0
Scientific Article   |    
A Prospective, Randomized Study of Preoperative Autologous Donation for Hip Replacement Surgery
Dinna B. Billote, MD; Silas N. Glisson, PhD; David Green, MD, PhD; Richard L. Wixson, MD
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2002; 84:1299-1304 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Preoperative autologous blood donation is commonly performed to meet potential perioperative transfusion needs and is a common practice prior to total hip arthroplasty. Using standardized transfusion guidelines, we prospectively analyzed the effectiveness of preoperative autologous donation as a method for decreasing allogeneic transfusion among patients undergoing unilateral primary total hip replacement who were eligible to donate autologous blood.

Methods: Patients who were scheduled for primary total hip replacement surgery and who had a preoperative baseline hemoglobin level =120 g/L were randomized either to donate two units of blood (autologous donors) or not to donate any blood (nondonors). The donors and nondonors were compared with regard to demographic data, blood-loss volumes, hemoglobin measurements, and transfusion rates. Randomization continued until data were obtained from at least forty patients per treatment group.

Results: Of the ninety-six patients who completed the study, forty-two were autologous donors and fifty-four were nondonors. There were no significant differences between the donors and nondonors with regard to age, male:female ratio, estimated blood volume, baseline physical condition, or operative blood loss. The hemoglobin values at the time of enrollment (baseline), at the time of hospital discharge, and six weeks postoperatively were not significantly different between the two groups, although values at the time of admission (129 ± 13 g/L versus 138 ± 12 g/L) and in the recovery room (104 ± 12 g/L versus 115 ± 13 g/L) were significantly lower in the autologous donor group (p < 0.05). No patient in either group required an allogeneic transfusion. Twenty-nine (69%) of the forty-two donors received an autologous transfusion. Thirty-four (41%) of eighty-two autologous units were wasted. At a charge of $379 per autologous unit, there was an additional cost of $758 for each patient in the donor group.

Conclusions: Preoperative autologous donation provided no benefit for nonanemic patients undergoing primary total hip replacement surgery. Preoperative autologous donation increased the likelihood of autologous transfusion, wastage of predonated units, and costs.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Chris J. Dangles
    Posted on August 14, 2002
    The Intangible aspects of Autologous Transfusions
    Carle Clinic Association, Champaign .IL

    Dear Richard and Co-authors,

    I read your excellent paper after a surgical day that included three total hip replacements (8/6/02). The orders to reinfuse the donated units of autologous blood were written before each of the cases were started. There was obviously no waste of the donated units of blood. The hematocrits the following morning were as follows,35,37,37. The pre op values were 42,40,38 respectively. The first patient recieved 1 unit of autologous blood and the other patients each received 2 units.It is apparent to me that I could have probably avoided transfusion in each of these patients.During the three night hospital stay for each of these patients none of the automatic hospital "alerts" were activated.These alerts include urine output less than 30cc/hr, Hct. less than 25, systolic or diastolic blood pressure below 100mmHg or60mmHg.I practice without surgical Residents and would be responding to these alerts.The patients did not require subsequent monitoring of their red cell count after post op day 1. The points I am trying to illustrate are more than physician benefits,there are patient benefits and some cost savings associated with autologous transfusions.The three patients mentioned in this reply are all one week post op, home and doing fine.

    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Hip
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center