0
Scientific Article   |    
Alternative Bearing Surfaces: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon); Jonathan P. Garino, MD
View Disclosures and Other Information
A. Seth Greenwald, DPhil(Oxon) Orthopaedic Research Laboratories, Lutheran Hospital, Cleveland Clinic Health System, 1730 West 25th Street, Cleveland, OH 44113. E-mail address: seth@orl-inc.com

Jonathan P. Garino, MD Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4303

Acknowledgments: David C. Ayers, MD, Joshua J. Jacobs, MD, Anastasia K. Skipor, MS, CeramTec AG, Sulzer Orthopedics, Limited, and Wright Medical Technology, Incorporated.

The authors did not receive grants or outside funding in support of their research or preparation of this manuscript. They did not receive payments or other benefits or a commitment or agreement to provide such benefits from a commercial entity. No commercial entity paid or directed, or agreed to pay or direct, any benefits to any research fund, foundation, educational institution, or other charitable or nonprofit organization with which the authors are affiliated or associated.

The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2001; 83:S68-72 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case
This article discusses current bearing-surface alternatives for long-term total hip articulations involving metal-polyethylene, ceramic-polyethylene, metal-metal, and ceramic-ceramic couples.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:A marked osteolytic response in a fifty-year-old patient.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Corresponding intracellular polyethylene debris viewed under polarized light.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 3:Mean acetabular cup wear rates versus gamma dose level. (Reprinted, with permission, from: McKellop H, Shen F-W, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:160.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:Wear rates of polyethylene when used against various orthopaedic materials.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:Fracture of an alumina ceramic ball six years after implantation. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Wagner M. Indications, technical considerations, and early results with modern metal-on-metal couple in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1998;9:146.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:McKee-Farrar metal-metal implant retrieved after twenty-five years in situ. (Reprinted from: Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Yue S, Tanzer M. Engineering issues and wear performance of metal-metal hip implants. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1997 Feb 13-17; San Francisco, CA.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:Müller metal-metal implant retrieved after twenty years in situ. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Wagner M. Indications, technical considerations, and early results with modern metal-on-metal couple in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1998;9:145.)
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:Metasul acetabular component with Metasul insert (Sulzer Orthopedics) in an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bed.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:Cross section of the Transcend acetabular cup with interchangeable metal insert (Wright Medical Technology).
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:Serum chromium levels for controls, patients with a hybrid implant in situ for three years, and those with a McKee-Farrar implant in situ for twenty-five years1,2.
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:Early Mittelmeier Autophor ceramic-ceramic cup (Smith and Nephew).
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:Wetting of alumina ceramic (left) and metal (right) ball heads. The smaller the wetting angle, the better the lubrication.
 
