0
Scientific Article   |    
e-Knee: Evolution of the Electronic Knee Prosthesis Telemetry Technology Development
Beverly A. Morris, MBA, RN; Darryl D. D'Lima, MD; John Slamin; Neb Kovacevic; Steven W. Arms; Christopher P. Townsend; Clifford W. ColwellJr., MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
Beverly A. Morris, MBA, RN
The Morris Agency, 12165 Iron View Row, San Diego, CA 92128. E-mail address: deters@aol.com

Darryl D. D’Lima, MD
Clifford W. Colwell Jr., MD
The Center for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Scripps Clinic, 11025 North Torrey Pines Road, Suite 140, La Jolla, CA 92037

John Slamin
DePuy Johnson and Johnson, 325 Paramount Drive, Raynham, MA 02767

Neb Kovacevic
NK Biotechnical Corporation, P.O. Box 26335, Minneapolis, MN 55426

Steven W. Arms
Christopher P. Townsend
MicroStrain, Incorporated, 294 North Winooski Avenue, Burlington, VT 05401

In support of their research or preparation of this manuscript, one or more of the authors received grants or outside funding from The Dr. Scholl Foundation. In addition, one or more of the authors received payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity (MicroStrain, Incorporated). No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:S62-66 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
Our purpose was to develop a fully instrumented tibial component of a total knee prosthesis (Fig. 1) containing multichannel transducers (load cells), a microtransmitter, and an antenna. Three complex technologies were incorporated into a prosthesis capable of measuring in vivo tibiofemoral compressive forces to transmit "real-time" data. The geometry was modified to accommodate the transducer and electronic technologies (Fig. 2).
As a result of the development of a fully instrumented implant, direct load measurements were recorded intraoperatively during the course of a total knee replacement. Long-term collection of in vivo measurements of loads on a total knee prosthesis will allow future improvements in knee-replacement design, rehabilitation, and assistive devices such as lower-extremity braces, orthotics, and shoes. This report describes the history and preliminary results of the use of a total knee prosthesis with a telemetric implant, the e-Knee. Until now no devices or methods for measuring loads in vivo in the knee have been available.
Measurement of tibiofemoral forces is directly relevant to the design and technique of implantation of knee prostheses. The wear and deformation of the articulating surface (polyethylene), the distribution of stress to the implant, the mechanical behavior of the bone-implant interface, and the load-carrying characteristics of the remaining bone are intimately related to the joint load. Until now, investigators have relied principally on theoretical data from mathematical modeling, biomechanical testing of cadavers, and clinical gait analysis to predict the physical forces on the knee (Fig. 3).
Predictions based on theoretical data have revealed that tibiofemoral forces range from three to six times body weight during walking, ascending and descending stairs, and isokinetic exercise. While the information gleaned from extensive historical studies has been useful, each technique has substantial shortcomings. The information generated by the e-Knee enables a direct comparison of measured joint forces with those that are theoretically predicted. Intraoperative measurements of joint loads may also be used to guide interrelated parameters such as selection of prosthetic size, joint-line placement, and ligament balancing. In addition to providing intraoperative measurements, long-term implantation of an e-Knee will allow in-depth analysis of forces transmitted across the knee joint during normal human activity, such as walking, rising from a chair, and stair-climbing. The results of this analysis can be used to develop design improvements, refine surgical instrumentation, guide postoperative physical therapy, and potentially detect the individual activities that would overload the implant. Patients who are counseled regarding factors that overstress the capacity of the prosthesis, such as running, jumping, lifting heavy weights, and obesity, can benefit from modernization of data to support the findings of previous reports. Telemetry has been used to measure in vivo forces in the hip1,2, spine, and femur. The available space within the knee prosthesis is physically more restricted than that within the hip. A prototype to the e-Knee, a tibial prosthesis instrumented with load cells, was demonstrated to be highly accurate by Kaufman et al. in 19963. Testing of this prosthesis demonstrated a correlation of 0.999 between actual and calculated load. The same instrumented prosthesis was subsequently used in a cadaver study (Fig. 4) to measure the effects of joint-line elevation on tibiofemoral forces4.
On the basis of the biomechanical results, the instrumented model was used to develop the configuration of the e-Knee.
This project represents an initiative undertaken by clinicians, scientists, and industry beginning in 1993; each participant contributed his or her established expertise. The geometry of an off-the-shelf prosthesis was modified to contain multichannel load transducers, a microtransmitter, and an antenna. The implant manufacturer (DePuy Johnson and Johnson, Warsaw, Indiana) provided a titanium-alloy tibial plateau, the design of which has been in clinical use since 1988. The plateau accepts standard, commercially available tibial inserts. The stem portion, which has the same outer proportions as the revision component, is hollow to allow for the installation of the electronic hardware. A standard polyethylene cap that was modified to accept the antenna is threaded onto the distal end of the stem. The technology contained within the implant is layered (stacked), and the implant is designed to be as strong as traditional implants.
Load cells were designed and patented by a specialty engineering firm (NK Biotechnical, Minneapolis, Minnesota) and are located at the four quadrants (anteromedial, anterolateral, posteromedial, and posterolateral) of the tibial tray (Fig. 5). The total force and the location of the center of pressure can be determined by measuring the force of each load cell.
