0
Scientific Articles   |    
Knee Proprioception in Patients with Osteosarcoma Around the Knee After Modular Endoprosthetic Reconstruction
Wei-Chun Li, PT, MS1; Rong-Sen Yang, MD, PhD2; Jau-Yih Tsauo, PT, PhD3
1 Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Chung-Hsiao Municipal Hospital, No. 87, Tong-Teh Road, Nan Kang, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
2 Department of Orthopedics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University and Hospital, No. 7, Chun-Shun South Road, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China
3 School and Graduate Institute of Physical Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 1, Jen-Ai Road, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China. E-mail address: jytsauo@ntu.edu.tw
The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery.  2005; 87:850-856  doi:10.2106/JBJS.D.01885
5 Recommendations (Recommend) | 3 Comments | Saved by 3 Users Save Case

Abstract

Background: Proprioception as an outcome for patients with osteosarcoma who have undergone modular endoprosthetic knee reconstruction has not been studied, as far as we know. The primary purpose of the present study was to understand the differences in knee proprioception between this patient population and control subjects. We also compared differences in proprioception between patients with tumors at different sites and between patients who had different proportions of bone length excised.

Methods: We evaluated twenty patients who had undergone a wide resection of a tumor about the knee followed by reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis. The mean age of the patients was 21.7 years. The patients were grouped according to tumor site, i.e., the distal part of the femur or the proximal part of the tibia; they were also grouped according to the length of resected bone (<40% or =40% of the length of the bone). Another twenty age-matched control subjects were recruited for this study. Knee proprioception was evaluated by comparing active and passive angular repositioning of the involved limb and the normal limb in the patients and the dominant limb in the central subjects.

Results: The absolute matching error of active and passive repositioning was 2.7° ± 2.1° and 2.9° ± 2.2°, respectively, for knees treated operatively and 3.2° ± 2.1° and 2.1° ± 1.3°, respectively, for the dominant knees in the control subjects. The differences between the operatively treated knees and the control knees were not significant (p > 0.05). There was also no significant difference in proprioception between the patients with a distal femoral tumor and those with a proximal tibial tumor (p > 0.05). The proprioception of the patients with a greater length of bone resected was significantly worse in both lower extremities than that of patients with a shorter resected length (p = 0.016 for the normal side and p = 0.025 for the involved side).

Conclusions: The proprioception of the involved knees in the patients with osteosarcoma who had modular endoprosthetic reconstruction was not found to be different from the normal knees or the knees in the control subjects. On the basis of our data, we found that proprioception is probably not influenced by the tumor site. Conversely, resection length appears to be an important factor. These study findings may be used as a reference for knee proprioception in patients with osteosarcoma who have a modular endoprosthetic knee reconstruction.

Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Figures in this Article
    Sign In to Your Personal ProfileSign In To Access Full Content
    Not a Subscriber?
    Get online access for 30 days for $30
    New to JBJS?
    Sign up for a full subscription to both the print and online editions
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities, to comment on public articles, or to sign up for alerts.
    Register for a FREE limited account to get full access to all CME activities
    Have a subscription to the print edition?
    Current subscribers to The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery in either the print or quarterly DVD formats receive free online access to JBJS.org.
    Forgot your password?
    Enter your username and email address. We'll send you a reminder to the email address on record.

     
    Forgot your username or need assistance? Please contact customer service at subs@jbjs.org. If your access is provided
    by your institution, please contact you librarian or administrator for username and password information. Institutional
    administrators, to reset your institution's master username or password, please contact subs@jbjs.org
    Accreditation Statement
    These activities have been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential Areas and policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
    CME Activities Associated with This Article
    Submit a Comment
    Please read the other comments before you post yours. Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest.
    Comments are moderated and will appear on the site at the discretion of JBJS editorial staff.

    * = Required Field
    (if multiple authors, separate names by comma)
    Example: John Doe




    Related Articles
    Related Cases
    Related Content
    Topic Collections
    Related Audio and Videos
    PubMed Articles
    Knee pain in a 17-year-old girl.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 2010 Jul
    Staged lengthening arthroplasty for pediatric osteosarcoma around the knee.
    Clinical orthopaedics and related research: Issue date- 2010 Jun
    Clinical Trials
    Readers of This Also Read...
    jbjs jobs
    12/22/2011
    ME - Central Maine Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    VA - Charleston Area Medical Center
    12/22/2011
    Maine - Central Maine Medical Center