FG Jr,Schenck RC Jr. Fractures of the hand. Clin Plast Surg,1996;23: 447-62. 23447  1996  [PubMed]
 
Ip WY, Ng KH,Chow SP. A prospective study of 924 digital fractures of the hand. Injury,1996;27: 279-85. 27279  1996  [PubMed]
 
Kozin SH, Thoder JJ,Lieberman G. Operative treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal shaft fractures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2000;8: 111-21. 8111  2000  [PubMed]
 
Maitra A,Burdett-Smith P. The conservative management of proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand in an accident and emergency department. J Hand Surg [Br],1992;17: 332-6. 17332  1992  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ. Management of fractures of the hand over the last 25 years. J Hand Surg [Am],2000;25: 817-23. 25817  2000  [PubMed]
 
Green DP,Anderson JR. Closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation of fractured phalanges. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1973;55: 1651-4. 551651  1973  [PubMed]
 
Belsky MR, Eaton RG,Lane LB. . Closed reduction and internal fixation of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1984;9: 725-9. 9725  1984  [PubMed]
 
Widgerow AD, Edinburg M,Biddulph SL. An analysis of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1987;12: 134-9. 12134  1987  [PubMed]
 
Edwards GS Jr, O’Brien ET,Heckman MM. Retrograde cross-pinning of transverse metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Hand,1982;14: 141-8. 14141  1982  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH, Igram CM,Hall RF. . Intramedullary nailing of proximal phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1995;20: 808-12. 20808  1995  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH,Hall RF Jr. Intramedullary fixation of metacarpal and proximal phalangeal fractures of the hand. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 47-54. 32747  1996  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB, Koniuch MP,Smith RJ. . The management of delayed union and nonunion of the metacarpals and phalanges. J Hand Surg [Am],1985;10: 457-66. 10457  1985  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE. Hand fractures. Repairreconstructionand rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 2000. p 25-9.  
 
Pratt DR. Exposing fractures of the proximal phalanx of the finger longitudinally through the dorsal extensor apparatus. Clin Orthop,1959;15: 22-6. 1522  1959  [PubMed]
 
Littler JW. Hand, wrist, and forearm incisions. In: Littler JW, Cramer LM, Smith JW, editors. Symposium on reconstructive hand surgery. St. Louis: CV Mosby; 1974. p 202. 
 
Field LD, Freeland AE,Jabaley ME. Midaxial approach to the proximal phalanx for fracture fixation. Contemp Orthop,1992;25: 133-7. 25133  1992 
 
Freeland AE, Geissler WB. Plate fixation of metacarpal shaft fractures. In: Blair WF, Steyers CM, editors. Techniques in hand surgery. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1996. p 255-64.  
 
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME. Open reduction internal fixation: metacarpal fractures. In: Strickland JW, editor. The hand. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p 3-33.  
 
Freeland AE. External fixation for the skeletal stabilization of severe open fractures of the hand. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 93-100. 21493  1987  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE, Geissler WB.Distal radial fractures: open reduction internal fixation. In: Wiss DA, editor. Fractures. Master techniques in orthopaedic surgery. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998. p 185-209.  
 
Smith RJ. Balance and kinetics of the fingers under normal and pathologic conditions. Clin Orthop,1974;104: 92-111. 10492  1974  [PubMed]
 
Smith RJ. Intrinsic muscles of the fingers: functiondysfunctionand surgical reconstruction. Instr Course Lect,1975;24: 200-20. 24200  1975 
 
Eglseder WA Jr, Juliano PJ,Roure R. Fractures of the fourth metacarpal. J Orthop Trauma,1997;11: 441-5. 11441  1997  [PubMed]
 
Strauch RJ, Rosenwasser MP,Lunt JG. Metacarpal shaft fractures: the effect of shortening on the extensor mechanism. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 519-23. 23519  1998  [PubMed]
 
Birndorf MS, Daley R,Greenwald DP. Metacarpal fracture angulation decreases flexor mechanical efficiency in human hands. Plast Reconstr Surg,1997;99: 1079-83. discussion 1084-5991079  1997  [PubMed]
 
Royle SG. Rotational deformity following metacarpal fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1990;15: 124-5. 15124  1990  [PubMed]
 
Viegas SF, Tencer A, Woodard P,Williams CR. Functional bracing of fractures of the second through fifth metacarpals. J Hand Surg [Am],1987;12: 139-43. 12139  1987  [PubMed]
 
Konradsen L, Nielsen PT,Albrecht-Beste E. Functional treatment of metacarpal fractures 100 randomized cases with or without fixation. Acta Orthop Scand,1990;61: 531-4. 61531  1990  [PubMed]
 
Greene TL, Noellert RC, Belsole RJ,Simpson LA. Composite wiring of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. J Hand Surg [Am],1989;14: 665-9. 14665  1989  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG,Burke FD. Fractures of the metacarpals: treatment by AO screw and plate fixation. J Hand Surg [Br],1987;12: 34-7. 1234  1987  [PubMed]
 