The tibial/transducer tray is 7.5 mm thicker than that of a standard prosthesis to accommodate the load cells. The size of the tibial tray in the transverse plane corresponds exactly to a standard 76 51-mm minimally constrained posterior-cruciate-retaining prosthesis. The tibial plateau is composed of an upper and a lower plate separated by four 2.5-mm square support posts with a height of 0.5 mm. Each transducer can measure up to 200 lb (90.7 kg) per load cell (Fig. 6. 6).
The microtransmitter, as shown in Figure 7, has been described by one of us (C.P.T.)5. It is developed from off-the-shelf surface mount analog/digital (ATD) integrated circuits (StrainLink; Microstrain, Incorporated, Burlington, Vermont). The microprocessor modulates the radiofrequency and controls the signal multiplexer, the ATD converter, and the digital filter. It is powered by an inductive coil, rather than a battery, coupled from the device, and it transmits measurements into a computer in a readable format. The external inductive coil is applied just distal to the knee.
The antenna is similar to the power technology used in pacemakers. Powering the e-Knee system is remote by magnetic near field coupling to transfer power to the implanted coil within the prosthetic stem. An external receiving coil is driven with AC current generating an AC magnetic field (Fig. 8). The external coil is driven by a power amplifier and a function generator.
The biomechanical laboratory at the Scripps Clinic has been utilizing the prototype of the e-Knee to perform cadaveric studies evaluating implant performance for the past ten years, and it developed the test protocols from the historical studies. The clinical staff of the Scripps Clinic worked in tandem with the three manufacturing companies to design and pretest an implant that would clear all clinical hurdles for implantation in patients.
The fully integrated implant has undergone a duration of ten million cycles of fatigue testing with use of the modified ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) test method. Following the performance of safety testing and calibration, the implant was sterilized and utilized to capture intraoperative joint loads from a single patient to evaluate tibial forces. Real-time data were collected along the following parameters: zero position (no active forces) with 10 and 15-mm tibial polyethylene inserts; 45°, 90°, and 100° of flexion; and varus and valgus forces.
A routine revision total knee replacement was performed on the left side of a seventy-nine-year-old, 167-lb (75.7-kg) man in January 2001. Verbal and written consent was obtained from the patient prior to the intraoperative measurements. During the course of the surgical procedure, the e-Knee was inserted into the tibial canal (Fig. 9) for the purpose of measuring tibial forces. Transducer data were sampled at regular intervals with use of standard tibial inserts of two different thicknesses (10 and 15 mm) (Fig. 10). Following the collection of data, the e-Knee was removed and was replaced with a standard revision prosthesis.
Intraoperative data were successfully collected, measured, and stored from all four transducers. The in vivo measurements can be seen in Figures 11, 12, 13, and 14. Figure 11 demonstrates force data detected by all four transducers with the 10-mm tibial insert and the knee in a neutral position. Forces were highest (9.9 lb [44.0 N]) in the anteromedial aspect of the tibial tray. Figure 12 illustrates the increase in forces with the 15-mm tibial insert. Negative forces in the posterolateral aspect of the implant in both figures were a result of tensile forces on the transducer indicating lift-off.
Figures 13 and 14, which show forces with the 10-mm tibial insert, illustrate the increase in forces at 100° of flexion, with varus and valgus maneuvers; these figures demonstrate that the greatest force was detected in the anteromedial aspect of the implant (with varus stress) and the anterolateral aspect of the implant (with valgus stress). The transducer/transmitter functioned well, with the design transmitting data without cross talk or artifact from the operating-room environment. The e-Knee accurately transmitted a data signal through bone, cement, and soft tissue.
This project brings electronic technology into the field of orthopaedic implants. The most notable feature of the e-Knee is its ability to measure in vivo tibiofemoral forces, a technological breakthrough with promise of aiding in the modification of implant design, intraoperative decisions, postoperative rehabilitation programs, and assistive devices. Sufficient data were detected in the first intraoperative attempt to measure telemetric forces. Testing will proceed as follows: (1) comparison of the intraoperative data with those obtained in previously proven cadaveric studies mirroring intraoperative procedures; (2) comparison of in vivo forces with theoretical joint forces; (3) permanent insertion into a total knee replacement candidate; (4) measurement of lift-off versus excessive loading of individual quadrants during activities of daily living; (5) comparison of posterior-cruciate-retaining and sparing designs; and (6) potential evaluation of mobile-bearing total knee prostheses.
Permanent in vivo generation can extend the range of data to measurements of tibial forces, including shear torque forces and those generated with asymmetric designs. The next, permanently placed implant will alter long-term data, including those obtained at intraoperative, early postoperative, and extended postoperative evaluations. The first in vivo implant produced accurate and reproducible data for measurement of tibiofemoral forces.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:Photograph of instrumented prototype and polyethylene insert.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Schematic of the e-Knee, a total knee prosthesis containing transducers (load cells), a transmitter, and an antenna.
 
