Background: Acquired flexible flatfoot encompasses a wide spectrum
of disease, and there is no validated treatment protocol. We hypothesized that
a medializing calcaneal osteotomy with a flexor digitorum longus transfer is
adequate to correct a less severe acquired flexible flatfoot but not a more
severe flatfoot. We also hypothesized that use of an additional procedure
would further correct the flatfoot.
Methods: The study included seven pairs of cadaver specimens, with
one side randomly selected for the creation of a mild flatfoot deformity and
the other, for the creation of a severe flatfoot deformity. Cyclic axial load
was applied to the intact foot, to the flatfoot, after correction with a
medializing calcaneal osteotomy and a flexor digitorum longus transfer, and
after the addition of a subtalar arthroereisis. Radiographic and
pedobarographic data were obtained at each stage. A repeated-measures analysis
of variance with post hoc analysis was used to compare all parameters in the
intact foot with those in the flatfoot and corrected specimens. A Student t
test was used to compare flatfoot severity between the mild and severe
models.
Results: Compared with the intact foot, the mild and severe flatfoot
models showed a significant change in the talar-first metatarsal angle (p =
0.01 and 0.03, respectively), talonavicular angle (p = 0.04 and 0.04), and
medial cuneiform height (p = 0.03 and 0.05). The mild and severe models were
significantly different from each other with regard to the talar-first
metatarsal angle (p = 0.003) and talonavicular angle (p = 0.002). After the
osteotomy and tendon transfer in the mild-flatfoot model, the talar-first
metatarsal angle and talonavicular angle were not significantly different from
those in the intact state. In the severe-flatfoot model, the talar-first
metatarsal angle, talonavicular angle, and medial cuneiform height remained
significantly undercorrected after the osteotomy and tendon transfer. After
the arthroereisis, the talonavicular angle and medial cuneiform height were
not significantly different from the values for the intact foot.
Conclusions: In a cadaver model, the effectiveness of different
procedures on radiographic and pedobarographic parameters varies with the
severity of an acquired flatfoot deformity.
Clinical Relevance: This study suggests that less severe acquired
flexible flatfoot might be appropriately treated with a combined medializing
calcaneal osteotomy and flexor digitorum longus transfer and that severe
flatfoot might require an additional procedure for adequate correction.