Background: Recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty is a
disabling complication that can be difficult to treat and may not be amenable
to nonoperative management. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate
the clinical and radiographic outcome associated with the use of a constrained
acetabular component as a salvage treatment for instability after hip
arthroplasty.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and radiographic
outcome of 110 arthroplasties, in 109 patients, that had been performed with
use of a single design of constrained acetabular component. In seventy-nine
hips the constrained component was implanted for the treatment of recurrent
instability, and in thirty-one hips it was implanted because of absent or
grossly deficient soft-tissue attachments that were believed to be associated
with a high risk for subsequent instability.
Results: The constrained acetabular device eliminated or prevented
hip instability in all patients except two, who continued to have sensations
of subluxation. The mean Harris hip score improved significantly, from 62.7
points preoperatively to 76.4 points at the time of the latest follow-up (p
< 0.0001). There were no instances of dislocation or disassembly of the hip
components. Radiographic analysis revealed radiolucent lines around the cup in
fifteen hips (14%). There was a total of nine revisions: six for deep
infection, two for acetabular component loosening, and one for a
periprosthetic fracture of the femur.
Conclusions: A constrained acetabular component reliably restores
and maintains hip stability in patients with recalcitrant recurrent
instability and can dependably prevent dislocation in those who are at high
risk because of absent or deficient soft tissues about the hip. However,
because of the early appearance of radiolucent lines around some components
and concerns about long-term fixation, the use of these devices should be
reserved for situations in which other methods are inadequate or have already
failed.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.