Bosscha K,Snellen JP. Internal fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with AO minifragment screws and plates: a prospective study. Injury,1993;24: 166-8. 24166  1993  [PubMed]
 
Chen SH, Wei FC, Chen HC, Chuang CC,Noordhoff S. Miniature plates and screws in acute complex hand injury. J Trauma,1994;37: 237-42. 37237  1994  [PubMed]
 
Pun WK, Chow SP, So YC, Luk KD, Ip FK, Chan KC, Ngai WK, Crosby C,Ng C. A prospective study on 284 digital fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1989;14: 474-81. 14474  1989  [PubMed]
 
Dabezies EJ,Schutte JP. Fixation of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures with miniature plates and screws. J Hand Surg [Am],1986;11: 283-8. 11283  1986  [PubMed]
 
Hastings H. Unstable metacarpal and phalangeal fracture treatment with screws and plates. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 37-52. 21437  1987  [PubMed]
 
Melone CP. Rigid fixation of phalangeal and metacarpal fractures. Orthop Clin North Am,1986;17: 421-35. 17421  1986  [PubMed]
 
Diwaker HN,Stothard J. The role of internal fixation in closed fractures of the proximal phalanges and metacarpals in adults. J Hand Surg [Br],1986;11: 103-8. 11103  1986  [PubMed]
 
Buchler U,Fischer T. Use of a minicondylar plate for metacarpal and phalangeal periarticular injuries. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 53-8. 21453  1987  [PubMed]
 
Ouellette EA,Freeland AE. Use of the mini condylar plate in metacarpal and phalangeal fractures. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 38-46. 32738  1996  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, Ali MS,Steel WM. Fractures of the fifth metacarpal neck: is reduction or immobilisation necessary. J Hand Surg [Br],1989;14: 165-7. 14165  1989  [PubMed]
 
McKerrell J, Bowen V, Johnston G,Zondervan J. Boxer’s fractures—conservative or operative management. J Trauma,1987;27: 486-90. 27486  1987  [PubMed]
 
Ashkenaze DM,Ruby LK. Metacarpal fractures and dislocations. Orthop Clin North Am,1992;23: 19-33. 2319  1992  [PubMed]
 
Jahss SA. Fractures of the metacarpals. A new method of reduction and immobilization. J Bone Joint Surg,1938;20: 178-86. 20178  1938 
 
Light TR,Bednar MS. Management of intra-articular fractures of the metacarpophalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 303-14. 10303  1994  [PubMed]
 
Vahey JW, Wegner DA,Hastings H. Effect of proximal phalangeal fracture deformity on extensor tendon function. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 673-81. 23673  1998  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AESennett BJ. Phalangeal fractures. In: Peimer CA 
 
editor. Surgery of the hand and upper extremity. Volume 1. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996. p 921-37.  
 
Baratz ME,Divelbiss B. Fixation of phalangeal fractures. Hand Clin,1997;13: 541-55. 13541  1997  [PubMed]
 
Ford DJ, el-Hadidi S, Lunn PG,Burke FD. Fractures of the phalanges: results of internal fixation using 1.5mm and 2mm A. O. screws. J Hand Surg [Br],1987;12: 28-33. 1228  1987  [PubMed]
 
Hall RF Jr. Treatment of metacarpal and phalangeal fractures in noncompliant patients. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 31-6. 21431  1987  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE,Jabaley ME. Stabilization of fractures of the hand and wrist with traumatic soft tissue and bone loss. Hand Clin,1988;4: 425-36. 4425  1988  [PubMed]
 
Lester B,Mallik A. Impending malunions of the hand. Treatment of subacutemalaligned fractures. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 55-62. 32755  1996  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB,Sheppard JE. Tension wire fixation of avulsion fractures in the hand. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 113-20. 214113  1987  [PubMed]
 
Jupiter JB,Lipton HA. Open reduction and internal fixation of avulsion fractures in the hand: the tension band wiring technique. Tech Orthop,1991;6: 10-8. 610  1991 
 
Bischoff R, Buechler U, De Roche R,Jupiter J. Clinical results of tension band fixation of avulsion fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1994;19: 1019-26. 191019  1994  [PubMed]
 
Weiss AP,Hastings H. Distal unicondylar fractures of the proximal phalanx. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 594-9. 18594  1993  [PubMed]
 
Dobyns JH,McElfresh EC. Extension block splinting. Hand Clin,1994;10: 229-37. 10229  1994  [PubMed]
 
Inoue G,Tamura Y. Treatment of fracture-dislocaton of the proximal interphalangeal joint using extension-block Kirschner wire. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1991;10: 564-8. 10564  1991  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE,Benoist LA. Open reduction and internal fixation method for fractures at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 239-50. 10239  1994  [PubMed]
 
Kiefhaber TR,Stern PJ. Fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 368-80. 23368  1998  [PubMed]
 
Eaton RG,Malerich MM. Volar plate arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint: a review of ten years’ experience. J Hand Surg [Am],1980;5: 260-8. 5260  1980  [PubMed]
 
