Background: Stiffness is an uncommon but disabling problem after
total knee arthroplasty. The prevalence of stiffness after knee replacement
has not been well defined in the literature. In addition, the outcomes of
revision surgery for a stiff knee following arthroplasty have not been
evaluated in a large series of patients, to our knowledge. The purposes of
this study were to define the prevalence of stiffness after primary total knee
arthroplasty and to evaluate the efficacy of revision surgery for treatment of
the stiffness.
Methods: We defined a stiff knee as one having a flexion contracture
of =15° and/or <75° of flexion. Two separate groups were
evaluated. First, the results of 1000 consecutive primary total knee
replacements were reviewed to determine the prevalence of stiffness. Second,
the results of fifty-six revisions performed because of stiffness, sometimes
associated with pain or component loosening, after primary total knee
arthroplasty were evaluated.
Results: The prevalence of stiffness was 1.3%, at an average of
thirty-two months postoperatively. The patients with a stiff knee had had
significantly less preoperative extension and flexion than did those without a
stiff knee (p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in age,
gender, implant design, diagnosis, or the need for lateral release between the
patients with and without stiffness. The second cohort, of knees revised
because of stiffness, were followed for an average of forty-three months. The
mean Knee Society score improved from 38.5 points preoperatively to 86.7
points at the time of follow-up; the mean Knee Society function score, from
40.0 to 58.4 points; and the mean Knee Society pain score, from 15.0 to 46.9
points. The mean flexion contracture decreased from 11.3° to 3.2°, the
mean flexion improved from 65.8° to 85.4°, and the mean arc of motion
improved from 54.6° to 82.2°. The arc of motion improved in 93% of the
knees, and flexion increased in 80%. Extension improved in 63%, and it
remained unchanged in 30%.
Conclusions: The prevalence of stiffness in our series of 1000
primary knee arthroplasties was 1.3%. Revision surgery was a satisfactory
treatment option for stiffness, as the Knee Society scores improved, the
flexion contractures diminished, and 93% of the knees had an increased arc of
motion. However, the results suggest that the benefits are modest.
Level of Evidence: Therapeutic study, Level IV (case
series [no, or historical, control group]). See Instructions to Authors for a
complete description of levels of evidence.