0
Scientific Article   |    
Biomechanical Comparison of Tibial Inlay and Tibial Tunnel Techniques for Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Analysis of Graft Forces
Daniel A. Oakes, MD; Keith L. Markolf, PhD; Justin McWilliams, BS; Charles R. Young, BS; David R. McAllister, MD
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2002; 84:938-944 
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: The tibial inlay technique of reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament offers potential advantages over the conventional transtibial tunnel technique, particularly with regard to the graft force levels that develop over a functional range of knee flexion. Abnormally high graft forces generated during rehabilitation activities could lead to stretch-out of the graft during the critical early healing period. The purpose of this study was to compare graft forces between these two techniques and with forces in the native posterior cruciate ligament.

Methods: A load cell was installed at the femoral origin of the posterior cruciate ligament in twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees to measure resultant forces in the ligament during a series of knee loading tests. The posterior cruciate ligament was then excised, and the femoral ends of 10-mm-wide bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts were attached to the load cell to measure resultant forces in the grafts. For the tunnel reconstruction, the distal bone block of the graft was placed into a tibial tunnel and thin stainless-steel cables interwoven into the bone block were gripped in a split clamp attached to the anterior tibial cortex. With the inlay technique, the distal bone block was fixed in a tibial trough with use of a cortical bone screw with a washer and nut. The proximal ends of all grafts were pretensioned to a level of force that restored intact knee laxity at 90° of flexion, and loading tests were repeated.

Results: There were no significant differences in mean graft forces between the two techniques under tibial loads consisting of 100 N of posterior tibial force, 5 N-m of varus and valgus moment, and 5 N-m of internal and external tibial torque. Mean graft forces with the tibial tunnel technique were approximately 10 to 20 N higher than those with the inlay technique with passive knee flexion beyond 95°. Mean graft forces with both reconstruction techniques were significantly higher than forces in the native posterior cruciate ligament with the knee flexed beyond approximately 90° for all but one mode of loading.

Conclusions: In this cadaveric testing model, neither technique for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament had a substantial advantage over the other with respect to generation of graft forces.

Clinical Relevance: The relatively high graft forces (compared with the forces in the native posterior cruciate ligament) observed beyond 90° of knee flexion after reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament with either the tunnel or the inlay technique suggest that rehabilitation activities that involve loading of the knee while it is flexed beyond 90° (such as kneeling, squatting, or climbing high stairs) should be avoided in the early postoperative period.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Intraoperative navigation evaluation of tibial translation after resection of anterior cruciate ligament remnants.
    Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2011 Sep
    Effectiveness of a footprint guide to establish an anatomic femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: computed tomography evaluation in a cadaveric model.
    Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association: Issue date- 2011 Jun
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center