Malerich MM,Eaton RG. The volar plate reconstruction for fracture-dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand Clin,1994;10: 251-60. 10251  1994  [PubMed]
 
Durham-Smith G,McCarten GM. Volar plate arthroplasty for closed proximal interphalangeal joint injuries. J Hand Surg [Br],1992;17: 422-8. 17422  1992  [PubMed]
 
Schenck RR. Advances in reconstruction of digital joints. Clin Plast Surg,1997;24: 175-89. 24175  1997  [PubMed]
 
Morgan JP, Gordon DA, Klug MS, Perry PE,Barre PS. Dynamic digital traction for unstable comminuted intra-articular fracture-dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1995;20: 565-73. 20565  1995  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ, Roman RJ, Kiefhaber TR,McDonough JJ. Pilon fractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 844-50. 16844  1991  [PubMed]
 
Weiss AP. Cerclage fixation for fracture dislocation of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Clin Orthop,1996;327: 21-8. 32721  1996  [PubMed]
 
Nagle DJ, af Ekenstam FW,Lister GD. Immediate Silastic arthroplasty for non-salvageable intraarticular phalangeal fractures. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg,1989;23: 47-50. 2347  1989  [PubMed]
 
Gerard F, Garbuio P, Galleze B, Obert L,Tropet Y. Value of Swanson implants in complex traumatic lesions of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1996;15: 158-66. French15158  1996  [PubMed]
 
Buchler U,Aiken MA. Arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joint by solid bone grafting and plate fixation in extensive injuries to the dorsal aspect of the finger. J Hand Surg [Am],1988;13: 589-94. 13589  1988  [PubMed]
 
Linscheid RL, Murray PM, Vidal MA,Beckenbaugh RD. Development of a surface replacement arthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg [Am],1997;22: 286-98. 22286  1997  [PubMed]
 
Surzur P, Rigault M, Charissoux JL, Mabit C,Amaud JP. Recent fractures of the base of the 1st metacarpal bone. A study of a series of 138 cases. Ann Chir Main Memb Super,1994;13: 122-34. French13122  1994  [PubMed]
 
Kahler DM. Fractures and dislocations of the base of the thumb. J South Orthop Assoc,1995;4: 69-76. 469  1995  [PubMed]
 
Cannon SR, Dowd GS, Williams DH,Scott JM. A long-term study following Bennett’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1986;11: 426-31. 11426  1986  [PubMed]
 
Timmenga EJ, Blokhuis TJ, Maas M,Raaijmakers EL. Long-term evaluation of Bennett’s fracture. A comparison between open and closed reduction. J Hand Surg [Br],1994;19: 373-7. 19373  1994  [PubMed]
 
Langhoff O, Andersen K,Kjaer-Petersen K. Rolando’s fracture. J Hand Surg [Br],1991;16: 454-9. 16454  1991  [PubMed]
 
Swanson TV, Szabo RM,Anderson DD. Open hand fractures: prognosis and classification. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 101-7. 16101  1991  [PubMed]
 
McLain RE, Steyers C,Stoddard M. Infections in open fractures of the hand. J Hand Surg [Am],1991;16: 108-12. 16108  1991  [PubMed]
 
Strickland JW, Steichen JB, Kleinman WB,Hastings H. Phalangeal fractures: factors influencing digital performance. Orthop Rev,1982;11: 39-50. 1139  1982 
 
Campbell DA,Kay SP. The Hand Injury Severity Scoring System. J Hand Surg [Br],1996;21: 295-8. 21295  1996  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH,Hall RF Jr. Low-velocity gunshot wounds of the proximal phalanx: treatment by early stable fixation. J Hand Surg [Am],1998;23: 150-5. 23150  1998  [PubMed]
 
Gonzalez MH, McKay W,Hall RF. Low-velocity gunshot wounds of the metacarpal: treatment by early stable fixation and bone grafting. J Hand Surg [Am],1993;18: 267-70. 18267  1993  [PubMed]
 
Freeland AE, Jabaley ME, Burkhalter WE,Chavis AM. Delayed primary bone grafting in the hand and wrist after traumatic bone loss. J Hand Surg [Am],1984;9: 22-38. 922  1984 
 
Godina M. Early microsurgical reconstruction of complex trauma of the extremities. Plast Reconstr Surg,1986;78: 285-92. 78285  1986  [PubMed]
 
Botte MJ, Davis JL, Rose BA, von Schroeder HP, Gellman H, Zinberg EM,Abrams RA. Complications of smooth pin fixation of fractures and dislocations in the hand and wrist. Clin Orthop,1992;276: 194-201. 276194  1992  [PubMed]
 
Stern PJ, Wieser MJ,Reilly DG. Complications of plate fixation in the hand skeleton. Clin Orthop,1987;214: 59-65. 21459  1987  [PubMed]
 
Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
12/22/2011
ME - Central Maine Medical Center
12/22/2011
VA - Charleston Area Medical Center