Background: Quantifying the effects of anterior cruciate ligament
deficiency on joint biomechanics is critical in order to better understand the
mechanisms of joint degeneration in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees
and to improve the surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries.
We investigated the changes in position of the in vivo tibiofemoral articular
cartilage contact points in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient and intact
contralateral knees with use of a newly developed dual orthogonal fluoroscopic
and magnetic resonance imaging technique.
Methods: Nine patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture in
one knee and a normal contralateral knee were recruited. Magnetic resonance
images were acquired for both the intact and anterior cruciate
ligament-deficient knees to construct computer knee models of the surfaces of
the bone and cartilage. Each patient performed a single-leg weight-bearing
lunge as images were recorded with use of a dual fluoroscopic system at full
extension and at 15°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion. The in
vivo knee position at each flexion angle was then reproduced with use of the
knee models and fluoroscopic images. The contact points were defined as the
centroids of the areas of intersection of the tibial and femoral articular
cartilage surfaces.
Results: The contact points moved not only in the anteroposterior
direction but also in the mediolateral direction in both the anterior cruciate
ligament-deficient and intact knees. In the anteroposterior direction, the
contact points in the medial compartment of the tibia were more posterior in
the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees than in the intact knees at
full extension and 15° of flexion (p < 0.05). No significant
differences were observed with regard to the anteroposterior motion of the
contact points in the lateral compartment of the tibia. In the mediolateral
direction, there was a significant lateral shift of the contact points in the
medial compartment of the tibia toward the medial tibial spine between full
extension and 60° of flexion (p < 0.05). The contact points in the
lateral compartment of the tibia shifted laterally, away from the lateral
tibial spine, at 15° and 30° of flexion (p < 0.05).
Conclusions: In the presence of anterior cruciate ligament injury,
the contact points shift both posteriorly and laterally on the surface of the
tibial plateau. In the medial compartment, the contact points shift toward the
medial tibial spine, a region where degeneration is observed in patients with
chronic anterior cruciate ligament injuries.
Clinical Relevance: This in vivo measurement technique may be useful
for assessing the ability of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction to
restore normal tibiofemoral cartilage contact biomechanics. The observed
altered motions of the tibiofemoral contact points might change contact stress
distributions in the cartilage and predispose the joint to degenerative
changes.