Background:
Radiolucent lines about the glenoid component of a total shoulder
replacement are a common finding, even on initial postoperative
radiographs. The achievement of complete osseous support of the
component has been shown to decrease micromotion. We evaluated the
ability of a group of experienced shoulder surgeons to achieve complete
cementing and support in a series of patients managed with keeled
and pegged glenoid components.
Methods:
We reviewed the initial postoperative radiographs of 493 patients
with primary osteoarthritis who had been managed with total shoulder
arthroplasty by seventeen different surgeons. One hundred and sixty-five
patients were excluded because of inadequate radiographs, leaving
328 patients available for review. Of these, thirty-nine patients
had a keeled component and 289 had a pegged component. The method
of Franklin was used to grade the degree of radiolucency around the
keeled components, and a modification of that method was used to
grade the degree of radiolucency around the pegged components. The
efficacy of component seating on host subchondral bone was evaluated
with a newly constructed five-grade scale based on the percentage
of the component that was supported by subchondral bone. Each radiograph
was graded four times, by two separate reviewers on two separate
occasions.
Results:
Radiolucencies were extremely common, with only twenty of the 328
glenoids demonstrating no radiolucencies. On a numeric scale (with
0 indicating no radiolucency and 5 indicating gross loosening),
the mean radiolucency score was 1.8 ± 0.9 for keeled
components and 1.3 ± 0.9 for pegged components (p = 0.0004).
After defining categories of "better" and "worse" cementing, we
found that pegged components more commonly had "better cementing"
than did keeled components (p = 0.0028). Incomplete seating was
also common, particularly among patients with keeled components.
Ninety-five of the 121 pegged components that had been inserted
by the most experienced surgeon had "better cementing," compared
with eighty-five of the 168 pegged components that had been inserted
by the remaining surgeons (p < 0.00001).
Conclusions:
Perfectly cementing and seating a glenoid replacement is a difficult
task. Radiolucencies and incomplete component seating occur more
frequently in association with keeled components compared with pegged
components. Surgeon experience may be an important variable in the
achievement of a good technical outcome.