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:Preclinical cadaveric testing of a tibial prosthesis instrumented with load cells. An external cable system is connected to the amplifier.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:Schematic of transducer placement within the tibial tray.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:Upper and lower plates containing the transducers.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:Block diagram of the microtransmitter integrated circuits.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:Instrumented tibial prosthesis and external coil.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:Intraoperative implantation of the instrumented tibial implant with transmission through an external coil.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:Instrumented tibial prosthesis with 10 and 15-mm standard tibial inserts.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:Forces with 10-mm insert, with no applied load.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:Forces with 15-mm insert, with no applied load.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 13:Forces with 100° of flexion, with a varus maneuver.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:Forces with 100° of flexion, with a valgus maneuver.
BergmannG, Graichen F, Siraky J, Jendrzynski H,Rohlmann A. Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. J Biomech,1988;21: 169-76. 21169  1988  [PubMed]
 
DavyDT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, Heiple KG, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG Jr, Berilla J,Burstein AH. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988;70: 45-50. 7045  1988  [PubMed]
 
KaufmanKR, Kovacevic N, Irby SE,Colwell CW. Instrumented implant for measuring tibiofemoral forces. J Biomech,1996;29: 667-71. 29667  1996  [PubMed]
 
Grady-Benson JC, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW. The influence of joint line location on tibiofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty. Read at the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 1992; Washington, DC. 
 
Townsend CP, Arms SW, Hamel MJ. Remotely powered, multichannel, microprocessor based telemetry systems for smart implantable devices and smart structures. Read at the Biannual Meeting of the International Society on Biotelemetry; 1999 May; Juneau, AK 
 

Submit a comment

Topics

Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:Photograph of instrumented prototype and polyethylene insert.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Schematic of the e-Knee, a total knee prosthesis containing transducers (load cells), a transmitter, and an antenna.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:Preclinical cadaveric testing of a tibial prosthesis instrumented with load cells. An external cable system is connected to the amplifier.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:Schematic of transducer placement within the tibial tray.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:Upper and lower plates containing the transducers.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:Block diagram of the microtransmitter integrated circuits.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:Instrumented tibial prosthesis and external coil.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:Intraoperative implantation of the instrumented tibial implant with transmission through an external coil.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:Instrumented tibial prosthesis with 10 and 15-mm standard tibial inserts.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:Forces with 10-mm insert, with no applied load.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:Forces with 15-mm insert, with no applied load.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 13:Forces with 100° of flexion, with a varus maneuver.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:Forces with 100° of flexion, with a valgus maneuver.
BergmannG, Graichen F, Siraky J, Jendrzynski H,Rohlmann A. Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. J Biomech,1988;21: 169-76. 21169  1988  [PubMed]
 
DavyDT, Kotzar GM, Brown RH, Heiple KG, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG Jr, Berilla J,Burstein AH. Telemetric force measurements across the hip after total arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1988;70: 45-50. 7045  1988  [PubMed]
 
KaufmanKR, Kovacevic N, Irby SE,Colwell CW. Instrumented implant for measuring tibiofemoral forces. J Biomech,1996;29: 667-71. 29667  1996  [PubMed]
 
Grady-Benson JC, Kaufman KR, Irby SE, Colwell CW. The influence of joint line location on tibiofemoral forces after total knee arthroplasty. Read at the Annual Meeting of the Orthopaedic Research Society; 1992; Washington, DC. 
 
Townsend CP, Arms SW, Hamel MJ. Remotely powered, multichannel, microprocessor based telemetry systems for smart implantable devices and smart structures. Read at the Biannual Meeting of the International Society on Biotelemetry; 1999 May; Juneau, AK 
 
Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
12/22/2011
VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
12/22/2011
ME - Central Maine Medical Center
12/22/2011
Virginia - Charleston Area Medical Center