 
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:Cross section of the Transcend acetabular cup with interchangeable ceramic insert (Wright Medical Technology).
The enduring success of the low-friction arthroplasty advanced by Sir John Charnley as a solution for painful hip problems can be appreciated by the fact that, in 1999, more than 270,000 hip arthroplasties were performed in the United States. Over the last three decades, patient profiles have changed substantially, resulting in demands for a greater service life of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene hip components. Material failure, often leading to an osteolytic response, is increasingly associated with younger, more active patients. In this context, the low-friction solution has become a problem, limiting in vivo system longevity (Figs. 1 and 2).
Previous attempts to improve the performance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene have included carbon-fiber reinforcement (Poly-2) and, more recently, polymer reprocessing to enhance mechanical properties (Hylamer). The former was withdrawn from the market because of excessive inflammatory response, whereas the latter has been linked to debris-induced osteolytic responses in early reports.
Laboratory simulation has demonstrated that the resistance of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene to wear is improved with increased cross-linking of the carbon-hydrogen polymer chains. A number of thermal and chemical processing solutions have been described. One such approach involves component storage at elevated temperatures in an oxygen-depleted environment. This is done following irradiation and encourages kinetic recombination of the carbon-hydrogen free radicals created by the radiation process.
Other techniques deliver increased radiation doses to the component material followed by remelting to quench free radicals. While this results in dramatic wear reduction in laboratory simulations (Fig. 3), it also changes the amorphous and crystalline regions of the polymer, affecting mechanical properties and potentially reducing fatigue strength. Clearly, clinical experience will demonstrate the in vivo viability of these "new polys."
Alumina and, subsequently, zirconia ceramic femoral head components were introduced as low-friction metallic substitutes as a means of reducing polyethylene wear debris in hip replacement. These materials are highly biocompatible and substantially smoother, harder, and more scratch-resistant than their metallic counterparts. Laboratory studies have documented dramatic reductions in wear volume, offering the prospect of increased polyethylene longevity and a decreased potential for osteolytic response (Fig. 4).
Ceramic components enjoy substantial use in younger populations with the concerns of added cost and a small reported incidence of brittle fracture (four in 100,000). The manufacture of precision tapers within the head and on the stem trunion as well as increasing ceramic quality and strength have reduced the potential for fracture (Fig. 5). In clinical application, care must be taken to use only stem and head assemblies from the same manufacturer, with inspection of the trunion in revision situations in which the stem is retained. It should also be noted that a recent Food and Drug Administration advisory warns against autoclave resterilization of zirconia heads, as evidence suggests that their surface characteristics are degraded in this process.
"Articulations ahead of their time" aptly describes the metal-metal McKee-Farrar, Ring, Müller, and Sivash prostheses. Short-term clinical failure in the face of growing success with Charnley prostheses led to their disuse by the early 1970s.
Suboptimum design, inconsistent component manufacturing techniques, poor fixation, and high equatorial frictional torques have been mentioned as reasons for aseptic loosening of these designs, which often occurs with little apparent wear of the bearing surfaces. Despite these early experiences, many metal-metal implants have survived twenty years or longer and still have exhibited highly polished surfaces (Figs. 6 and 7).
Over the last decade, a resurgence of interest in metal-metal articulations has evolved. Currently, upwards of 100,000 Sulzer Metasul designs have been implanted in Europe, and on August 3, 1999, this device received Food and Drug Administration 510K approval for commercial distribution. Other designs have recently been cleared by the Food and Drug Administration for clinical use in the United States, and reclassification efforts should make them generally available in the near term.
The Metasul design includes an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene sandwich that theoretically dampens load transmission to periacetabular bone as a means of preventing component subsidence given the high rigidity of the metal-metal components (Fig. 8). This approach has also been adopted in some ceramic-ceramic applications to accommodate high rigidity as well as the low energy-absorbing capacity of the ceramic.
With other contemporary metal-metal designs, modularity is maintained by direct assembly of the cobalt-chromium liner into its cementless shell, with stability usually achieved by means of a Morse-taper locking mechanism (Fig. 9).
Hip-simulator studies have demonstrated the importance of specific diametrical clearances to facilitate polar bearing and access for serum lubrication. Close control of component dimensions, sphericity, and surface finish are also critical, but they add to manufacturing costs. Currently, both cast and wrought cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys of differing carbon content are used in this self-bearing application. These alloys possess high hardness and a capacity to "self-heal" by polishing out third-body scratches in contact areas. Simulator studies have demonstrated a twentyfold to 100-fold reduction in the amount of particle generation in comparison with that demonstrated in similar evaluations of metal-ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene articulations, suggesting their potential for longevity in in vivo use.
Despite their apparent advantage in younger patient populations, there is a longer-term concern about metal particle and ion generation. Toxicity, hypersensitivity, and carcinogenesis have all been mentioned as potential adverse events, but a relationship has not been established. Figure 10 depicts increased serum chromium concentrations at the time of long-term follow-up of a population of patients with McKee-Farrar implants.
The clinical use of alumina ceramic as a hard-on-hard articulation dates back to the early 1970s. Early failures attributed to poor implant design, acetabular component loosening, and low-quality ceramic resulting in fracture and debris generation dampened enthusiasm for its use. Only the Mittelmeier implant was marketed in the United States, for a short time (Fig. 11).
The quality of today’s alumina ceramic is much improved, with minimization of impurities, which are potential stress-risers. Reduction of grain boundaries has substantially increased material strength and toughness, while better quality control through proof-testing has substantially reduced the prevalence of component fracture. Tribology properties of wear, lubrication, and friction are excellent. Simulator studies have demonstrated that ceramic-ceramic articulations have lower wear volumes than all other currently available couples (Figs. 12 and 13).
The goals of modern designs are to facilitate the articulation and to avoid ceramic-ceramic impingement while providing for durable acetabular fixation. These goals may be accomplished by employing a modular cup construction in which the ceramic liner is secured to a cementless metal shell through a taper lock (Fig. 14). Closely matching tolerances of head-neck and cup-liner junctions to avoid fracture remain a very important factor for the successful use of these constructs.
n The debris from standard polyethylene-metal bearings has been responsible for aseptic loosening and osteolysis in many patients. With the indications for hip replacement expanding to include younger and more active patients and with the increasing recreational activities and life expectancy of our senior population, the search for bearing alternatives has intensified.
n Enhanced polyethylenes represent a class of emerging ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene alternatives whose common denominator is that they were created with an appreciation of the importance of increased cross-linking of the polymer chains and the elimination of free radicals to reduce component wear. A number have already gone through the Food and Drug Administration regulatory process, and their in vivo performance should be closely followed.
n Alumina and zirconia ceramic femoral head components substantially reduce polyethylene wear volume but are highly taper-tolerance sensitive. Their selection on the basis of patient age and activity level may well justify their added cost. They are currently available for clinical use in the United States.
n Both contemporary metal-metal and ceramic-ceramic hip-replacement systems are widely used in Europe, with clinical experience dating back ten years and longer. The poor clinical performance of first-generation metal-metal designs appears to have been overcome through improved metallurgy, design, and manufacture. There is lingering concern about a causal relationship between malignancy and other systemic problems and elevated levels of trace metals, but no relationship has yet been established.
n Contemporary metal-metal hip articulations have been successfully used in Europe for more than a decade. On August 3, 1999, the Sulzer Metasul cup design received a 510K clearance for distribution in the United States; it has been followed by several other designs. Reclassification efforts should make these cups generally available in the near term. Ultimately, their increased cost will be weighed against patient benefit and will define which particular patients are candidates for their use.
n Ceramic-ceramic hip systems have good biocompatibility with much improved material composition, designs, and manufacture. Matching taper tolerances of the head-neck and cup-liner junctions reduces the prospect of fracture. Precise technical placement of the hip components during surgery is essential to avoid ceramic-ceramic impingement and the potential for debris generation.
n Currently, ceramic-ceramic hip systems are investigational and are not available for general clinical use in the United States. However, in July 2000, a first design gained a Food and Drug Administration Advisory Panel recommendation for approval. Ultimate release of these systems by the Food and Drug Administration will depend on the demonstration of their safety and effectiveness through ongoing clinical trials and laboratory evaluation. Once this bearing-surface alternative becomes available, its increased cost will have to be carefully weighed against long-term patient benefit in the current reimbursement climate.
JacobsJJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J,Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998;80: 1447-58. 801447  1998  [PubMed]
 
JacobsJJ, Skipor AK, Doorn PF, Campbell P, Schmalzried TP, Black J,Amstutz HC. Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal on metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop,1996;(329 Suppl): 256-63. (329 Suppl)256  1996 
 

Submit a comment

Topics

Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 1:A marked osteolytic response in a fifty-year-old patient.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 2:Corresponding intracellular polyethylene debris viewed under polarized light.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 3:Mean acetabular cup wear rates versus gamma dose level. (Reprinted, with permission, from: McKellop H, Shen F-W, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Development of an extremely wear-resistant ultra high molecular weight polyethylene for total hip replacements. J Orthop Res. 1999;17:160.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 4:Wear rates of polyethylene when used against various orthopaedic materials.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 5:Fracture of an alumina ceramic ball six years after implantation. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Wagner M. Indications, technical considerations, and early results with modern metal-on-metal couple in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1998;9:146.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 6:McKee-Farrar metal-metal implant retrieved after twenty-five years in situ. (Reprinted from: Chan FW, Bobyn JD, Medley JB, Krygier JJ, Yue S, Tanzer M. Engineering issues and wear performance of metal-metal hip implants. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons; 1997 Feb 13-17; San Francisco, CA.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 7:Müller metal-metal implant retrieved after twenty years in situ. (Reprinted, with permission, from: Wagner M. Indications, technical considerations, and early results with modern metal-on-metal couple in total hip arthroplasty. Semin Arthroplasty. 1998;9:145.)
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 8:Metasul acetabular component with Metasul insert (Sulzer Orthopedics) in an ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene bed.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 9:Cross section of the Transcend acetabular cup with interchangeable metal insert (Wright Medical Technology).
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 10:Serum chromium levels for controls, patients with a hybrid implant in situ for three years, and those with a McKee-Farrar implant in situ for twenty-five years1,2.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 11:Early Mittelmeier Autophor ceramic-ceramic cup (Smith and Nephew).
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 12:Wetting of alumina ceramic (left) and metal (right) ball heads. The smaller the wetting angle, the better the lubrication.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 13:Wear rates of bearing couples.
Anchor for JumpAnchor for Jump
+Fig. 14:Cross section of the Transcend acetabular cup with interchangeable ceramic insert (Wright Medical Technology).
JacobsJJ, Skipor AK, Patterson LM, Hallab NJ, Paprosky WG, Black J,Galante JO. Metal release in patients who have had a primary total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, controlled, longitudinal study. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1998;80: 1447-58. 801447  1998  [PubMed]
 
JacobsJJ, Skipor AK, Doorn PF, Campbell P, Schmalzried TP, Black J,Amstutz HC. Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal on metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop,1996;(329 Suppl): 256-63. (329 Suppl)256  1996 
 
Accreditation Statement
These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
CME Activities Associated with This Article
Submit a Comment
Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

* = Required Field
(if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
Example: John Doe




Related Articles
Related Cases
Related Content
Topic Collections
Hip
Related Audio and Videos
PubMed Articles
Clinical Trials
Readers of This Also Read...
jbjs jobs
12/22/2011
ME - Central Maine Medical Center
12/22/2011
VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
12/22/2011
Maine - Central Maine Medical Center